Literature DB >> 35391795

Whole-Genome Analyses Reveal Genomic Characteristics and Selection Signatures of Lincang Humped Cattle at the China-Myanmar Border.

Luyang Sun1,2, Kaixing Qu3, Xiaohui Ma2, Quratulain Hanif4, Jicai Zhang1, Jianyong Liu1, Ningbo Chen2, Quji Suolang5, Chuzhao Lei2, Bizhi Huang1.   

Abstract

The location on the Yunnan border with Myanmar and its unique cultural landscape has shaped Lincang humped cattle over time. In the current study, we investigated the genetic characteristics of 22 Lincang humped cattle using whole-genome resequencing data. We found that Lincang humped cattle derived from both Indian indicine and Chinese indicine cattle depicted higher levels of genomic diversity. Based on genome-wide scans, candidate genomic regions were identified that were potentially involved in local thermal and humid environmental adaptions, including genes associated with the body size (TCF12, SENP2, KIF1C, and PFN1), immunity (LIPH, IRAK3, GZMM, and ELANE), and heat tolerance (MED16, DNAJC8, HSPA4, FILIP1L, HELB, BCL2L1, and TPX2). Missense mutations were detected in candidate genes IRAK3, HSPA4, and HELB. Interestingly, eight missense mutations observed in the HELB gene were specific to the indicine cattle pedigree. These mutations may reveal differences between indicine and taurine cattle adapted to variable climatic conditions. Our research provides new insights into the genetic characteristics of Lincang humped cattle representing Lincang and Pu'er areas as an important channel for the migration of Indian indicine from domestication centers toward southwestern China.
Copyright © 2022 Sun, Qu, Ma, Hanif, Zhang, Liu, Chen, Suolang, Lei and Huang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HELB; Lincang humped cattle; genetic characteristics; selection signatures; whole-genome resequencing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35391795      PMCID: PMC8981028          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.833503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


Introduction

Domestic cattle comprise two subspecies, humpless taurine (Bos taurus) and humped indicine or zebu (Bos indicus), both of which are derived from extinct wild aurochs (Bos primigenous) (Decker et al., 2014). Existing research has recognized that worldwide cattle can be divided into five continental groups, European taurine, Eurasian taurine, East Asian taurine, Chinese indicine, and Indian indicine, through whole-genome sequencing analysis (Chen et al., 2018). As for current distribution patterns, modern cattle live in different geographical and climatic zones worldwide. Taurine cattle mainly inhabit temperate environments. In contrast, indicine cattle adapt to continuous high and variable temperate climates (Barendse, 2017). Yunnan province in China is traversed by the Tropic of Cancer, which is mainly a tropical and subtropical climate zone. Recent studies have identified the complex genetic diversity and admixture patterns of cattle breeds in Yunnan province (Chen et al., 2018; R.; Li et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020). Lincang humped cattle is the more primitive regional livestock breed mainly distributed in the southern part of Lincang and Pu’er cities in Yunnan province bordering Myanmar (Gan, 2011). The exact history of the formation of Lincang humped cattle has not been verified. However, the reason for the formation of this breed is the adaptive selection and breeding of local farmers according to their social needs. Moreover, the local ethnicity (Wa ethnic) regards cattle as a totem, and the birth of the Wa ethnicity culture is closely associated with cattle. Lincang humped cattle displays superior characteristics of heat tolerance and resistance to disease and are one kind of Yunnan high-humped cattle (Y. Zhang, 2011). Long-term strong natural selection and human-mediated selection might have potentially affected the structure of the Lincang humped cattle genome by forming detectable selection signals in functional genes (Andersson and Georges, 2004; Hoffmann, 2010). The unique adaptive characterization of indigenous African and Asian cattle breeds has become a hot topic based on whole-genome sequencing. (Ben-Jemaa, Mastrangelo, Lee, Lee, and Boussaha, 2020; J.; Kim et al., 2017; Xia et al., 2021). In the current study, the whole genome of 22 Lincang humped cattle was resequenced and compared with the sequence data of 61 cattle from five continental groups. Our analysis reports the genome characterization of Lincang humped cattle using whole-genome resequencing, providing many insights into their candidate signatures of positive selection.

Methods

Samples and Resequencing

A total of 22 domestic Lincang humped cattle (NCBI: PRJNA781760) from Cangyuan Wa Ethnicity Autonomous County, Lincang City, Yunnan Province, China, were sequenced. The purity of that breed was ensured throughout the sampling. However, one cattle might fall under hybrid cattle. Genomic DNA was extracted from the ear tissue samples. Twenty-two paired-end DNA libraries were constructed for the 22 pieces (500 bp insert size) and subjected to Illumina NovaSeq sequencing at the Novogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing, China. The genome sequence data of 61 cattle from five continental groups including European cattle breeds [Angus and Simmental (n = 17)], Chinese native breeds (Leiqiong, Guangfeng, Jian, Jingjiang, Wannan, and Wenshan n = 24), Indian cattle breeds (Sahiwal, Hariana, Tharparkar, Nelore, Gir, and Brahman, n = 10), and Korean native breed (Hanwoo, n = 10) were used for the combined analysis (Supplementary Table S1).

Reads Mapping and SNP Calling

The clean reads were mapped to the latest Bos taurus reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2_Btau5.0.1Y.fa) using BWA-MEM (0.7.13-r1126) (H. Li & Durbin, 2009). The average mapping rate of the reads was 99.72%, and the sequencing coverage was approximately 9.75 × (ranging from 8.94 to 11.78) per individual. Duplicate reads were removed using Picard Tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard). The genome analysis toolkit (GATK, version 3.8) (Using the HaplotypeCaller, GenotypeGVCFs, and Select Variants module) was used to detect SNPs. Previous studies have referred to the SNP calling parameters (Chen et al., 2018). Moreover, ANNOVAR (Using the table_annovar.pl module) (K. Wang, Li, & Hakonarson, 2010) was used to annotate the functions of the SNPs.

Population Genetic Analysis

VCFtools (Danecek et al., 2011) was used to estimate the nucleotide diversity of each breed in window sizes of 50 kb with 20 kb increment. Furthermore, the linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay between pairwise SNPs was calculated by PopLDdecay software (C. Zhang, Dong, Xu, He, & Yang, 2019). PLINK was used to detect the runs of homozygosity (ROH) in each cattle population. The number and length of ROH for each population were estimated and classified into three categories: 0.5–1 Mb, 1–2 Mb, and 2–4 Mb (Sun et al., 2021). PLINK (version 1.9) (Purcell et al., 2007) was again used to remove the linkage sites in genomic data (--indep-pair-wise 50 5 0.2) to perform principal component analysis (PCA) and ADMIXTURE analysis. To accurately identify the components of Lincang humped cattle, ADMIXTURE software (Alexander & Lange, 2011) was used to analyze the population structure with a kinship (K) set from 2 to 5. The aforementioned results were visualized via RStudio software (Loraine et al., 2015). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method by PLINK with the matrix of pairwise genetic distances and visualized in MEGA7 (Kumar, Stecher, & Tamura, 2016) and FigTree v1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Selective Sweep Identification

To identify selective sweep regions in Lincang humped cattle, three methods were used (I) The fixation index (F ST) values (Weir & Cockerham, 1984; Porto-Neto et al., 2013), (II) Cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) (Sabeti et al., 2007), and (III) The composite likelihood ratio (CLR) (Nielsen et al., 2005). F ST and XP-EHH were calculated with a 50-kb sliding window and 20-kb steps along the autosomes using VCFtools and in-house scripts between Lincang humped cattle and the reference group. The CLR test was calculated for sites in non-overlapping 50-kb windows using “SweepFinder”. Tajima’s D statistics and nucleotide diversity were calculated for each candidate gene using VCFtools. Furthermore, functional annotation (GO analysis) and KEGG pathway enrichment were performed by DAVID 6.8 (Huang da, Sherman, & Lempicki, 2009), and FDR <0.05 was used as a threshold to detect significantly enriched genes and pathways. The LD heatmap was visualized for candidate genes using VCFtools based on LDBlockShow (Dong et al., 2021).

Results

Resequencing, Identification, and Diversity of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

The Lincang humped cattle (n = 22) were selected for genome resequencing (Supplementary Figure S1A). The data were combined with the available dataset (n = 61) from 15 breeds, giving a total of 83 individuals (Supplementary Table S1). Nelore, Gir, and Brahman were also used to represent Indian indicine cattle in this study. In total, 2.58 billion clean reads were generated and aligned to the reference genome ARS-UCD1.2_Btau5.0.1Y.fa with an average alignment rate of 99.72% and an average depth of 11.87 × in Lincang humped cattle. Furthermore, 34,636,187 SNPs were detected in mapped reads across 22 Lincang humped cattle. Approximately, 0.7% of SNPs with 98,226 nonsynonymous and 154,537 synonymous SNPs were detected in exonic regions. Then, 37.9% of SNPs were found in intronic regions, 59.1% were found in intergenic regions, 1% of SNPs were observed in untranslated regions (UTR), and 1.2% of SNPs were found in upstream and downstream of genes (Figure 1A). The highest number of SNPs was observed in the Chinese indicine, while the number was lower in taurine cattle than in indicine cattle (Supplementary Table S2). Moreover, the highest and second highest numbers of specific SNPs were found in Chinese indicine and Lincang humped cattle, respectively (Supplementary Figure S1B). The difference in the number of SNPs and specific SNPs might indicate the differences in the cattle numbers and different populations.
FIGURE 1

Genomic characteristics of cattle population. (A) Functional classification of the detected SNPs in Lincang cattle. (B) The estimation of number and length of ROH for each group. (C) Estimated nucleotide diversity for each group. (D) Linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on cattle autosomes estimated from each group.

Genomic characteristics of cattle population. (A) Functional classification of the detected SNPs in Lincang cattle. (B) The estimation of number and length of ROH for each group. (C) Estimated nucleotide diversity for each group. (D) Linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on cattle autosomes estimated from each group. In the absence of pedigree records, ROH may help to infer the level of inbreeding. At the ROH threshold of >2 Mb, Lincang humped cattle showed low levels of genomic inbreeding. Cattle of European origin appeared to be more inbred than other groups (Figure 1B). The nucleotide diversity was the highest in Chinese indicine cattle, followed by Lincang and Indian indicine cattle (Figure 1C). The lowest nucleotide diversity was found in taurine cattle. The genome-wide LD was lower for the indicine cattle than for the taurine cattle, which might indicate faster LD decay in indicine cattle than in taurine cattle (Figure 1D).

Phylogenetic Relationship, Principal Component Analysis, and Population Structure

The phylogenetic relationship among 83 cattle samples was explored based on the autosomal SNPs. The NJ tree separated taurine and indicine in its clade. The taurine clade clustered Angus, Simmental, and Hanwoo, whereas Chinese indicine, Indian indicine, and Lincang humped cattle were clustered into the indicine clade (Figure 2A). An individual of Lincang humped cattle appeared alone between the taurine and the indicine clade, indicating it as a hybrid. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated a clear genetic structure. PC1 explained 7.73% of the total variation and was driven by the difference between taurine and indicine cattle. Within indicine, a separation was found between Chinese indicine and Indian indicine along PC2. The Lincang humped cattle were found at an intermediate position between Chinese indicine and Indian indicine (Figure 2B). The admixture estimated from K = 2 to K = 5 showed gradual separation of Lincang humped cattle. When K = 2, the CV error value was the lowest, which means the most reasonable biological explanation was obtained. Lincang humped cattle belonged to Bos indicus, composed of crosses with Indian–Chinese indicine genotypes (Figure 2C). In particular, hybrid cattle between taurine and indicine cattle appeared in Lincang humped cattle, which might represent the recent introduction of Simmental cattle. To ensure the accuracy of studying Lincang humped cattle, this particular sample was removed in the follow-up analysis.
FIGURE 2

Population structure and relationships of Lincang cattle. (A) Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships between the cattle group. (B) Principal component analysis of the cattle group. (C) Model-based clustering of the cattle group using ADMIXTURE (with K = 2 to K = 5). Breeds are colored by geographic regions and labeled with breed names.

Population structure and relationships of Lincang cattle. (A) Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships between the cattle group. (B) Principal component analysis of the cattle group. (C) Model-based clustering of the cattle group using ADMIXTURE (with K = 2 to K = 5). Breeds are colored by geographic regions and labeled with breed names.

Candidate Regions and Genes Under Positive Selection

The composite likelihood method (CLR) was applied to detect the selection signals in Lincang humped cattle (Figure 3A). The top 1% signal window was selected as candidate regions, while 618 genes were annotated with selection characteristics (Supplementary Table S3). KEGG pathway and gene ontology (GO) analyses were used to perform functional enrichment analysis. However, no significant enrichment pathway was found. Surprisingly, the TCF12 gene was annotated in the top 10 signal windows of CLR. The primary biological process of TCF12 is to orchestrate the activity of myogenic factors through myogenic differentiation (Parker, Perry, Fauteux, Berkes, & Rudnicki, 2006). Throughout the entire TCF12 region, Lincang humped cattle showed low nucleotide diversity and constant haplotype diversity patterns (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3

Selective signals in Lincang cattle. (A) Manhattan plot of selective sweeps by the CLR method. The horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where CLR >61) used for extracting outliers. (B) Nucleotide diversity plots and haplotype pattern heatmaps of the TCF12 gene region. (C) Distribution of the F ST (x axis) and XP-EHH (y axis) between Lincang and Hanwoo cattle. The dashed vertical and horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where F ST > 0.62 and XP-EHH > 2.1) used for extracting outliers. (D) Nucleotide diversity and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the KIF1C gene region. (E) TajimaD, nucleotide diversity, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the LIPH gene region. (F) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the DNAJC8 gene region. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow.

Selective signals in Lincang cattle. (A) Manhattan plot of selective sweeps by the CLR method. The horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where CLR >61) used for extracting outliers. (B) Nucleotide diversity plots and haplotype pattern heatmaps of the TCF12 gene region. (C) Distribution of the F ST (x axis) and XP-EHH (y axis) between Lincang and Hanwoo cattle. The dashed vertical and horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where F ST > 0.62 and XP-EHH > 2.1) used for extracting outliers. (D) Nucleotide diversity and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the KIF1C gene region. (E) TajimaD, nucleotide diversity, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the LIPH gene region. (F) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the DNAJC8 gene region. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow. The fixation index (F ST) test was performed on various groups (I) Lincang humped cattle and Indian indicine; (II) Lincang humped cattle and Chinese indicine; (III) Lincang humped cattle and Hanwoo cattle; and (IV) Lincang humped cattle and European taurine, averaging 0.047, 0.048, 0.32, and 0.34, respectively. Moreover, the F ST and XP-EHH methods were performed on Lincang and Hanwoo cattle to detect the significant positive selection signatures, owing to their vast genetic differences between both breeds pertaining to the ecological adaption (Figure 3C). The outlier regions were screened in the top 1% of the empirical distribution of F ST and XP-EHH statistics (Supplementary Table S4) and annotated (316 genes). The pathway “negative regulation of protein kinase activity” (FDR = 0.03) was significantly enriched in the KEGG pathway, which might play an important role in the adaptation of Lincang humped cattle to stressful environments. Moreover, it is noticeable that the regions scanned by F ST on BTA1(81.60–81.65 MB), BTA5 (47.58–47.65 MB), BTA7 (43.16–43.27, 43.40–43.45 MB), BTA16 (50.56–50.61 MB), and BTA19 (26.38–26.45 MB) showed a strong positive selection signal, while using XP-EHH, BTA2 (125.14–125.19 MB), BTA7 (44.54–44.63 MB), BTA11 (55.84–55.89 MB), and BTA12 (24.12–24.19, 76.56–76.65 MB) regions showed strong positive selection signals (Table 1). Overall, genes related to the body size (SENP2, KIF1C, and PFN1) (Figure 3D and Supplementary Figure 2A), immunity (LIPH, IRAK3, GZMM, and ELANE) (Figure 3E and Supplementary Figure 2B), and heat resistance (MED16, DNAJC8, and HSPA4) (Figure 3F and Supplementary Figure 2C,D) were identified in the 11 candidate genomic regions. Most target genes exhibited lower nucleotide diversity, higher F ST, and differential Tajima’s D values than Hanwoo genomic regions, indicating strong selective sweeps. Furthermore, a missense mutation (rs521365524) was found in the IRAK3 gene, an immune-related gene. This mutation presented a predominant divergence between Lincang humped cattle (allele G frequency = 0.9) and Hanwoo cattle (allele T frequency = 1). Another missense mutation (rs210913195) was detected in the heat-related gene HSPA4, which showed a widespread pattern in Lincang humped cattle (frequency 0.98) and the opposite pattern in Hanwoo cattle (frequency 0.2).
TABLE 1

Genomic regions and associated genes putatively under selection identified using F ST, XP-EHH, and CLR statistics.

TestBTAStart (pb)End (pb)Max F ST Max XP-ehhMax-CLRGenes
Top F ST 181600001816500000.875749———— SENP2, LIPH
547580001476500000.879839———— TRNAK-CUU, IRAK3, and TMBIM4
743160001432700000.920406———— MADCAM1, TPGS1,CDC34, GZMM, BSG, HCN2, TRNAE-UUC, FGF22, POLRMT, and RNF126
743400001434500000.908626———— PRTN3, ELANE, R3HDM4, CFD, and MED16
1650560001506100000.900547———— SKI, PRKCZ, and FAAP20
1926380001264500000.890845———— INCA1, KIF1C, CAMTA2, SPAG7, PFN1, and ENO3
Top XP-EHH21251400011.25E+08——3.26—— ATP5IF1 and DNAJC8
74454000144630000——3.74—— ZCCHC10, AFF4, and HSPA4
115884000158890000——3.36—— LRRTM4
122412000124190000——3.66—— TRPC4
127656000176650000——3.57—— CLYBL
F ST, XP-EHH, and CLR144080001442500000.7967222.8443.703861 CMSS1 and FILIP1L
261500001615700000.7107152.9482.469142 LCT and MCM6
547500001475700000.7361842.6492.679749 HELB and IRAK3
790280001904300000.7766162.68220.938087 ADGRV1 and MIR2464
1173880001739300000.6420262.1773.228089 DTNB
1361160001613900000.7812112.54185.266809 COX4I2, ID1, BCL2L1, TPX2, MYLK2, and FOXS1
1939780001398500000.6745892.5379.785159 FBXL20, TRNAW-CCA, and MED1
1944040001440900000.7641242.2271.273024 SLC4A1
Genomic regions and associated genes putatively under selection identified using F ST, XP-EHH, and CLR statistics. It is worth noting that eight overlapped genomic regions and 19 genes were detected among the three mentioned selection methods (Table 1), indicating that these were strongly selected in Lincang humped cattle. Among them, FILIP1L, HELB, BCL2L1, and TPX2 genes were all associated with heat stress. Candidate genes showed a stable haplotype diversity pattern in Lincang humped cattle or discrepant Tajima’s D and nucleotide diversity (Figure 4A and Supplementary Figure S2E,F).
FIGURE 4

Characteristics of the HELB gene. (A) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow. (B) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs in each group and the schematic structure of genes. The vertical bars in the structure diagram represent the exon region. (C) LD plot of SNPs. LD values (D′) between two loci are detailed in boxes (D′ = 0–1). D′ = 1 indicates perfect disequilibrium. (D) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs across the 54 populations in the BGVD. Population names associated with serial numbers are as follows. 1 Tharparkar; 2 Sahiwal; 3 Hariana; 4 Brahman; 5 Nelore; 6 Gir; 7 Dabieshan; 8 Wandong; 9 Jinjiang; 10 Lingnan; 11 Shorthorn Zebu; 12 Kenana; 13 Srilanka; 14 Bashan; 15 Dianzhong; 16 Wenshan; 17 Guangfeng; 18 Jian; 19 Weining; 20 Ogaden; 21 Leiqiong; 22 Luxi; 23 Nganda; 24 Boran; 25 JiaxianRed; 26 Kazakh; 27 Wannan; 28 Zaobei; 29 Nanyang; 30 Rashoki; 31 Tibetan; 32 Ankole; 33 NDama; 34 Chaidamu; 35 Mongolian; 36 BohaiBlack; 37 Yanbian; 38 Nsongora; 39 Mishima; 40 Kuchinoshima; 41 Hanwoo; 42 Jerse; 43 Simmental; 44 Gelbvieh; 45 Piedmontese; 46 Limousin; 47 Salers; 48 Charolais; 49 MaineAnjou; 50 Devon; 51 Holstein; 52 Hereford; 53 RedAngus; and 54 Angus.

Characteristics of the HELB gene. (A) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow. (B) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs in each group and the schematic structure of genes. The vertical bars in the structure diagram represent the exon region. (C) LD plot of SNPs. LD values (D′) between two loci are detailed in boxes (D′ = 0–1). D′ = 1 indicates perfect disequilibrium. (D) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs across the 54 populations in the BGVD. Population names associated with serial numbers are as follows. 1 Tharparkar; 2 Sahiwal; 3 Hariana; 4 Brahman; 5 Nelore; 6 Gir; 7 Dabieshan; 8 Wandong; 9 Jinjiang; 10 Lingnan; 11 Shorthorn Zebu; 12 Kenana; 13 Srilanka; 14 Bashan; 15 Dianzhong; 16 Wenshan; 17 Guangfeng; 18 Jian; 19 Weining; 20 Ogaden; 21 Leiqiong; 22 Luxi; 23 Nganda; 24 Boran; 25 JiaxianRed; 26 Kazakh; 27 Wannan; 28 Zaobei; 29 Nanyang; 30 Rashoki; 31 Tibetan; 32 Ankole; 33 NDama; 34 Chaidamu; 35 Mongolian; 36 BohaiBlack; 37 Yanbian; 38 Nsongora; 39 Mishima; 40 Kuchinoshima; 41 Hanwoo; 42 Jerse; 43 Simmental; 44 Gelbvieh; 45 Piedmontese; 46 Limousin; 47 Salers; 48 Charolais; 49 MaineAnjou; 50 Devon; 51 Holstein; 52 Hereford; 53 RedAngus; and 54 Angus.

Eight Missense Mutations in HELB to Indicine Cattle

The low diversity of the HELB gene haplotype in Lincang humped cattle (Figure 4A), corresponding to the LD heatmap, showed strong linkage disequilibrium (Figure 4B). Surprisingly, we detected eight missense mutations (rs433576296, rs517104855, rs478515513, rs447583631, rs432042680, rs479117197, rs447470311, and rs525001520) that were located within the HELB gene, indicating significant genomic differences between Lincang humped cattle and Hanwoo cattle. The allele frequencies of these missense mutations were estimated in the five major cattle populations. These missense mutations only occur in indicine cattle in our samples (Figure 4C), while one of the missense mutations (rs447470311) has been confirmed to be specific to indicine cattle (Naval-Sánchez et al., 2020). To check whether these mutations are also specific for indicine cattle in a wider cattle breed population, the frequencies of these eight missense mutations were searched among 432 individuals from 54 cattle breeds around the world (Figure 4D, Supplementary Table S5, S3), adopting BGVD (Bovine Genome Variation Database and Selective Signatures) (Chen et al., 2020) (Figure 4D, Supplementary Table S5, S3). It was observed that 37 breeds harbored rs479117197 and rs447470311 mutations, where 36 out of 37 were either indicine breeds or mixed with indicine. The remaining one was Yanbian cattle from Northeast Asia, which may have individual deviations. At the same time, in rs433576296, rs517104855, rs478515513, rs447583631, rs432042680, and rs525001520, only breeds with indicine ancestry showed the mutations, revealing a higher frequency of these mutations in indicine ancestry alone. It is worth mentioning that the species from Mongolian, Chaidamu, Kazakh from northwest China, and Tibetan depicted low-frequency mutations, probably due to minute indicine introgression (Chen et al., 2018).

Discussion

Lincang humped cattle is one of the groups of Yunnan high-humped cattle in the southern part of Lincang and Pu’er cities bordering Myanmar. Lincang humped cattle has become a valuable genetic resource in the region because of its good environmental adaptability and particularity to the Wa ethnicity (Gan, 2011). As cattle genetic resources are being exhausted (Y. Zhang, 2011), the genetic characterization of Lincang humped cattle is of great significance to this vital genetic resource. The genetic diversity of genomes may reflect differences in cattle management or breed history. Compared to taurine cattle with long breeding histories, indicine cattle has a lower degree of selection history and higher genetic diversity, consistent with our results and matching those observed in earlier studies (Mei et al., 2018). The Myanmar border is a habitat of Indian indicine, whereas Lincang and Pu’er areas inhabit Lincang humped cattle admixed with Chinese and Indian indicines. Prior studies mark Yunnan as an admixture zone of Bos taurus and Bos indicus (R. Li et al., 2019), and the entry of Indian indicine in China is also proposed through the Yunnan border (Jia et al., 2007). Our research results indicated that Lincang humped cattle are composed of Indian–Chinese indicine cross genotypes in the genetic structure. This demonstrated that Indian indicine may have entered East Asia through the Lincang and Pu’er areas, which may be an important route for Indian indicine to migrate from the domestication sites (Utsunomiya et al., 2019). The smaller body size of Lincang humped cattle is associated with its ecological adaptation to hot and humid conditions (Gardner, Peters, Kearney, Joseph, & Heinsohn, 2011). Interestingly, our study detected genes related to skeletal muscle development (TCF12, SENP2, KIF1C, and PFN1). Skeletal muscle development is a complex biological process involving multiple key genes. The protein encoded by TCF12 acts as a complex to positively regulate itself during muscle development (Fu et al., 2020). Related pathways include extracellular signal-regulated kinase signal transduction and CDO in myogenesis (Parker et al., 2006). The SENP2 gene plays an essential role in the regulation of the muscle growth inhibitor expression and myogenesis, which encodes SUMO-specific protease 2 and is an important regulator of fatty acid metabolism in skeletal muscle (Koo et al., 2015). KIF1C plays a role in maintaining membrane circulation during myogenesis and adult muscle (Ginkel & Wordeman, 2000). PFN1 is a critical factor in skeletal development and regulates sternal bone development and endochondral bone formation (Miyajima et al., 2012). It should be noted that Lincang humped cattle weigh less than 300 kg and have an average height of 1 m (Y. Zhang, 2011). They were small body size cattle. The change in the body size can be explained as an adaptive response to the climate, which means positively selected genes associated with the body size may contribute Lincang humped cattle in humid and hot conditions. The superior adaptability of Lincang humped cattle is partly attributed to their resistance to disease and parasites (Turner, 1980). Our study detected genes related to immune response and parasite resistance (LIPH, IRAK3, GZMM, and ELANE). A previous study identified the association of LIPH with cattle immunity (Zhuang et al., 2021). Similarly, the LIPH gene is also found in Dehong cattle (the same Yunnan high-humped cattle as Lincang humped cattle) (R. Li R et al., 2020). IRAK3 is thought to be a negative regulator of innate immune signaling (Lange, Nelen, Cohen, & Kulathu, 2021). In addition, this gene is also found in selective scans of other indicine cattle (Naval-Sánchez et al., 2020). GZMM can affect the killing efficacy against intracellular pathogens (S. Wang, Xia, Shi, & Fan, 2012). ELANE mutations may trigger neutrophil precursors’ death and lead to neutropenia (Garg et al., 2020). Furthermore, ELANE and GZMM have also been demonstrated in African N’Dama cattle, depicting multiple biological functions in parasitic infections (Ben-Jemaa et al., 2020). For indicine cattle that have lived in tropical and subtropical climatic conditions, several reports have shown that the indicine breed exhibits stronger heat tolerance (Hansen, 2004; J.; Kim et al., 2017). This was also demonstrated by our screening of candidate genes for DNA damage repair and apoptosis associated with heat resistance (MED16, DNAJC8, HSPA4, FILIP1L, HELB, BCL2L1, and TPX2). MED16 is recruited as the HSP gene promoter in response to heat stress (S. Kim & Gross, 2013). Previous studies have established that knockdown of DNAJC8 decreases antioxidant defenses and increases oxidative damage in honeybees, while DNAJC8 has been shown to function significantly under heat stress in honeybees (G. Li G et al., 2020). Moreover, HSPA4 promotes cellular protection against thermal damage and prevents protein denaturation (Niu et al., 2006). Furthermore, several recent genome-wide analyses had detected selective scans for HSPA4 and highlighted it as a candidate gene for adaptation to hot climates in African indicine cattle (Edea et al., 2018; J.; Kim et al., 2017). FILIP1L interacts with HSF1 to modulate the heat shock response (Hu & Mivechi, 2011). BCL2L1 acts as an anti-apoptotic gene to control apoptosis inducers (Zinkel, Gross, & Yang, 2006), and it has been suggested that it may be a valuable candidate for heat stress studies in dairy cattle (Khan et al., 2020). TPX2 functions in the amplification of the DNA damage response (Neumayer, Belzil, Gruss, & Nguyen, 2014). Considering that Lincang humped cattle are well-adapted to hot climates, these genes may play a vital role in the thermal adaptability of Lincang humped cattle. HELB is involved in DNA damage response as a DNA end-excision inhibitor (Tkáč et al., 2016). Multiple mutations in HELB have been identified in mouse cell lines with temperature-sensitive DNA replication (Tada et al., 2001). Furthermore, the mutation rs447470311 in HELB revealed in tropical cattle may allow better adaptation to the environment (Naval-Sánchez et al., 2020). An important finding in our study was not only the identification of rs447470311 specific to cattle with indicine cattle pedigree but also the identification of seven missense mutations (rs479117197, rs433576296, rs517104855, rs478515513, rs447583631, rs432042680, and rs525001520) which were only found in cattle with indicine pedigree. Meanwhile, the strong linkage disequilibrium of HELB implied that the significant association of a few SNPs in the gene with the trait may be sufficient to indicate association with the majority of SNPs in the gene and implied a substantial enrichment of the biological function (Qanbari, 2019). Therefore, these results may support the hypothesis that missense mutations in HELB caused alterations in its DNA damage response function, making indicine cattle more adapted to the hot environment. Additional studies may be required in the future to fully understand the effects of HELB on adaptation in indicine cattle.

Conclusion

This study explored the genomic variation in the local cattle population at the China–Myanmar border for the first time via whole-genome resequencing data. The genomic diversity of Lincang humped cattle was explored and identified as indicine cattle. It is proposed that the Indian indicine might have migrated to southwestern China through the Lincang and Pu’er areas. In addition, we identified candidate genes associated with environmental adaptations such as the body size, immunity, and heat tolerance. Finally, we identified missense mutations in HELB that were specific to indicine cattle and were presumed to be associated with adaptation to hot environments. Overall, these results provided a basis for a proper genetic assessment of Lincang humped cattle and further studies on the relationship between HELB and heat tolerance in indicine cattle.
  54 in total

1.  Overexpressed heat shock protein 70 protects cells against DNA damage caused by ultraviolet C in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  Piye Niu; Lin Liu; Zhiyong Gong; Hao Tan; Feng Wang; Jing Yuan; Youmei Feng; Qingyi Wei; Robert M Tanguay; Tangchun Wu
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic Architecture and Selection of Chinese Cattle Revealed by Whole Genome Resequencing.

Authors:  Chugang Mei; Hongcheng Wang; Qijun Liao; Lizhong Wang; Gong Cheng; Hongbao Wang; Chunping Zhao; Shancen Zhao; Jiuzhou Song; Xuanmin Guang; George E Liu; Anning Li; Xueli Wu; Chongzhi Wang; Xiaodong Fang; Xin Zhao; Stephen B Smith; Wucai Yang; Wanqiang Tian; Linsheng Gui; Yingying Zhang; Rodney A Hill; Zhongliang Jiang; Yaping Xin; Cunling Jia; Xiuzhu Sun; Shuhui Wang; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Wenjuan Zhu; Linsen Zan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  FADD cleavage by NK cell granzyme M enhances its self-association to facilitate procaspase-8 recruitment for auto-processing leading to caspase cascade.

Authors:  S Wang; P Xia; L Shi; Z Fan
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 5.  TPX2: of spindle assembly, DNA damage response, and cancer.

Authors:  Gernot Neumayer; Camille Belzil; Oliver J Gruss; Minh Dang Nguyen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations.

Authors:  Pardis C Sabeti; Patrick Varilly; Ben Fry; Jason Lohmueller; Elizabeth Hostetter; Chris Cotsapas; Xiaohui Xie; Elizabeth H Byrne; Steven A McCarroll; Rachelle Gaudet; Stephen F Schaffner; Eric S Lander; Kelly A Frazer; Dennis G Ballinger; David R Cox; David A Hinds; Laura L Stuve; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Andrew Boudreau; Paul Hardenbol; Suzanne M Leal; Shiran Pasternak; David A Wheeler; Thomas D Willis; Fuli Yu; Huanming Yang; Changqing Zeng; Yang Gao; Haoran Hu; Weitao Hu; Chaohua Li; Wei Lin; Siqi Liu; Hao Pan; Xiaoli Tang; Jian Wang; Wei Wang; Jun Yu; Bo Zhang; Qingrun Zhang; Hongbin Zhao; Hui Zhao; Jun Zhou; Stacey B Gabriel; Rachel Barry; Brendan Blumenstiel; Amy Camargo; Matthew Defelice; Maura Faggart; Mary Goyette; Supriya Gupta; Jamie Moore; Huy Nguyen; Robert C Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Jessica Roy; Erich Stahl; Ellen Winchester; Liuda Ziaugra; David Altshuler; Yan Shen; Zhijian Yao; Wei Huang; Xun Chu; Yungang He; Li Jin; Yangfan Liu; Yayun Shen; Weiwei Sun; Haifeng Wang; Yi Wang; Ying Wang; Xiaoyan Xiong; Liang Xu; Mary M Y Waye; Stephen K W Tsui; Hong Xue; J Tze-Fei Wong; Luana M Galver; Jian-Bing Fan; Kevin Gunderson; Sarah S Murray; Arnold R Oliphant; Mark S Chee; Alexandre Montpetit; Fanny Chagnon; Vincent Ferretti; Martin Leboeuf; Jean-François Olivier; Michael S Phillips; Stéphanie Roumy; Clémentine Sallée; Andrei Verner; Thomas J Hudson; Pui-Yan Kwok; Dongmei Cai; Daniel C Koboldt; Raymond D Miller; Ludmila Pawlikowska; Patricia Taillon-Miller; Ming Xiao; Lap-Chee Tsui; William Mak; You Qiang Song; Paul K H Tam; Yusuke Nakamura; Takahisa Kawaguchi; Takuya Kitamoto; Takashi Morizono; Atsushi Nagashima; Yozo Ohnishi; Akihiro Sekine; Toshihiro Tanaka; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Panos Deloukas; Christine P Bird; Marcos Delgado; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Rhian Gwilliam; Sarah Hunt; Jonathan Morrison; Don Powell; Barbara E Stranger; Pamela Whittaker; David R Bentley; Mark J Daly; Paul I W de Bakker; Jeff Barrett; Yves R Chretien; Julian Maller; Steve McCarroll; Nick Patterson; Itsik Pe'er; Alkes Price; Shaun Purcell; Daniel J Richter; Pardis Sabeti; Richa Saxena; Stephen F Schaffner; Pak C Sham; Patrick Varilly; David Altshuler; Lincoln D Stein; Lalitha Krishnan; Albert Vernon Smith; Marcela K Tello-Ruiz; Gudmundur A Thorisson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Peter E Chen; David J Cutler; Carl S Kashuk; Shin Lin; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Weihua Guan; Yun Li; Heather M Munro; Zhaohui Steve Qin; Daryl J Thomas; Gilean McVean; Adam Auton; Leonardo Bottolo; Niall Cardin; Susana Eyheramendy; Colin Freeman; Jonathan Marchini; Simon Myers; Chris Spencer; Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly; Lon R Cardon; Geraldine Clarke; David M Evans; Andrew P Morris; Bruce S Weir; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda; Todd A Johnson; James C Mullikin; Stephen T Sherry; Michael Feolo; Andrew Skol; Houcan Zhang; Changqing Zeng; Hui Zhao; Ichiro Matsuda; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl R Macer; Eiko Suda; Charles N Rotimi; Clement A Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Patricia A Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Charmaine D M Royal; Mark F Leppert; Missy Dixon; Andy Peiffer; Renzong Qiu; Alastair Kent; Kazuto Kato; Norio Niikawa; Isaac F Adewole; Bartha M Knoppers; Morris W Foster; Ellen Wright Clayton; Jessica Watkin; Richard A Gibbs; John W Belmont; Donna Muzny; Lynne Nazareth; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; David A Wheeler; Imtaz Yakub; Stacey B Gabriel; Robert C Onofrio; Daniel J Richter; Liuda Ziaugra; Bruce W Birren; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler; Richard K Wilson; Lucinda L Fulton; Jane Rogers; John Burton; Nigel P Carter; Christopher M Clee; Mark Griffiths; Matthew C Jones; Kirsten McLay; Robert W Plumb; Mark T Ross; Sarah K Sims; David L Willey; Zhu Chen; Hua Han; Le Kang; Martin Godbout; John C Wallenburg; Paul L'Archevêque; Guy Bellemare; Koji Saeki; Hongguang Wang; Daochang An; Hongbo Fu; Qing Li; Zhen Wang; Renwu Wang; Arthur L Holden; Lisa D Brooks; Jean E McEwen; Mark S Guyer; Vivian Ota Wang; Jane L Peterson; Michael Shi; Jack Spiegel; Lawrence M Sung; Lynn F Zacharia; Francis S Collins; Karen Kennedy; Ruth Jamieson; John Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  SUMO-Specific Protease 2 (SENP2) Is an Important Regulator of Fatty Acid Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Young Do Koo; Jin Woo Choi; Myungjin Kim; Sehyun Chae; Byung Yong Ahn; Min Kim; Byung Chul Oh; Daehee Hwang; Jae Hong Seol; Young-Bum Kim; Young Joo Park; Sung Soo Chung; Kyong Soo Park
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle.

Authors:  Jaemin Kim; Olivier Hanotte; Okeyo Ally Mwai; Tadelle Dessie; Salim Bashir; Boubacar Diallo; Morris Agaba; Kwondo Kim; Woori Kwak; Samsun Sung; Minseok Seo; Hyeonsoo Jeong; Taehyung Kwon; Mengistie Taye; Ki-Duk Song; Dajeong Lim; Seoae Cho; Hyun-Jeong Lee; Duhak Yoon; Sung Jong Oh; Stephen Kemp; Hak-Kyo Lee; Heebal Kim
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Jiaxian Red cattle using whole-genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Xiaoting Xia; Shunjin Zhang; Huaju Zhang; Zijing Zhang; Ningbo Chen; Zhigang Li; Hongxia Sun; Xian Liu; Shijie Lyu; Xianwei Wang; Zhiming Li; Peng Yang; Jiawei Xu; Xiaoting Ding; Qiaoting Shi; Eryao Wang; Baorui Ru; Zejun Xu; Chuzhao Lei; Hong Chen; Yongzhen Huang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.