Literature DB >> 35391766

Development and Validation of an AI-driven Mammographic Breast Density Classification Tool Based on Radiologist Consensus.

Veronica Magni1, Matteo Interlenghi1, Andrea Cozzi1, Marco Alì1, Christian Salvatore1, Alcide A Azzena1, Davide Capra1, Serena Carriero1, Gianmarco Della Pepa1, Deborah Fazzini1, Giuseppe Granata1, Caterina B Monti1, Giulia Muscogiuri1, Giuseppe Pellegrino1, Simone Schiaffino1, Isabella Castiglioni1, Sergio Papa1, Francesco Sardanelli1.   

Abstract

Mammographic breast density (BD) is commonly visually assessed using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) four-category scale. To overcome inter- and intraobserver variability of visual assessment, the authors retrospectively developed and externally validated a software for BD classification based on convolutional neural networks from mammograms obtained between 2017 and 2020. The tool was trained using the majority BD category determined by seven board-certified radiologists who independently visually assessed 760 mediolateral oblique (MLO) images in 380 women (mean age, 57 years ± 6 [SD]) from center 1; this process mimicked training from a consensus of several human readers. External validation of the model was performed by the three radiologists whose BD assessment was closest to the majority (consensus) of the initial seven on a dataset of 384 MLO images in 197 women (mean age, 56 years ± 13) obtained from center 2. The model achieved an accuracy of 89.3% in distinguishing BI-RADS a or b (nondense breasts) versus c or d (dense breasts) categories, with an agreement of 90.4% (178 of 197 mammograms) and a reliability of 0.807 (Cohen κ) compared with the mode of the three readers. This study demonstrates accuracy and reliability of a fully automated software for BD classification. Keywords: Mammography, Breast, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022. 2022 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Deep Learning Algorithms; Machine Learning Algorithms; Mammography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35391766      PMCID: PMC8980865          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  18 in total

1.  New Federal Requirements to Inform Patients About Breast Density: Will They Help Patients?

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Lydia E Pace
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  AI applications to medical images: From machine learning to deep learning.

Authors:  Isabella Castiglioni; Leonardo Rundo; Marina Codari; Giovanni Di Leo; Christian Salvatore; Matteo Interlenghi; Francesca Gallivanone; Andrea Cozzi; Natascha Claudia D'Amico; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.

Authors:  Nataliia Moshina; Marta Roman; Sofie Sebuødegård; Gunvor G Waade; Giske Ursin; Solveig Hofvind
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Adam Yala; Tal Schuster; Brian Dontchos; Manisha Bahl; Kyle Swanson; Regina Barzilay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Automated mammographic density measurement using Quantra™: comparison with the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiology synoptic scale.

Authors:  Inez Yeo; Judith Akwo; Ernest Ekpo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-05-29

Review 7.  Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.

Authors:  Phoebe E Freer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.

Authors:  Hanna Sartor; Kristina Lång; Aldana Rosso; Signe Borgquist; Sophia Zackrisson; Pontus Timberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shayan Shaghayeq Nazari; Pinku Mukherjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.