Literature DB >> 35392494

Blood Urea Nitrogen as a Prognostic Marker in Severe Acute Pancreatitis.

Minhui Dai1,2,3,4, Yifei Fan1,2,3,4, Pinhua Pan1,2,3,4, Yun Tan5.   

Abstract

Objectives: To explore independent risk factors with good and early predictive power for SAP severity and prognosis.
Methods: Patients with SAP were enrolled at Central South University Xiangya Hospital between April 2017 and May 2021 and used as the training cohort. From June 2021 to February 2022, all patients with SAP were defined as external patients for validation. Patients were grouped by survival status at a 30-day posthospital admission and then compared in terms of basic information and laboratory tests to screen the independent risk factors.
Results: A total of 249 patients with SAP were enrolled in the training cohort. The all-cause mortality rate at a 30-day postadmission was 25.8% (51/198). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were significantly higher in the mortality group (20.45 [interquartile range (IQR), 19.7] mmol/L) than in the survival group (6.685 [IQR, 6.3] mmol/L; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM), the BUN level was still higher in the mortality group than in the survival group (18.415 [IQR, 19.555] mmol/L vs. 10.63 [IQR, 6.03] mmol/L; P = 0.005). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of BUN was 0.820 (95% confidence interval, 0.721-0.870; P < 0.001). The optimal BUN level cut-off for predicting a 30-day all-cause mortality was 10.745 mmol/L. Moreover, patients with SAP were grouped according to BUN levels and stratified according to optimal cut-off value. Patients with high BNU levels were associated with significantly higher rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (before PSM: 61.8% vs. 20.6%, P < 0.001; after PSM: 71.1% vs. 32%, P = 0.048) and a 30-day all-cause mortality (before PSM: 44.9% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001; after PSM: 60% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.032) than those with low BNU levels before or after PSM. The effectiveness of BUN as a prognostic marker was further validated using ROC curves for the external validation set (n = 49). The AUC of BUN was 0.803 (95% CI, 0.655-0.950; P = 0.011). It showed a good ability to predict a 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAP. We also observed similar results regarding disease severity, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (before PSM: 16 [IQR, 8] vs. 8 [IQR, 6], P < 0.001; after PSM: 18 [IQR, 10] vs. 12 [IQR, 7], P < 0.001), SOFA score (before PSM: 7 [IQR, 5] vs. 3 [IQR, 3], P < 0.001; after PSM: 8 [IQR, 5] vs. 5 [IQR, 3.5], P < 0.001), and mMarshall score (before PSM: 4 [IQR, 3] vs. 3 [IQR, 1], P < 0.001; after PSM: 5 [IQR, 2.5] vs. 3 [IQR, 1], P < 0.001). There was significant increase in intensive care unit occupancy in the high BUN level group before PSM (93.3% vs. 73.1%, P < 0.001), but not after PSM (97.8% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.074). Conclusions: Our results showed that BUN levels within 24 h after hospital admission were independent risk factors for a 30-day all-cause death in patients with SAP.
Copyright © 2022 Minhui Dai et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35392494      PMCID: PMC8983180          DOI: 10.1155/2022/7785497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


1. Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a digestive system disease with an increased prevalence. The pathogenesis of AP involves the self-digestion of exocrine pancreas due to various reasons. AP is generally a self-limiting illness whose symptoms resolve within several days; however, approximately 20% of cases can progress to severe disease with multiple organ failure and even death. Severe AP (SAP) involves persistent multiple organ failure (POF) in one or more organs with a mortality rate of 15%-30% [1]. Reliable prognostic factors can significantly affect treatment and clinical care. Most previous studies focused on exploring early predicators of progression from AP to SAP or mortality from AP [2-4]. Thus, an easy-to-use predictor of SAP outcomes and severity remains rarely reported. Here, we aimed to identify a meaningful independent predictor of poor outcomes to improve the prognosis of patients with AP or SAP.

2. Method

2.1. Study Participants

We reviewed 1608 consecutive cases of AP between April 2017 and May 2021 at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Data from 249 patients who diagnosed with SAP according to the modified Atlanta criteria 2012 were used as the training cohort. From June 2021 to February 2022, all patients with SAP were defined as external patients (n = 49) for validation. Those who met at least two of the following criteria were diagnosed with AP: [1] an acute, sudden surge in pain, radiating to the back and waist; [2] high concentration of serum amylase and/or a lipase level ≥ 3 times the normal reference values; and [3] a typical imaging change on abdominal ultrasound, enhanced computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (pancreatic edema or pancreatic exudate). AP with POF > 48 h and a modified Marshall score of ≥2 points was diagnosed as SAP. All patients were divided into a survival group (n = 198) and a mortality group (n = 51) based on their survival status at a 30-day posthospital admission. A telephone follow-up was conducted to determine a 30-day survival if the patient's hospital stay was <30 days.

2.2. Clinical Data Collection

We gathered the following variables for this retrospective analysis: basic information including age, sex, history of smoking and alcohol consumption, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and hypertension), body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. Laboratory tests include arterial blood gases (pH value, FiO2, PaO2, PaCO2, and lactic acid), routine blood examinations (hematocrit; white blood cell, platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, basophil, and monocyte counts; mean corpuscular volume; mean corpuscular hemoglobin; mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; red blood cell distribution width; plateletcrit; mean platelet volume; and platelet distribution width), routine serum biochemistry (potassium, sodium, and calcium concentrations; albumin, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density cholesterol levels), blood coagulation tests (plasma prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, and fibrinogen level), blood and urinary amylase levels, and procalcitonin level. The baseline clinical data were collected within 24 h of admission and analyzed. Other outcome indexes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, incidence of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Indicators related to disease severity included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and modified Marshall (mMarshall) score.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as mean (SD) for normally distributed variables using an unpaired t-test and median (IQR) for nonnormal distributions and were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are presented as count (proportion) and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. First, a univariate logistic analysis was performed to identify latent predictors. Variables with values of P > 0.10 were included in the multivariable logistic regression model analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of variables screened by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounding factors between the survival and mortality groups at a ratio of 1 : 1 using the nearest neighbor PSM algorithm. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 26.0).

3. Results

A total of 1608 patients with AP were admitted to our institution between April 2017 and May 2021; of them, 249 patients with SAP were enrolled (Figure 1(a)). The all-cause mortality rate at a 30-day postadmission was 25.8% (51/198). The baseline characteristics of the 249 SAP patients are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Patients in the mortality group (53.08 ± 13.54 years) were older than those in the survival group (47.24 ± 12.7 years, P = 0.007). Statistically significant intergroup differences were noted in 30 parameters, such as BUN (6.685 [IQR, 6.3] mmol/L vs. 20.45 [IQR, 19.7] mmol/L; P < 0.001). See Table 3 for tract abbreviations and associated acronyms in Table 1.
Figure 1

Flow chart of the study.

Table 1

Basic clinical characteristics before and after propensity score matching.

VariablesBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matching
Survival (n = 198)Mortality (n = 51) P valueSurvival (n = 37)Mortality (n = 37) P value
Age, yr, mean (SD)47.24 (12.70)53.08 (13.54)0.00751.59 (14.893)52.35 (13.438)0.819
Gender, male, n(%)137 (62.7)32 (69.2)0.37927 (73)23 (62.2)0.321
Smoking, yes, n(%)79 (39.9)9 (17.6)0.00312 (32.4)8 (21.6)0.295
Alcohol, yes, n(%)69 (34.8)9 (17.6)0.0207 (18.9)8 (21.6)1.000
Hypertension, yes, n(%)53 (26.8)16 (31.4)0.51210 (27)11 (29.7)0.797
DM, yes, n(%)53 (26.8)10 (19.6)0.36712 (32.4)5 (13.5)0.053
Causes, n(%)0.1390.832
 Hypertriglyceridemia101 (51.0)18 (35.3)15 (40.5)14 (37.8)
 Gallstone61 (30.8)21 (41.2)12 (32.4)15 (40.5)
 Others36 (18.2)12 (23.5)10 (27)8 (21.6)
FHR, cpm, mean (SD)110.22 (21.63)112.18 (18.98)0.555114 (28)112 (25)0.733
TEMP, °C, median (IQR)37.00 (1.10)37.3 (1.3)0.12437 (0.75)37.2 (1.35)0.212
RR, cpm, median (IQR)23.00 (8.00)23 (11)0.94725 (11)23 (11)0.672
SBP, mmHg, mean (SD)137.39 (23.66)124.39 (28.13)0.001141.03 (25.389)125.49 (27.602)0.014
DBP, mmHg, median (IQR)80.00 (17.25)74 (21)0.00188 (23)74 (19.1)0.004
FiO2, median (IQR)0.4 (0.17)0.41 (0.2)0.0000.4 (0.27)0.4 (0.2)0.287
PaO2, KPa, median (IQR)74 (23.25)81 (62)0.00677 (26)78 (42)0.563
PaCO2, KPa, median (IQR)35 (8)35 (8)0.99335 (9.45)35 (7)0.611
Lac, mmol/L, median (IQR)1.4 (0.9)1.85 (1.0)0.0001.3 (0.6)1.8 (1.3)0.001
WBC, ×109/L, median (IQR)12.4 (8.2)13.2 (8.1)0.59712.4 (10.15)13.1 (8.75)0.733
HCT, %, mean (SD)33.62 (8.25)28.19 (8.90)0.00031.2 (10)27.5 (11.1)0.109
PLT, G/L, median (IQR)185 (114.25)158 (131)0.044200 (111)158 (122)0.058
NEc, G/L, median (IQR)10.5 (8)11.2 (9.5)0.64710.3 (10.6)10.2 (8.6)0.661
LYc, G/L, median (IQR)0.8 (0.5)0.7 (0.5)0.0160.8 (0.55)0.8 (0.65)0.248
EOc, G/L, median (IQR)0 (0.1)0 (0.1)0.5130 (0.1)0 (0.1)0.668
BAc, G/L, median (IQR)0 (0.02)0 (0.01)0.6930 (0.02)0 (0.03)0.501
MOc, G/L, median (IQR)0.6 (0.6)0.6 (0.8)0.7490.7 (0.5)0.6 (0.8)0.692
MCV, fl, median (IQR)91.7 (7)92.6 (7)0.82891.3 (7.4)92.7 (6.55)0.310
MCH, pg, median (IQR)30.5 (2.5)30.7 (2.2)0.88330.5 (3.1)30.7 (1.4)0.414
MCHC, g/L, median (IQR)331 (15)331 (18.1)0.761330 (16.7)332 (17.91)0.523
PCT, %, median (IQR)0.18 (0.1)0.17 (0.12)0.1340.18 (0.1)0.17 (0.12)0.178
RDW, %, median (IQR)14.2 (1.6)15.3 (1.5)0.00014.5 (1.6)15.2 (1.8)0.030
MPV, fl, median (IQR)9.51 (1.8)9.9 (2.08)0.0539.5 (2)10.1 (1.93)0.119
K, mmol/L, median (IQR)3.715 (0.7)4.05 (0.8)0.0003.96 (0.77)4.01 (0.72)0.191
Na, mmol/L, median (IQR)140.25 (6.5)144.1 (7.9)0.000140.9 (8.45)144.2 (7.65)0.021
Ca, mmol/L, median (IQR)1.94 (0.3)1.96 (0.3)0.4661.94 (0.37)1.96 (0.37)0.489
ALB, g/L, median (IQR)30.3 (6.1)26.5 (5.1)0.00028.5 (6.7)27.9 (5.6)0.077
TBIL, μmol/L, median (IQR)19.4 (22)25.4 (65.5)0.02519.4 (19.3)25.4 (57.4)0.355
ALT, U/L, median (IQR)23.5 (29.2)27.1 (50.6)0.51727.9 (34.45)32.6 (72.3)0.292
AST, U/L, median (IQR)36.1 (33.7)55 (82.6)0.00945.1 (43.75)56.2 (103.25)0.196
BUN, mmol/L, median (IQR)6.685 (6.3)20.45 (19.7)0.00010.14 (11.25)18.14 (19.24)0.007
CREA, μmol/L, median (IQR)76.55 (53.6)298.7 (272.1)0.000102.9 (198.6)297.1 (309.6)0.008
TG, mmol/L, median (IQR)2.98 (3.75)2.5 (3.17)0.7002.75 (4.02)2.5 (3.57)0.829
TC, mmol/L, median (IQR)3.69 (2.83)2.45 (1.74)0.0002.76 (2.46)2.5 (2.16)0.177
HDL-C, mmol/L, median (IQR)0.62 (0.46)0.37 (0.29)0.0000.58 (0.39)0.41 (0.28)0.005
LDL-C, mmol/L, median (IQR)2.37 (1.74)1.48 (1.05)0.0002.01 (1.63)1.59 (1.39)0.079
APTT, s, median (IQR)33.8 (9.1)37.2 (9.3)0.00735.2 (9.38)37.2 (12.4)0.289
PT, s, median (IQR)13.9 (2.55)14.8 (2.8)0.04114.25 (2.68)14.8 (2.95)0.222
TT, s, median (IQR)16.66 (3.58)16 (3.5)0.47916.22 (4.08)15.8 (3.25)0.449
FIB, g/L, median (IQR)5.76 (2.92)4.38 (2.21)0.0005.93 (2.97)3.99 (1.95)0.004
DD, μg/mL, median (IQR)2.49 (3.89)4.14 (8.49)0.0073.48 (8.02)4.14 (10.32)0.149
Procalcitonin, ng/mL, median (IQR)1.65 (4.25)10.83 (30.34)0.0005.63 (12.02)8.32 (33.225)0.189

∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.001. Definitions of abbreviations are shown in Table 3.

Table 2

Outcomes and severity of patients with SAP based on BUN level.

VariablesBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matching
BUN ≤ 10.745 mmol/L (n = 160)BUN > 10.745 mmol/L (n = 89) P valueBUN ≤ 10.745 mmol/L (n = 29)BUN > 10.745 mmol/L (n = 45) P value
mMarshall score, median (IQR)3 (1)4 (3)0.0003 (1)5 (2.5)0.000
APACHE II score, median (IQR)8 (6)16 (8)0.00012 (7)18 (10)0.000
SOFA score, median (IQR)3 (3)7 (5)0.0005 (3.5)8 (5)0.000
SIRS score, median (IQR)6 (5)7 (5)0.0006 (4.5)7 (4)0.011
30-day all-cause mortality, n(%)11 (6.9)40 (44.9)0.00010 (34.5)27 (60)0.032
ICU admission rate, n(%)117 (73.1)83 (93.3)0.00025 (86.2)44 (97.8)0.074
LOS, d, median (IQR)18 (18)18 (27)0.50522 (26)17 (26)0.184
IMV, n(%)33 (20.6)55 (61.8)0.00014 (32)32 (71.1)0.048

mMarshall score: modified Marshall score; APACHE II score: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score; SOFA: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome; ICU: intensive care unit; LOS: length of stay; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation.

Table 3

Definition of abbreviations.

SequenceAbbreviationMeaning
1ALBAlbumin
2ALTAlanine aminotransferase
3APTTActivated partial thromboplastin time
4ASTAspartate aminotransferase
5BacBasophils
7BUNBlood urea nitrogen
8CaCalcium concentration
9CREACreatinine
10DBPDiastolic blood pressure
11DDD-dimer
12DMDiabetes mellitus
13EocEosinophils
14FDPFibrin degradation product
15FHRHeart rate
16FIBFibrinogen
17FiO2Fraction of inspiration oxygen
18GLUGlucose
19HCTHematocrit
20HDL-CHigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol
21INRInternational normalized ratio
22KPotassium concentration
23LacLactic acid
24LDHLactate dehydrogenase
25LDL-CLow-density cholesterol
26LYcLymphocytes
27MCHMean corpuscular hemoglobin
28MCHCMean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
29MCVMean corpuscular volume
30MocMonocytes
31MPVMean platelet volume
32NaSodium concentration
33NEcNeutrophils
34PaCO2Artery carbon dioxide partial pressure
35PaO2Arterial oxygen partial pressure
36PCTPlateletcrit
37PDWPlatelet distribution width
38PLTPlatelets
39PTPlasma prothrombin time
40RBCRed blood cells
41RDWRed blood cell distribution width
42RRRespiratory rate
43SBPSystolic blood pressure
44TBILTotal bilirubin
45TCTotal cholesterol
46TEMPTemperature
47TGTriglyceride
48TTThrombin time
50WBCWhite blood cell
Thirty variables with P < 0.05 on PSM (Table 1) were subjected to univariate logistic regression analysis (Table 4). Following the exclusion of collinearity, parameters with values of P < 0.10 including history of alcohol consumption and BUN, procalcitonin, ALB, and AST levels were entered into the multivariate analysis. Ultimately, four variables were included in the final model. Of them, BUN (odds ratio [OR], 1.097; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.052–1.144; P < 0.001) and procalcitonin (OR, 1.070; 95% CI, 1.035–1.105; P < 0.001) levels were risk factors, whereas a history of alcohol consumption (OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.064–0.574; P = 0.003) and ALB level (OR, 0.829; 95% CI, 0.743–0.92; P = 0.001) were protective factors.
Table 4

Predictors for mortality of patients with SAP in logistic regression analysis.

VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariable analysisAfter propensity score matching
ORLowerUpper P valueORLowerUpper P valueORLowerUpper P value
Alcohol0.1370.0270.6960.0170.1920.0640.5740.003
ALB0.8430.7300.9730.0200.8290.7430.9250.001
BUN1.0670.9881.1530.0981.0971.0521.1440.0001.0701.0171.1260.009
Procalcitonin1.0541.0091.1010.0181.0701.0351.1050.000
HDLC0.0790.0051.2820.074
AST1.0030.9991.0070.131
Smoking3.3170.073150.2550.538
Age1.0200.9751.0660.394
SBP1.0000.9741.0270.984
DBP0.9980.9571.0400.917
FiO20.5550.02412.7900.713
PaO21.0060.9881.0240.513
Lac1.2140.7152.0620.473
PLT1.0020.9981.0050.329
HCT0.9910.9161.0730.825
LYc0.4420.1561.2510.124
RDW0.9300.7221.2000.578
K2.3880.8356.8290.104
Na1.0620.9611.1730.236
TBIL1.0040.9991.0100.136
CREA1.0010.9961.0050.750
TC1.0850.4962.3710.839
LDLC1.0860.2694.3780.907
PT0.9870.7531.2920.922
APTT0.9780.9351.0220.326
FIB0.9010.7121.1390.383
DD0.9760.8821.0790.631

Definitions of abbreviations are shown in Table 3.

We further analyzed the ROC curve to determine the diagnostic value of the risk factors including BUN and procalcitonin levels using multivariate logistic regression analysis (Figure 2). The area under the ROC curve for BUN was 0.820 (95% CI, 0.721–0.870; P < 0.001; Figure 2(a)). The AUC for procalcitonin was 0.795 (95% CI, 0.750–0.890; P < 0.001; Figure 2(b)). The best cut-off values for BUN and procalcitonin were 10.745 mmol/L (sensitivity = 0.780, specificity = 0.751) and 3.0705 ng/mL (sensitivity = 0.837, specificity = 0.678), respectively. In contrast, the potential value of BUN was higher than that of procalcitonin as a predictor of a 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAP. Therefore, we used BUN for further validation.
Figure 2

Predictive values of (a) BUN level (AUC: 0.820; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.721–0.870; P < 0.001) and (b) procalcitonin (AUC: 0.795; 95% [CI]: 0.750–0.890; P < 0.001) for a 30-day all-cause mortality.

To further verify this conclusion, we matched the predictors in the multivariate logistic regression model except BUN, and continuous variables including ALB and procalcitonin were stratified by the median cut-off point. In addition, confounders that reportedly affect outcomes for AP or SAP, including age, APACHE II score, and mMarshall score, were matched [5-11] (Table 5). After PSM, BUN levels were still higher in the mortality group than in the survival group (18.415 [IQR, 19.555] mmol/L vs. 10.63 [IQR, 6.03] mmol/L; P = 0.005). After PSM, there were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the history of alcohol consumption, ALB level, and procalcitonin level (Table 1). In the multivariate logistic regression model, BUN level was the only independent risk factor associated with a 30-day all-cause mortality (Table 4). In addition, the effectiveness of BUN as a prognostic marker was further validated using ROC curves for the external validation set, whose underlying conditions are listed in Table S1. As shown in Figure S1, the AUC of BUN was 0.803 (95% CI, 0.655–0.950; P = 0.011). The best cut-off value was 12.01 mmol/L (sensitivity = 0.714, specificity = 0.810). These results showed a good ability to predict a 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAP.
Table 5

Balance the factors for propensity score matching.

VariableBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matching P value
Survival (n = 198)Mortality (n = 51) P valueSurvival (n = 37)Mortality (n = 37)
Age, yr, n(%)0.0230.642
 ≤50124 (62.6)23 (45.1)17 (45.9)19 (51.4)
 >5074 (37.4)28 (54.9)20 (54.1)18 (48.6)
Alcohol, yes, n(%)69 (34.8)9 (17.6)0.0207 (18.9)8 (21.6)1.000
APACHE II, n(%)0.0001.000
 ≤886 (43.4)3 (5.9)3 (8.1)3 (8.1)
 >8112 (56.6)48 (94.1)34 (91.9)34 (91.9)
mMarshall score, n(%)0.0000.787
 ≤3153 (77.3)19 (37.3)10 (27.0)8 (21.6)
 >345 (22.7)32 (62.7)27 (73.0)29 (78.4)
ALB, g/L, n(%)0.0000.809
 ≤29.487 (43.9)38 (74.5)23 (62.2)24 (64.9)
 >29.4111 (56.1)13 (25.5)14 (37.8)13 (35.1)
Procalcitonin, ng/mL, n(%)0.0001.000
 ≤2.22116 (58.6)9 (7.2)10 (27.0)9 (24.3)
 >2.2282 (41.4)42 (82.4)27 (73.0)28 (75.7)

mMarshall score: modified Marshall score; APACHE II score: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score; ALB: albumin.

Moreover, patients with SAP were grouped by BUN level and stratified by the optimal cut-off value (10.745 mmol/L) based on ROC analysis. We compared the indices related to outcome or disease severity [12-16] between high-level group (BUN > 10.745 mmol/L) and low-level group (BUN ≤ 10.745 mmol/L) (Table 2). Patients with high BUN levels were associated with significantly higher IMV rate (before PSM: 61.8% vs. 20.6%, P < 0.001; after PSM: 71.1% vs. 32%, P = 0.048) and 30-day all-cause mortality rates (before PSM: 44.9% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001; after PSM: 60% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.032) than those with low BUN levels before or after PSM. We also observed similar results in the indicators of disease severity, including APACHE II score (before PSM: 16 [IQR, 8] vs. 8 [IQR, 6], P < 0.001; after PSM: 18 [IQR, 10] vs. 12 [IQR, 7], P < 0.001), SOFA score (before PSM: 7 [IQR, 5] vs. 3 [IQR, 3], P < 0.001; after PSM: 8 [IQR, 5] vs. 5 [IQR, 3.5], P < 0.001) and mMarshall score (before PSM: 4 [IQR, 3] vs. 3 [IQR, 1], P < 0.001; after PSM: 5[IQR, 2.5] vs. 3[IQR, 1], P < 0.001). There was a significant increase of ICU occupancy in the high BUN level group before PSM (93.3% vs. 73.1%, P < 0.001) but not after PSM (97.8% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.074). The difference in LOS was not statistically significant regardless of whether PSM was performed.

4. Discussion

Due to the high mortality rate among patients with SAP, it is necessary to rapidly identify those with a more severe disease state and a high risk of death early during hospitalization. Our study showed that a high BUN level is a reliable predictor of early warning of SAP. BUN level at admission was the only parameter with an AUC > 0.80 among single predictors for predicting a 30-day all-cause mortality. It was also an independent prognostic factor for SAP before and after PSM. In addition, a high BUN level (>10.745 mmol/L) was associated with an increased risk of IMV and ICU admission. BUN is produced by the liver and excreted by the kidneys. Previous studies of BUN have primarily focused on renal diseases. More recently, several studies reported that BUN concentrations and their changes can predict AP severity and mortality with high sensitivity [17-20]. However, limited data of SAP outcomes and severities have been reported. With the exception of pancreatic disease, BUN levels have predictive power as independent or integrated biomarkers such as the incidence of acute cardiac and cerebral vascular events, mortality of critically ill patients, and coronavirus disease 2019 patients [21-25]. Little is known about the predictive ability of BUN beyond the estimation of renal function. There are a few possible explanations for this: [1] renal hypovolemia due to increased vascular permeability and interstitial extravasations induced by inflammation correlated with the systemic inflammatory response [26-28] and [2] chemical injury to the kidney by activated enzymes, inflammatory factors, and cytokines from the blood circulation [29-31]. Several studies have reported on the bedside index for severity in AP (BISAP), a potential prognostic scoring system for identifying patients at high risk for in-hospital mortality [11, 32, 33]. It had a comparable ability to that of APACHE II to predict disease severity, organ failure, and death among patients with AP [33]. We can only exclude it from the disease severity index because its calculation includes BUN levels. In our study, the APACHE II AUC was 0.875 (95% CI 0.831-0.920; P < 0.001) (data not shown), higher than that of other variables. However, this method is too complex to be widely used. Patients with SAP often have comorbid damage to other distant organs. We found that the lung was the most frequently involved organ, affecting accounting for 88.3% of patients with SAP (data not shown). When grouped according to the optimal BUN cut-off value, the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute respiratory failure (ARF) (data not shown) differed no significantly. These results suggest that BUN levels may be independent of severity of AP-induced lung injury severity. Therefore, further studies are required.

5. Conclusions

Our results showed that BUN level within 24 h after hospital admission was an independent risk factor for a 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with SAP.
  33 in total

1.  Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Georgios I Papachristou; Venkata Muddana; Dhiraj Yadav; Michael O'Connell; Michael K Sanders; Adam Slivka; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Heartbeat:Blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio predicts outcome in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  AKI Associated with Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tareq I Nassar; Wajeh Y Qunibi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Modified Marshall Score Predicts Mortality in Patients With Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis Treated in an Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Joachim Hartmann; Mikkel Werge; Palle Nordblad Schmidt; Erik Feldager Hansen; Ulf Gøttrup Pedersen; Klaus Tjelle Kristiansen; Lise Lotte Gluud; Srdan Novovic
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  [Acute kidney injury following acute pancreatitis (AP-AKI): Definition, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Therapy].

Authors:  Florian Gunnar Scurt; Katrin Bose; Ali Canbay; Peter R Mertens; Christos Chatzikyrkou
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Comparison of multifactor scoring systems and single serum markers for the early prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Wen-Hua He; Yin Zhu; Yong Zhu; Qi Jin; Hong-Rong Xu; Zhi-Juan Xion; Min Yu; Liang Xia; Pi Liu; Nong-Hua Lu
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus.

Authors:  Peter A Banks; Thomas L Bollen; Christos Dervenis; Hein G Gooszen; Colin D Johnson; Michael G Sarr; Gregory G Tsiotos; Santhi Swaroop Vege
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Early Changes in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) Can Predict Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis: Comparative Study between BISAP Score, APACHE-II, and Other Laboratory Markers-A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pando; Piero Alberti; Rodrigo Mata; María José Gomez; Laura Vidal; Arturo Cirera; Cristina Dopazo; Laia Blanco; Concepción Gomez; Mireia Caralt; Joaquim Balsells; Ramón Charco
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  The Role of IL-6, 8, and 10, sTNFr, CRP, and Pancreatic Elastase in the Prediction of Systemic Complications in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  E Fisic; G Poropat; L Bilic-Zulle; V Licul; S Milic; D Stimac
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Predictors of Mortality and Drug Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae-Infected Pancreatic Necrosis Patients.

Authors:  Di Wu; Jie Xiao; Junjie Ding; Yan Jia; Zimeng Guo; Huanmiao Liu; Jie Peng
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2021-07-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  A prediction model for acute respiratory distress syndrome among patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Fengyu Lin; Rongli Lu; Duoduo Han; Yifei Fan; Yan Zhang; Pinhua Pan
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.158

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.