Literature DB >> 35395057

Solving large break minimization problems in a mirrored double round-robin tournament using quantum annealing.

Michiya Kuramata1, Ryota Katsuki2, Kazuhide Nakata1.   

Abstract

Quantum annealing has gained considerable attention because it can be applied to combinatorial optimization problems, which have numerous applications in logistics, scheduling, and finance. In recent years, with the technical development of quantum annealers, research on solving practical combinatorial optimization problems using them has accelerated. However, researchers struggle to find practical combinatorial optimization problems, for which quantum annealers outperform mathematical optimization solvers. Moreover, there are only a few studies that compare the performance of quantum annealers with the state-of-the-art solvers, such as Gurobi and CPLEX. This study determines that quantum annealing demonstrates better performance than the solvers in that the solvers take longer to reach the objective function value of the solution obtained by the quantum annealers for the break minimization problem in a mirrored double round-robin tournament. We also explain the desirable performance of quantum annealing for the sparse interaction between variables and a problem without constraints. In this process, we demonstrate that this problem can be expressed as a 4-regular graph. Through computational experiments, we solve this problem using our quantum annealing approach and two-integer programming approaches, which were performed using the latest quantum annealer D-Wave Advantage, and Gurobi, respectively. Further, we compare the quality of the solutions and the computational time. Quantum annealing was able to determine the exact solution in 0.05 seconds for problems with 20 teams, which is a practical size. In the case of 36 teams, it took 84.8 s for the integer programming method to reach the objective function value, which was obtained by the quantum annealer in 0.05 s. These results not only present the break minimization problem in a mirrored double round-robin tournament as an example of applying quantum annealing to practical optimization problems, but also contribute to find problems that can be effectively solved by quantum annealing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35395057      PMCID: PMC8993026          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nonnegative/Binary matrix factorization with a D-Wave quantum annealer.

Authors:  Daniel O'Malley; Velimir V Vesselinov; Boian S Alexandrov; Ludmil B Alexandrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Experimental investigation of performance differences between coherent Ising machines and a quantum annealer.

Authors:  Ryan Hamerly; Takahiro Inagaki; Peter L McMahon; Davide Venturelli; Alireza Marandi; Tatsuhiro Onodera; Edwin Ng; Carsten Langrock; Kensuke Inaba; Toshimori Honjo; Koji Enbutsu; Takeshi Umeki; Ryoichi Kasahara; Shoko Utsunomiya; Satoshi Kako; Ken-Ichi Kawarabayashi; Robert L Byer; Martin M Fejer; Hideo Mabuchi; Dirk Englund; Eleanor Rieffel; Hiroki Takesue; Yoshihisa Yamamoto
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Detecting multiple communities using quantum annealing on the D-Wave system.

Authors:  Christian F A Negre; Hayato Ushijima-Mwesigwa; Susan M Mniszewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Traffic signal optimization on a square lattice with quantum annealing.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Akihisa Okada; Tadayoshi Matsumori; Kazuyuki Aihara; Hiroaki Yoshida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.