Literature DB >> 35391771

Assessing Methods and Tools to Improve Reporting, Increase Transparency, and Reduce Failures in Machine Learning Applications in Health Care.

Christian Garbin1, Oge Marques1.   

Abstract

Artificial intelligence applications for health care have come a long way. Despite the remarkable progress, there are several examples of unfulfilled promises and outright failures. There is still a struggle to translate successful research into successful real-world applications. Machine learning (ML) products diverge from traditional software products in fundamental ways. Particularly, the main component of an ML solution is not a specific piece of code that is written for a specific purpose; rather, it is a generic piece of code, a model, customized by a training process driven by hyperparameters and a dataset. Datasets are usually large, and models are opaque. Therefore, datasets and models cannot be inspected in the same, direct way as traditional software products. Other methods are needed to detect failures in ML products. This report investigates recent advancements that promote auditing, supported by transparency, as a mechanism to detect potential failures in ML products for health care applications. It reviews practices that apply to the early stages of the ML lifecycle, when datasets and models are created; these stages are unique to ML products. Concretely, this report demonstrates how two recently proposed checklists, datasheets for datasets and model cards, can be adopted to increase the transparency of crucial stages of the ML lifecycle, using ChestX-ray8 and CheXNet as examples. The adoption of checklists to document the strengths, limitations, and applications of datasets and models in a structured format leads to increased transparency, allowing early detection of potential problems and opportunities for improvement. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Lifecycle, Auditing, Transparency, Failures, Datasheets, Datasets, Model Cards Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022. 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial Intelligence; Auditing; Datasets; Datasheets; Failures; Lifecycle; Machine Learning; Model Cards; Transparency

Year:  2022        PMID: 35391771      PMCID: PMC8980932          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  5 in total

1.  Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  John Mongan; Linda Moy; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25

2.  Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Linda Moy; Miriam A Bredella; Birgit B Ertl-Wagner; Kathryn J Fowler; Vicky J Goh; Elkan F Halpern; Christopher P Hess; Mark L Schiebler; Clifford R Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.

Authors:  Ziad Obermeyer; Brian Powers; Christine Vogeli; Sendhil Mullainathan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification.

Authors:  Ivo M Baltruschat; Hannes Nickisch; Michael Grass; Tobias Knopp; Axel Saalbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels.

Authors:  Mark P Sendak; Michael Gao; Nathan Brajer; Suresh Balu
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.