Atefeh Shafaat1,2, Rokas Žalnėravičius3, Dalius Ratautas4,5, Marius Dagys4, Rolandas Meškys4, Rasa Rutkienė4, Juan Francisco Gonzalez-Martinez1,2, Jessica Neilands6, Sebastian Björklund1,2, Javier Sotres1,2, Tautgirdas Ruzgas1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö 205 06, Sweden. 2. Biofilms-Research Center for Biointerfaces, Malmö University, Malmö 205 06, Sweden. 3. State Research Institute, Centre for Physical Sciences and Technology, Saulėtekio av. 3, Vilnius LT-10257, Lithuania. 4. Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania. 5. Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania. 6. Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö 205 06, Sweden.
Abstract
To maximize the potential of 5G infrastructure in healthcare, simple integration of biosensors with wireless tag antennas would be beneficial. This work introduces novel glucose-to-resistor transduction, which enables simple, wireless biosensor design. The biosensor was realized on a near-field communication tag antenna, where a sensing bioanode generated electrical current and electroreduced a nonconducting antenna material into an excellent conductor. For this, a part of the antenna was replaced by a Ag nanoparticle layer oxidized to high-resistance AgCl. The bioanode was based on Au nanoparticle-wired glucose dehydrogenase (GDH). The exposure of the cathode-bioanode to glucose solution resulted in GDH-catalyzed oxidation of glucose at the bioanode with a concomitant reduction of AgCl to highly conducting Ag on the cathode. The AgCl-to-Ag conversion strongly affected the impedance of the antenna circuit, allowing wireless detection of glucose. Mimicking the final application, the proposed wireless biosensor was ultimately evaluated through the measurement of glucose in whole blood, showing good agreement with the values obtained with a commercially available glucometer. This work, for the first time, demonstrates that making a part of the antenna from the AgCl layer allows achieving simple, chip-less, and battery-less wireless sensing of enzyme-catalyzed reduction reaction.
To maximize the potential of 5G infrastructure in healthcare, simple integration of biosensors with wireless tag antennas would be beneficial. This work introduces novel glucose-to-resistor transduction, which enables simple, wireless biosensor design. The biosensor was realized on a near-field communication tag antenna, where a sensing bioanode generated electrical current and electroreduced a nonconducting antenna material into an excellent conductor. For this, a part of the antenna was replaced by a Ag nanoparticle layer oxidized to high-resistance AgCl. The bioanode was based on Au nanoparticle-wired glucose dehydrogenase (GDH). The exposure of the cathode-bioanode to glucose solution resulted in GDH-catalyzed oxidation of glucose at the bioanode with a concomitant reduction of AgCl to highly conducting Ag on the cathode. The AgCl-to-Ag conversion strongly affected the impedance of the antenna circuit, allowing wireless detection of glucose. Mimicking the final application, the proposed wireless biosensor was ultimately evaluated through the measurement of glucose in whole blood, showing good agreement with the values obtained with a commercially available glucometer. This work, for the first time, demonstrates that making a part of the antenna from the AgCl layer allows achieving simple, chip-less, and battery-less wireless sensing of enzyme-catalyzed reduction reaction.
Entities:
Keywords:
Internet of Things; chip-less wireless sensing; direct electron transfer; glucose dehydrogenase; wireless detection of glucose
Development
of wireless sensors
and biosensors is intensive, and a high number of efforts are devoted
to demonstrate their application as non-invasive wearables,[1,2] implants,[3] and highly mobile point-of-care
devices.[4] Integration of wireless biosensors
into the Internet of Things (IoT), together with artificial intelligence
(AI) analytics and unprecedented connectivity via the 5G infrastructure,
is broadly recognized as a life-changing technical evolution.[5] To adhere to this wireless monitoring evolution,
biosensor developments exploit nanotechnologies for making smaller
biosensor electrodes and miniaturized, chip-based potentiostats, which
are then integrated with passive or active wireless communication
techniques, such as Bluetooth, ZigBee, radio-frequency identification
(RFID), and near-field communication (NFC).[6,7] These
wireless biosensor configurations require batteries and chips, which
need to be reused or recycled, thus limiting a broad application of
biosensors in IoT.[8] Massive biosensor application
in IoT would strongly benefit from biosensors operating in passive,
chip-less, and battery-less modes. However, the availability of such
wireless designs is still limited.[9] In
this work, we, for the first time, demonstrate that making a part
of an antenna comprised of a AgCl layer allows achieving simple, chip-less,
and battery-less wireless sensing of enzyme-catalyzed reduction reaction.
We exemplify the mechanism and operation of the design by wireless
detection of glucose.The development of battery-less, or self-powered,
biosensors has
greatly benefitted from research on biofuel cells (BFCs).[10−12] The concepts of BFCs can be adopted to perform biosensing and other
bioelectronic functions.[13] In this case,
the bioanode or the biocathode of the BFC works as a sensing electrode,
while the second BFC electrode serves as an electron collector or
electron provider.[14] Since BFCs generate
low electrical power in the range of a few hundred μW, they
are often combined with capacitive charging/discharging to power wireless
communication.[15,16] More simple electrical circuits
have been proposed, which combine self-powered measurements and wireless
signal transfer by original bioradiotransmitter design.[17] Attempts are also made to develop chip-less
biosensor tags.[18,19] In these biosensors, specific
transduction reactions modulate capacitive or resistive characteristics
of the sensor material, which is intimately coupled to the tag antenna.[20−26] To the best of our knowledge, wireless sensing based on biological
AgCl reduction to Ag, as described in this work, has not been demonstrated.Novel wireless biosensor concepts are often studied in a format
of proof-of-concept glucose biosensors. Approximately one-third of
academic publications in the field of wireless sensing have been focused
on healthcare, where developments of wireless glucose biosensors account
for a considerable share.[7] This is fueled
by the estimate that diabetes will cause a drop in GDP (gross domestic
product) for OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development)
countries in order of 490 billion US$ by 2030.[27] Thus, convenient, simple, and inexpensive wireless glucose
biosensors have an undisputed and growing demand. Currently, the majority
of wireless glucose biosensors are based on small wireless potentiostats,[28−33] including the well-established and clinically viable continuous
glucose monitoring systems.[34] Although
these biosensors can be made impressively small,[30] they contain a number of semiconductor elements, which
are generally expensive and associated with low disposability and
sustainability. Simpler passive, battery-less, and chip-less designs
have been realized on magnetoelastic pH-sensitive material[35] and phenol-boronic acid hydrogel.[36] The possibility of optical (wireless) monitoring
of glucose-based oxygen-sensitive polymer implanted under the skin
was also demonstrated.[37] These examples
comprise too small number of ideas for building a creative research
arena, which could enable development of simpler wireless glucose
biosensors. To augment this research field, we disclose simple and
novel wireless glucose biosensor design.In our recent work,
we have demonstrated that direct electronic
coupling of the enzymes to a nanomaterial, constituting part of the
tag antenna circuit, can be a basis for the construction of wireless
biosensors.[23] The proof of concept has
been illustrated for wireless detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by utilizing silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) as
part of the tag antenna, which were oxidized to AgCl by H2O2, catalyzed by horseradish peroxidase.[25] Although the response time of the biosensor was in the
range of hours, this work disclosed wireless monitoring of Ag/AgCl
redox conversion, driven by enzymatic redox reactions, as one of the
simplest concepts of wireless biosensing to date. However, this simple
design concept has not been demonstrated for monitoring of AgCl reducing
reactions, e.g., detection of glucose.The aim of this work
was to demonstrate that wireless glucose detection
can be realized by exploiting direct electron coupling of glucose
dehydrogenase (GDH) to the nanomaterial integrated into a tag antenna
circuit, i.e., a radio-frequency (RF) antenna. To realize this, the
AgCl layer was included as part of the antenna of the biosensor tag.
In the presence of glucose, the enzyme catalyzed oxidation of glucose
and provided electrons for AgCl reduction to Ag. The Ag/AgCl redox
conversion was wirelessly monitored, thus enabling wireless detection
of glucose. The obtained results, in the frame of our earlier publications,
prove that the proposed design of the wireless biosensor, where enzymes
are electronically coupled to materials of the antenna, is generic
and possible to realize with different oxidoreductase enzymes. Here,
for the first time, we present a comprehensive description of this
type of wireless biosensor in terms of its construction, the principle
of operation, and electrical equivalent circuit. Glucose-to-resistor
transduction, which exploits Ag/AgCl redox reaction on the part of
the tag antenna and enables wireless glucose detection, is also presented
for the first time. All this is important for future improvement and
optimization of this wireless biosensor concept. To mimic the final
application, the proposed biosensor was evaluated through wireless
measurements of glucose in whole blood. In the developed form, the
bioanode-cathode-antenna part of the biosensor could be considered
as having a shape/form similar to a glucose strip. This antenna-containing
strip, allowing wireless detection, could also bring an advantage
by excluding the need to connect the strip to the measuring device.
Such a biosensor option might provide extra convenience to the users
who experience difficulties to insert a glucose biosensor strip into
the potentiostat. In general, the results of this work suggest that
the realization of intimate enzyme-antenna connection, and thus, development
of simple wireless biosensors, can possibly be achieved with a number
of other enzymes since direct electron transfer reactions have been
shown for a high number of oxidoreductases.[38]
Results and Discussion
Scheme illustrates
the working principle of the developed biosensor for wireless detection
of glucose by showing coupling of a cathodic AgCl layer into the antenna
of the RF tag and a sensing bioanode, which, in the presence of glucose,
reduces AgCl (cathode material) to Ag.
Scheme 1
Conceptual Illustration
of a Battery-less and Chip-less Biosensor
Tag for Wireless Measurement of Glucose in Solution
The design is comprised of
(i) a bioanode, (ii) a cathode layer, and (iii) a passive tag antenna,
with a 5 mm removed antenna line, allowing connection of two electrodes
of SPE, bridged by the cathodic transduction layer. The bioanode is
based on glucose dehydrogenase in direct electron transfer contact
with one of SPE electrodes. The cathode layer contains AgNPs, which
were electrooxidized to AgCl before measurements of glucose. The SPE-antenna
coupling makes the cathode layer a part of the tag antenna circuit.
The tag reader wirelessly reads the impedance characteristics of the
antenna circuit, which are represented by the reflection spectrum,
|S11|. This |S11| provides easy reading of the characteristic frequency, f0, and the corresponding Q-factor
of the antenna circuit. Determining the change of the f0 and Q-factor makes it possible to monitor
the resistance change of the transduction layer when the AgCl layer
transforms to metallic Ag. This transformation happens when the SPE
is exposed to glucose solution, since oxidation of glucose on the
bioanode reduces AgCl to Ag on the cathode. The SPE-tag antenna connection
thus allows wireless detection of glucose.
Conceptual Illustration
of a Battery-less and Chip-less Biosensor
Tag for Wireless Measurement of Glucose in Solution
The design is comprised of
(i) a bioanode, (ii) a cathode layer, and (iii) a passive tag antenna,
with a 5 mm removed antenna line, allowing connection of two electrodes
of SPE, bridged by the cathodic transduction layer. The bioanode is
based on glucose dehydrogenase in direct electron transfer contact
with one of SPE electrodes. The cathode layer contains AgNPs, which
were electrooxidized to AgCl before measurements of glucose. The SPE-antenna
coupling makes the cathode layer a part of the tag antenna circuit.
The tag reader wirelessly reads the impedance characteristics of the
antenna circuit, which are represented by the reflection spectrum,
|S11|. This |S11| provides easy reading of the characteristic frequency, f0, and the corresponding Q-factor
of the antenna circuit. Determining the change of the f0 and Q-factor makes it possible to monitor
the resistance change of the transduction layer when the AgCl layer
transforms to metallic Ag. This transformation happens when the SPE
is exposed to glucose solution, since oxidation of glucose on the
bioanode reduces AgCl to Ag on the cathode. The SPE-tag antenna connection
thus allows wireless detection of glucose.An important feature of the biosensor tag is that the cathode layer
bridges two electrodes of the SPE (working and counter electrodes
in this particular design) and that the connection of these electrodes
to the tag makes the cathode layer a part of the tag antenna circuit.
The mechanism of wireless glucose detection relies on the bioelectrocatalytic
oxidation of glucose at the bioanode with a consequent supply of electrons
to the cathode. This reduces AgCl in the cathode layer to metallic
Ag. As a result, the transition of a poor electric conductor (AgCl
layer) to an excellent conductor (metallic Ag) is accomplished. This
transition strongly lowers the resistance (generally impedance) of
the tag antenna circuit. Importantly, these reactions and the bioanode-cathode
connection thus realize glucose-to-resistance transduction. The impedance
change is then wirelessly detected by measuring the characteristic
frequency, f0, and Q-factor
of the biosensor-tag system. Practically, f0 and Q-factor are determined from the |S11| spectrum, which is measured by using a wireless tag
reader (the |S11| measurements are explained
in Experimental Section). In the following
paragraphs, the essential components and features of this wireless
biosensor design are described. This includes a description of the
bioanode and cathode, proof-of-concept demonstration of glucose detection
and a calibration plot, the effect of chloride concentration on the
response, and presentation of the equivalent circuit of the biosensor
tag. The majority of experiments have been made to explain the concept
of this novel biosensor design and to demonstrate possible means to
optimize and improve the performance characteristics of this battery-less,
chip-less wireless biosensor design.
GDH in Direct Electron
Transfer (DET) on the Electrode Surface
Constitutes a Bioanode
To realize wireless glucose biosensing,
GDH was immobilized on a gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-modified planar
gold electrode (GE) or a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) following a
previously described procedure.[39] AuNPs
were utilized to increase the surface area, while 4-ATP (4-aminothiophenol)
was used to immobilize GDH in DET-facile orientation (these modifications
are detailed in the Supporting Information). The purpose of using the GCE was to provide a higher geometric
area, as compared to the area of the planar GE. The resulting glucose-sensing
electrodes are denoted as GE/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH and GCE/PEI/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH.
Cyclic voltammetry measurements (Figure A) proved that, in the absence of glucose,
the electrodes showed no catalytic current. In the presence of glucose
(50 mM), the bioelectrocatalytic oxidation of glucose started at −0.23
V (vs SCE), proving a successful DET coupling of GDH to the electrode
surface. Maximal bioelectrocatalytic current densities, at 50 mM glucose,
were 0.63 and 0.75 mA cm–2 for GE/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH
and GCE/PEI/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH, respectively. The open-circuit potential
(OCP vs SCE) of the bioanode in the presence of glucose corresponded
to cyclic voltammetry results (Figure A) and was equal to −0.2 V (Figure B). This relatively high negative
OCP is an important feature for the electrode to function as a bioanode
in the novel glucose-to-resistor transduction. It should be emphasized
that, without 4-ATP modification of AuNPs, the bioelectrocatalytic
current was 15 times lower, specifically, 0.05 mA cm–2 (compared to 0.75 mA cm–2; see the Supporting Information). These results confirmed
the essential role of 4-ATP for the enzyme immobilization in DET-facile
orientation.[39−41] Importantly, the GE/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH and GCE/PEI/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH
electrodes gave similar current densities, indicating the robustness
of the electrode preparation procedure. Additionally, both electrode
designs showed excellent stability and allowed their use as glucose-sensing
bioanodes for more than a week without losing bioelectrocatalytic
activity (kept in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), at +4 °C when
not in use). To emphasize the importance of AuNP/4-ATP modification
in achieving DET of GDH, these GDH-modified electrodes, in the text
below, are referred to as AuNP/4-ATP/GDH-modified electrodes.
Figure 1
(A) Cyclic
voltammograms of GE/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH- and GCE/PEI/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH-modified
bioanode electrodes recorded in PBS, pH 7.4, in the absence and presence
of glucose (50 mM). Potential scan rate of 1 mV s–1 starting at −0.3 V. (B) Open-circuit potential (OCP) recorded
for the AuNP/4-ATP/GDH electrode before and after addition of 50 mM
glucose. (C) Schematic presentation of connection of the bioanode
(GDH-modified) and the cathode (SPE hosting the AgCl-containing transduction
layer). (D) Amperometric curves (current vs time) obtained with the
electrodes, connected as shown in panel (C) and immersed in PBS. Glucose
addition gave a 50 mM glucose concentration in PBS. This allowed the
electrons, generated at the bioanode, to convert AgCl to Ag on the
cathode layer. The AgCl/Ag conversion is obvious from the increase
in current through the cathodic transduction layer (red trace). The
control experiment shows that the bioanode without GDH was not able
to convert AgCl to Ag; the current through the transduction layer
is the same after the addition of glucose (blue trace).
(A) Cyclic
voltammograms of GE/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH- and GCE/PEI/AuNP/4-ATP/GDH-modified
bioanode electrodes recorded in PBS, pH 7.4, in the absence and presence
of glucose (50 mM). Potential scan rate of 1 mV s–1 starting at −0.3 V. (B) Open-circuit potential (OCP) recorded
for the AuNP/4-ATP/GDH electrode before and after addition of 50 mM
glucose. (C) Schematic presentation of connection of the bioanode
(GDH-modified) and the cathode (SPE hosting the AgCl-containing transduction
layer). (D) Amperometric curves (current vs time) obtained with the
electrodes, connected as shown in panel (C) and immersed in PBS. Glucose
addition gave a 50 mM glucose concentration in PBS. This allowed the
electrons, generated at the bioanode, to convert AgCl to Ag on the
cathode layer. The AgCl/Ag conversion is obvious from the increase
in current through the cathodic transduction layer (red trace). The
control experiment shows that the bioanode without GDH was not able
to convert AgCl to Ag; the current through the transduction layer
is the same after the addition of glucose (blue trace).
AgCl Layer Is a Part of the Tag Antenna Circuit and Functions
as a Cathode in Glucose-to-Resistance Transduction
To demonstrate
that the AgCl-containing layer between two electrodes on the SPE (see Scheme ) acts as a cathode,
a complete design of the wireless biosensor (Scheme ) is inconvenient. Advantageously, the construction
can be divided into separate components for easier study of their
functionality. Figure C depicts the bioanode and cathode separated from the RF antenna
and connected to a potentiostat. Specifically, Figure C depicts a cathode, comprised of a AgCl
layer, which bridges two electrodes on the SPE in connection with
the GDH-based bioanode. The bridge accomplishes glucose-to-resistance
transduction; if the layer is dominated by AgCl, the resistance is
high. However, if the bioanode reduces AgCl to metallic Ag, the resistance
of the layer becomes very low. The resistance change of the transduction
layer was measured by a potentiostat, in amperometric mode, as shown
in Figure C.In Figure C, the
AuNP/4-ATP/GDH electrode is connected as a bioanode in respect to
a cathode comprised of a AgCl-containing transduction layer. This
connection enables glucose-powered reduction of AgCl to metallic Ag.
For practical demonstration, the electrodes were immersed in PBS,
5 mV DC potential was applied on the AgCl-containing transduction
layer, and the resulting current was registered (see data in Figure D). The figure shows
that the current is very different before and after the addition of
50 mM glucose in PBS. It can also be noted that, in this particular
example, it took 264 s until the low initial current (0.125 nA, resistance
of the transduction layer R = 40 MΩ) changed
to 2.68 mA, indicating that AgCl on the cathode has been reduced to
metallic Ag by glucose oxidation at the bioanode. The layer resistance
became equal to 2 Ω as calculated from the amperometric data
shown in Figure D.
This experiment confirms that the GDH-modified electrode acts as a
bioanode and the AgCl-containing layer as a cathode. Importantly,
the experiments prove that the described connection and modification
of the electrodes provide glucose-to-resistance transduction.
Proof-of-Concept
Demonstration of Wireless Detection of Glucose
To demonstrate
wireless glucose sensing, AuNP/4-ATP/GDH bioanode
design was realized on the counter electrode of the SPE as shown in Figure A (inset; left).
For the initial proof-of-concept experiments, the working and counter
electrodes on the SPE were bridged by drop-casting a layer comprised
solely of AgNPs (0.5 μL, three times deposition; insets in Figure A). The AgNP layer
was electrochemically oxidized in PBS to AgCl and then the SPE was
connected with the RF antenna as shown in Scheme . The SPE was immersed in PBS and the |S11| characteristic curve (marked with AgCl in Figure A) of this biosensor
was wirelessly recorded using the RF antenna reader. The |S11| indicated that the SPE-antenna-coupled circuit
had a characteristic frequency, f0, equal
to 17.5 MHz. After the addition of glucose into the PBS solution,
the |S11| transformed (after some time)
into a new |S11| trace, marked with Ag
in Figure A. This
change of |S11| indicates that the electrical
antenna circuit has changed, causing a new value of a characteristic
frequency of 13.5 MHz. As discussed above, this is a consequence of
the change of the resistance of the transduction layer after AgCl
is reduced to Ag by glucose oxidation on the bioanode. This result
provides a proof of concept of wireless detection of glucose and confirms
the role of the transduction layer as an enabler of wireless registration
of enzymatic redox reaction. It could be noted that the value of the
characteristic frequency (13.5 MHz) is very close to the value of
the characteristic frequency of the original RF antenna of this particular
NFC tag (13.56 MHz tag). This is only possible if the transduction
layer after AgCl reduction to Ag has negligible resistance compared
to the resistance of the tag antenna; the relation of the transduction
layer resistance to |S11| characteristics
(f0 and Q-factor) is
discussed further.
Figure 2
(A) Dependence of the reflection coefficient |S11| on frequency recorded with wireless biosensor
configuration
shown in Scheme .
The curves are recorded for the biosensor setup where the transduction
layer on the SPE was comprised of only AgNPs converted to AgCl (marked
with AgCl) and after the AgCl reduction to metallic Ag (marked with
Ag) by the bioanode. (B) Change of characteristic frequency of the
wireless biosensor as a response to 4 mM glucose (time zero represent
time when glucose was added into the measurement cell). Notes indicate
the composition of the transduction layers and their resistances after
the AgNP oxidation to AgCl. (C) |S11|
vs frequency recorded for the biosensor where the transduction layer
was comprised (marked with AgCl) of AuNP-AgNP mixture with the AgNPs
converted to AgCl and (marked with Ag) after the AgCl reduction to
metallic Ag. The reduction reactions were driven by the bioanode in
the presence of 4 mM glucose in PBS. Different |S11| curves reflect monotonic |S11| transition in time. The corresponding f0 vs t trace is shown in panel (B), curve 2. (D)
Calibration curve, i.e., the inverse response time of the biosensor
tag vs glucose concentration in PBS. The transduction layer was comprised
of AgNP-AuNP mixture where AgNPs were electrochemically oxidized to
AgCl. The wireless biosensor configuration is depicted in Scheme , where only the
SPE with the bioanode and cathode (the transduction layer) was in
solution during the measurements of glucose.
(A) Dependence of the reflection coefficient |S11| on frequency recorded with wireless biosensor
configuration
shown in Scheme .
The curves are recorded for the biosensor setup where the transduction
layer on the SPE was comprised of only AgNPs converted to AgCl (marked
with AgCl) and after the AgCl reduction to metallic Ag (marked with
Ag) by the bioanode. (B) Change of characteristic frequency of the
wireless biosensor as a response to 4 mM glucose (time zero represent
time when glucose was added into the measurement cell). Notes indicate
the composition of the transduction layers and their resistances after
the AgNP oxidation to AgCl. (C) |S11|
vs frequency recorded for the biosensor where the transduction layer
was comprised (marked with AgCl) of AuNP-AgNP mixture with the AgNPs
converted to AgCl and (marked with Ag) after the AgCl reduction to
metallic Ag. The reduction reactions were driven by the bioanode in
the presence of 4 mM glucose in PBS. Different |S11| curves reflect monotonic |S11| transition in time. The corresponding f0 vs t trace is shown in panel (B), curve 2. (D)
Calibration curve, i.e., the inverse response time of the biosensor
tag vs glucose concentration in PBS. The transduction layer was comprised
of AgNP-AuNP mixture where AgNPs were electrochemically oxidized to
AgCl. The wireless biosensor configuration is depicted in Scheme , where only the
SPE with the bioanode and cathode (the transduction layer) was in
solution during the measurements of glucose.
Optimization of the Wireless Biosensor Response
The
change of f0 as a response to glucose,
demonstrated in Figure A, provides evidence that the biosensor system allows wireless detection
of glucose in solution. It is also clear that the higher is the glucose
concentration, the shorter is the response time. However, a more extensive
study showed that the response time also depended on the amount of
AgNPs deposited in the transduction layer and the fraction of their
conversion to AgCl (e.g., complete or partial AgNP layer oxidation;
see Experimental Section). We also noticed
that the microstructure and composition of the transduction layer
(e.g., solely AgCl or AuNP-AgCl mixture) affected the response time.
We studied the microstructure by impedance spectroscopy; however,
it was not possible to simply relate the results to the response of
the wireless biosensor (impedance characterization of the microstructure
of the layers is presented in the Supporting Information). Some of the features of the transduction layer, which enable tuning
of the wireless biosensor characteristics, such as response time and
sensitivity, are discussed below.To understand how the response
time of the proposed wireless biosensor can be tuned by manipulating
the AgCl-containing transduction layer, two aspects have been assessed.
Particularly, (i) the effect of AgNP oxidation to AgCl and (ii) the
effect of admixing 20% of AuNPs in the transduction layer were studied.
Only the most important observations are summarized below. The thicknesses
of AgNP or AgNP-AuNP transduction layers drop-casted for bridging
the two electrodes on the SPE were a few micrometers (see the Supporting Information). Complete or partial
AgNP oxidation to AgCl in the transduction layer was achieved at 200
mV applied voltage for 120 s or 70 mV for 12 s, respectively. The
layers after complete conversion of AgNPs to AgCl had a few MΩ
resistance values. Partial oxidation gave the layer with a few kΩ
resistance values. Figure B demonstrates a few examples of how the characteristic frequency
of the biosensor-tag system changed in time after the SPE, hosting
the bioanode and cathode with a differently oxidized transduction
layer, was exposed to 4 mM glucose in PBS. As can be seen in Figure B, the characteristic
frequency vs time curves are very different. The response time (the
time needed to reach f0 close to 13.5
MHz from the initial f0 of 17.5–18
MHz) as well as the rate of the f0 change
depended on the oxidation degree of the AgNPs in the layer and its
composition. Specifically, for the layer comprised of just AgNPs after
their complete oxidation (resistance, >40 MΩ), the response
time to 4 mM glucose is equal to approximately 17.5 min (Figure B, curve 1). For
the layer comprised of AgNP-AuNP mixture and partial AgNP oxidation
(layer resistance, 2 kΩ), the response time is shorter than
3 min. For the same layer, which was completely oxidized, (R = 11 MΩ), the response time was prolonged to longer
than 15 min. It is also obvious that, for the layers comprised of
AgNP-AuNP mixture, the change of the characteristic frequency is gradual
(Figure B, curve 2). Figure C shows corresponding
|S11| trace transformation in due time
of the experiment. The gradual change of the characteristic frequency
might be beneficial in the future optimization of transduction layers
since this process might indicate that Ag/AgCl reaction proceeds more
homogeneously in the entire layer. In conclusion, it is important
to state that partial oxidation and addition of AuNPs to the transduction
layer allow a shorter response time of the wireless biosensor to glucose.
The fact that the response times can be shortened by manipulating
the transduction layer composition and, obviously, the amount of AgNPs
in the transduction layer points to the possibility of optimizing
this biosensor design for achieving more rapid wireless measurements
of glucose.
Sensitivity of the Wireless Biosensor Tag
to Glucose: Calibration
Curve
Data in Figure B demonstrate that the response time of the biosensor tag
to glucose depends on several characteristics of the transduction
layer. However, if the transduction layer is made by using the same
method, the response time of the biosensor tag is reproducible (see
the Supporting Information, Figure S9) and dependent on glucose concentration
(Figure D). Figure D shows that the
higher is the glucose concentration, the shorter is the response time.
This dependence, inverse response time vs glucose concentration (Figure D), represents a
calibration curve; the curve was obtained with a transduction layer
comprised of 20% AuNP and 80% AgNPs (3× 0.5 μL of concentrated
AuNP-AgNP mixture). The AgNPs in the layer were oxidized by applying
70 mV vs SCE for 12 s, resulting in the layer resistance of approximately
2 kΩ.As can be seen in Figure D, the calibration is linear. The linearity
is expected. Usually, amperometric biosensors rely on the linear dependence
of current response (charge/time: Q/t) vs concentration. In our case, the charge is always the same and
it is determined by the amount of AgCl in the transduction layer.
So, if the current generated by the bioanode increases with glucose
concentration, then a shorter time period (shorter response time)
is needed to get the same amount of the charge (electrons), which
reduces AgCl to Ag. This indicates that inverse response time vs concentration
should be linear as has been found experimentally and shown in Figure D. It is important
to note that, during the measurement of glucose, a high-resistance
AgCl cathodic transduction layer is converted to a low-resistance
Ag layer, i.e., the bioanode-cathode connection realizes glucose-to-resistance
transduction. However, independent of the glucose concentration, the
final resistance of the resulting Ag layer is practically the same
and the time to reduce AgCl in the cathodic layer to Ag is different.
To develop a practically competitive wireless biosensor, our work
is directed to increase the reproducibility of AgNP deposition and
to produce transduction layers containing smaller amounts of AgNPs,
aiming for response times shorter than 1 min.
The Response of the Biosensor
Does Not Depend on the Chloride
Concentration
After discussing the proof of concept (Figure ) and the calibration
curve (Figure D),
it is important to understand if changes of solution composition (e.g.,
chloride concentration) might affect the biosensor response. The redox
potential of Ag/AgCl increases with the decrease in chloride concentration,
and thus, the thermodynamic potential difference between the bioanode
(glucose/gluconolactone) and the cathode (Ag/AgCl) increases. The
question is, thus, if this will affect the biosensor response time.
To assess this, the response of the biosensor to the same glucose
concentration (6 mM) at different concentrations of chloride present
in the solution has been studied using the experimental setup shown
in Figure C. As can
be seen in Figure A, the amperometric responses are very similar in terms of the response
time, which is equal to 43.3 ± 4.7 s, determined at 50% of the
maximal current. The observed independence of the biosensor response
time on the chloride concentration proves that the potential difference
between the bioanode and the cathode is sufficiently high; the bioanode
and cathode reactions can no longer be made more rapidly by increasing
the potential difference between these electrodes, e.g., by lower
chloride concentrations.
Figure 3
(A) Responses of the biosensor to 6 mM glucose
in phosphate buffer
containing different concentrations of KCl. The response was recorded
using amperometric measurement mode with the electrode connection
shown in Figure C.
The transduction layer was made by drop-casting AgNP-AuNP mixture
and electrooxidation of AgNPs to AgCl in PBS. Inset: dependence of
maximal current that flows through the transduction layer on the chloride
concentration present in the solution during the AgCl reduction to
Ag by the bioanode. (B) SEM image of the transduction layer comprised
of AgNP-AuNP mixture after AgNP oxidation to AgCl. (C) |S11| curves recorded with the tag-SPE system, where the
transduction layer was based on AgNPs. The oxidation state of Ag in
the layer and the solution in the measurement cell are specified.
(D) Equivalent circuit of the biosensor tag. L1, R1, and C1 represent the inductance, resistance,
and capacitance of the original tag antenna circuit, respectively.
R2 and C2 represent the resistance of the Ag/AgCl
transduction layer (including adjacent PBS solution) and the parasitic
capacitance of the antenna-SPE connections, respectively.
(A) Responses of the biosensor to 6 mM glucose
in phosphate buffer
containing different concentrations of KCl. The response was recorded
using amperometric measurement mode with the electrode connection
shown in Figure C.
The transduction layer was made by drop-casting AgNP-AuNP mixture
and electrooxidation of AgNPs to AgCl in PBS. Inset: dependence of
maximal current that flows through the transduction layer on the chloride
concentration present in the solution during the AgCl reduction to
Ag by the bioanode. (B) SEM image of the transduction layer comprised
of AgNP-AuNP mixture after AgNP oxidation to AgCl. (C) |S11| curves recorded with the tag-SPE system, where the
transduction layer was based on AgNPs. The oxidation state of Ag in
the layer and the solution in the measurement cell are specified.
(D) Equivalent circuit of the biosensor tag. L1, R1, and C1 represent the inductance, resistance,
and capacitance of the original tag antenna circuit, respectively.
R2 and C2 represent the resistance of the Ag/AgCl
transduction layer (including adjacent PBS solution) and the parasitic
capacitance of the antenna-SPE connections, respectively.Figure A
(inset),
however, shows that the current that passes the metallic Ag transduction
layer, after the biosensor responded to glucose (i.e., after the reduction
of AgCl to Ag), is higher if the AgCl reduction to Ag proceeded at
higher KCl concentrations. The observed dependence is most probably
determined by the difference in the layer microstructures, including
the possible presence of AgCl left without being reduced. The fact
that the Ag layer is comprised of microstructures is obvious from
SEM images presented in Figure B; however, the conductivity–microstructure relation
is difficult to prove. Characterization of these layers using electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy also confirmed that their electrochemical behavior
can be described by considering the microstructure-containing microchannel
(see the Supporting Information).
AgCl-to-Ag
Transition in the Transduction Layer Decouples the
Wireless Biosensor from the Biosensor Environment
The cathodic
transduction layer possesses an additional, very interesting, and
practically important feature of the biosensor. After the biosensor
response to glucose, i.e., after AgCl reduction to Ag, wirelessly
monitored |S11| becomes completely insensitive
to the surrounding of the SPE electrode containing the transduction
layer. As shown in Figure C, curve a, the |S11| trace is
the same if the SPE, with the transduction layer comprised of Ag,
is in PBS or in air. This means that the transduction layer comprised
of Ag completely decouples surrounding conditions at which the SPE
with the bioanode and cathode is exposed to. The |S11| no longer depends on, e.g., the salt concentration
of the solution. It could be said that the environmental and surrounding
conditions are short-circuited by the metallic Ag transduction layer.
Intuitively, this feature might be very important in practical applications
of the biosensor. For a deeper understanding of this chip-less and
wireless biosensor, tag-SPE features were modeled by an equivalent
circuit shown in Figure D. Relevant experiments and the modeling of the equivalent circuit
are described in the next paragraph.
The Equivalent Circuit
of the Wireless Biosensor Is a Tag Antenna,
which Hosts Redox Reaction-to-Resistance Transduction
In Figure D, we propose an
equivalent circuit of the wireless biosensor comprised of an RF antenna
of NFC tag with an integrated Ag/AgCl-based transduction layer. Since
the equivalent circuit of this type of wireless biosensor has never
been discussed before, an easy-to-grasp explanation is provided below.
Rigorous modeling was also conducted, and it is described in the Supporting Information. To understand how the
equivalent circuit in Figure D describes the dependence of the characteristic frequency f0 and Q-factor of the biosensor
tag (i) on the state of the transduction layer (metallic Ag vs AgCl)
and (ii) on the salt concentration of solution where the SPE with
the transduction layer is immersed to, additional experiments have
been done. The antenna-coupled SPE, containing a metallic Ag or AgCl
transduction layer, was exposed to air or immersed into PBS of different
dilutions/concentrations, and |S11| curves
were recorded. An example of the |S11|
curves is presented in Figure C; |S11| depends on the state
of the transduction layer (AgCl or Ag) and on the dilution of PBS
when the transduction layer is comprised of AgCl. The ionic strength
dependencies of the corresponding f0 and Q-factor, derived from these |S11| curves, are presented in Figure A,B. As can be seen from these figures, the values
of f0 and Q are completely
independent of the ionic strength of the solution when the transduction
layer is comprised of Ag (curves marked with f0(Ag) and Q(Ag), Figure A,B, respectively). The absence
of the dependence confirms that the |S11| characteristic does not depend on the solution composition to which
the metallic Ag transduction layer is exposed to. Additionally, since
the f0(Ag) and Q(Ag) are very close to the original tag characteristics, the
equivalent circuit, to the first approximation, can be represented
by the usual RF tag antenna circuit, which is composed of a serial
connection of tag antenna inductance (L1), resistance (R1), and capacitance (C1).[42−44] The corresponding
circuit is shown on the far left in Figure C, noted as C(a).
Figure 4
(A) Characteristic frequency
(f0(Ag) and f0(AgCl)) and (B) Q-factor (Q(Ag) and Q(AgCl)) of the antenna with a coupled
SPE exposed to air
or immersed into solution of different ionic strengths. The SPE hosts
a transduction layer comprised of Ag or AgCl. (C) Equivalent circuits
representing the antenna circuit and its illustration (tag antenna
and the SPE) when the transduction layer on the SPE is exposed to
different environmental conditions: air, water, and concentrated or
diluted PBS as indicated in the drawings.
(A) Characteristic frequency
(f0(Ag) and f0(AgCl)) and (B) Q-factor (Q(Ag) and Q(AgCl)) of the antenna with a coupled
SPE exposed to air
or immersed into solution of different ionic strengths. The SPE hosts
a transduction layer comprised of Ag or AgCl. (C) Equivalent circuits
representing the antenna circuit and its illustration (tag antenna
and the SPE) when the transduction layer on the SPE is exposed to
different environmental conditions: air, water, and concentrated or
diluted PBS as indicated in the drawings.It can be easily noted (Figure A,B) that, when the transduction layer is composed
of AgCl and exposed to 10 times concentrated PBS (ionic strength is
equal to 1657 mM), the characteristic frequency f0(AgCl) is almost the same as for the transduction layer
comprised of metallic silver, f0(Ag) (f0(AgCl) = 13.18 MHz and f0(Ag) = 13.03 MHz). The Q value is, however,
significantly lower: Q(AgCl) = 5.66 and Q(Ag) = 11.69. To account for the similarity
of f0 and for the difference of Q values, the antenna-SPE circuit can be complemented by
a resistor R2, as shown by the circuit C(b) in Figure C. The close similarity
of f0 (f0(Ag) ≈ f0(AgCl) in 10×PBS) means that reactive elements C1 and L1 are
practically the same in both these situations (see the equation for f0 in the Supporting Information, Table S4). Additionally, the R2 was
found to be dependent only on the ionic strength of the solution since
removing the AgCl transduction layer (leaving the gap between the
two electrodes on the SPE empty) did not change the |S11| dependence on the ionic strength (data are not shown).By examining the |S11| characteristics,
recorded with the transduction layer comprised of AgCl, it could be
noted that the f0(AgCl) and Q(AgCl) values are very similar in air (f0(AgCl) = 19.67 MHz and Q(AgCl) = 18.23) and in pure water (f0(AgCl) = 19.12 MHz and Q(AgCl) = 17.98; also
listed in Tables S3 and S4). Under these
conditions, R2 can obviously be regarded as infinity, which
is shown in the circuit noted by C(d) (far right in Figure C). Additionally,
since the values of f0(AgCl) in air and
in water are very similar, when the relative permittivity values of
these media are different (relative permittivity of air is εr = 1 and that of water is εr = 80), we can
conclude that the C2 is very little affected by the double-layer
capacitance of the transduction layer (AgCl) and the underlying surface
of gold electrodes of the SPE. The value of C2 must thus
be dominated by a parasitic capacitance of the connections and wire
lines connecting the SPE to the gap of the RF antenna. The fact that
the C2 does not depend on the double layers of the electrodes
of the SPE and on the bridging AgCl layer is quite unexpected and
might not be a general phenomenon (to conclude, a deeper study of
the antenna-SPE system is needed).In summary, this simplified
explanation of the equivalent circuit
of the wireless biosensor confirms that the Ag/AgCl transduction layer
can be represented as a resistor. It is important to note that the
layer can carry out transduction of any reaction that is able to achieve
Ag/AgCl redox transformations. This means that the proposed Ag/AgCl
layer inserted as part of the RF antenna can be regarded as a general
redox reaction-to-resistance transducer. The circuit analysis (Figure C) is useful for
explaining the specific and general features of the mechanism of the
wireless biosensor. Additionally, rigorous mathematical modeling has
been performed based on analytical equations, which describe the f0 and Q values (see the Supporting Information). The equations are complicated;
however, they can be written in symbolic form (we exploited Mathematica
software) and used to fit the experimental data of Figure A,B. Fitting is shown in Figure S10A,B, and the corresponding values of
circuit elements R1, L1, C1, and
C2 that had been found from this fitting were equal to
0.247 Ω, 8.23 × 10–8 H, 9.63 × 10–9 F, and 29.98 × 10–9 F, respectively.
In general, the values look reasonable, e.g., the resistance of the
tag antenna is, as expected, below 1 Ω. However, deeper analysis
of the values and improvement of the equivalent circuit are needed
to explain the physical origin of the circuit elements.
Application
of the Proposed Wireless Biosensor for Detection
of Glucose in Whole Blood
The application of the proposed
wireless biosensor in whole blood analysis was shown by the calibration
curve method and standard addition method. In the calibration curve
method, the SPE modified with a bioanode and a cathode layer (Ag-AuNPs
oxidized to the MΩ level) was prepared and coupled to the tag
antenna and the characteristic frequency was monitored wirelessly
with the SPE in PBS containing different concentrations of glucose
(4–14 mM). The time taken for the transition of the characteristic
frequency from 17.5 MHz to 13.5 MHz at different concentrations of
glucose was used to construct a calibration curve, as shown in Figure A. Undiluted blood
samples from three volunteers (n = 3) were then analyzed
using the same setup. The analysis was performed three times for each
sample and the time needed for conversion of AgCl to Ag was used to
find the glucose concentration in whole blood from the calibration
curve shown in Figure A. As shown in Figure B, the results of the proposed method showed good agreement with
the standard method in whole blood glucose analysis. Table S5 summarizes the results obtained by the wireless biosensor
cross-checked against the results of a commercially available glucometer.
The results are encouraging; however, for building a practically competitive
biosensor, the response time must be considerably shortened. As discussed
above, the approach to exploiting the cathode layer comprised of Ag-AuNPs
partially oxidized to the kΩ level will shorten the response
time of the biosensor; however, full oxidation of the transduction
layer to the MΩ level will generate more reproducible results
when measuring glucose in whole blood samples. To avoid any inconsistency
caused by the matrix effect, the concentration of glucose in whole
blood was also determined using the standard addition method. Accordingly,
blood samples were spiked with different concentrations of glucose
in the range of 0–12 mM and were analyzed using the same biosensor
setup. Figure C shows
the plot of inverse response time versus different concentrations
of glucose spiked to the whole blood. Extrapolation of the recorded
responses to zero resulted in a blood glucose concentration of 5.88
mM, which was close to the concentration detected by the glucometer
in the primary blood sample (5.3 mM). To show the efficiency of the
bioanode part (enzyme biosensor) in whole blood analysis, the response
times (t) found in the standard addition method were
used to calculate the current (I) generated by the
bioanode in successive addition of glucose through . Here, the charge (Q)
is proportional to the amount of AgNPs deposited on the cathode layer.
The average Q for 11 electrodes prepared for this
experiment was calculated to be 4441 ± 660 μC (Q was determined by integration of the area of I vs t when Ag was oxidizing to AgCl, Figure S11). Figure D demonstrates an increase in generated current
together with increasing concentration of glucose in whole blood;
the results are promising, showing that the efficiency of the enzyme
biosensor is not affected by the other compounds/interferences during
successive measurements in whole blood. Table S6 shows a comparison between the proposed sensor and previously
reported wireless sensors for glucose measurement in whole blood or
other real samples (e.g., interstitial fluid, sweat, urine, tears,
and saliva). Some glucose sensors operating in passive and chip-less
mode have been already reported; however, it is important to note
that the sensor proposed in this work benefits from both a simple/cost-effective
read-out system and efficient sensing mechanism based on direct electron
transferring of enzyme glucose dehydrogenase.
Figure 5
(A) Calibration curve,
i.e., the inverse response time of the biosensor
tag vs glucose concentration in PBS. The transduction layer was comprised
of Ag-AuNP mixture electrochemically oxidized to the MΩ level.
(B) Result of comparison between the proposed wireless biosensor and
the standard method (glucometer) for glucose analysis in the whole
blood samples from three different donors. (C) Calibration curve of
the wireless biosensor obtained by the standard addition method using
whole blood samples. (D) Estimation of the current generated by the
enzyme biosensor during successive addition of glucose to the whole
blood samples.
(A) Calibration curve,
i.e., the inverse response time of the biosensor
tag vs glucose concentration in PBS. The transduction layer was comprised
of Ag-AuNP mixture electrochemically oxidized to the MΩ level.
(B) Result of comparison between the proposed wireless biosensor and
the standard method (glucometer) for glucose analysis in the whole
blood samples from three different donors. (C) Calibration curve of
the wireless biosensor obtained by the standard addition method using
whole blood samples. (D) Estimation of the current generated by the
enzyme biosensor during successive addition of glucose to the whole
blood samples.
Conclusions
In
this work, we present a novel design of glucose-to-resistance
transduction, which enables simple battery-less and chip-less wireless
detection of glucose. The biosensor is based on a glucose-sensing
bioanode and a cathode layer comprised of AgNPs electrooxidized to
AgCl. The cathode layer was inserted as a path of RF antenna wind.
In this biosensor, the bioanode carried out direct electron transfer-based
bioelectrocatalytic oxidation of glucose at a AuNP/4-ATP/GDH-modified
electrode with concomitant reduction of AgCl to Ag on the cathode
layer. We proved that the bioanode-cathode connection fulfilled a
function of glucose-to-resistance transduction. The process of AgCl-to-Ag
reduction, and thus, the detection of glucose, was wirelessly monitored
by measuring the change of the reflection spectra, |S11|, of the biosensor antenna circuit. As a proof of concept,
wireless detection of glucose in PBS and whole blood has been demonstrated.
One of the limitations of the proposed concept is the relatively long
time of biosensor response to clinically relevant glucose concentrations. The mitigation
of this limitation requires a reproducible deposition of low amounts
of silver nanoparticles in the cathode layer. The required deposition
is hard to ensure by manual pipetting but might be achievable by modern
inkjet or other thin-film technologies.Analysis of equivalent
circuits of this biosensor setup showed
that the thin Ag/AgCl layer can be regarded as a general redox reaction-to-resistance
transducer coupled to an RF antenna. Specifically, we demonstrate
that, in the presence of glucose, the bioanode reduced AgCl in the
cathodic transduction layer to metallic Ag. This process was confirmed
by measurements of the transduction layer resistance, which changed
from high (a few tenths of kΩ or MΩ) to low (usually below
10 Ω). Wireless detection of this resistance change was done
by determining the characteristic frequency f0 and Q-factor of the antenna circuit by measuring
the RF reflection spectra (|S11|). Specifically,
the characteristic frequency of the wireless biosensor was 17.5 MHz
when the cathodic transduction layer was comprised of AgCl. After
the reduction of AgCl to Ag, the characteristic frequency of the wireless
biosensor changed to 13.5 MHz. The time needed for this characteristic
frequency transition (the response time) was dependent on the glucose
concentration in the solution where the GDH-based bioanode and AgCl-containing
transduction layer, as the cathode, were immersed to. The response
time was shorter at higher concentrations of glucose. We also found
that the response time can be tuned by manipulating the cathodic transduction
layer, specifically, by admixing AuNPs and by deploying a lower or
higher degree of the AgNP electrooxidation to AgCl. These experiments
suggest that the transduction layer can be optimized to increase the
sensitivity of this biosensor to glucose. Specifically, we experimentally
showed that the transduction layer made from AgNP-AuNP mixture can
provide a wireless response of the biosensor system to 4 mM glucose
in less than 2 min.Additionally, for understanding the mechanism
of this battery-less
and chip-less wireless biosensor, the equivalent circuit has been
proposed and discussed. This analysis allowed one to conclude that,
after the response to glucose, the biosensor wireless signal (|S11|) does not depend on the solution characteristics
where the biosensor is immersed to, e.g., on the ionic strength of
the solution. Future work is conducted to design biosensor tags responding
to physiologically relevant glucose concentrations in less than 1
min.
Experimental Section
Materials
d-(+)-Glucose (≥99.5%), phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) tablets, silver nitrate (≥99.0%), gold(III) chloride
trihydrate (≥99.9%), sodium citrate dihydrate (≥99.0%), l-ascorbic acid (≥99.0%), potassium chloride (≥99.0%),
sulfuric acid (98%), methanol (≥99.9%), polyethylenimine (PEI,
MW ≈ 25000 by LS), Nafion solution (5 wt %), and 4-aminothiophenol
(4-ATP, 97%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Heme-containing, membrane-bound
bacterial glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) from Ewingella
americana was purified and characterized according
to a previously published protocol.[39,45] All aqueous
solutions were prepared in ultrapure water (resistivity of 18.2 MΩ
cm) purified by a Purelab Flex system (ELGA LabWater, High Wycombe,
UK). For whole blood analysis, blood samples from healthy donors were
collected in VACUETTE FC Mix tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster,
Austria). The tubes contain a mixture of additives Na2EDTA,
sodium fluoride, citric acid, and sodium citrate, which inhibits glycolysis
and prevents coagulation. Blood collection for analysis with the biosensors
was approved by the Swedish Ethical Board (approval number 2009/180).
Synthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles
Silver and
gold nanoparticles were synthesized according to our previously reported
protocols.[23] For silver nanoparticles (AgNPs),
ascorbic acid and sodium citrate were exploited as the reductant and
capping agents, respectively. Briefly, 2 mL of sodium citrate aqueous
solution (1%, w/v), 0.5 mL of silver nitrate (1%, w/v), and 1 mL of
potassium chloride (8 mM) were consecutively added to 1.5 mL of distilled
water under stirring conditions at room temperature. Concurrently,
95 mL of distilled water was heated to boiling and 100 μL of
ascorbic acid aqueous solution (100 mM) was added. After 5 min, the
mixture containing AgNO3 was added to the boiling ascorbic
acid solution. The reaction mixture kept boiling for 1 h under stirring
conditions, resulting in a change from a transparent solution to a
yellow solution. The nanoparticle dispersion was left to cool down
to room temperature and then kept in a fridge for subsequent characterization,
processing, and applications. Obtained AgNPs had a 32 nm diameter
(DLS measurement) and −39 mV zeta potential, and the concentration
was 0.36 nM. Concentrated dispersion (approximately 0.18 μM)
was obtained by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 20 min. Characterization
of AgNPs and their dispersion is described in Section S2.Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were synthesized
from gold(III) chloride trihydrate and trisodium citrate via the Turkevich
method.[46] Following this protocol, 50 mL
of gold(III) chloride trihydrate aqueous solution (1 mM) was heated
to 80 °C under stirring. Afterward, 10 mL of trisodium citrate
(38.8 mM) was added to the above solution, which led to color changes
from yellow to deep red. The nanoparticle dispersion was left to cool
down to room temperature and then kept in the fridge for subsequent
characterization, processing, and applications. Obtained AuNPs had
a 16 nm diameter (DLS measurement) and −44 mV zeta potential,
and the concentration was 2.1 nM. Concentrated dispersion (approximately
1 μM) was obtained by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 20 min.
Characterization of AuNPs and their dispersion is described in Section S2.
Modification of the Screen-Printed
Electrode (SPE) with Nanoparticles:
Preparation of the Cathodic Transduction Layer
To prepare
the cathodic transduction layer, gold SPEs (DRP-C223AT, Asturias,
Spain) were partially covered with scotch tape, leaving an open area,
approximately 2 mm long and 0.5 mm broad, connecting the working (W)
and counter (C) electrodes. This area was filled with 0.5 μL
(three layers) of AgNPs or AgNP and AuNP mixture. The nanoparticles
were then dried at 50 °C. To prevent detachment of the particles
along with enhancing the layer mechanical stability, 1 μL of
Nafion solution (5 wt %) was drop-casted on the NPs.[47] After all these modifications, the resistance across the
NP-bridged working and counter electrodes was less than 10 Ω.
Electrochemical conversion of AgNPs to AgCl on the SPE was carried
out in PBS solutions using a three-electrode system in which external
reference and counter electrodes were used together with the NP-modified
SPE as a working electrode. AgNP oxidation to AgCl was conducted using
an applied potential of 200 mV (vs SCE) for 120 s (referred to as
full AgNP oxidation) or 70 mV for 12 s (referred to as partial AgNP
oxidation). The SPEs encompassing the AgCl cathodic transduction layer
were then thoroughly rinsed with water and kept dry. The transduction
layer thickness, composition, and morphology were characterized by
a number of surface techniques such as scanning electron microscopy,
electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, etc. All characterization
results are summarized in Sections S2, S4, and S5.
Preparation of the Glucose Dehydrogenase-Modified
Electrodes:
Fabrication of the Bioanode
To make a glucose-sensing bioanode,
glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) was immobilized on several types of electrodes,
specifically, a gold disc electrode (GE, BASi, West Lafayette, USA),
glassy carbon electrode (GCE), or a part of the gold counter electrode
of SPE with surface areas of 0.02, 0.07, and 0.02 cm2,
respectively. GE and GCE were polished on 1.0 μm and 0.1 μm
alumina powders and rinsed with ultrapure water. Continuous cycling
in 0.5 M sulfuric acid solutions was carried out for electrochemical
cleaning of the electrodes in the applied potential range of −0.4
to 1.4 V (vs SCE) with the potential scan rate of 100 mV s–1. Following this procedure, a positively charged surface of glassy
carbon electrode (GCE/PEI) was prepared by immersing the electrode
into the 1 mg mL–1 solution of PEI in water for
2 min. Afterward, 3 μL of concentrated AuNPs was drop-casted
on the gold electrode (GE) or GCE/PEI or on a part of the counter
electrode of SPE and left to dry at room temperature. A self-assembled
monolayer (SAM) of 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP) on the surface-confined
AuNPs was established by the incubation of the electrodes in 2 mM
4-ATP in nitrogen-saturated methanol solution for 2 h. The SAM-modified
surfaces were further drop-covered with 3 μL of GDH (34 mg mL–1) and left for 2 h for the enzyme immobilization under
humid conditions. Following these steps, two types of biosensors identified
as GCE/PEI/AuNPs/4-ATP/GDH and GE/AuNPs/4-ATP/GDH were prepared, rinsed
with PBS, and kept in the fridge at 4 °C in the same solution.
GCE/PEI/AuNPs/4-ATP/GDH stands for glassy carbon electrode consecutively
modified with polyethylene imine, AuNPs, 4-aminothioplenol, and finally,
GDH enzyme. Similarly, GE/AuNPs/4-ATP/GDH stands for a plane gold
electrode modified with AuNPs, 4-ATP, and GDH. To evaluate the bioelectrocatalytic
properties of the GDH-modified electrodes, cyclic voltammograms were
recorded in PBS solution in the presence and absence of glucose at
the scan rate of 1 mV s–1. The cyclic voltammograms
(Figure A, main text)
were recorded within the potential range of −0.3 to 0.35 V
(vs SCE) using an Ivium potentiostat in a three-electrode electrochemical
cell. A platinum wire and SCE were exploited as auxiliary and reference
electrodes, respectively.
Measurements of Bioanode-Driven Reduction
of AgCl to Ag on the
Cathode
To realize an enzyme-catalyzed glucose-to-resistance
transduction, the GDH-based bioanode was connected to the SPE hosting
two electrodes, which were bridged by a AgCl layer. Specifically,
the AgCl layer bridged working and counter electrodes and the bioanode
was connected to the counter electrode. The described setup was immersed
in PBS, and the current flowing between two electrodes of the SPE,
across the AgCl bridge, was measured by a potentiostat in chronoamperometric
mode with 5 mV applied DC voltage (Figure C, main text). The use of a multimeter for
measuring the resistance of the layer was refused due to the risk
of invoking electrochemical reactions; multimeters usually use applied
voltage higher than 1 V for measurements of resistance. To achieve
the bioanode-driven reduction of the AgCl bridge, a certain concentration
of glucose was added to the measurement cell containing PBS. The current
measurements were then used to calculate the resistance of the transduction
layer using Ohm’s law (example of data in Figure D, main text).
Measurements
of Glucose in Whole Blood
The application
of the proposed glucose biosensor in whole blood was tested using
two different methods: calibration curve method and standard addition
method. For the calibration curve method, SPEs modified with the bioanode
and cathode layer (Ag-AuNPs oxidized to MΩ level) were prepared
and connected to the tag antenna, as shown in Scheme . Following this step, standard solutions
of glucose with the concentration range of 4–14 mM in PBS were
analyzed on the SPE and the |S11| characteristic
curve of the biosensor during conversion of AgCl (f0 = 17.5 MHz) to Ag (f0 =
13.5 MHz) was recorded wirelessly. The time needed for the transition
of f0 was considered as the biosensor
response (response time) and was used to construct a calibration plot,
as shown in Figure A. With the same setup, 50 μL of unmodified blood samples,
from three volunteers, was dropped on the SPE and the time needed
for conversion of AgCl to Ag was used to find the glucose concentration
in whole blood. The efficiency of the biosensor in whole blood analysis
was also validated using a commercially available glucometer (HemoCue
Glucose 201 RT system, Ängelholm, Sweden), which is known for
its high accuracy in the diagnosis and screening of diabetes. For
the standard addition method, blood samples were spiked with different
concentrations of glucose in the range of 0–12 mM. Following
this step, 50 μL of each blood sample, spiked with a specified
concentration of glucose, was dropped on the SPE and the time for
transition in characteristic frequency from 17.5 MHz to 13 MHz was
recorded for each sample (concentration). The calibration curve obtained
using blood was extrapolated to zero of the y-axis
to find the glucose concentration in the primary blood sample.
Wireless
Measurement of AgCl-to-Ag Conversion on the Cathode:
Recording of |S11| Characteristic
A simple vector network analyzer DG8-SAQ VNA (SDR-Kits, Melksham,
UK) serving as a wireless radio-frequency (RF) antenna reader was
used. The reader was equipped with a homemade copper circular antenna
(diameter, 4 cm; four loops) connected to the TX port of a VNA. An
NFC tag (Smartrac, 13.56 MHz tag) was exploited as an RF antenna of
the biosensor and thus enabled wireless monitoring of biosensing reaction.
To couple the SPE, modified with a Ag/AgCl-based transduction layer,
into the tag antenna, 5 mm of the antenna path was cut out. The produced
path ends were connected to the working and counter electrodes on
the SPE bridged by the AgCl layer (a photo of the setup is demonstrated
in Figure S12). For all reported wireless
measurements, the reader and the tag antennas were kept at a fixed
distance of 1 cm. During the wireless measurements, the magnitude
of the reflection parameter |S11| was
monitored continuously in the frequency range of 3–32 MHz.
The magnitude of |S11| is defined by the
following relation:where PT is the
power transmitted to the tag antenna at a certain frequency, and PMAX is the maximum achievable transmitted power.
The |S11| depended on the frequency of
the electromagnetic field created by the antenna of the reader. This
dependence was used to determine the characteristic (resonance) frequency
of the tag antenna circuit comprised of the tag antenna coupled to
the SPE that hosted the transduction layer.
Authors: Conan Mercer; Richard Bennett; Peter Ó Conghaile; James F Rusling; Dónal Leech Journal: Sens Actuators B Chem Date: 2019-02-17 Impact factor: 7.460