| Literature DB >> 35391795 |
Luyang Sun1,2, Kaixing Qu3, Xiaohui Ma2, Quratulain Hanif4, Jicai Zhang1, Jianyong Liu1, Ningbo Chen2, Quji Suolang5, Chuzhao Lei2, Bizhi Huang1.
Abstract
The location on the Yunnan border with Myanmar and its unique cultural landscape has shaped Lincang humped cattle over time. In the current study, we investigated the genetic characteristics of 22 Lincang humped cattle using whole-genome resequencing data. We found that Lincang humped cattle derived from both Indian indicine and Chinese indicine cattle depicted higher levels of genomic diversity. Based on genome-wide scans, candidate genomic regions were identified that were potentially involved in local thermal and humid environmental adaptions, including genes associated with the body size (TCF12, SENP2, KIF1C, and PFN1), immunity (LIPH, IRAK3, GZMM, and ELANE), and heat tolerance (MED16, DNAJC8, HSPA4, FILIP1L, HELB, BCL2L1, and TPX2). Missense mutations were detected in candidate genes IRAK3, HSPA4, and HELB. Interestingly, eight missense mutations observed in the HELB gene were specific to the indicine cattle pedigree. These mutations may reveal differences between indicine and taurine cattle adapted to variable climatic conditions. Our research provides new insights into the genetic characteristics of Lincang humped cattle representing Lincang and Pu'er areas as an important channel for the migration of Indian indicine from domestication centers toward southwestern China.Entities:
Keywords: HELB; Lincang humped cattle; genetic characteristics; selection signatures; whole-genome resequencing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35391795 PMCID: PMC8981028 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.833503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Genomic characteristics of cattle population. (A) Functional classification of the detected SNPs in Lincang cattle. (B) The estimation of number and length of ROH for each group. (C) Estimated nucleotide diversity for each group. (D) Linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on cattle autosomes estimated from each group.
FIGURE 2Population structure and relationships of Lincang cattle. (A) Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships between the cattle group. (B) Principal component analysis of the cattle group. (C) Model-based clustering of the cattle group using ADMIXTURE (with K = 2 to K = 5). Breeds are colored by geographic regions and labeled with breed names.
FIGURE 3Selective signals in Lincang cattle. (A) Manhattan plot of selective sweeps by the CLR method. The horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where CLR >61) used for extracting outliers. (B) Nucleotide diversity plots and haplotype pattern heatmaps of the TCF12 gene region. (C) Distribution of the F ST (x axis) and XP-EHH (y axis) between Lincang and Hanwoo cattle. The dashed vertical and horizontal lines indicate the significance threshold (where F ST > 0.62 and XP-EHH > 2.1) used for extracting outliers. (D) Nucleotide diversity and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the KIF1C gene region. (E) TajimaD, nucleotide diversity, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the LIPH gene region. (F) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations at the DNAJC8 gene region. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow.
Genomic regions and associated genes putatively under selection identified using F ST, XP-EHH, and CLR statistics.
| Test | BTA | Start (pb) | End (pb) | Max | Max XP-ehh | Max-CLR | Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | 1 | 81600001 | 81650000 | 0.875749 | —— | —— |
|
| 5 | 47580001 | 47650000 | 0.879839 | —— | —— |
| |
| 7 | 43160001 | 43270000 | 0.920406 | —— | —— |
| |
| 7 | 43400001 | 43450000 | 0.908626 | —— | —— |
| |
| 16 | 50560001 | 50610000 | 0.900547 | —— | —— |
| |
| 19 | 26380001 | 26450000 | 0.890845 | —— | —— |
| |
| Top XP-EHH | 2 | 125140001 | 1.25E+08 | —— | 3.26 | —— |
|
| 7 | 44540001 | 44630000 | —— | 3.74 | —— |
| |
| 11 | 58840001 | 58890000 | —— | 3.36 | —— |
| |
| 12 | 24120001 | 24190000 | —— | 3.66 | —— |
| |
| 12 | 76560001 | 76650000 | —— | 3.57 | —— |
| |
|
| 1 | 44080001 | 44250000 | 0.796722 | 2.8 | 443.703861 |
|
| 2 | 61500001 | 61570000 | 0.710715 | 2.94 | 82.469142 |
| |
| 5 | 47500001 | 47570000 | 0.736184 | 2.64 | 92.679749 |
| |
| 7 | 90280001 | 90430000 | 0.776616 | 2.68 | 220.938087 |
| |
| 11 | 73880001 | 73930000 | 0.642026 | 2.17 | 73.228089 |
| |
| 13 | 61160001 | 61390000 | 0.781211 | 2.54 | 185.266809 |
| |
| 19 | 39780001 | 39850000 | 0.674589 | 2.53 | 79.785159 |
| |
| 19 | 44040001 | 44090000 | 0.764124 | 2.22 | 71.273024 |
|
FIGURE 4Characteristics of the HELB gene. (A) F ST, TajimaD, and degree of haplotype sharing across populations. The major allele at each SNP position is colored in yellow. (B) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs in each group and the schematic structure of genes. The vertical bars in the structure diagram represent the exon region. (C) LD plot of SNPs. LD values (D′) between two loci are detailed in boxes (D′ = 0–1). D′ = 1 indicates perfect disequilibrium. (D) Allele frequency of the eight missense SNPs across the 54 populations in the BGVD. Population names associated with serial numbers are as follows. 1 Tharparkar; 2 Sahiwal; 3 Hariana; 4 Brahman; 5 Nelore; 6 Gir; 7 Dabieshan; 8 Wandong; 9 Jinjiang; 10 Lingnan; 11 Shorthorn Zebu; 12 Kenana; 13 Srilanka; 14 Bashan; 15 Dianzhong; 16 Wenshan; 17 Guangfeng; 18 Jian; 19 Weining; 20 Ogaden; 21 Leiqiong; 22 Luxi; 23 Nganda; 24 Boran; 25 JiaxianRed; 26 Kazakh; 27 Wannan; 28 Zaobei; 29 Nanyang; 30 Rashoki; 31 Tibetan; 32 Ankole; 33 NDama; 34 Chaidamu; 35 Mongolian; 36 BohaiBlack; 37 Yanbian; 38 Nsongora; 39 Mishima; 40 Kuchinoshima; 41 Hanwoo; 42 Jerse; 43 Simmental; 44 Gelbvieh; 45 Piedmontese; 46 Limousin; 47 Salers; 48 Charolais; 49 MaineAnjou; 50 Devon; 51 Holstein; 52 Hereford; 53 RedAngus; and 54 Angus.