| Literature DB >> 35399642 |
Shengxi Meng1, Shaopeng Li2, Huize Chen1, Chujun Deng1, Zeyu Meng3, Yimo Wang2.
Abstract
With the aging of population, vascular dementia (VaD) seriously threatens people's health and quality of life. It is of great significance to explore biomarkers of VaD from the perspective of metabolomics and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Therefore, VaD was divided into kidney deficiency and blood stasis syndrome (KDBS) and non-KDBS according to TCM. Then, some patients received the treatment of Hengqing I (HQI) prescription. The urine of six groups (VaD group, normal group, KDBS group, non-KDBS group, HQI group, and control group) was detected on LC-MS/MS. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that the metabolic profiles of the three comparisons were significantly different. The top analysis-ready molecules of downregulated histamine and upregulated biotin, methionine, pantothenic acid, SAH, histidine, and kaempferol may be the most related metabolites. These putative biomarkers play an important role in the regulation of key metabolic processes linked to VaD. Additionally, pathway analysis showed aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, and amino acids metabolic pathways were highly correlated with the occurrence of VaD. In this present paper, vitamins, amino acids, and their derivatives were selected as the basis for VaD diagnosis and treatment monitoring, and the significance of TCM classification and Hengqing I prescription in the treatment of VaD was discussed.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35399642 PMCID: PMC8986386 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1636145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of Hengqing I on cognitive level of VaD patients.
| Group | MMSE score | HDS score | ADL score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
| HQI | 22.45 ± 3.32 | 28.48 ± 4.32ab | 23.48 ± 3.22 | 30.30 ± 3.72ab | 41.88 ± 9.38 | 76.5 ± 6.72ab |
| Control | 23.08 ± 3.15 | 25.52 ± 3.39 | 22.36 ± 3.95 | 27.32 ± 4.8 | 43.49 ± 9.14 | 58.49 ± 7.33 |
Small “a” indicates significant difference compared with that before treatment (P < 0.05). Small “b” indicates significant difference compared with the control group (P < 0.05).
Figure 1The PCA score plots of VaD ratio normal (a), KDBS ratio non-KDBS (b), and HQI ratio control group (c).
Figure 2The OPLS-DA score plots of VaD ratio normal (a), KDBS ratio non-KDBS (b), and HQI ratio control group (c). (d–f) OPLS-DA permutation plots.
Differential analysis of the metabolites in VaD and normal groups (as shown in the first 20 lines).
| Name | m/ | RT2 (min) | VIP |
| LogFC3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biotin | 245.09 | 5.12 | 1.05 | 1.52E-06 | 4.10 |
| N-Acetyl-L-leucine | 174.11 | 4.15 | 1.48 | 8.72E-10 | 3.72 |
| cis-4-Hydroxy-D-proline | 132.06 | 11.87 | 1.87 | 2.75E-10 | 2.68 |
| 4-Hydroxy-6-methyl-2-pyrone | 127.04 | 3.15 | 1.60 | 1.21E-09 | 2.46 |
| 1,7-Dimethyluric acid | 197.07 | 6.10 | 1.13 | 1.56E-04 | 2.33 |
| H-Pro-Hyp-OH | 229.12 | 11.92 | 1.97 | 1.47E-09 | 2.29 |
| Decanoylcarnitine | 316.25 | 6.53 | 1.79 | 2.44E-14 | 2.21 |
| 5-Methyluridine | 259.09 | 11.17 | 1.60 | 5.52E-04 | 2.18 |
| 5-Aminolevulinic acid | 132.06 | 5.00 | 1.08 | 6.75E-05 | 2.04 |
| Naringenin | 273.08 | 6.45 | 1.06 | 9.81E-03 | -2.00 |
| 3-Aminoisobutyric acid | 104.07 | 10.51 | 1.34 | 7.05E-06 | 1.86 |
| Kynurenine | 209.09 | 8.96 | 1.87 | 3.67E-10 | 1.82 |
| Isoleucine | 132.10 | 9.21 | 2.33 | 4.17E-09 | 1.81 |
| 6-Hydroxynicotinic acid | 140.04 | 8.97 | 1.31 | 9.53E-04 | 1.80 |
| Sorbitol | 205.07 | 9.84 | 1.44 | 2.73E-02 | -1.79 |
| Deoxycarnitine | 146.12 | 10.29 | 1.73 | 3.59E-07 | 1.77 |
| Asp-Phe | 281.10 | 10.84 | 1.74 | 1.09E-03 | 1.69 |
| Tyrosine | 182.08 | 10.09 | 1.70 | 3.80E-03 | -1.66 |
| Methionine | 150.06 | 9.55 | 1.88 | 8.48E-09 | 1.54 |
| Trigonelline | 160.04 | 9.83 | 1.98 | 1.67E-05 | -1.48 |
1Mass-to-charge ratio; 2retention time; 3logarithm of fold change based on two.
Differential analysis of the metabolites in KDBS and non-KDBS groups (as shown in the first 20 lines).
| Name | m/ | RT2 (min) | VIP |
| LogFC3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pantothenic acid | 220.12 | 5.22 | 1.81 | 3.00 | 5.90 |
| Norleucine | 132.10 | 4.15 | 1.80 | 5.55 | 4.66 |
| Biotin | 245.09 | 5.12 | 1.77 | 8.15 | 4.44 |
| N-Cinnamoylglycine | 206.08 | 4.64 | 1.64 | 9.54 | 4.15 |
| Pyroglutamic acid | 130.05 | 6.29 | 1.50 | 4.77 | 3.61 |
| N-Acetyl-L-leucine | 174.11 | 4.15 | 1.90 | 5.87 | 3.47 |
| 5-Aminolevulinic acid | 132.06 | 5.00 | 1.45 | 6.06 | 2.59 |
| Hexamethylene bisacetamide | 201.16 | 8.88 | 1.20 | 1.64 | 1.90 |
| cis-4-Hydroxy-D-proline | 132.06 | 11.87 | 1.90 | 1.10 | 1.88 |
| N-Acetylputrescine | 131.11 | 9.54 | 1.70 | 4.75 | −1.83 |
| 3-Indoleacetic acid | 176.07 | 6.68 | 1.88 | 2.94 | −1.81 |
| H-Pro-Hyp-OH | 229.12 | 11.92 | 1.73 | 3.73 | 1.75 |
| Phosphocholine | 184.07 | 12.71 | 1.39 | 1.12 | 1.50 |
| S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine | 385.13 | 12.16 | 2.02 | 1.92 | 1.49 |
| 5-Methylcytidine | 258.11 | 8.56 | 1.08 | 3.83 | 1.48 |
| D-Maltose | 343.12 | 12.34 | 1.59 | 2.91 | 1.44 |
| Acetylhomoserine | 162.07 | 7.21 | 1.60 | 1.60 | −1.42 |
| Ecgonine | 186.11 | 4.31 | 1.46 | 2.62 | −1.35 |
| Hippuric acid | 180.07 | 4.44 | 1.76 | 2.45 | −1.35 |
| L-Citrulline | 176.10 | 12.21 | 1.75 | 3.93 | 1.32 |
1Mass-to-charge ratio; 2retention time; 3logarithm of fold change based on two.
Differential analysis of the metabolites in HQI and control groups (as shown in the first 20 lines).
| Name | m/ | RT2 (min) | VIP |
| LogFC3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histamine | 1act12.09 | 9.14 | 1.55 | 8.58 | −3.11 |
| Hexamethylene bisacetamide | 201.16 | 8.88 | 2.43 | 2.48 | −3.03 |
| Dopamine | 154.10 | 9.15 | 1.21 | 8.12 | −2.84 |
| Decanoylcarnitine | 316.25 | 6.53 | 2.20 | 2.04 | 2.54 |
| Xanthurenic acid | 206.04 | 7.44 | 1.96 | 2.17 | −2.44 |
| N-Acetyl-L-leucine | 174.11 | 4.15 | 1.77 | 6.18 | 2.42 |
| 4-Methylpyrimidine | 95.06 | 9.14 | 1.42 | 9.51 | −2.36 |
| 1-Methylnicotinamide | 137.07 | 9.37 | 2.16 | 2.67 | −2.08 |
| 5-Methyluridine | 259.09 | 11.17 | 1.64 | 1.73 | 2.06 |
| Kynurenine | 209.09 | 8.96 | 2.14 | 2.03 | 2.04 |
| H-Pro-Hyp-OH | 229.12 | 11.92 | 1.78 | 1.24 | 1.83 |
| Methionine | 150.06 | 9.55 | 2.24 | 3.08 | 1.82 |
| Methylguanidine | 74.07 | 8.80 | 1.30 | 3.91 | 1.76 |
| Isoleucine | 132.10 | 9.21 | 2.33 | 1.33 | 1.72 |
| 5-Methylcytosine | 126.07 | 8.26 | 1.42 | 1.10 | 1.63 |
| Asp-Phe | 281.10 | 10.84 | 1.86 | 7.88 | 1.56 |
| Propionylcarnitine | 218.14 | 8.81 | 1.48 | 2.53 | 1.54 |
| Tyrosine | 182.08 | 10.09 | 1.68 | 3.20 | −1.53 |
| Kaempferol | 287.05 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 3.42 | 1.46 |
| Histidine | 156.08 | 13.74 | 1.52 | 3.11 | 1.24 |
1Mass-to-charge ratio; 2retention time; 3logarithm of fold change based on two.
Figure 3The metabolic pathway map of VaD ratio normal (a), KDBS ratio non-KDBS (b), and HQI ratio control group (c). Pathway names are displayed with P < 0.05.
Figure 4Relationship between different metabolites and VaD and biomarkers of Hengqing I against VaD.