Literature DB >> 35395084

Autoclaving time-related reduction in metabolizable energy of poultry meal is greater in growing pigs compared with broiler chickens.

Jung Yeol Sung1, Markus K Wiltafsky-Martin2, J Caroline González-Vega2, Olayiwola Adeola1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the energy utilization responses of growing pigs and broiler chickens to poultry meal that was autoclaved at 134 °C for 0 to 180 min. Poultry meal from the same batch was autoclaved at 134 °C for 7 autoclaving times of 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, or 180 min to generate 7 samples. Eight experimental diets consisting of a basal diet based on corn and soybean meal, and seven test diets in which 15% of energy-contributing ingredients in the basal diet were replaced with each of the seven poultry meal samples were used. In experiment 1, there were 64 barrows (initial body weight = 19.4 ± 1.0 kg) allotted to 8 experimental diets in a randomized complete block design with body weight as a blocking factor. Each pig received an experimental diet during 5 d of adaptation followed by 5 d of quantitative total, but separate, collection of urine and feces. In experiment 2, a total of 512 male broiler chickens at day 17 post-hatching (initial body weight = 660 ± 80 g) in 8 replicate cages were allotted to 8 experimental diets in a randomized complete block design with body weight as a blocking factor. Excreta were collected from days 20 to 22 post-hatching, and birds were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation for ileal digesta collection. Data from experiments 1 and 2 were pooled together for statistical analysis as a 2 × 7 factorial treatment arrangement with the effect of species (pigs or broiler chickens) and autoclaving time of poultry meal (7 autoclaving times between 0 and 180 min). An interaction between species and their linear effect of autoclaving time was observed (P < 0.05) in metabolizable energy (ME) of poultry meal. Specifically, linear decrease in ME values in poultry meal with increasing autoclaving time was greater (P < 0.05) in growing pigs (4,792 to 3,897 kcal/kg dry matter) compared with broiler chickens (3,591 to 3,306 kcal/kg dry matter). The ME value of unautoclaved poultry meal was greater (P < 0.01) for pigs than broiler chickens at 4,792 vs. 3,591 kcal/kg dry matter. Although decrease in ME values with autoclaving time of poultry meal was greater in growing pigs than in broiler chickens, the ME in autoclaved poultry meal fed to pigs was greater than ME in non-autoclaved poultry meal fed to broiler chickens. Furthermore, the ratio of cysteine to crude protein concentration is a potential indicator for estimating the ratio of ME to gross energy in poultry meal for growing pigs (r2 = 0.81) and broiler chickens (r2 = 0.84).
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autoclaving; broiler; energy; poultry meal; swine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35395084      PMCID: PMC9126198          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  32 in total

1.  Effect of pressure processing on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal for poultry.

Authors:  R B Shirley; C M Parsons
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Maillard reaction and protein cross-linking in relation to the solubility of milk powders.

Authors:  Thao T Le; Bhesh Bhandari; John W Holland; Hilton C Deeth
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Rate of food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat.

Authors:  G G Mateos; J L Sell; J A Eastwood
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Digestibility index marker type, but not inclusion level affects apparent digestibility of energy and nitrogen and marker recovery in growing pigs regardless of added oat bran.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Energy values of solvent-extracted canola meal and expeller-derived canola meal for broiler chickens and growing pigs determined using the regression method1.

Authors:  Ruqing Zhong; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The effects of poultry meal source and ash level on nursery pig performance.

Authors:  T P Keegan; J M DeRouchey; J L Nelssen; M D Tokach; R D Goodband; S S Dritz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of Heat-oxidized Soy Protein Isolate on Growth Performance and Digestive Function of Broiler Chickens at Early Age.

Authors:  X Chen; Y P Chen; D W Wu; C Wen; Y M Zhou
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients.

Authors:  J Y Ahn; D Y Kil; C Kong; B G Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Feeding oxidized chicken byproduct meal impacts digestibility more than performance and oxidative status in nursery pigs.

Authors:  Carl A Frame; Elisabeth Huff-Lonergan; Brian J Kerr; Mariana Rossoni Serao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Impact of dietary oxidized protein on oxidative status and performance in growing pigs.

Authors:  Carl A Frame; Erika Johnson; Logan Kilburn; Elisabeth Huff-Lonergan; Brian J Kerr; Mariana Rossoni Serao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.