| Literature DB >> 35398414 |
Priti Chhanda Ojha1, Swati Sucharita Satpathy2, Akash Kumar Ojha3, Lala Behari Sukla2, Debabrata Pradhan4.
Abstract
Biomedical wastes (BMWs) are potentially infectious to the environment and health. They are co-dependent and accumulative during the ongoing coronavirus disease-2019(COVID-19) pandemic. In India the standard treatment processes of BMWs are incineration, autoclaving, shredding, and deep burial; however, incineration and autoclaving are the leading techniques applied by many treatment providers. These conventional treatment methods have several drawbacks in terms of energy, cost, and emission. But the actual problem for the treatment providers is the huge and non-uniform flow of the BMWs during the pandemic. The existing treatment methods are lacking flexibility for the non-uniform flow. The Government of India has provisionally approved some new techniques like plasma pyrolysis, sharp/needle blaster, and PIWS-3000 technologies on a trial basis. But they are all found to be inadequate in the pandemic. Therefore, there is an absolute requirement to micromanage the BMWs based on certain parameters for the possible COVID-19 like pandemic in the future. Segregation is a major step of the BMW management. Its guideline may be shuffled as segregation at the entry points followed by collection instead of the existing system of the collection followed by segregation. Other steps like transportation, location of treatment facilities, upgradation of the existing treatment facilities, and new technologies can solve the challenges up to a certain extent. Technologies like microwave treatment, alkaline hydrolysis, steam sterilization, biological treatment, catalytic solar disinfection, and nanotechnology have a lot of scopes for the treatment of BMWs. Hi-tech approaches in handling and transportation are found to be fruitful in the initial steps of BMW management. End products of the treated BMWs can be potentially fabricated for the application in the built environment. Some policies need to be re-evaluated by the health care facilities or government administrations for efficient BMW management.Entities:
Keywords: Biomedical wastes; COVID-19 pandemic; Policies; Treatment facilities; Upgrading conventional techniques
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35398414 PMCID: PMC8988481 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 10.753
Fig. 1BMW generated and treated in India from the year 2007 to 2019 in terms of tons per day(TPD). *Data is collected from CPCB website, 2022.
Fig. 2Percentage of BMW treated in India from the year 2007 to 2019. *Data is collected from CPCB website, 2022.
Fig. 3COVID-19 related BMWs generated in India during pandemic in terms of tons per day(TPD). *Data is collected from CPCB website, 2022.
Fig. 4Liquid BMW treatment procedure (Kaushal et al., 2022).
Segregation and treatment methods for BMWs (Behera, 2021; Dehal et al., 2021; Nema et al., 2011).
| BMW Category | Type of Bags/Boxes | Types of BMW | Treatment/ Disposal Techniques |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow | Non-chlorinated plastic or semi plastic | • Human anatomical wastes (human tissues, organs, body parts) | • Plasma pyrolysis |
| Red | Non chlorinated and autoclavable | • Cytotoxic materials | • UV sterilization |
| Blue | Cardboard containers | • Discarded glass and metallic wastes | • Disinfection/Sterilization/Chemical disinfection |
| White | Leak and puncture proof containers | • Waste metallic sharps | • Wet or dry heat sterilization |
| Black | Non-Chlorinated plastic or semi plastic | • Hazardous wastes | • Incineration/destruction and disposal in land fills |
Fig. 5Schematic conventional techniques used for BMW Management.
Fig. 6Possible aspects of BMW management for overcoming challenges due to COVID-19 like pandemic in the future.