S T Ruiz1, R V Bakklund1, A K Håberg2,3, E M Berntsen4,3. 1. From the Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging (S.T.R., R.V.B., E.M.B.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2. Neuromedicine and Movement Sciences (A.K.H.), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.K.H., E.M.B.), St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 4. From the Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging (S.T.R., R.V.B., E.M.B.), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences erik.berntsen@ntnu.no.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Imaging biomarkers derived from different brainstem structures are suggested to differentiate among parkinsonian disorders, but clinical implementation requires normative data. The main objective was to establish high-quality, sex-specific data for relevant brainstem structures derived from MR imaging in healthy subjects from the general population in their sixth and seventh decades of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D T1WI acquired on the same 1.5T scanner of 996 individuals (527 women) between 50 and 66 years of age from a prospective population study was used. The area of the midbrain and pons and the widths of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles were measured, from which the midbrain-to-pons ratio and Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index [MRPI = (Pons Area / Midbrain Area) × (Middle Cerebellar Peduncles / Superior Cerebellar Peduncles)] were calculated. Sex differences in brainstem measures and correlations to age, height, weight, and body mass index were investigated. RESULTS: Inter- and intrareliability for measuring the different brainstem structures showed good-to-excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.785-0.988). There were significant sex differences for the pons area, width of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles, midbrain-to-pons ratio, and MRPI (all, P < .001; Cohen D = 0.44-0.98), but not for the midbrain area (P = .985). There were significant very weak-to-weak correlations between several of the brainstem measures and age, height, weight, and body mass index in both sexes. However, no systematic difference in distribution caused by these variables was found, and because age had the highest and most consistent correlations, age-/sex-specific percentiles for the brainstem measures were created. CONCLUSIONS: We present high-quality, sex-specific data and age-/sex-specific percentiles for the mentioned brainstem measures. These normative data can be implemented in the neuroradiologic work-up of patients with suspected brainstem atrophy to avoid the risk of misdiagnosis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Imaging biomarkers derived from different brainstem structures are suggested to differentiate among parkinsonian disorders, but clinical implementation requires normative data. The main objective was to establish high-quality, sex-specific data for relevant brainstem structures derived from MR imaging in healthy subjects from the general population in their sixth and seventh decades of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D T1WI acquired on the same 1.5T scanner of 996 individuals (527 women) between 50 and 66 years of age from a prospective population study was used. The area of the midbrain and pons and the widths of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles were measured, from which the midbrain-to-pons ratio and Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index [MRPI = (Pons Area / Midbrain Area) × (Middle Cerebellar Peduncles / Superior Cerebellar Peduncles)] were calculated. Sex differences in brainstem measures and correlations to age, height, weight, and body mass index were investigated. RESULTS: Inter- and intrareliability for measuring the different brainstem structures showed good-to-excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.785-0.988). There were significant sex differences for the pons area, width of the middle cerebellar peduncles and superior cerebellar peduncles, midbrain-to-pons ratio, and MRPI (all, P < .001; Cohen D = 0.44-0.98), but not for the midbrain area (P = .985). There were significant very weak-to-weak correlations between several of the brainstem measures and age, height, weight, and body mass index in both sexes. However, no systematic difference in distribution caused by these variables was found, and because age had the highest and most consistent correlations, age-/sex-specific percentiles for the brainstem measures were created. CONCLUSIONS: We present high-quality, sex-specific data and age-/sex-specific percentiles for the mentioned brainstem measures. These normative data can be implemented in the neuroradiologic work-up of patients with suspected brainstem atrophy to avoid the risk of misdiagnosis.
Authors: Leona Möller; Jan Kassubek; Martin Südmeyer; Rüdiger Hilker; Elke Hattingen; Karl Egger; Florian Amtage; Elmar H Pinkhardt; Gesine Respondek; Maria Stamelou; Franz Möller; Alfons Schnitzler; Wolfgang H Oertel; Susanne Knake; Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Günter U Höglinger Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett Journal: Neuroimaging Clin N Am Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Leona Möller; Martin Südmeyer; Rüdiger Hilker; Elke Hattingen; Karl Egger; Florian Amtage; Gesine Respondek; Maria Stamelou; Alfons Schnitzler; Elmar H Pinkhardt; Wolfgang H Oertel; Susanne Knake; Jan Kassubek; Günter U Höglinger Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: S Gilman; G K Wenning; P A Low; D J Brooks; C J Mathias; J Q Trojanowski; N W Wood; C Colosimo; A Dürr; C J Fowler; H Kaufmann; T Klockgether; A Lees; W Poewe; N Quinn; T Revesz; D Robertson; P Sandroni; K Seppi; M Vidailhet Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Günter U Höglinger; Gesine Respondek; Maria Stamelou; Carolin Kurz; Keith A Josephs; Anthony E Lang; Brit Mollenhauer; Ulrich Müller; Christer Nilsson; Jennifer L Whitwell; Thomas Arzberger; Elisabet Englund; Ellen Gelpi; Armin Giese; David J Irwin; Wassilios G Meissner; Alexander Pantelyat; Alex Rajput; John C van Swieten; Claire Troakes; Angelo Antonini; Kailash P Bhatia; Yvette Bordelon; Yaroslau Compta; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Carlo Colosimo; Dennis W Dickson; Richard Dodel; Leslie Ferguson; Murray Grossman; Jan Kassubek; Florian Krismer; Johannes Levin; Stefan Lorenzl; Huw R Morris; Peter Nestor; Wolfgang H Oertel; Werner Poewe; Gil Rabinovici; James B Rowe; Gerard D Schellenberg; Klaus Seppi; Thilo van Eimeren; Gregor K Wenning; Adam L Boxer; Lawrence I Golbe; Irene Litvan Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2017-05-03 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Andrea Quattrone; Maurizio Morelli; Maria G Bianco; Jolanda Buonocore; Alessia Sarica; Maria Eugenia Caligiuri; Federica Aracri; Camilla Calomino; Marida De Maria; Maria Grazia Vaccaro; Vera Gramigna; Antonio Augimeri; Basilio Vescio; Aldo Quattrone Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-07-20