| Literature DB >> 35397554 |
Tao Wang1, Fanfei Meng1, Tianle Che1, Jinjin Chen1, Haiyang Zhang1, Yang Ji1, Zhengwei Fan1, Guoping Zhao1, Wenhui Zhang1, Baogui Jiang1, Qiang Xu1, Chenlong Lv1, Taoxing Shi1, Shiman Ruan2, Lanzheng Liu2, Wei Liu3,4, Yang Yang5, Liqun Fang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging mite-borne pathogens and associated disease burdens in recent decades are raising serious public health concerns, yet their distributions and ecology remain under-investigated. We aim to describe the geographical distributions of blood-sucking mites and mite-borne agents and to assess their ecological niches in China.Entities:
Keywords: China; Distribution; Mite; Mite-borne disease; Mite-borne pathogen; Risk determinant
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35397554 PMCID: PMC8994071 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-022-00966-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
The average testing areas-under-curve (AUC) of the BRT models at the county level and model-predicted numbers, areas and population sizes of affected counties for the 21 most prevalent mite species in China
| Mite species | Average AUC (5 ‒95% percentiles) | Predicted/observed (relative difference%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of counties | Area (10,000 km2) | Population size (million) | ||
| 0.78 (0.74, 0.82) | 897/259 (246.3) | 456.8/189.8 (140.7) | 415.6/115.2 (260.8) | |
| 0.78 (0.73, 0.83) | 1,493/200 (646.5) | 295.8/58.0 (410.0) | 744.1/91.3 (715.0) | |
| 0.77 (0.73, 0.82) | 861/188 (358.0) | 208.4/76.4 (172.8) | 451.7/93.9 (381.0) | |
| 0.81 (0.77, 0.87) | 1,046/185 (465.4) | 242.1/67.3 (259.7) | 516.7/91.7 (463.5) | |
| 0.80 (0.73, 0.85) | 703/140 (402.1) | 197.5/65.8 (200.2) | 250.6/46.4 (440.1) | |
| 0.81 (0.76, 0.85) | 745/138 (439.9) | 175.7/43.8 (301.1) | 320.6/64.1 (400.2) | |
| 0.92 (0.88, 0.95) | 534/126 (323.8) | 106.6/32.9 (224.0) | 287.2/68.4 (319.9) | |
| 0.78 (0.72, 0.85) | 495/117 (323.1) | 111.6/37.5 (197.6) | 213.4/47.1 (353.1) | |
| 0.76 (0.69, 0.83) | 598/109 (448.6) | 99.4/26.9 (269.5) | 333.1/62.4 (433.8) | |
| 0.80 (0.72, 0.86) | 393/100 (293.0) | 132.5/57.1 (132.0) | 135.9/31.5 (331.4) | |
| 0.85 (0.81, 0.90) | 263/97 (171.1) | 55.9/20.4 (174.0) | 138.6/52.9 (162.0) | |
| 0.85 (0.78, 0.90) | 402/86 (367.4) | 64.5/18.8 (243.1) | 243.4/43.8 (455.7) | |
| 0.93 (0.89, 0.96) | 349/75 (365.3) | 49.9/13.7 (264.2) | 233.6/58.1 (302.1) | |
| 0.86 (0.77, 0.94) | 389/59 (559.3) | 75.7/14.2 (433.1) | 172.8/23.4 (638.5) | |
| 0.78 (0.67, 0.89) | 420/50 (740.0) | 94.4/14.1 (569.5) | 176.5/23.2 (660.8) | |
| 0.89 (0.81, 0.95) | 169/49 (244.9) | 30.1/11.9 (152.9) | 74.9/23.2 (222.8) | |
| 0.82 (0.70, 0.90) | 238/43 (453.5) | 155.2/50.4 (207.9) | 55.6/12.1 (359.5) | |
| 0.89 (0.82, 0.94) | 140/40 (250.0) | 34.9/11.8 (195.8) | 55.3/16.2 (241.4) | |
| 0.84 (0.75, 0.93) | 384/39 (884.6) | 44.8/8.0 (460.0) | 225.6/25.2 (795.2) | |
| 0.92 (0.85, 0.97) | 148/37 (300.0) | 36.2/10.3 (251.5) | 57.3/12.6 (354.8) | |
| 0.95 (0.90, 0.99) | 62/28 (121.4) | 19.0/9.9 (91.9) | 20.4/8.9 (129.2) | |
The predicted numbers are compared with the actual observations from field surveys and the relative differences (%) are given in parentheses
aTop 5 mite species affecting largest numbers of counties
bTop 5 mite species affecting largest areas
cTop 5 mite species affecting largest population sizes
Fig. 1Mite species richness (circles) at the prefecture level in seven biogeographic zones in the mainland of China from 1978 to 2020. I = Northeast zone, II = North China zone, III = Inner Mongolia-Xinjiang zone, IV = Qinghai-Tibet zone, V = Southwest China zone, VI = Central China zone, VII = South China zone (Additional file 3: Materials and Methods).
Source data are provided in the Additional file 4
Fig. 2Clustering of mite species based on their ecological features and spatial distributions at the county level. The dendrogram in panel A displays the clusters I‒IV of mite species (Additional file 3: Materials and Methods). The features used for clustering are three quantities associated with each predictor in the BRT models. Two of the three quantities were displayed in A to indicate the possible level of ecological suitability: relative contributions (colors in ascending order from yellow to red) and standardized median value of the predictor (numbers in the heatmap) among counties with mite occurrence (numbers 1‒4 indicate the position of this median in reference to the quartiles of this predictor among all counties). B‒E indicate the spatial distribution of the four clusters (clusters I‒IV). The boundaries of the provinces and seven biogeographic zones are shown as black and red lines, respectively.
Source data are provided in Additional file 1
Fig. 3The matrix of mite species and the mite-associated agents in China from 1978 to 2020. The mite species marked in blue and mite-associated agents marked in red were taken into consideration in the BRT models. The colors and numbers of cells indicate the number of relative literatures.
Source data are provided in Additional file 2
Fig. 4The distribution of mite-associated agents detected in mites, human and the reported and model-predicted distribution of O. tsutsugamushi in China. A Locations of hantavirus, SFTSV, Y. pestis, R. felis, R. australis, C. burnetii and unnamed Rickettsia sp. detected in mites at prefecture, city and province levels, locations of SFTSV (2010 ‒2018), Y. pestis (2004 ‒2018) and C. burnetii (2004 ‒2018) detected in human, and reported annual incidence rate of human hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (2004 ‒2018) (Additional file 3: Materials and Methods); B Reported annual incidence rate of human scrub typhus from 2010 to 2018 and locations of O. tsutsugamushi detected from mites, rodents and human; C Spatial distribution of model-predicted probabilities of O. tsutsugamushi presence.
Source data are provided in Additional file 2
BRT-model-estimated mean (standard deviation) relative contributions of major ecoclimatic and environmental factors to the spatial distributions of O. tsutsugamushi
| Category | Variable | |
|---|---|---|
| Ecoclimatic | Total precipitation | 38.60 (5.21) |
| Mean diurnal range | 17.59 (5.23) | |
| Precipitation of driest quarter | 5.33 (1.76) | |
| Temperature seasonality | 4.67 (0.72) | |
| Annual mean temperature | 2.74 (0.70) | |
| Environmental | High coverage grasslands | 3.52 (0.45) |
| Mammalian richness | 3.08 (0.60) | |
| Mite Distribution | 10.25 (0.82) | |
| 5.97 (0.89) | ||
| 4.68 (0.80) | ||
| 3.58 (0.80) | ||
| AUC | Train | 0.943 (0.940‒0.946) |
| Test | 0.923 (0.905‒0.935) | |
| Partial AUC ratio | Train | 1.33 |
| Test | 1.30 |
Mean AUCs (95% percentiles) and partial area AUC ratio (calculated at tolerance level of 0.2) are given
AUC areas-under-curve