Literature DB >> 35399127

Tibetan birds lay larger but fewer eggs in a clutch.

Yangyang Guo1, Xin Lu2.   

Abstract

How do offspring size and number vary along elevational gradients? This is a striking but rarely addressed question in life-history evolution. Here we comparatively explore it using phylogenetically paired passerine birds of lowland China vs. the Tibetan plateau spanning an elevational range of 18-4500 m. Toward the Tibetan plateau, egg size increased, clutch size decreased and total clutch volume (= clutch size × egg size) did not change, when accounting for major confounding factors. Larger eggs and smaller clutches can be a response to harsh abiotic conditions at higher elevations and the corresponding reduction in food resources required for raising young, respectively. There was a negative correlation between egg size and clutch size after controlling for elevation effect on either trait, suggesting that the trade-off contributed to the expression of these two traits across elevations, given the lack of an elevational trend in total clutch volume. Tibetan birds had a shorter breeding season, prolonged incubation and nestling period than their lowland counterparts. While fewer clutches over the short breeding season may facilitate the increase in egg size, the concentration of annual reproductive investment did not seem to act on clutch size; despite the smaller clutches, hard environments may impose greater costs of parental care on Tibetan birds. The current research provides insight into the evolution of avian life histories across elevations.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elevation; Life history; Maternal investment; Pairwise comparison; Trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35399127     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05159-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  27 in total

Review 1.  Avian egg size: variation within species and inflexibility within individuals.

Authors:  Julian K Christians
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-02

2.  Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages.

Authors:  Richard M Allen; Yvonne M Buckley; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Maternal investment increases with altitude in a frog on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  W Chen; Z H Tang; X G Fan; Y Wang; D A Pike
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Avian life history variation along altitudinal gradients: an example with cardueline finches.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Elevation and latitude interact to drive life-history variation in precocial birds: a comparative analysis using galliformes.

Authors:  Priya Balasubramaniam; John T Rotenberry
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.091

6.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

7.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--Correlation within subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

8.  Altitudinal life history variation in the dung flies Scathophaga stercoraria and Sepsis cynipsea.

Authors:  W U Blanckenhorn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Evolutionary ecology of egg size and number in a seed beetle: genetic trade-off differs between environments.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Czesak; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Breeding in high-elevation habitat results in shift to slower life-history strategy within a single species.

Authors:  H Bears; K Martin; G C White
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.