| Literature DB >> 35392473 |
Abstract
Under the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), green, low-carbon, and sustainable development has become a global consensus, and the world will enter a low-carbon and intelligent production mode faster. As the largest contributor to world economic growth and an active participant in global environmental governance, achieving green recovery and the high-quality economic and social development of China is of great significance to promote the global sustainable development strategy. The green transformation of resource-based cities in Western China is the key factor for China to build a high-quality modern economic system and promote long-term sustainable development. This article used the Super Efficiency Slack Based Model (Super-SBM) model and Malmquist index model of the Data Envelope Analysis (DEA) method to measure the static and dynamic green transformation efficiency of resource-based cities in Western China. It investigated the impact of different factors on the static and dynamic efficiency by constructing panel Tobit and dynamic panel models. The research found that the static efficiency of the green transformation of resource-based cities in Western China is low, and the development is uneven. The dynamic efficiency of green transformation showed a fluctuating upward trend first and an accelerating upward trend later. Different factors have different effects on green transformation efficiency. This article holds that the combination of post-epidemic economic recovery and green transformation is expected to promote the green transformation of western resource-based cities while injecting new vitality into China's green sustainable development in the post-COVID-19 era.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Data Envelopment Analysis; GMM method; Tobit model; green transformation efficiency; resource-based cities in Western China
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35392473 PMCID: PMC8980323 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.832904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Variable of panel regression model.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| TE | Calculated by Super-SBM model based on undesirable output: if TE >1, it refers to a high efficiency; if TE is equal to 1, it is valid; if TE <1, it refers to a low efficiency. |
| MI | Calculated by global reference Malmquist index model: if MI is >1, it means that the total factor productivity (TFP) increases; If MI is equal to 1, it means that the TFP is unchanged; if MI is <1, it means that the TFP decreases. |
| AIS | Output value of tertiary industry / Output value of secondary industry. |
| RO | Total export-import volume of the city / GDP. |
| TI | Financial expenditure on science and technology of the city/GDP. |
| ER | Calculated by entropy weight method: sulfur dioxide removal rate and industrial soot (dust) removal rate. |
| GDPP | Actual GDP per capita (based on 2005). |
| URB | Population in municipal districts at the end of the year/Total population of the whole city. |
| HC | Number of students in colleges and universities/Total population at the end of the year. |
Number of cities with effective static efficiency (≥1) from 2005 to 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cities | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 81 |
Figure 1Mean static efficiency of green transformation of resource-based cities in western China from 2005 to 2016.
Number of cities with dynamic efficiency growth (> 1) from 2005 to 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cities | 11 | 19 | 19 | 23 | 18 | 23 | 13 | 25 | 23 | 21 | 24 | 35 | 252 |
Figure 2Mean dynamic efficiency of green transformation of resource-based cities in western China from 2005 to 2016.
Figure 3Dynamic efficiency trend of green transformation in western resource-based cities from 2005 to 2016.
Regression results of influencing factors of static efficiency and dynamic efficiency of green transformation in western resource-based cities.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| AIS | 0.0286 (0.0210) | 0.0281 |
| RO | −0.0151 (0.0124) | −0.0047 |
| TI | 0.0318 | 0.0237 |
| RE | 0.0183 (0.0161) | 0.0347 |
| GDPP | 0.1278 | 0.1460 |
| URB | 0.0409 (0.0348) | 0.0220 |
| HC | −0.0991 | −0.0002 |
| Constant | 0.7435 | −0.3344 |
| LR | 231.21 | |
| 0.000 | ||
| First-order lag term of dynamic efficiency MI | 0.1445 | |
| AR(1) | 0.0015 | |
| AR(2) | 0.8853 | |
| Sargan test | 1.0000 |
indicate significance at the level of 1, 5, and 10%, respectively; the values in brackets are robust standard errors.