Literature DB >> 35394598

Comparing the Efficiency of Online and Field-Based Outreach for the Recruitment of Black and Latino Sexual Minority Men into an HIV Prevention Implementation Trial.

Jesse Bradford-Rogers1, Jonathan Lopez-Matos1,2, Demetria Cain1, David Lopez3, Tyrel J Starks4,5.   

Abstract

Rates of HIV diagnoses among young Black and Latino sexual minority men (SMM) have continued to increase since 2011; meanwhile, overall rates in the USA have decreased. Despite their importance, academic and medical institutions have often struggled to engage and recruit racial and ethnic minority SMM in HIV prevention services and research. The current study compares the success of two strategies for recruiting racial and ethnic minority SMM. Recruitment occurred in the context of a larger implementation study testing the effectiveness of a substance use and HIV prevention intervention among SMM at high risk for HIV infection. SMM (n = 778) were reached through either (1) field-based outreach conducted by two local community-based organizations (CBOs) delivering the intervention or (2) online recruitment coordinated by the trial's academic research partner. Field-based recruitment reached a significantly larger proportion of Black (42.9% vs. 18.2% reached online) and Latino individuals (40.3% vs. 28.1% reached online). Although online recruitment reached a greater proportion of SMM who met trial eligibility criteria (58.4% vs. 35.3% for field-based outreach; χ2(1) = 38.471, p < .001), a greater proportion of eligible participants identified through field-based outreach actually enrolled into the study trial (30.9% vs. 18.8% for online recruitment; χ2(1) = 7.82, p < .01). As a result, field-based recruitment required fewer recruitment staff hours (2.62 per enrolled participant) than online recruitment (3.46 recruitment staff hours per enrolled participant). Findings illustrate the potential for field-based, CBO-executed recruitment to reach Black and Latino SMM and for CBOs to successfully enroll those identified as eligible. Future prevention and implementation research should routinely engage community partners in the development of study recruitment strategies in a manner that can inform outreach and marketing efforts for HIV prevention research and prevention. Clinicaltrials.gov = NCT03488914.
© 2022. Society for Prevention Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community-based; HIV prevention; Racial/ethnic minority; Recruitment; Sexual minority men

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35394598     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01367-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  5 in total

1.  Finding and recruiting the highest risk HIV-negative men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Andrea C Vial; Tyrel J Starks; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2014-02

2.  Culturally Competent Strategies for Recruitment and Retention of African American Populations into Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jane Otado; John Kwagyan; Diana Edwards; Alice Ukaegbu; Faun Rockcliffe; Nana Osafo
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Going social: Success in online recruitment of men who have sex with men for prevention HIV vaccine research.

Authors:  Lindsey Buckingham; Julie Becher; Chelsea D Voytek; Danielle Fiore; Debora Dunbar; Annet Davis-Vogel; David S Metzger; Ian Frank
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Recruiting drug using men who have sex with men in behavioral intervention trials: a comparison of internet and field-based strategies.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Parsons; Andrea C Vial; Tyrel J Starks; Sarit A Golub
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-02

5.  Comparative Analysis of Recruitment Strategies in a Study of Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Bradley E Iott; Tiffany C Veinot; Jimena Loveluck; Erin Kahle; Leon Golson; Akilah Benton
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2018-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.