Literature DB >> 35399540

Integrated genomic analyses identify high-risk factors and actionable targets in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Haichuan Zhu1,2,3, Bingjie Dong1,2, Yingchi Zhang4, Mei Wang1,2, Jianan Rao5,6, Bowen Cui5,6, Yu Liu5,6, Qian Jiang7, Weitao Wang1,2, Lu Yang1,2, Anqi Yu1,2, Zongru Li7, Chao Liu4, Leping Zhang8, Xiaojun Huang2,7, Xiaofan Zhu4, Hong Wu1,2,7.   

Abstract

T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy often associated with poor outcomes. To identify high-risk factors and potential actionable targets for T-ALL, we perform integrated genomic and transcriptomic analyses on samples from 165 Chinese pediatric and adult T-ALL patients, of whom 85% have outcome information. The genomic mutation landscape of this Chinese cohort is very similar to the Western cohort published previously, except that the rate of NOTCH1 mutations is significant lower in the Chinese T-ALL patients. Among 47 recurrently mutated genes in 7 functional categories, we identify RAS pathway and PTEN mutations as poor survival factors for non-TAL and TAL subtypes, respectively. Mutations in the PI3K pathway are mutually exclusive with mutations in the RAS and NOTCH1 pathways as well as transcription factors. Further analysis demonstrates that approximately 43% of the high-risk patients harbor at least one potential actionable alteration identified in this study, and T-ALLs with RAS pathway mutations are hypersensitive to MEKi in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our integrated genomic analyses not only systematically identify high-risk factors but suggest that these high-risk factors are promising targets for T-ALL therapies.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health Inc., on behalf of the Chinese Medical Association (CMA) and Institute of Hematology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (IHCAMS).

Entities:  

Keywords:  High risk; PI3K; RAS; T-ALL; WES

Year:  2022        PMID: 35399540      PMCID: PMC8974951          DOI: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Sci        ISSN: 2543-6368


INTRODUCTION

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a heterogeneous disease caused by accumulated genetic alterations in T progenitor cells.[1,2] The incidence of T-ALL is approximately 10% to 15% in pediatric ALL and 25% in adult ALL.[3,4] Despite advances in T-ALL treatment, approximately 20% of pediatric and 40% of adult patients are expected to have poor prognosis.[5,6] Recent unbiased large-scale genomic landscape studies, some in combination with transcriptome analyses, have revealed frequently mutated genes and dysregulated pathways associated with several major subtypes of T-ALLs.[7-9] Other prognosis-based sequencing analyses are mainly focused on adult T-ALL. Mutations in the JAK/STAT, RAS/PTEN, TP53, IDH2, and DNMT3A genes are correlated with worse survival, while mutations in the NOTCH pathway as well as TCR gamma and CDKN2A/CDKN2B homozygous deletion are related with better survival in adult T-ALL patients.[10-12] Chromosomal rearrangements are another frequent genetic alterations found in T-ALL, which lead to dysregulated transcription factors.[1] Dysregulated HOXA cluster expressions, either by fusion events or 3D genome alterations, are associated with poor survival of T-ALL.[13] Additionally, MLL related rearrangement and SPI1 fusions were related with worse survival,[9,14] and SPI1 fusion was associated with higher preTCR-LCK signaling and could be targeted by dasatinib.[15] Early T cell precursor TALL (ETP ALL), a subtype of T-ALL characterized by the lack of mature T cell markers and the expression of stem and myeloid-lineage genes, has also been reported to have poor prognosis.[16,17] However, systematic investigation of the genetic landscape underlying poor prognosis of T-ALL, especially pediatric T-ALL, is needed for molecular-based prognosis and designing new targeted therapeutic strategies. In this study, we conducted integrated whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses on a large Chinese cohort to identify those high-risk factors associated with poor prognosis of T-ALL. As many of the high-risk factors identified are potential drug targets, our study may shed light on the molecular-based prognosis of T-ALL, which would enable the design of new therapeutic strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

T-ALL patient samples

Primary and remission samples used for this study were obtained from the Institute of Hematology at Peking University (n = 66) and the Tianjin Institute of Hematology (n = 99) from 2010 to 2018. Among 165 patient samples, 33 were from adult (age ≥18) and 128 were from pediatric (age < 18) T-ALL patients, four patients missed age information. The study protocols were approved by the ethics committees of these two institutions. All patients gave written informed consent for treatments and sample collections. The diagnosis of T-ALL was made by morphological, immunophenotypical, and cytogenetic analyses of bone marrow specimens according to the World Health Organization classification.[18] ETP ALL and non-ETP ALL status were determined according to a previous publication.[16] Immunophenotypes were evaluated by 8-color multi-parameter flow cytometry analysis. Other detailed patient-related information can be found in Table 1 and supplemental Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the T-ALL patient cohort∗.

Peking (n = 66)Tianjin (n = 99)

Total (n = 165)Adult (n = 33)Pediatric (n = 29)Pediatric (n = 99)
Age, years
 Median1130108
 Range1–6918–692–171–15
 Unknown440
Gender
 Male, n (%)119 (72.6%)23 (69.7%)22 (75.9%)73 (73.7%)
 Female, n (%)45 (27.4%)10 (30.3%)7 (24.1%)26 (26.3%)
 Unknown110
ETP status
 ETP, n (%)37 (23.8%)11 (33.3%)10 (34.5%)16 (17.2%)
 Non-ETP, n (%)118 (76.2%)22 (66.7%)19 (65.5%)77 (82.8%)
 Unknown1046
WBC count, ×109/L
 ≥100, n (%)71 (48%)7 (26%)10 (45.5%)54 (54.5%)
 <100, n (%)77 (52%)20 (74%)12 (54.5%)45 (45.5%)
 Unknown17170
Hemoglobin, g/L
 Median105118103.5101
 Range41–15852–14647–13641–158
 Unknown19190
Platelet, ×109/L
 Median545498.548
 Range4–46112–27412–4614–293
 Unknown19190
Blasts in BM, %
 Median868680.7587.3
 Range26.5–9942–9827–9126.5–99
 Unknown22139
Hepatosplenomegaly
 Positive, n (%)107 (76.4%)12 (54.5%)14 (66.7%)81 (83.5%)
 Negative, n (%)33 (23.6%)10 (45.5%)7 (33.3%)16 (16.5%)
 Unknown25232
CR
 Complete remission, n (%)126 (89.4%)19 (86.4%)19 (95%)88 (88.9%)
 No response, n (%)15 (10.6%)3 (13.6%)1 (5%)11 (11.1%)
 Unknown24240
Minimal residual disease (MRD)
 MRD positive, n (%)50 (39.1%)12 (60%)4 (23.5%)34 (37.4%)
 MRD negative, n (%)78 (60.9%)8 (40%)13 (76.5%)57 (62.6%)
 Unknown37298

ETP = Early T cell precursor, T-ALL = T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WBC = white blood cell.

Detailed clinical information can be found in supplemental Table 1.

Four patients from the Institute of Hematology at Peking University missed all clinical information excepted 3 of them had gender information.

Clinical characteristics of the T-ALL patient cohort∗. ETP = Early T cell precursor, T-ALL = T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, WBC = white blood cell. Detailed clinical information can be found in supplemental Table 1. Four patients from the Institute of Hematology at Peking University missed all clinical information excepted 3 of them had gender information.

Treatment

The treatment protocol included induction and post-remission therapy. For pediatric patients, the Chinese Children Leukemia Group CCLG-2008 protocol was used for 50 patients between April 2008 and December 2014, and the CCLG-2015 protocol was used for an additional 49 patients after 2015. Details of the CCLG-2008 and CCLG-2015 treatment regimens have been published previously.[19,20] For adult patients, CODPL regimens (cyclophosphamide, daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and L-asparaginase) were used as the induction therapy. After remission, patients received consolidation therapy, including a modified hyper-CVAD regimen (fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine for four cycles). After consolidation chemotherapy, patients received a maintenance regimen (vindesine, prednisone, mercaptopurine, and methotrexate) for 2 years. Based on physician recommendations as well as patients’ desires, some patients with available donors received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after at least two cycles of consolidation therapy according to the protocol published previously.[21]

Whole-exome sequencing (WES)

Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (69504, Qiagen). The quality of the DNA samples was measured with agarose gel electrophoresis. One microgram of high-quality DNA from each sample was used for exome enrichment and library preparation following the manufacturer's protocols of SureSelectXT. Human All Exon V6 (Agilent Technologies, 5190-8865) and NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit (NEB, E7645) were used for the library construction. The WES library was then sequenced on the HiSeq X Ten platform after performing quality control analysis.

WES data analysis

Paired-end reads were aligned with BWA v0.7.15[22] to the human reference genome hg19. Duplicates were marked with Picard tool v2.9.2. GATK toolkit v3.7.0[23] was used for realignment and base recalibration. Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified by MuTect v1.1.7[24] and Bambino v1.06[25] using 42 primary-remission paired samples. Insertions/deletions (indels) were identified by Strelka v1.0.15[26] and Bambino v1.06.[25] Significantly mutated genes were identified by MuSiC.[27] For unpaired samples, we created a panel of normal controls using the 42 remission samples. We then used the MuTect2 algorithm to identify SNVs and indels. Variants were filtered by removing those that met one of the following conditions: (1) <6 supporting reads in tumor samples; (2) <20 depth in tumor samples; (3) >2 supporting variant reads in normal samples; (4) <10 depth in normal samples; (5) identification as variants in the 1000 Genome East Asian Project (August 2015 release) and not in the COSMIC database (version 70); and (6) identification as variants in the ExAC nonTCGA East Asian database (version 0.3) and not in the COSMIC database. We used Medal Ceremony[28] to annotate driver sites. All the variants were verified by the Integrative Genomics Viewer.[29] We used GATK4 to identify copy number variations; recurrent copy number variations were calculated by GISTIC2.[30]

mRNA sequencing

RNA-seq library was established as previously described.[31] In brief, total RNA was isolated from each sample using a RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74104). Oligo(dT)25 cellulose beads were used for the isolation of mRNA from 1 μg of total RNA. After cDNA generation, RNA-seq library was prepared using an NEBNext® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB, E7645) following the manufacturer's protocol, and was sequenced on a HiSeq X Ten platform.

T-ALL patient-derived xenografts (PDX) models and in vivo treatment

To establish PDX mouse models, 6- to 8-week-old NOD/SCID/IL-2Rγ-null (NCG) mice (Jiangsu GemPharmatech Co, Ltd, China) were sub-lethally irradiated (2 Gry; once one day before transplantation), and 5 × 105 T-ALL cells harvested from patients’ bone marrow were intravenously injected. Ten days after the initial transplantation, mice were randomly assigned into control and treatment groups. PD0325901 (25 mg/kg) was administrated once daily. Leukemia development was monitored daily by physical appearance, and weekly by peripheral blood smear and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using anti-human CD7 antibody. T-ALL was confirmed when leukemia burden reached >20% in peripheral blood, and the spleen was harvested for analysis as described previously.[31] The experiments were performed with the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee of Peking University under the protocol of ID LSC-WuH-1.

mRNA sequencing data analysis

RNA sequencing reads were aligned to human hg19 with MapSplice v2.1.8.[32] Gene expression was quantified by RSEM[33] using the transcript model TCGA GAF (https://gdc.cancer.gov/about-data/data-harmonization-and-generation/gdc-reference-files). Gene fusion was detected by CICERO.[34] Differential expression analysis was performed using R package DESeq2 v1.22.1.[35] KEGG enrichment analysis was performed by clusterProfiler.[36] MuTect2 and RNAIndel[37] were applied for SNV and Indel analysis and annotated with VEP.[38] Variants were further filtered by removing those that met one of the following conditions: (1) in Ig/TCR region; (2) <3 supporting variant reads; (3) <8 reads depth; (4) >0.001 allele frequency in 1000 Genome; (5) not in coding or splicing regions; (6) matching variant in the internal artifact blacklist representing mutation artifact. We then selected variants meets any of the flowing conditions: (1) mutant allele fraction (MAF) greater than 0.1, predicted as “deleterious” and “possibly damaging” in SIFT and PolyPhen, respectively, in the internal tumor associated gene list; (2) recurrent (n ≥ 3) in the COSMIC[39] database or in previously published datasets including PCGP[40] or TARGET.[41] We used fusion events and the expression of transcription factors to classify patients into 4 subtypes: (1) LMO2/LYL1: patients with both LMO2 and LYL1 upregulation; (2) HOXA: patients with HOXA activation related fusion events or HOXA gene upregulation; (3) LTX: patients with TLX3 activation related fusion events, or patients with TLX1, TLX3, or NKX2-1 upregulation; (4) TAL: patients with TAL1 or TAL2 activation related fusion events, or patients with TAL1 or TAL2 upregulation.[8,42]

Western blot analysis

Western blotting was performed as described previously.[43] P-p44/42 MAPK (CST, 4370S) and p44/42 MAPK (CST, 4695S) antibodies were used to measure RAS/MAPK pathway activities, using β-actin (CST, 3700S) as a loading control.

Statistical and survival analyses

Fisher's exact test was used to identify associations between mutations or pathway alterations with age, minimal residual disease (MRD) status, and immunophenotype. MRD positivity status as evaluated at induction therapy about 1 month, MRD positive was defined with MRD larger than 0.01%. Survival analysis was performed using a Cox regression model and presented as overall or event-free survival as outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to death from any cause. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis to treatment failure, relapse, or death from any cause. Variables tested in the multivariable Cox regression model included risk factors, age (pediatric vs. adult), gender, white blood cell count (WBC < 100 × 109/L),[44] hemoglobin (<100 g/L), platelet count (<100 × 109/L),[17] and hepatosplenomegaly. Patients who received transplantation were excluded from survival analysis.

Data access

The raw sequence data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive[45] in National Genomics Data Center,[46] China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number HRA000122 that are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa.

RESULTS

Genomic landscape of Chinese T-ALL

To investigate the genomic landscape-associated with different outcomes, we conducted WES and RNA-seq analyses, and the overall experimental design was illustrated in supplemental Figure 1A. WES analysis on 42 paired samples identified 585 somatic coding mutations, including 471 nonsynonymous SNVs and 114 indels (Supplemental Table 2). For the additional 79 samples without matched remission controls, we also conducted WES analysis, using pooled 42 remission samples as germline and background controls, and performed mutation calling. In total, we identified 47 recurrently mutated genes (Supplemental Table 3), which belonged to seven functional categories (Fig. 1A and supplemental Figure 1D).
Figure 1

Mutational landscape-associated in T-ALL. (A) Recurrently mutated genes in T-ALL were ordered by functional categories shown on the left. Synonymous mutations were excluded, 147 cases were shown. Lower part summarized mutations in each functional category. (B) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival of T-ALLs with (red) or without (black) RAS pathway mutations (upper) and with (blue) or without (grey) PTEN mutations (lower) in the entire cohort. (C) Co-occurring (green) or mutually exclusive (red) pathway alterations (P < .05; two-sided Fisher's exact test).

Mutational landscape-associated in T-ALL. (A) Recurrently mutated genes in T-ALL were ordered by functional categories shown on the left. Synonymous mutations were excluded, 147 cases were shown. Lower part summarized mutations in each functional category. (B) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival of T-ALLs with (red) or without (black) RAS pathway mutations (upper) and with (blue) or without (grey) PTEN mutations (lower) in the entire cohort. (C) Co-occurring (green) or mutually exclusive (red) pathway alterations (P < .05; two-sided Fisher's exact test). The overall somatic mutation burden and signature in this Chinese T-ALL cohort were very similar to the previous report[41] (Supplemental Figure 1B-C). However, the mutation rate of NOTCH1 was lower, while the mutation rates of SETD2, CDKN2A, ASXL1, and TP53 were higher in the Chinese cohort compared to the White population (57.9% vs. 74%, 5.1% vs. 1.5%, 5.1% vs. 0.8%, 4.1% vs. 0.8%, and 3% vs. 0.4% in Chinese cohort and in White population, respectively; Supplemental Figure 1E).[7,8] WES-based copy number variation (CNV) analysis also identified recurrent deletions in the CDKN2A/CDKN2B, TCRA, TCF7, and SUZ12 loci (Supplemental Figure 1F), consistent with a previous publication.[8] High frequent chromosome 14 and 15 amplifications were also observed, but the biological significance of this finding requires further investigation. For the 124 samples with RNA-seq data, we followed the steps described in the Method section to identify the potential driver mutations. Mutations identified in this way were largely consistent with those identified by WES analysis (Supplemental Figure 1G).

Recurrent alterations-associated with clinical outcomes of entire population

Among the seven functional categories (Supplemental Table 3), NOTCH pathway mutations had the highest mutation frequency (59%), affecting more than half of the patients, followed by mutations in the epigenetic regulators (42%) and transcription factors. Mutations in the PI3K, JAK-STAT, and RAS pathways were present in 17%, 20%, and 14% of the T-ALL samples, respectively. We observed that PTEN mutation was the dominant factor affecting the PI3K pathway. We also identified that 8% patients harbored cell cycle related mutations (Supplemental Table 3). We then investigated the relationship between the recurrent pathway mutations and clinical outcomes in the entire population (n = 113), and found that RAS pathway and PTEN alterations were related with EFS (Fig. 1B, Supplemental Figure 1H and Supplemental Table 5 and 6). Interestingly, mutations in the PI3K pathway were mutually exclusive from mutations in the RAS and NOTCH pathways as well as transcription factors (Fig. 1C). Sub-clonal mutations are defined by MAF of less than 0.3.[8,47] Interestingly, most RAS pathway mutations were monoclonal mutations, except two patients harboring NRAS and NF1 mutations, and 5/23 samples were sub-clonal. On the other hand, nearly half samples with PTEN mutations carried two or more than two distinct PTEN mutations and 4/27 samples were sub-clonal (Supplemental Figure 1J). At individual gene level, we found that patients with JAK3 (n = 7), ASXL1 (n = 7) mutations might be related with worse outcome (OS: P < .001 and P = .005, respectively; Supplemental Table 5 and 6).

Mutations associated with age and MRD

Age is known to associate with worse outcome in T-ALL.[48] In our cohort, 82% adult T-ALL were dead or relapsed within 3 years and had poor outcome compared with pediatric T-ALL (OS: P < .001, EFS: P < .001; Fig. 2A; Supplemental Figure 2A). We found a higher mutation rates of epigenetic regulators in adult T-ALL (66.7% in adult cases vs. 33.6% in pediatric cases), e.g., DNMT3A and IDH2 mutations were only detected in adult T-ALL while MED12 mutations were highly enriched in adult T-ALL (18.2% in adult cases vs. 5.5% in pediatric cases; Fig. 2B and Supplemental Figure 2B). In addition, we also found higher mutation rates of JAK3 (21.2% in adult cases vs. 4.7% in pediatric cases) and JAK-STAT pathway (30.3% in adult cases vs. 18% in pediatric cases) in adult T-ALL (Fig. 2B and Supplemental Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Relationship between recurrent mutations and clinical features. (A) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of adult (orange) and pediatric T-ALLs (purple). (B) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in adult (orange) and pediatric (purple) T-ALLs. (C) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of MRD positive (brown) and MRD negative (yellow) T-ALLs. (D) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in MRD positive (brown) and MRD negative (yellow) T-ALLs. (E) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of ETP (red) and non-ETP ALLs (blue). (F) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in ETP (red) and non-ETP ALLs (blue). ∗, P < .05.

Relationship between recurrent mutations and clinical features. (A) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of adult (orange) and pediatric T-ALLs (purple). (B) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in adult (orange) and pediatric (purple) T-ALLs. (C) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of MRD positive (brown) and MRD negative (yellow) T-ALLs. (D) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in MRD positive (brown) and MRD negative (yellow) T-ALLs. (E) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of ETP (red) and non-ETP ALLs (blue). (F) Bar graph showed the different rates of gene mutation (left) or mutation-associated functional category (right) in ETP (red) and non-ETP ALLs (blue). ∗, P < .05. As for pediatric T-ALL, RAS pathway mutations were associated with both OS (P = .002) and EFS (P = .025) in all pediatric T-ALL (n = 102) and those pediatric patients who participated in the clinical trials (OS: P = .002; EFS: P = .016; n = 91), while PTEN mutations were only associated with EFS of pediatric patients participated in the clinical trials (P = .041; Supplemental Figure 1I; Supplemental Table 5 and 6). MRD is a clinical feature routinely used in monitoring the T-ALL patients,[49] and we found that the MRD positive rate was much higher in adult T-ALL than that of pediatric T-ALL (60% vs. 35%; Table 1). MRD positivity was related with worse outcome in the entire cohort (OS: P < .001; EFS: P < .001) and pediatric T-ALL (OS: P < .001; EFS: P < .001; Fig. 2C and Supplemental Figure 2C-D). MED12 and JAK1 mutations were positively correlated with MRD positivity (14% in MRD positive cases vs. 3.8% in MRD negative cases; and 10% vs. 1.3%, respectively), while USP7 mutation was negatively correlated with MRD positivity (2% in MRD positive cases vs. 12.8% in MRD negative cases; Fig. 2D and Supplemental Figure 2E). ETP ALL has been reported as an aggressive subtype of T-ALL with poor prognosis,[16,17,50] although another study found no difference in the OS between ETP ALL and non-ETP ALL.[51] Despite the higher incidences of ETP ALL in adult T-ALL than that in pediatric T-ALL, 33.3% and 21.3%, respectively, and enriched epigenetic regulators mutations (64.9% in ETP ALL vs. 33.9% in non-ETP ALL), we did not find significant differences in the outcomes between ETP ALL and non-ETP ALL both in the entire cohort (OS: P = .473; EFS: P = .92) and in pediatric T-ALLs (OS: P = .565; EFS: P = .29; Fig. 2E-F and Supplemental Figure 2F-G). Thus, ETP is not a significant contributing factor for poor prognosis in our cohort.

Recurrent mutations-associated with major T-ALL subtypes

Previous study demonstrated that chromosome translocation-mediated gene fusions were major drivers of leukemogenesis.[1] According to the fusion events-associated dysregulated transcription factors, T-ALLs could be separated into six major subtypes, i.e., LOM2/LYL1, HOXA, TLX3, TLX1, NKX2-1 and TAL1 subtypes.[8,42] Utilizing the RNA-seq data from 124 patients, we identified 156 fusion events in 86 (69.4%) samples (Fig. 3A–B and Supplemental Table 7). Most of these recurrent fusion events were associated with HOXA and TAL1 subtypes, while only one TLX3 related fusion event was detected in 21 cases with TLX3 upregulation, which was much lower than the previous report[8] (Fig. 3B, top listed fusion events identified in this study). We also detected TCF7-SPI1 translocation in 3 cases (2.4%), which was reported as a high risk factor in a previous publication[9] (Fig. 3A).
Figure 3

The association of recurrent mutations and major subtypes of T-ALL. (A) Circos plot of the oncogenic fusion events discovered by RNA-seq, ordered by chromosome. Ribbon widths were proportional to the frequency of each fusion event. (B) Heatmap showed the major fusion events and associated dysregulated transcription factors expression, annotated by subtypes and age. (C and D) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of entire cohort (C) or pediatric T-ALLs (D) with HOXA (pink), TLX (blue), and TAL subtypes (green). (E) Heatmap showed the rates of gene mutation (top) or mutation-associated functional category (bottom) in HOXA, TLX, and TAL subtypes. (F) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of pediatric T-ALLs with (red) or without (black) RAS pathway mutations in non-TAL subtype. (G) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of pediatric T-ALLs with (blue) or without (grey) PTEN mutations in the TAL subtype.

The association of recurrent mutations and major subtypes of T-ALL. (A) Circos plot of the oncogenic fusion events discovered by RNA-seq, ordered by chromosome. Ribbon widths were proportional to the frequency of each fusion event. (B) Heatmap showed the major fusion events and associated dysregulated transcription factors expression, annotated by subtypes and age. (C and D) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of entire cohort (C) or pediatric T-ALLs (D) with HOXA (pink), TLX (blue), and TAL subtypes (green). (E) Heatmap showed the rates of gene mutation (top) or mutation-associated functional category (bottom) in HOXA, TLX, and TAL subtypes. (F) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of pediatric T-ALLs with (red) or without (black) RAS pathway mutations in non-TAL subtype. (G) Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curve of pediatric T-ALLs with (blue) or without (grey) PTEN mutations in the TAL subtype. Since there were only 7 samples in the LMO2/LYL1 subtype, we analyzed EFS of patients within the HOXA (n = 14), TLX (n = 20) and TAL subtypes (n = 32). For the entire cohort, the HOXA subtype showed a worse EFS when compared to the TLX and TAL subtypes (P = .012 and P = .008, respectively; Fig. 3C), and KEGG analysis showed that HOXA subtype was enriched for term such as transcriptional misregulation in cancer and MAPK signaling pathway (Supplemental Figure 3A-B). However, the survival difference was diminished when only pediatric T-ALL cases were analyzed (Fig. 3D and Supplemental Figure 3C). We also studied mutations that were preferentially associated with each subtype. We found higher mutation frequencies of IDH2, DNMT3A and FLT3 in the LMO2/LYL1 subtype (Supplemental Figure 3E), MED12 and RPL5 mutation in the HOXA subtype, PHF6, CTCF, EP300, WT1, GATA3, and NRAS mutation in the TLX subtype, while USP7 mutation only in the TAL subtype (Fig. 3E, upper). There were also higher number of adult T-ALL found in the HOXA subtype with 15/31 adult in HOXA, while only 2/23 and 6/45 adult T-ALL were found in TLX and TAL subtypes, respectively (Fig. 3B and Supplemental Figure 3D). Interestingly, RAS pathway alterations were associated with poor survival of non-TAL subtypes (EFS: P = .024) while JAK3 mutation was associated with poor prognosis of TLX subtype (EFS: P = .005; Fig. 3F and Supplemental Figure 3F). The TAL subtype showed the highest 5-year event free survival rate (Fig. 3C), but the high-risk cases within this subtype were all associated with PTEN mutations (Fig. 3G), and were mutually exclusive from USP7 or BCL11B mutations (Supplementary Figure 3G). Comparing with patients with PTEN mutation in the TAL subtype, most patients with USP7 or BCL11B mutations were MRD negative (Fig. 2D) and showed better outcome (OS: P = .004; EFS: P = .001; Supplementary Figure 3H).

T-ALL with RAS pathway mutations are hypersensitive to MEK inhibition

T-ALLs with the PI3K pathway activation are sensitive to those PI3K, AKT and mTOR inhibitors both in vitro and in vivo.[31,43,52] To determine whether RAS pathway mutations could be potential drug targets, we investigated the nature of the mutations in our cohort and found most of them were gain-of-function mutations (Fig. 4A and Supplemental Figure 4A-C). Many of the same mutations could also be found in human T-ALL lines (Fig. 4A). Importantly, T-ALL cell lines with RAS pathway mutations, such as DND-41, MOLT-3, MOLT-4, MOLT-13, KE-37, CCRF-CEM, and P12-ICHIKAWA, were more sensitive to MEK/ERK inhibitors CI-1040, PD0325901, Refametinib and Trametinib with lower IC50 (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Table 10).[53] PF-382 was an exception as it was resistant to CI-1040 and PD0325901 but relatively sensitive to Refametinib and Trametinib (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Table 10).
Figure 4

T-ALLs with mutations in the RAS pathway are sensitive to MEK inhibition. (A) Mutation profile for NRAS (left) and KRAS (right) in T-ALL samples (top) and T-ALL cell lines (bottom; CCLE database [https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle]). (B) The IC50 values of 4 MEK inhibitors in 14 T-ALL cell lines. Red, cell line with RAS pathway mutation; grey, WT for RAS pathway. (C) Representative DNA sequencing chromatograms of N-RAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) samples, showing a mono-allelic G12D mutation. (D) Intracellular FACS analyses of P-ERK levels in the NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) patient samples. Gray line: isotype control. (E) Western blot analyses of P-p44/42 MAPK levels in the NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) cells after different concentrations of PD0325901 treatment. (F) Survival analysis of NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) cells after different concentrations of PD0325901 treatment. (G) A schematic outline of in vivo drug treatment using the PDX models. n = 6 per group. (H) The proportion of human CD7+ leukemic blasts in the peripheral blood were measured by FACS from day 0 to day 25 in control and drug treatment cohorts. ∗∗, P < .01. (I) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of PDX models treated with placebo (control) and PD0325901. (J) Spleens from control and treatment groups were weighed and photographed. ∗∗∗, P < .001.

T-ALLs with mutations in the RAS pathway are sensitive to MEK inhibition. (A) Mutation profile for NRAS (left) and KRAS (right) in T-ALL samples (top) and T-ALL cell lines (bottom; CCLE database [https://portals.broadinstitute.org/ccle]). (B) The IC50 values of 4 MEK inhibitors in 14 T-ALL cell lines. Red, cell line with RAS pathway mutation; grey, WT for RAS pathway. (C) Representative DNA sequencing chromatograms of N-RAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) samples, showing a mono-allelic G12D mutation. (D) Intracellular FACS analyses of P-ERK levels in the NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) patient samples. Gray line: isotype control. (E) Western blot analyses of P-p44/42 MAPK levels in the NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) cells after different concentrations of PD0325901 treatment. (F) Survival analysis of NRAS WT (T-ALL.RM.044) and mutant (T-ALL.RM.017) cells after different concentrations of PD0325901 treatment. (G) A schematic outline of in vivo drug treatment using the PDX models. n = 6 per group. (H) The proportion of human CD7+ leukemic blasts in the peripheral blood were measured by FACS from day 0 to day 25 in control and drug treatment cohorts. ∗∗, P < .01. (I) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of PDX models treated with placebo (control) and PD0325901. (J) Spleens from control and treatment groups were weighed and photographed. ∗∗∗, P < .001. In our cohort, 12 out of 18 patients carried N-RAS/K-RAS mutations at amino acid Gly12 and Gly13, hot spot mutations known to associate with RAS pathway activation. We further confirmed mono-allelic mutation by Sanger sequencing, and demonstrated the RAS/MAPK pathway activation by intra-cellular FACS analysis of T-ALL-RM-017(NRAS_G12D), T-ALL-RM-014(NRAS-G13 V) and T-ALL-RM-044 (WT) samples (Fig. 4C-D and Supplemental Figure 4D). Comparing to T-ALL-RM-044 (WT) cells, T-ALL-RM-017(NRAS_G12D) cells had higher P-p44/42 MAPK levels and were sensitive to MEK inhibitor PD0325901 (Fig. 4E). Cell survival analysis showed that T-ALL-RM-017(NRAS_G12D) cells were more sensitivity to PD0325901 than that of T-ALL-RM-044 in vitro (Fig. 4F) and in vivo in PDX models (Fig. 4G–H). PD0325901 could also significantly prolong the survival of T-ALL-RM-017 leukemia mice (P = .002; Fig. 4I) by reducing leukemic burden, as evidenced by reduced spleen weight and size in the T-ALL-RM-017 PDX mice model (Fig. 4J). Taken together, these results suggest that T-ALLs with RAS pathway mutations are hypersensitive to RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway inhibition.

DISCUSSION

Taken the advantage of available survival related information in this Chinese cohort, we were able to identify those high risk factors that significantly contributed to poor prognosis of T-ALL (Fig. 5). Survival analysis demonstrated that adult T-ALL had median OS and EFS time less than 1 year, while MRD-positive patients had the median OS and EFS time around 2 years in the entire population and 2 – 3 years in the pediatric patients (Fig. 5A). MED12 and JAK1/JAK3 mutations were significantly enriched in adult and MRD-positive patients, while DMNT3A and IDH2 mutations were only present in adult T-ALL patients in our cohort (Fig. 2B and Supplemental Figure 2B and E).
Figure 5

Multi-variable analysis of high-risk factors in T-ALL. (A) Bar graph shows the median overall (blue) and event-free (orange) survival time associated with each clinical or genetic feature; right, P-value and adjusted P-value of overall and event-survival analysis. Adjusted P-values larger than .1 were not shown. Symbol ∗ after TLX and TAL represent median survival time longer than 5 years (1825 days). (B) Heatmap showed the correlation of major clinical and genetic risk factors. (C) Mutations identified in this cohort that were associated with the PI3K (left) and RAS (right) pathways.

Multi-variable analysis of high-risk factors in T-ALL. (A) Bar graph shows the median overall (blue) and event-free (orange) survival time associated with each clinical or genetic feature; right, P-value and adjusted P-value of overall and event-survival analysis. Adjusted P-values larger than .1 were not shown. Symbol ∗ after TLX and TAL represent median survival time longer than 5 years (1825 days). (B) Heatmap showed the correlation of major clinical and genetic risk factors. (C) Mutations identified in this cohort that were associated with the PI3K (left) and RAS (right) pathways. In our study, mutations in the RAS pathway and PTEN represented the most significant genetic risk factors and were mutually exclusive from each other (Figs. 1C and 5A–B). RAS pathway mutations were enriched in non-TAL subtype with the median OS and EFS time around 1 to 2 years, while PTEN mutations were preferentially present in TAL subtype with median OS and EFS time around 1 year (Figs. 3F–G and 5A–B). Previous studies have identified RAS/PTEN mutations as high-risk factors in adult T-ALL.[6] We found in this study that RAS/PTEN mutations were also associated with poor outcomes in pediatric T-ALL, and demonstrated the prognostic value of RAS pathway and PTEN mutations in nonTAL and TAL subtypes, respectively. The mutual exclusive relationship between RAS pathway and PTEN mutations could be confirmed by retrospectively analyzing data from previous publications.[7-9] Interestingly, although RAS pathway and PTEN co-mutations were extremely rare in clinical samples (0 in this and Gianfelici[54] studies, 1/168 in Trinquand study[6]), 5/14 T-ALL cell lines documented in the CCLE datasets were RAS pathway and PTEN co-mutated,[55] which may reflect the selective pressure in vitro when these lines were established. Our study also demonstrates the mutual exclusive relationships of PTEN mutations with JAK3 mutations (Fig. 5B), as well as mutations-associated with better prognosis, including those in the NOTCH/FBXW7 pathways, transcription factor BCL11b and USP7 (Fig. 1C and Supplemental Figure 3G-H).[8,56,57] Increased NOTCH activity and HES1 expression have been reported to associate with improved outcome in pediatric T-ALL.[58] Although we also observed a trend of increased HES1 expression in patients with NOTCH/FBXW7 pathway mutations, we did not observe significant survival differences between HES1 high vs. low or NOTCH/FBXW7 WT vs. mutant patients in the entire population or in pediatric T-ALLs (data not shown). Besides these genetic mutations, upregulated HOXA family transcription factor expressions were also associated with poor prognosis with the median survival time around 1 - 2 years (Figs. 3C and 5A). Our recent study has identified translocation-mediated neo-loops and NUP98-related fusion events as underlying mechanisms for 3D genome alterations associated with dysregulated HOXA13 expression. Interestingly, patients with HOXA11-A13 expression, but not other genes in the HOXA cluster, have poor outcomes.[13] In our cohort, HOXA subtype was preferentially present in adult T-ALL while TLX and TAL subtypes were preferentially present in pediatric T-ALL (Supplemental Figure 3D), which may explain the longer median survival time in these two subtypes. Although the spectrum of driver alterations we identified in this Chinese cohort was very similar to those reported in the Western cohort using similar methodologies,[8] the mutation rate of NOTCH1 was relatively low in our cohort. Liu et al found that 74.6% pediatric T-ALL patients harbor the NOTCH1 mutations[8] while only 52% pediatric T-ALL patients in our cohort carried the NOTCH1 mutations. Similarly, NOTCH1 mutation rates in two other Chinese T-ALL studies were also lower than that of the Western cohort when same standard was considered (63% and 47.4% respectively).[7,59]NOTCH pathway mutations are generally associated with better prognosis,[6,11,54] however, we did not observe this correlation in our population (Supplementary Table 5–6). The lower NOTCH1 mutation rate in the Chinese T-ALLs may contribute to the lower OS and EFS rates as compared to the Western T-ALLs.[8] Our analysis also identified potential actionable targets associated with the high-risk factors. In our cohort, mutations in the PTEN and RAS pathways accounted for 16% and 14% of cases, respectively (Fig. 5C; Supplemental Figure 4). We also demonstrate that T-ALLs with RAS pathway mutations are more sensitive to anti-RAS/MAPK pathway inhibitors in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4). This, together with previously reported sensitivities of PTEN mutated T-ALLs to anti-PI3K targeted therapies,[31,43,52,60] suggest that RAS pathway and PTEN mutations may serve as both prognostic indicators and actionable drug targets for more than 30% T-ALLs. Previous study also suggested that the combination of PI3K inhibitor and MEKi inhibitor was an effective treatment strategy in relapse T-ALLs.[61] If we narrowly define those patients who had died or relapsed within three years as high-risk patients, then 43% of them had potential actionable targets (Supplementary Table 9). Further pre-clinical and clinical investigations are required to test these targets.
  61 in total

Review 1.  Minimal residual disease diagnostics in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: need for sensitive, fast, and standardized technologies.

Authors:  Jacques J M van Dongen; Vincent H J van der Velden; Monika Brüggemann; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Early T-cell precursor leukemia: a subtype of high risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Meilin Ma; Xiang Wang; Jingyan Tang; Huiliang Xue; Jing Chen; Ci Pan; Hua Jiang; Shuhong Shen
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ETP-ALL/LBL) in adolescents and adults: a high-risk subtype.

Authors:  Nitin Jain; Audrey V Lamb; Susan O'Brien; Farhad Ravandi; Marina Konopleva; Elias Jabbour; Zhuang Zuo; Jeffrey Jorgensen; Pei Lin; Sherry Pierce; Deborah Thomas; Michael Rytting; Gautam Borthakur; Tapan Kadia; Jorge Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Joseph D Khoury
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Targeting the MYC and PI3K pathways eliminates leukemia-initiating cells in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Suzanne Schubbert; Anjelica Cardenas; Harrison Chen; Consuelo Garcia; Wei Guo; James Bradner; Hong Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  MapSplice: accurate mapping of RNA-seq reads for splice junction discovery.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Darshan Singh; Zheng Zeng; Stephen J Coleman; Yan Huang; Gleb L Savich; Xiaping He; Piotr Mieczkowski; Sara A Grimm; Charles M Perou; James N MacLeod; Derek Y Chiang; Jan F Prins; Jinze Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Network-based systems pharmacology reveals heterogeneity in LCK and BCL2 signaling and therapeutic sensitivity of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Gocho; Jingjing Liu; Jianzhong Hu; Wentao Yang; Neekesh V Dharia; Jingliao Zhang; Hao Shi; Guoqing Du; August John; Ting-Nien Lin; Jeremy Hunt; Xin Huang; Bensheng Ju; Lauren Rowland; Lei Shi; Dylan Maxwell; Brandon Smart; Kristine R Crews; Wenjian Yang; Kohei Hagiwara; Yingchi Zhang; Kathryn Roberts; Hong Wang; Elias Jabbour; Wendy Stock; Bartholomew Eisfelder; Elisabeth Paietta; Scott Newman; Giovanni Roti; Mark Litzow; John Easton; Jinghui Zhang; Junmin Peng; Hongbo Chi; Stanley Pounds; Mary V Relling; Hiroto Inaba; Xiaofan Zhu; Steven Kornblau; Ching-Hon Pui; Marina Konopleva; David Teachey; Charles G Mullighan; Kimberly Stegmaier; William E Evans; Jiyang Yu; Jun J Yang
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-01-21

Review 9.  Targeting PI3K Signaling in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Vanessa Edna Sanchez; Cydney Nichols; Hye Na Kim; Eun Ji Gang; Yong-Mi Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer.

Authors:  John G Tate; Sally Bamford; Harry C Jubb; Zbyslaw Sondka; David M Beare; Nidhi Bindal; Harry Boutselakis; Charlotte G Cole; Celestino Creatore; Elisabeth Dawson; Peter Fish; Bhavana Harsha; Charlie Hathaway; Steve C Jupe; Chai Yin Kok; Kate Noble; Laura Ponting; Christopher C Ramshaw; Claire E Rye; Helen E Speedy; Ray Stefancsik; Sam L Thompson; Shicai Wang; Sari Ward; Peter J Campbell; Simon A Forbes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.