Hang Hu1, Chen Chen1, Fugang Chen1, Naitong Sun2. 1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Yancheng No. 1 People's Hospital, Yancheng, China. 2. Department of Hematology and Oncology Medicine, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most aggressive types of cancer worldwide. It has been reported that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in the pathogenesis of NSCLC. In addition, LINC00152 is known to be upregulated in NSCLC. However, the mechanism underlying the effect of LINC00152 on NSCLC tumorigenesis remains to be elucidated. Methods: In the present study, cell viability, apoptosis and invasion were investigated by CCK-8, flow cytometry and Transwell assays, respectively. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were performed to determine the mRNA and protein expression levels. In addition, the association between LINC00152, microRNA (miR)-16-5p and BCL2-like 2 (BCL2L2) was evaluated using a dual-luciferase assay. Results: The results demonstrated that LINC00152-knockdown significantly attenuated the viability of NSCLC cells via promoting cell apoptosis. In addition, the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells was also decreased following transfection of cells with LINC00152 siRNA. Furthermore, miR-16-5p inhibitor or BCLCL2-overexpression reversed LINC00152 siRNA-induced NSCLC cell growth inhibition. Conclusions: The findings of the present study demonstrated that LINC00152-silencing suppressed NSCLC tumorigenesis via regulating the miR-16-5p/BCL2L2 axis. Therefore, linc00152 has the potential as a molecular marker and may be a potential target for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most aggressive types of cancer worldwide. It has been reported that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in the pathogenesis of NSCLC. In addition, LINC00152 is known to be upregulated in NSCLC. However, the mechanism underlying the effect of LINC00152 on NSCLC tumorigenesis remains to be elucidated. Methods: In the present study, cell viability, apoptosis and invasion were investigated by CCK-8, flow cytometry and Transwell assays, respectively. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were performed to determine the mRNA and protein expression levels. In addition, the association between LINC00152, microRNA (miR)-16-5p and BCL2-like 2 (BCL2L2) was evaluated using a dual-luciferase assay. Results: The results demonstrated that LINC00152-knockdown significantly attenuated the viability of NSCLC cells via promoting cell apoptosis. In addition, the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells was also decreased following transfection of cells with LINC00152 siRNA. Furthermore, miR-16-5p inhibitor or BCLCL2-overexpression reversed LINC00152 siRNA-induced NSCLC cell growth inhibition. Conclusions: The findings of the present study demonstrated that LINC00152-silencing suppressed NSCLC tumorigenesis via regulating the miR-16-5p/BCL2L2 axis. Therefore, linc00152 has the potential as a molecular marker and may be a potential target for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and is known to be the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide (1). Surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are currently the main treatment approaches for NSCLC. Although great efforts have been made over the past 20 years, the 5-year survival rate of patients with NSCLC remains low due to metastasis and recurrence (2). Therefore, novel treatment strategies for NSCLC are urgently required.Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNA transcripts, ~200 nucleotides in length (3). The close association between lncRNAs and carcinogenesis has been previously reported (4,5). For example, lncRNA XIST-knockdown enhanced the chemosensitivity of NSCLC cells via inhibiting autophagy (6). Furthermore, LINC00152 is a lncRNA that was found to be upregulated in NSCLC (7); however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear and requires further investigation.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding RNAs that regulate mRNA expression (8). It has been reported that miRNAs are involved in tumorigenesis (9). Kim et al. (10) indicated that miR-34a may act as an inhibitor of breast cancer via inhibition of Bcl-2. In addition, high expression of miR-21 was associated with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer (11). Therefore, miRNAs may serve as promising biomarkers in human malignancies. Additionally, another study suggested that miR-16-5p may be involved in the development of NSCLC (12), and LINC00152 could sponge miR-16-5p in glioma cells (13). However, the association between LINC00152 and miR-16-5p in NSCLC remains unclear.The present study aimed to investigate the mechanism by which LINC00152 could regulate the growth of NSCLC cells, with the aim of shedding new light on the treatment of NSCLC. We present the following article in accordance with the MDAR reporting checklist (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-59/rc).
Methods
Cell culture
The NSCLC cell lines (A549, NCI-H838, NCI-H3122 and NCI-H1975), and the human normal lung epithelial BEAS-2B cell line, were obtained from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; both Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and 100 U/mL penicillin at 37 ℃.
Cell transfection
The small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting LINC00152 (si-LINC00152; 10 nM) and the corresponding negative control siRNA (si-NC) were purchased from Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. and transfected into NSCLC cells (5×103) using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The transfection efficiency was evaluated using reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The sequences of the siRNAs were as follows: For si-NC, 5'-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3'; and for si-LINC00152, 5'-GGGTTACGATTGCCCAGAT-3'.For miR-16-5p transfection, A549 cells were transfected with miR-16-5p inhibitor or inhibitor-control (NC) using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), as previously described (14). miR-16-5p inhibitor and the corresponding NC were purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. After 24 h of transfection, transfected cells were used for subsequent experimentation.
BCL2 like 2 (BCL2L2)-overexpression
NSCLC cells were transfected with the pcDNA3.1 vector (NC) or pcDNA3.1-BCL2L2 (BCL2L2-overexpression) at 37 ℃ for 24 h using Lipofectamine® 3000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The pcDNA3.1 vector and pcDNA-BCL2L2 were purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The cell supernatant was collected 48 h following transfection.
Bioinformatics analysis
The association between LINC00152 and the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) was analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA) databases (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) (15).
RT-qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from NSCLC cells using TRIzol® reagent and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (both Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Shiga, Japan). The temperature and duration of reverse-transcription were as follows: 37 ℃ for 60 min and 85 ℃ for 5 min. The mRNA expression levels of each gene were determined in triplicate using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shiga, Japan) kit on a Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems 7500; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and normalized to β-actin. The amplification protocol was set as follows: Incubation at 95 ℃ for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 ℃ for 10 sec and 60 ℃ for 30 sec. The primers for LINC00152, miR-16-5p, β-actin and U6 were obtained from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, and the primer sequences were as follows: LINC00152 forward, 5'-TTTTTTTCCTTCTTAGTCGTGTGTA-3' and reverse, 5'-AAATTGACATTCCAGAC-3'; miR-16-5p forward, 5'-TAGCAGCACGTAAATATTGGCG-3' and reverse, 5'-TGCGTGTCGTGGAGTC-3'; β-actin forward, 5'-AGCGAGCATCCCCCAAAGTT-3' and reverse 5'-GGGCACGAAGGCTCATCATT-3'; and U6 forward, 5'-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3' and reverse, 5'-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3'. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used for quantification (16).
CCK-8 assay
The NSCLC cell viability in each group was evaluated using a CCK-8 assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The optical density values at a wavelength of 450 nm were measured using a microplate reader to determine cell viability.
Cell apoptosis analysis
For the analysis of cell apoptosis, the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection kit (BD Biosciences) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). The results were analyzed using a flow cytometer (FACS; BD Biosciences) with FlowJo software (v10.6.2; BD Biosciences).
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The miRNAs targeting LINC00152 were predicted using the starBase online software (version 2.0; http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/index.php). miR-16-5p was predicted as the miRNA directly targeting LINC00152. Subsequently, the protein target of miR-16-5p was predicted using two online databases, namely TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) and miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org/). The analysis predicted that BCL2L2 could be the putative protein target of miR-16-5p. A dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed to validate the aforementioned findings. The wild-type (WT) and mutant (MUT) LINC00152 were sub-cloned into the pmiR-RB-Report™ dual-luciferase reporter vectors (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). Furthermore, NSCLC cell lines were co-transfected with miR-16-5p mimics (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) or control vector and the WT- or MUT-LINC00152 reporter plasmid using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at 37 ℃ for 48 h according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The luciferase activity was measured by a Dual-luciferase Assay System (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The interaction between BCL2L2 and miR-16-5p was also verified using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. The positions in the sequence were presented in http://www.mirdb.org/cgi-bin/target_detail.cgi?targetID=1788842. After 48 h of transfection, the relative luciferase activity was detected using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The data were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.
Western blot analysis
Cell lysates were prepared using a RIPA lysis buffer (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and proteins were quantified with a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Equal amounts (20 µg) of protein extracts from each group were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and were then transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Following blocking with 10% FBS for 1 h at room temperature, the membranes were first incubated with primary antibodies against BCL2L2 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ab190952), Bax (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ab32503), Bcl-2 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ab182858), and caspase 3 (dilution, 1:1,000; cat. no. ab49822), and then with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (dilution, 1:5,000; cat. no. ab7090; all from Abcam). GAPDH was utilized as an endogenous control. Enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used to visualize the protein bands.
Transwell assay
A 24-well Transwell chamber with an 8-µm pore membrane (Corning Incorporated) was utilized for the Transwell invasion assay. For the invasion assay, the upper chamber was pre-treated with 50 µL Matrigel (12.5 mg/L). NSCLC cells (4×104) were suspended in 200 µL DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) without FBS. Cell culture medium supplemented with 20% FBS was added into the lower chamber to serve as a chemoattractant. Following incubation for 24 h, the invaded cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and stained with 0.25% crystal violet for 5 min at room temperature. Images were captured under a light microscope (magnification, ×200; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as the mean± standard deviation. Differences between groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, with GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
LINC00152-silencing significantly attenuates the proliferation of NSCLC cells. To investigate the biological effect of LINC00152 on NSCLC, RT-qPCR analysis was performed. As shown in , LINC00152 was notably upregulated in NSCLC cells. Since A549 and NCI-H838 were more sensitive to LINC00152 expression, these two cell lines were selected for further analysis. In addition, NSCLC cell lines were efficiently transfected with si-LINC00152 (). Subsequently, a CCK-8 assay was performed. The results revealed that LINC00152-silencing notably attenuated NSCLC cell proliferation (). Since the A549 cells were more susceptible to si-LINC00152, A549 cells were selected for subsequent experiments. Additionally, TCGA data analysis revealed that LINC00152 was associated with a poor prognosis in NSCLC (), and the expression of LINC00152 in LUAD tissues was higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (). These findings indicated that LINC00152 was upregulated in NSCLC.
Figure 1
Downregulation of LINC00152 significantly suppresses the proliferation of NSCLC cells. (A) The expression of LINC00152 in BEAS-2B, A549, NCI-H838, NCI-H3122 or NCI-H1975 cells was detected by qPCR. (B) NSCLC cells were transfected with LINC00152-NC or LINC00152 siRNA for 24 h. Next, the efficiency of cell transfection was detected by qPCR. The viability of (C) A549 or (D) NCI-H838 cells was detected by Cell Counting kit-8 assay. (E) The correlation between LINC00152 and survival of patients with NSCLC was investigated by The Cancer Genome Atlas. (F) The expression of LINC00152 in LUAD or adjacent normal tissues was obtained from the GEPIA database. *, P<0.05 compared with adjacent normal tissues; **, P<0.01 compared with BEAS-2B or control. NC, negative control; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; OD, optical density.
Downregulation of LINC00152 significantly suppresses the proliferation of NSCLC cells. (A) The expression of LINC00152 in BEAS-2B, A549, NCI-H838, NCI-H3122 or NCI-H1975 cells was detected by qPCR. (B) NSCLC cells were transfected with LINC00152-NC or LINC00152 siRNA for 24 h. Next, the efficiency of cell transfection was detected by qPCR. The viability of (C) A549 or (D) NCI-H838 cells was detected by Cell Counting kit-8 assay. (E) The correlation between LINC00152 and survival of patients with NSCLC was investigated by The Cancer Genome Atlas. (F) The expression of LINC00152 in LUAD or adjacent normal tissues was obtained from the GEPIA database. *, P<0.05 compared with adjacent normal tissues; **, P<0.01 compared with BEAS-2B or control. NC, negative control; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; OD, optical density.Knockdown of LINC00152 notably increases apoptosis and inhibits the invasion of NSCLC cells. Subsequently, flow cytometry was performed to measure cell apoptosis. As expected, downregulation of LINC00152 increased the apoptosis of A549 and NCI-H838 cells (, Figures S1A,S1B). Similarly, NSCLC cell migration and invasion were notably decreased following transfection of A549 cells with si-LINC00152 siRNA (). Taken together, these findings demonstrated that LINC00152-knockdown could notably increase apoptosis and decrease the migration and invasion ability of NSCLC cells.
Figure 2
Knockdown of LINC00152 notably increases the apoptosis and inhibits the invasion of NSCLC cells. (A) The apoptosis of A549 cells was detected by flow cytometry. The apoptosis rate was calculated. (B) Cell invasion of NSCLC was detected by Transwell assay. (C) Cell migration of NSCLC was detected by Transwell assay. The metastasized cells of Transwell assay were stained by 0.25% crystal violet, and the images were captured under a light microscope at the magnification ×200. **, P<0.01 compared to control. NC, negative control; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Knockdown of LINC00152 notably increases the apoptosis and inhibits the invasion of NSCLC cells. (A) The apoptosis of A549 cells was detected by flow cytometry. The apoptosis rate was calculated. (B) Cell invasion of NSCLC was detected by Transwell assay. (C) Cell migration of NSCLC was detected by Transwell assay. The metastasized cells of Transwell assay were stained by 0.25% crystal violet, and the images were captured under a light microscope at the magnification ×200. **, P<0.01 compared to control. NC, negative control; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.LINC00152 inhibits the tumorigenesis of NSCLC via miR-16-5p. To investigate the mechanism underlying the effect of LINC00152 on NSCLC tumorigenesis, the Starbase database was used. As shown in , miR-16-5p could be the downstream miRNA target of LINC00152. Furthermore, the relative luciferase activity of WT-LINC00152 was significantly decreased in the presence of miR-16-5p mimics (). In addition, the RT-qPCR results demonstrated that miR-16-5p was markedly downregulated in NSCLC cells (). Furthermore, the miR-16-5p inhibitor was stably transfected into NSCLC cells (), and miR-16-5p downregulation partially rescued the antiproliferative effect of si-LINC00152 on A549 cells (). The aforementioned findings suggested that LINC00152 could attenuate the progression of NSCLC via downregulation of miR-16-5p.
Figure 3
LINC00152 inhibits the tumorigenesis of NSCLC via mediation of miR-16-5p. (A) Gene structure of LINC00152 indicated the predicted target site of miR-16-5p. The positions in the sequence are presented. (B) Dual-luciferase assay was used to test the luciferase activity. (C) The expression of miR-16-5p in BEAS-2B, A549, NCI-H838, NCI-H3122 or NCI-H1975 cells was detected by qPCR. (D) A549 cells were transfected with inhibitor control or miR-16-5p inhibitor. Next, the expression of miR-16-5p in A549 cells was tested by reverse transcription-qPCR. (E) A549 cells were treated with NC, LINC00152 siRNA, LINC00152 siRNA + inhibitor control or LINC00152 siRNA + miR-16-5p inhibitor for 0, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively. Next, cell viability was measured by Cell Counting kit-8 assay. **, P<0.01 compared with control or BEAS-2B; ##, P<0.01 compared with LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; OD, optical density; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
LINC00152 inhibits the tumorigenesis of NSCLC via mediation of miR-16-5p. (A) Gene structure of LINC00152 indicated the predicted target site of miR-16-5p. The positions in the sequence are presented. (B) Dual-luciferase assay was used to test the luciferase activity. (C) The expression of miR-16-5p in BEAS-2B, A549, NCI-H838, NCI-H3122 or NCI-H1975 cells was detected by qPCR. (D) A549 cells were transfected with inhibitor control or miR-16-5p inhibitor. Next, the expression of miR-16-5p in A549 cells was tested by reverse transcription-qPCR. (E) A549 cells were treated with NC, LINC00152 siRNA, LINC00152 siRNA + inhibitor control or LINC00152 siRNA + miR-16-5p inhibitor for 0, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively. Next, cell viability was measured by Cell Counting kit-8 assay. **, P<0.01 compared with control or BEAS-2B; ##, P<0.01 compared with LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; OD, optical density; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.LINC00152 indirectly targets BCL2L2. To identify the targets of miR-16-5p, the TargetScan and miRDB databases were used. The results indicated that miR-16-5p could directly target BCL2L2 (). In addition, the dual-luciferase reporter assay further confirmed these finding (). Meanwhile, the expression of BCL2L2 in NSCLC cells was significantly increased in the presence of pcDNA3.1-BCL2L2 (). Furthermore, BCL2L2-overexpression significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of si-LINC00152 on NSCLC cell proliferation (). Consistently, the apoptotic effect of si-LINC00152 on NSCLC cells was markedly inhibited following BCL2L2-overexpression (). In summary, LINC00152 could indirectly target BCL2L2.
Figure 4
LINC00152 indirectly targets BCL2L2. (A) Gene structure of BCL2L2 showed the target site of miR-16-5p in its 3’-UTR. (B) The luciferase activity was measured using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. (C) A549 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1-BCL2L2. Next, the expression of BCL2L2 in A549 cells was tested by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (D) A549 cells were treated with NC, LINC00152 siRNA, LINC00152 siRNA + pcDNA3.1 vector or LINC00152 siRNA + BCL2L2 pcDNA3.1 for 0, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively. Next, Cell Counting kit-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability and (E) flow cytometry was used to measure cell apoptosis. **, P<0.01 compared to control; ##, P<0.01 compared to LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; OD, optical density; UTR, untranslated region.
LINC00152 indirectly targets BCL2L2. (A) Gene structure of BCL2L2 showed the target site of miR-16-5p in its 3’-UTR. (B) The luciferase activity was measured using a dual-luciferase reporter assay. (C) A549 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1-BCL2L2. Next, the expression of BCL2L2 in A549 cells was tested by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. (D) A549 cells were treated with NC, LINC00152 siRNA, LINC00152 siRNA + pcDNA3.1 vector or LINC00152 siRNA + BCL2L2 pcDNA3.1 for 0, 12, 24 and 48 h, respectively. Next, Cell Counting kit-8 assay was performed to detect cell viability and (E) flow cytometry was used to measure cell apoptosis. **, P<0.01 compared to control; ##, P<0.01 compared to LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; OD, optical density; UTR, untranslated region.Overexpression of BCL2L2 significantly attenuates the effect of LINC00152-silencing on the expression of apoptotic proteins in NSCLC cells. Finally, to further investigate the effect of LINC00152 on NSCLC in vitro, Western blot analysis was performed. As expected, the expression levels of BCL2L2 and Bcl-2 in NSCLC cells were significantly decreased by LINC00152-knockdown. This effect was notably reversed by BCL2L2-overexpression (). By contrast, LINC00152-knockdown notably enhanced the protein expression levels of Bax and caspase-3. However, the effect of si-LINC00152 on the two proteins was markedly suppressed following BCL2L2-overexpression (). The aforementioned results suggested that BCL2L2 overexpression could significantly attenuate the effect of LINC00152-silencing on the expression of apoptotic proteins in NSCLC cells.
Figure 5
Overexpression of BCL2L2 significantly suppresses the effect of LINC00152 silencing on apoptotic proteins in NSCLC cells. (A) The protein expression of BCL2L2, Bcl-2, Bax, cleaved caspase 3 and pro-caspase 3 in A549 cells were tested by Western blotting. (B-E) The relative protein expressions were quantified by normalizing to GAPDH. **, P<0.01 compared to control; ##, P<0.01 compared to LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Overexpression of BCL2L2 significantly suppresses the effect of LINC00152 silencing on apoptotic proteins in NSCLC cells. (A) The protein expression of BCL2L2, Bcl-2, Bax, cleaved caspase 3 and pro-caspase 3 in A549 cells were tested by Western blotting. (B-E) The relative protein expressions were quantified by normalizing to GAPDH. **, P<0.01 compared to control; ##, P<0.01 compared to LINC00152 siRNA. NC, negative control; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Discussion
It has been previously reported that LINC00152 is involved in tumorigenesis (17-19). For example, a study demonstrated that LINC00152 may serve a key role in the progression of colorectal cancer (20). These findings suggested that LINC00152 could act as an oncogene in several types of cancer. In addition, it has been reported that LINC00152 is upregulated in NSCLC, and that LINC00152 could promote lung adenocarcinoma proliferation via interacting with EZH2 and inhibiting IL24 transcription (7,21). The findings of the present study were consistent with these previous results, further verifying that LINC00152 may serve an important role in the tumorigenesis of NSCLC.miRNAs have multiple biological functions (22). The present study revealed that LINC00152 was associated with miR-16-5p. Several previous studies have reported that miR-16-5p is involved in different types of malignant tumors and that it may act as a tumor suppressor (22-24). A previous study demonstrated that miR-16-5p could inhibit NSCLC development (12). In addition, Chen et al. (13) reported that LINC00152 could directly bind with miR-16-5p in glioma. The results of the present study were consistent with those of previous studies. However, another study suggested that LINC00152 may regulate the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via regulating miR-107 (19). This difference may be due to the different tumor type.miRNAs exert their biological functions mainly via regulating the expression of their target mRNAs (9). In the present study, BCL2L2 was revealed to be directly targeted by miR-16-5p. BCL2L2 has been considered to act as an inhibitory factor during the apoptosis of cells, similarly to Bcl-2 (25). Liu et al. (26) confirmed that miR-93 may alleviate the proliferation and induce the apoptosis of trophoblast cells via targeting BCL2L2 in recurrent spontaneous abortion. miR-126-5p has been considered to regulate the tumorigenesis of ovarian cancer via targeting BCL2L2 (27). According to the results of a previous study (13), LINC00152 may promote the tumorigenesis of glioma through sponging miR-16. In addition, BCLCL2 was found to be the direct target of miR-16 in the present study. Therefore, it can be suggested that LINC00152 regulates the expression of BCLCL2 through sponging BCL2L2. However, Yin et al. (28) indicated that PIK3R1 and RAF1 were directly targeted by miR-16-5p. These differences may be attributed to the different types of diseases investigated.Additionally, the present study demonstrated that LINCC00152-silencing may promote the apoptosis of NSCLC cells. Furthermore, LINC00152-silencing significantly increased the protein expression levels of Bax and caspase-3 and downregulated those of Bcl-2. Bax, caspase-3 and Bcl-2 are considered to be key mediators of cell apoptosis in several diseases (2,29,30). Emerging evidence has supported that Bax and caspase-3 are pro-apoptotic proteins (31), while Bcl-2 upregulation inhibits cell apoptosis (32). Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that LINC00152-knockdown induced NSCLC cell apoptosis via upregulating Bax and caspase-3, and downregulating Bcl-2.However, the present study is limited by the fact that the effect of LINC00152 siRNA on NSCLC cell proliferation remains to be further verified. Therefore, further investigations are required in the future.In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that LINC00152-knockdown inhibited the development of NSCLC via regulating the miR-16-5p/BCL2L2 axis, thereby providing novel insight into the treatment of NSCLC.The article’s supplementary files as
Authors: Nima Nalin; Ali Al Dhanhani; Alia AlBawardi; Charu Sharma; Sanjana Chandran; Javed Yasin; Omran Bakoush Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2020-10-05
Authors: Dongmin Kim; Jieun Lee; Jun Kang; Sung Hun Kim; Tae-Kyung Yoo; Sooeun Oh; Ahwon Lee Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 3.588