Hossein Sharifi1, Charles K Mann1, Ahmed Z Noor2, Amir Nikou1, Connor R Ferguson1, Zhan-Qiu Liu1, Alexus L Rockward1, Faruk Moonschi3, Kenneth S Campbell2,3, Steve W Leung2, Jonathan F Wenk4,5. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, 269 Ralph G. Anderson Building, Lexington, KY, 40506-0503, USA. 2. Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, 269 Ralph G. Anderson Building, Lexington, KY, 40506-0503, USA. jonathan.wenk@uky.edu. 5. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. jonathan.wenk@uky.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mouse models are widely utilized to enhance our understanding of cardiac disease. The goal of this study is to investigate the reproducibility of strain parameters that were measured in mice using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking (CMR42, Canada). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed black-blood CMR datasets from thirteen C57BL/6 B6.SJL-CD45.1 mice (N = 10 female, N = 3 male) that were imaged previously. The circumferential, longitudinal, and radial (Ecc, Ell, and Err, respectively) parameters of strain were measured in the mid-ventricular region of the left ventricle. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were assessed for both the end-systolic (ES) and peak strain. RESULTS: The ES strain had larger intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values when compared to peak strain, for both the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility studies. Specifically, the intraobserver study showed excellent reproducibility for all three ES strain parameters, namely, Ecc (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-0.98), Ell (ICC 0.90, 95% CI 0.59-0.97), and Err (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). This was also the case for the interobserver study, namely, Ecc (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.60-0.98), Ell (ICC 0.76, 95% CI 0.33-0.93), and Err (ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-0.98). Additionally, the coefficient of variation values were all < 10%. CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study showed excellent reproducibility for all ES strain parameters, with good to excellent reproducibility for the peak strain parameters. Moreover, all ES strain parameters had larger ICC values than the peak strain. In general, these results imply that feature-tracking with CMR42 software and black-blood cine images can be reliably used to assess strain patterns in mice.
PURPOSE: Mouse models are widely utilized to enhance our understanding of cardiac disease. The goal of this study is to investigate the reproducibility of strain parameters that were measured in mice using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking (CMR42, Canada). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed black-blood CMR datasets from thirteen C57BL/6 B6.SJL-CD45.1 mice (N = 10 female, N = 3 male) that were imaged previously. The circumferential, longitudinal, and radial (Ecc, Ell, and Err, respectively) parameters of strain were measured in the mid-ventricular region of the left ventricle. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were assessed for both the end-systolic (ES) and peak strain. RESULTS: The ES strain had larger intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values when compared to peak strain, for both the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility studies. Specifically, the intraobserver study showed excellent reproducibility for all three ES strain parameters, namely, Ecc (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-0.98), Ell (ICC 0.90, 95% CI 0.59-0.97), and Err (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). This was also the case for the interobserver study, namely, Ecc (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.60-0.98), Ell (ICC 0.76, 95% CI 0.33-0.93), and Err (ICC 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-0.98). Additionally, the coefficient of variation values were all < 10%. CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study showed excellent reproducibility for all ES strain parameters, with good to excellent reproducibility for the peak strain parameters. Moreover, all ES strain parameters had larger ICC values than the peak strain. In general, these results imply that feature-tracking with CMR42 software and black-blood cine images can be reliably used to assess strain patterns in mice.
Authors: Alistair A Young; Brent A French; Zequan Yang; Brett R Cowan; Wesley D Gilson; Stuart S Berr; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Stuart S Berr; Rene Jack Roy; Brent A French; Zequan Yang; Wesley Gilson; Christopher M Kramer; Frederick H Epstein Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Steve W Leung; Theresa M Ratajczak; Mohamed Abo-Aly; Elica Shokri; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Jonathan F Wenk Journal: J Biomech Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Jose Gavara; Jose F Rodriguez-Palomares; Filipa Valente; Jose V Monmeneu; Maria P Lopez-Lereu; Clara Bonanad; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; Bruno Garcia Del Blanco; Julian Rodriguez-Garcia; Maria Mutuberria; Elena de Dios; Cesar Rios-Navarro; Nerea Perez-Sole; Paolo Racugno; Ana Paya; Gema Minana; Joaquim Canoves; Mauricio Pellicer; Francisco J Lopez-Fornas; Jose Barrabes; Arturo Evangelista; Julio Nunez; Francisco J Chorro; David Garcia-Dorado; Vicente Bodi Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-12-13
Authors: Steve W Leung; Richard J Charnigo; Theresa Ratajczak; Mohamed Abo-Aly; Elica Shokri; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Jonathan F Wenk Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tomas Lapinskas; Sebastian Kelle; Jana Grune; Anna Foryst-Ludwig; Heike Meyborg; Sarah Jeuthe; Ernst Wellnhofer; Ahmed Elsanhoury; Burkert Pieske; Rolf Gebker; Ulrich Kintscher; Philipp Stawowy Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Christopher M Haggerty; Sage P Kramer; Cassi M Binkley; David K Powell; Andrea C Mattingly; Richard Charnigo; Frederick H Epstein; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 5.364