| Literature DB >> 35392831 |
Zi Zhou1, Wei Zhang2, Ya Fang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited research has examined the role that famine exposure plays in adulthood stroke risk. We aim to explore the causal implications of early exposure to the Great Chinese Famine on stroke risk and determine whether these associations were mediated by cognitive function, and depression.Entities:
Keywords: Famine exposure; Marginal structural models; Mediating analysis; Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392831 PMCID: PMC8988351 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02990-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Fig. 1Hypothetical Relationship among Famine Exposure, Cognitive Function and Depression, Stroke Incidence, and Confounders in CHARLS, 2011–2015
Baseline Characteristics of Participants by Life Stage at the Time of Famine Exposure in CHARLS
| Unexposed 1963–1966 ( | Fetally exposed 1959–1962 ( | Childhood-exposed 1949–1958 ( | Adolescence/adulthood-exposed 1921–1948 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childhood economic status | 0.153 | ||||
| Good | 192 (9.76) | 150 (9.52) | 416 (8.11) | 359 (8.95) | |
| Fair | 1021 (51.88) | 818 (51.94) | 2616 (51.00) | 2047 (51.06) | |
| Poor | 755 (38.36) | 607 (38.54) | 2097 (40.89) | 1603 (39.99) | |
| Childhood health status | 0.248 | ||||
| Good | 678 (34.45) | 565 (35.87) | 1815 (35.39) | 1372 (34.22) | |
| Fair | 1041 (52.90) | 831 (52.76) | 2619 (51.06) | 2118 (52.83) | |
| Poor | 249 (12.65) | 179 (11.37) | 695 (13.55) | 519 (12.95) | |
| Age in 2011a | 46.76 (1.07) | 50.29 (1.17) | 57.54 (2.76) | 69.84 (5.75) | < 0.001 |
| Male | 840 (42.68) | 723 (45.90) | 2505 (48.84) | 2004 (49.99) | < 0.001 |
| Rural residence | 1221 (62.04) | 997 (63.30) | 3335 (65.02) | 2597 (64.78) | 0.085 |
| Married | 1912 (97.15) | 1489 (94.54) | 4744 (92.49) | 3083 (76.90) | < 0.001 |
| Ethnic Han | 1823 (92.63) | 1430 (90.79) | 4720 (92.03) | 3746 (93.44) | 0.004 |
| Education | < 0.001 | ||||
| Less than primary school | 462 (23.48) | 432 (27.43) | 2620 (51.08) | 2330 (58.12) | |
| Primary school or above | 1506 (76.52) | 1143 (72.57) | 2509 (48.92) | 1679 (41.88) | |
| Exposed to severe famine | 792 (40.24) | 579 (36.76) | 2078 (40.51) | 1662 (41.46) | 0.015 |
| Income (Chinese yuan)a | 30,687.19 (41,771.75) | 29,800.58 (48,565.44) | 25,778.89 (38,968.84) | 21,525.62 (36,813.99) | < 0.001 |
| Smoking status | < 0.001 | ||||
| Nonsmoker | 1308 (66.46) | 984 (62.48) | 2996 (58.41) | 2333 (58.19) | |
| Former smoker | 168 (8.54) | 133 (8.44) | 554 (10.80) | 500 (12.47) | |
| Current smoker | 492 (25.00) | 458 (29.08) | 1579 (30.79) | 1176 (29.33) | |
| Drinking status | < 0.001 | ||||
| Nondrinker | 1195 (60.72) | 920 (58.41) | 2956 (57.63) | 2348 (58.57) | |
| Former drinker | 85 (4.32) | 82 (5.21) | 379 (7.39) | 463 (11.55) | |
| Current drinker | 688 (34.96) | 573 (36.38) | 1794 (34.98) | 1198 (29.88) | |
| Overweight | 974 (49.49) | 762 (48.38) | 2119 (41.31) | 1374 (34.27) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 275 (13.97) | 287 (18.22) | 1138 (22.19) | 1223 (30.51) | < 0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia | 127 (6.45) | 138 (8.76) | 459 (8.95) | 385 (9.60) | 0.001 |
| Diabetes | 60 (3.05) | 81 (5.14) | 290 (5.65) | 238 (5.94) | < 0.001 |
| Stroke | 21 (1.07) | 26 (1.65) | 75 (1.46) | 124 (3.09) | < 0.001 |
| Depression | 404 (20.53) | 384 (24.38) | 1411 (27.51) | 1319 (32.90) | < 0.001 |
| Cognitive function a | 13.15 (2.92) | 12.67 (3.11) | 11.85 (3.27) | 10.73 (3.46) | < 0.001 |
a The mean (standard deviation) was used to present the continuous variables
Estimates of the Direct and Indirect effects of Famine Exposure on Stroke in CHARLS, 2011–2015
| Mediators | Fetally exposed vs Unexposed | Childhood-exposed vs Unexposed | Adolescence/adulthood-exposed vs Unexposed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% CI | 95% CI | 95% CI | ||||
| Cognitive function (M1) a | ||||||
| NDE | 0.75* | 0.20, 1.57 | 0.64* | 0.23, 1.29 | 1.50* | 1.24, 2.16 |
| NIE | 0.02* | 0.01, 0.04 | 0.06* | 0.01, 0.10 | 0.11* | 0.01, 0.20 |
| Cognitive function (M1) and depression (M2) b | ||||||
| NDE | 0.76* | 0.26, 1.60 | 0.58* | 0.02, 1.20 | 1.45* | 1.00, 2.16 |
| NIE through M1 | 0.02* | 0.01, 0.05 | 0.05* | 0.02, 0.11 | 0.11* | 0.04, 0.21 |
| NIE through M2 | 0.12 | −0.03, 0.32 | 0.28* | 0.13, 0.51 | 0.44* | 0.22, 0.70 |
CI confidence interval, NDE natural direct effects, NIE natural indirect effects
a Stabilized weights accounted for age, sex, ethnicity, type of residence, childhood economic/health status, marital status, educational level, income, smoking, drinking, body mass index, depression, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes
b Stabilized weights accounted for age, sex, ethnicity, type of residence, childhood economic/health status, marital status, educational level, income, smoking, drinking, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes
*p < .05
Percentages of the Association between Early-life Famine Exposure and Incident Adult Stroke Mediated by Cognitive Function and Depression in Adulthood in CHARLS, 2011–2015
| Mediators | Proportion of the natural indirect effect explained a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetally exposed | Childhood-exposed | Adolescence/adulthood-exposed | ||||
| % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | % | 95% CI | |
| Cognitive function (M1) b | 2.43* | 0.65, 5.67 | 6.00* | 2.05, 16.91 | 5.42* | 1.80, 10.15 |
| Depression (M2) c | 12.96 | −3.37, 45.16 | 30.36* | 9.87, 87.44 | 22.13* | 10.00, 35.60 |
| M1 + M2d | 15.38 | −0.85, 48.75 | 36.35* | 14.19, 96.19 | 27.55* | 14.92, 40.02 |
CI confidence interval
a Calculated as [natural indirect effect/(natural direct effect + natural indirect effect)]*100%
b Stabilized weights accounted for age, sex, ethnicity, type of residence, childhood economic/health status, marital status, educational level, income, smoking, drinking, body mass index, depression, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes
c Stabilized weights accounted for age, sex, ethnicity, type of residence, childhood economic/health status, marital status, educational level, income, smoking, drinking, body mass index, cognitive function, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes
d Stabilized weights accounted for age, sex, ethnicity, type of residence, childhood economic/health status, marital status, educational level, income, smoking, drinking, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes
*p < .05
Fig. 2Joint Analysis of Famine Exposure and Famine Severity in Relation to the Stroke Risk in CHARLS, 2011–2015