| Literature DB >> 35392626 |
Juliana Jamal1,2, Margaret M Roebuck1,3, Amanda Wood1, Alasdair Santini4,5, George Bou-Gharios1, Simon P Frostick3, Pooi-Fong Wong2.
Abstract
Degradation of articular cartilage is the defining feature of end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) with osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, malalignment and joint space narrowing being additional indicators of advanced disease. Obesity, older age and female gender are OA risk factors. Differing degrees of synovitis are observed in OA, soft tissue and traumatic injuries of the knee. The synovium is also subject to systemic, enhanced lipids and inflammatory mediators characteristic of obesity. Synovial cellular composition changes specific to OA and associated with its handling of cartilage debris are unclear. Triangulation of data from three knee pathologies was used to highlight findings pertaining to OA compared to non-OA. OA patient data was compared to non-OA from knee ligament and tibial frature patients at surgery. Knee pathology, gender and BMI informed patient identification. Once consented, patient inclusion and characterisation utilised data from clinical assessments, blood tests, function scores, and radiological imaging, scores and intraoperative assessment. Intra-operative synovial tissues from the same site and processed identically underpins in-depth analyses and comparisons of histopathological images from these different knee pathologies. This supports the identification of distinct changes in the cellular composition of the knee synovium characteristic of OA. This data underpins a better understanding of OA pathogenesis and disease progression vital for the design of targeted therapeutics. The tissue and cell data include detailed results from the semi-quantitative synovitis score established by Krenn and observational data for morphological features such as cartilage debris inclusion, inflammatory cells aggregate and infiltration. This histopathological data is presented in the context of detailed clinical and functional information. This data and the holistic study design can be used as a foundation for the multifactorial collection and analysis of clinical data from OA patients, OA severity measures, tissue immuno-histology and synovial inflammation analysis to underpin the details and comparisons needed in further studies into OA and its treatment globally.Entities:
Keywords: Cartilage debris; Cartilage inclusion; Inflammatory infiltrate; Macrophage; Peri-cartilage; Peri-vascular; Synovitis; Synovium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392626 PMCID: PMC8980702 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Individual patient's clinical data demography.
| Sample i.d. | Pathology | Gender | Age (years) | BMI (kg/m2) | Duration of symptoms (years) | BP (mmHg) | WCC x109/L | CRP (mg/l) | S100a8a9 | ASA grade | CIRS | WOMAC score | SF-12 Ph | SF-12 M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | OA | M | 72.06 | 35.93 | 10.00 | 150/70 | 8.4 | 1 | 6.05 | 2 | 7 | 59 | 34.80 | 50.40 |
| 29 | OA | F | 60.05 | 28.59 | 9.00 | 157/79 | 10.3 | 1 | 5.26 | 1 | 3 | 72 | 25.50 | 54.40 |
| 31 | OA | M | 69.62 | 32.19 | 27.00 | 160/90 | 6.9 | 1 | 6.78 | 2 | 7 | 66 | 21.00 | 57.20 |
| 35 | OA | M | 53.63 | 32.55 | 3.00 | 120/80 | 7.2 | 1 | 5.42 | 2 | 5 | 82 | 23.90 | 56.40 |
| 36 | OA | F | 57.83 | 34.22 | 20.00 | 125/70 | 6.6 | 1 | 6.37 | 1 | 3 | 66 | 36.20 | 26.50 |
| 43 | OA | F | 63.67 | 29.02 | 5.00 | 135/83 | 7.2 | 1 | 6.64 | 2 | 9 | 69 | 13.20 | 68.30 |
| 44 | OA | M | 71.73 | 32.70 | 5.00 | 140/80 | 6.1 | 1 | 5.07 | 2 | 8 | 36 | 34.90 | 68.00 |
| 48 | OA | F | 67.44 | 24.27 | 10.00 | 141/90 | 7.0 | 1 | 6.37 | 2 | 6 | 82 | 16.90 | 62.80 |
| 70 | OA | M | 58.75 | 25.61 | 1.00 | 135/82 | 6.4 | 8 | 5.25 | 2 | 10 | 66 | 30.99 | 45.30 |
| 75 | OA | M | 57.48 | 26.87 | 7.00 | 145/89 | 6.0 | 1 | 5.88 | 2 | 4 | 77 | 33.55 | 52.03 |
| 78 | OA | F | 59.95 | 36.88 | 3.00 | 150/90 | 4.1 | 1 | 5.23 | 2 | 6 | 71 | 32.83 | 45.48 |
| 89 | OA | F | 73.90 | 25.62 | 10.00 | 150/80 | 5.7 | 1 | 4.05 | 2 | 6 | 54 | 34.96 | 68.01 |
| 90 | OA | M | 55.40 | 28.73 | 20.00 | 132/85 | 7.3 | 1 | 5.22 | 2 | 4 | 96 | 19.15 | 60.41 |
| 98 | OA | F | 56.00 | 37.48 | 2.00 | 99/63 | 6.8 | 19 | 9.57 | 2 | 9 | 72 | 29.18 | 42.75 |
| 99 | OA | M | 76.01 | 26.43 | 10.00 | 139/79 | 6.7 | 1 | 5.54 | 2 | 4 | 45 | 25.13 | 66.02 |
| 169 | OA | F | 54.66 | 33.56 | 3.00 | 149/88 | 4.4 | 1 | - | 2 | 9 | 65 | 26.71 | 40.03 |
| 18 | Scope | F | 33.96 | 26.30 | 0.50 | 110/80 | 6.1 | 1 | 4.52 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 44.00 | 66.70 |
| 59 | Scope | F | 26.32 | 21.36 | 1.00 | 100/64 | 6.9 | 1 | 5.47 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 46.44 | 60.73 |
| 60 | Scope | M | 25.97 | 19.88 | 1.00 | 110/60 | 6.1 | 1 | 4.27 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 39.19 | 63.50 |
| 61 | Scope | M | 25.68 | 24.16 | 1.50 | 120/80 | 6.4 | 1 | 5.68 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 51.06 | 59.29 |
| 81 | Scope | M | 28.71 | 25.53 | 1.00 | 128/75 | 5.4 | 1 | 6.02 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 33.86 | 68.66 |
| 88 | Scope | M | 29.16 | 25.25 | 1.00 | 120/85 | 14.4 | 1 | 4.50 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - |
| 91 | Scope | F | 27.17 | 22.25 | 0.50 | 132/78 | 7.1 | 1 | 3.71 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 46.70 | 64.96 |
| 120 | Scope | F | 33.03 | 23.97 | 0.50 | 115/72 | 5.4 | 1 | 10.17 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 39.26 | 63.85 |
| 155 | Scope | F | 25.25 | 24.06 | 1.50 | 120/70 | 8.8 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 52.76 | 58.52 |
| 46 | Trauma | M | 37.33 | 24.19 | 0.02 | 123/79 | 7.6 | 61 | 4.80 | 1 | 3 | - | - | - |
| 54 | Trauma | F | 54.33 | 27.00 | 0.04 | 114/80 | 6.8 | 18 | 5.21 | 2 | 12 | - | - | - |
| 55 | Trauma | M | 46.00 | 39.20 | 0.04 | 111/71 | 12.2 | - | - | 1 | 6 | - | - | - |
| 58 | Trauma | F | 63.00 | 30.60 | 0.02 | 146/81 | 11.7 | - | 5.44 | 2 | 7 | - | - | - |
| 62 | Trauma | M | 29.27 | 21.40 | 0.04 | 150/81 | 7.2 | - | - | 2 | 6 | - | 60.10 | 34.77 |
| 63 | Trauma | F | 34.82 | 48.43 | 0.04 | 139/90 | 9.2 | 15 | 3.43 | 2 | 5 | - | 61.19 | 41.46 |
| 84 | Trauma | F | 24.42 | 19.79 | 0.02 | 120/78 | 5.4 | 6 | 2.30 | 1 | 0 | - | 46.31 | 40.36 |
| 95 | Trauma | M | 19.34 | 23.44 | 0.02 | - | 6.1 | 19 | 6.41 | 1 | 1 | - | 26.28 | 66.34 |
Clinical range guidelines recommended by the NHS UK:
BMI: Body mass index (kg/m2): normal,18≤BMI<25; overweight, 25≤BMI<30; obesity, BMI≥30
BP: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): ideal BP, between 90/60 – 120/80; high BP>140/90; at risk of developing high BP, between 120/80 – 140/90
WCC: White blood cells counts (x109/L): normal, 3.8–10.8
CRP: C-reactive protein (mg/l), normal range: <5
S100a8a9: Constitutively expressed in neutrophils and monocytes, a predictive biomarker for diagnosis of inflammation-associated diseases.
ASA: Physical status classification grade >1; patients with systemic disease, mild or severe
CIRS: Cumulative illness rating scale total: morbidity count, which indicates the number of diseases on which the patients scored a severity of 2 or higher.
WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
SF-12 Ph: The 12-item Short Form Survey, a physical component score
SF-12 M: The 12-item Short Form Survey, a mental component score
Individual patient's synovial tissue histology analysis.
| Sample i.d. | No of image grids | Pain Score | Synovitis grade | Synovial lining hyperplasia | Density of the resident cells | Inflammatory infiltrate | Presence of cartilage inclusion | Diffuse infiltrate | Peri-vascular focal infiltrate | Peri-cartilage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 29 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | yes | no | no | no |
| 31 | 7 | 9 | - | - | - | - | no | yes | no | no |
| 35 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 36 | 0 | 10 | - | - | - | - | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 43 | 26 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 44 | 21 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | no | yes | yes | no |
| 48 | 22 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 70 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | yes | yes | yes | no |
| 75 | 25 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | no |
| 78 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | no |
| 89 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 90 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 98 | 40 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | yes | yes | yes | no |
| 99 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| 169 | 36 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | yes | yes | no | no |
| 18 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | no | no | no | no |
| 59 | 10 | - | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 60 | 16 | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 61 | 5 | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 81 | 5 | - | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 88 | 10 | - | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | no | no | no | no |
| 91 | 7 | - | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 120 | 4 | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | no | no | no | no |
| 155 | 9 | - | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | no | yes | no | no |
| 46 | 10 | - | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 54 | 4 | - | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | no | yes | no | no |
| 55 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | no | yes | no | no |
| 58 | 14 | - | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 62 | 5 | - | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | no | yes | no | no |
| 63 | 4 | - | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | no | yes | no | no |
| 84 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | no | yes | no | no |
| 95 | 5 | - | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | no | yes | no | no |
ND: Not determined
Sample i.d. 36 did not have any histological assessment results due to handling issues during tissue processing, hence were excluded from analysis.
Pain score: evaluated by WOMAC pain questionnaires during walking, using stairs, in bed, sitting or lying, and standing upright with a possible score range of 0-20. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Synovitis grade: sum of all three morphological features score of synovial lining hyperplasia, density of the resident cells and inflammatory infiltrate score. Sum 0 to 1 indicates no synovitis, sum between 2 to 4 indicates low-grade synovitis and sum between 5 to 9 shows high-grade synovitis. The grading criteria of synovial lining hyperplasia, density of the resident cells and inflammatory infiltrate score are as described in Krenn et al., (2006).
For observational analysis of the presence of cartilage inclusion, diffuse inflammatory immune cells infiltration, peri-vascular focal inflammatory immune cells infiltrate, and peri-cartilage focal inflammatory immune cells infiltrate was stated as a yes or no nominal response.
Radiologic findings of knee OA severity assessment.
| Osteophytes | Joint Space Loss | Subchondral Sclerosis | Deformity | K-L | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample i.d. | Location | Grade | Location | Grade | Location | Grade | Description | Grade | Grade | Intraoperative observation notes |
| 29 | Medial tibia; superior & inferior patella; lateral anterior & posterior femur | 1 | Absent on medial side | 2 | Medial tibial plateau | 2 | Moderate varus | 2 | 3 | Grade IV changes medially, Grade III changes patellofemoral, Grade II changes laterally. |
| 43 | Medial femur, tibia, patella | 1 | Decreased on medial side | 1 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 2 | Severe medial OA |
| 48 | Lateral tibial plateau, medial femoral condyle; patella | 2 | Severely decreased on lateral side | 2 | Lateral tibial condyle | 1 | Mild valgus | 1 | 3 | Grade IV changes medially |
| 70 | Medial femoral condyle | 1 | Moderate decrease on medial side | 1 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 3 | PFJ Abnormalities: Generalised degeneration |
| 75 | Extensive distal femur & patella | 1 | Decreased on medial side | 1 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 3 | Proximal tibial deformity |
| 89 | Distal femur; patella | 2 | Decreased on medial side | 1 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 3 | Marked OA |
| 90 | Mild femur & patella | 1 | Virtually absent medial compartments | 2 | Medial tibial plateau | 1 | Mild varus | 1 | 4 | Marked OA |
| 99 | Extensive distal femur & patella | 3 | Absent on both medial & lateral compartments but severe collapse on medial side | 3 | Medial tibial plateau | 1 | Severe varus | 3 | 4 | Marked OA. Varus. Severely deformed FFD. Deficient posterio-medial tibial condyle |
| 16 | Tibia, femur & patella but less on tibia | 2 | Absent medial side | 2 | Minimal | 1 | Moderate varus | 2 | 4 | Femur: Grade IV both condyles |
| 31 | Extensive | 2 | Virtually absent medial compartment | 2 | Minimal | 1 | Mild varus | 1 | 4 | Moderate synovitis Tibial plateau:Grade IV medial & Grade II lateral Femoral condyles: Grade IV medial & Grade II lateral Patella: Grade III OA Medial facet, Grade II OA Lateral facet |
| 35 | Mild femur & patella | 1 | Markedly reduced on medial side | 2 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 3 | Grade IV changes medially Grade II changes patellofemoral Grade II changes laterally. |
| 36 | Mild femur & tibia | 1 | Difficult because of malalignment; some loss | 1 | Medial tibial plateau | 1 | Moderate varus | 2 | 3 | Grade I changes laterally malalignment of femur on tibia; possible ligament instability |
| 44 | Femur, tibia, patella | 2 | Virtually complete loss on medial compartment | 2 | Medial tibial plateau | 1 | Mild varus | 1 | 4 | Grade IV changes laterally Grade IV changes patellofemoral joint Grade IV changes medially |
| 78 | Mild femur, tibia, patella | 1 | Significant decrease on medial side | 1 | No | 0 | Mild varus | 1 | 3 | Tri-compartment osteoarthritis with severe arthritis of the knee medial side |
| 98 | Minimal | 1 | Slight decrease medial compartment | 1 | No | 0 | Possibly very Mild varus | 1 | 2 | General: Significant synovitis, arthritic changes, serous fluid |
| 169 | Mild femur & tibia, patella | 1 | Moderate to severe loss lateral compartment | 2 | No | 0 | Moderate valgus | 2 | 3 | PFJ grade IV Medial compartment, grade IV Lateral compartment, and grade IV Possible history of Lateral tibial plateau injury |
Individual radiographic features in knee OA patients include grading of osteophytes, joint space loss or narrowing, subchondral sclerosis, varus and valgus deformity and K-L (Kellgren-Lawrence) score.
PFJ: Patello femoral joint
FFD: Fixed flexion deformity
Fig. 1| Subject | Health and medical sciences (Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation) |
| Specific subject area | Contrasting histopathology of knee synovial tissues from osteoarthritic total knee replacement and non-osteoarthritic soft tissue and trauma injury patients |
| Type of data | Tables |
| How the data were acquired | Demographic and clinical parameters from consenting patients at the time of surgery with tissue collection |
| Data format | |
| Description of data collection | Knee patients requiring surgery provided demographic, health and functional score data: 16 endstage primary osteoarthritis, and 17 with no clinical or radiological evidence of arthritis, 9 ligament tears and 8 tibial plateau fractures. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and infection were excluded. |
| Data source location | Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom |
| Data accessibility |