Brenda van den Broek1, Sophie Rijnen2, Annemarie Stiekema3, Caroline van Heugten4, Boudewijn Bus2. 1. Multidisciplinary Specialist Centre for Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: B.Broekvanden@ggzoostbrabant.nl. 2. Multidisciplinary Specialist Centre for Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. 3. School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. 4. School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The latest literature review on partner relationships after traumatic brain injury (TBI), conducted a decade ago, discussed solely quantitative work and noted significant knowledge gaps. The current review updates and expands on this work by providing an overview of the current state of knowledge on factors related to relationship quality and stability after TBI. DATA SOURCES: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Embase, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, APA PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched on April 23, 2020, for literature on factors associated with (1) relationship quality; and (2) relationship stability after TBI. STUDY SELECTION: English quantitative and qualitative studies investigating factors associated with relationship quality and/or stability after TBI were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility. If consensus was not reached, a third reviewer's conclusion was decisive. Forty-three studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Information regarding study objectives and characteristics, participant demographics, independent and dependent variables, and main findings was extracted. Study quality was rated using the JBI Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and/or the CASP Checklist for Qualitative Research. Both were performed by the lead reviewer and checked by the second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-eight factors related to relationship quality and/or stability were identified, covering injury characteristics (eg, severity), body functions (eg, personality changes), activities (eg, communication), participation (eg, social dependence), environment (eg, children), and personal factors (eg, coping strategies). CONCLUSIONS: Relationship quality and stability after TBI are related to a multitude of factors, including newly identified factors such as personality changes and dependence. Future research may wish to quantitatively investigate factors thus far only identified in qualitative research, explore possible positive effects of TBI on relationships, study the experiences of same-sex couples, and include the perspectives of both partners with and without the injury.
OBJECTIVE: The latest literature review on partner relationships after traumatic brain injury (TBI), conducted a decade ago, discussed solely quantitative work and noted significant knowledge gaps. The current review updates and expands on this work by providing an overview of the current state of knowledge on factors related to relationship quality and stability after TBI. DATA SOURCES: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Embase, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, APA PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched on April 23, 2020, for literature on factors associated with (1) relationship quality; and (2) relationship stability after TBI. STUDY SELECTION: English quantitative and qualitative studies investigating factors associated with relationship quality and/or stability after TBI were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility. If consensus was not reached, a third reviewer's conclusion was decisive. Forty-three studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Information regarding study objectives and characteristics, participant demographics, independent and dependent variables, and main findings was extracted. Study quality was rated using the JBI Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and/or the CASP Checklist for Qualitative Research. Both were performed by the lead reviewer and checked by the second reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-eight factors related to relationship quality and/or stability were identified, covering injury characteristics (eg, severity), body functions (eg, personality changes), activities (eg, communication), participation (eg, social dependence), environment (eg, children), and personal factors (eg, coping strategies). CONCLUSIONS: Relationship quality and stability after TBI are related to a multitude of factors, including newly identified factors such as personality changes and dependence. Future research may wish to quantitatively investigate factors thus far only identified in qualitative research, explore possible positive effects of TBI on relationships, study the experiences of same-sex couples, and include the perspectives of both partners with and without the injury.