| Literature DB >> 35399687 |
Malaiporn Wongkaew1,2, Pipat Tangjaidee3, Noppol Leksawasdi3,4, Kittisak Jantanasakulwong3,4, Pornchai Rachtanapun3,4, Phisit Seesuriyachan3,4, Yuthana Phimolsiripol3,4, Thanongsak Chaiyaso3,4, Warintorn Ruksiriwanich5,6, Pensak Jantrawut5,6, Sarana Rose Sommano2,6,7.
Abstract
Prebiotics are functional food ingredients that assist probiotic growth and render many other health benefits. Mango peel is the biomass of the processing industry and has recently been value-added as a dietary fiber pectin. Besides its general use as a food additive, mango peel pectin (MPP) is partially hydrolyzed by pectinase to obtain pectic oligosaccharides (POSs) that have recently gained attention as novel prebiotic products and in medical research. This review describes probiotic candidates responsible for the digestion of pectin derivatives and the advantages of POSs as functional additives and their current best retrieval options. Mango pectic oligosaccharide (MPOS) recovery from low methoxyl MPP from mango with prebiotic performance both in vivo and in vitro environments is discussed. Current research gaps and potential developments in the field are also explored. The overall worthiness of this article is the potential use of the cheap-green food processing bioresource for high-value components.Entities:
Keywords: fruit biomass; intestinal microflora; lactic acid bacteria; probiotic; short-chain fatty acids
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399687 PMCID: PMC8987974 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.798543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Most important representatives of probiotic microorganisms.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
Mainly used for animals.
Recently reclassified as Bifidobacterium animalis sub sp. lactis (.
Adapted from Holzapfel et al. (.
Probiotic products and their compositions.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Align | |
| Activia yogurt | |
| Culturelle | |
| Culturelle for kids | 1.5 billion bacteria per packet |
| Howaru | |
| Kefir | |
| Lactinex | |
| Protectis | |
| RepHresh Pro-B | |
| VSL#3 | |
| Yakult |
CFU, colony forming unit.
Pharmacist's Letter 2012; 28(7):280707. Islam (.
Figure 1Major mechanisms of action of probiotics.
Types and sources of natural prebiotics.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Arabinoxylooligosaccharides | Wheat bran | ( |
| Cyclodextrins | Water-soluble glucans | ( |
| Enzyme-resistant dextrin | Potato starch | ( |
| Fructooligosaccharides | Asparagus, sugar beet, garlic, chicory, onion, Jerusalem artichoke, wheat, honey, banana, barley tomato, rye | ( |
| Galactooligosaccharides | Human's milk and cow's milk | ( |
| Isomaltulose | Honey, sugarcane juice | ( |
| Isomaltooligosaccharides | Starch | ( |
| Lactulose | Lactose (milk) | ( |
| Maltooligosaccharides | Starch | ( |
| Pectic oligosaccharide | Mango, sugar beet, citrus | ( |
| Raffinose oligosaccharides | Seeds of legumes, lentils, peas, beans, chickpeas, mallow composite, mustard | ( |
| Soybean oligosaccharide | Soybean | ( |
| Xylooligosaccharides | Bamboo shoots, fruits, vegetables, milk, honey, wheat bran | ( |
Preparation of POS from various sources by different techniques.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple pomace | Enzymatic technique | DP 7–10 |
| Acetic acid, propionic acid | ( |
| Artichoke | Enzymatic technique | 0.3–100.0 kDa | n/a | n/a | ( |
| Citrus peel | Enzymatic technique | <1.0–1.8 kDa | n/a | ( | |
| Lemon peel | Enzymatic technique (Crude gungal PL and yeast PG) | 51.4 kDa | Bacterial groups; Bifidobacterium, | Acetic acid, butyric acid | ( |
| Mango peel | Enzymatic technique | <1.0 kDa | Acetic acid, propionic acid | ( | |
| Orange peel | Enzymatic technique (Fungal crude enzyme; pectinase, cellulase, CMCase, xylanase) | <1.0–>3.0 kDa | n/a | ( | |
| Sugar beet pulp | Enzymatic technique | 63.9 kDa | Bacterial groups; | Acetic acid, butyric acid | ( |
| Sunflower | Enzymatic technique | 100–800 kDa | Bacterial groups from fecal | Acetic acid | ( |
| Apple pectin | Physical technique (Dynamic high-pressure microfluidisation) | n/a | Bacterial groups from fecal | Acetic acid, propionic acid | ( |
| Lemon peel waste | Physical technique (Hydrothermal treatment) | DP 2–18 | n/a | n/a | ( |
| Mixed technique | <0.7–>3.0 KDa | Bacterial groups from fecal | Acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid | ( | |
| Hawthorn fruit | Mixed technique | 0.8–2.2 KDa | n/a | n/a | ( |
| Citrus peel pectin | Chemical technique | 2.0–4.0 KDa | n/a | ( |
DP, degree of esterification; PL, pectin lyase, PG, polygalacturonase.
Figure 2The relationship between prebiotic types and the specific growth rate of selected gut bacteria. The plot was regenerated from the data presented in (84).
Figure 3Mango peel pectin and mango pectic oligosaccharide recovery from different varieties of mango fruits.