Literature DB >> 35390297

Cancer cell viscoelasticity measurement by quantitative phase and flow stress induction.

Tomas Vicar1, Jiri Chmelik2, Jiri Navratil3, Radim Kolar2, Larisa Chmelikova2, Vratislav Cmiel2, Jiri Jagos4, Ivo Provaznik2, Michal Masarik3, Jaromir Gumulec5.   

Abstract

Cell viscoelastic properties are affected by the cell cycle, differentiation, and pathological processes such as malignant transformation. Therefore, evaluation of the mechanical properties of the cells proved to be an approach to obtaining information on the functional state of the cells. Most of the currently used methods for cell mechanophenotyping are limited by low robustness or the need for highly expert operation. In this paper, the system and method for viscoelasticity measurement using shear stress induction by fluid flow is described and tested. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) is used for image acquisition because this technique enables one to quantify optical path length delays introduced by the sample, thus providing a label-free objective measure of morphology and dynamics. Viscosity and elasticity determination were refined using a new approach based on the linear system model and parametric deconvolution. The proposed method allows high-throughput measurements during live-cell experiments and even through a time lapse, whereby we demonstrated the possibility of simultaneous extraction of shear modulus, viscosity, cell morphology, and QPI-derived cell parameters such as circularity or cell mass. Additionally, the proposed method provides a simple approach to measure cell refractive index with the same setup, which is required for reliable cell height measurement with QPI, an essential parameter for viscoelasticity calculation. Reliability of the proposed viscoelasticity measurement system was tested in several experiments including cell types of different Young/shear modulus and treatment with cytochalasin D or docetaxel, and an agreement with atomic force microscopy was observed. The applicability of the proposed approach was also confirmed by a time-lapse experiment with cytochalasin D washout, whereby an increase of stiffness corresponded to actin repolymerization in time.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35390297      PMCID: PMC9117928          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  32 in total

1.  A biomechanical model for fluidization of cells under dynamic strain.

Authors:  Tenghu Wu; James J Feng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Measurement of cell motility and morphology with an automated microscope system.

Authors:  G Thurston; B Jaggi; B Palcic
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1988-09

Review 3.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis.

Authors:  Denis Wirtz; Konstantinos Konstantopoulos; Peter C Searson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Are cancer cells really softer than normal cells?

Authors:  Charlotte Alibert; Bruno Goud; Jean-Baptiste Manneville
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties.

Authors:  Pei-Hsun Wu; Dikla Raz-Ben Aroush; Atef Asnacios; Wei-Chiang Chen; Maxim E Dokukin; Bryant L Doss; Pauline Durand-Smet; Andrew Ekpenyong; Jochen Guck; Nataliia V Guz; Paul A Janmey; Jerry S H Lee; Nicole M Moore; Albrecht Ott; Yeh-Chuin Poh; Robert Ros; Mathias Sander; Igor Sokolov; Jack R Staunton; Ning Wang; Graeme Whyte; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Parametric Deconvolution for Cancer Cells Viscoelasticity Measurements from Quantitative Phase Images.

Authors:  Tomas Vicar; Jaromir Gumulec; Radim Kolar; Jiri Chmelik; Jiri Navratil; Larisa Chmelikova; Vratislav Cmiel; Ivo Provaznik; Michal Masarik
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

Review 7.  Mechanical properties of single cells: Measurement methods and applications.

Authors:  Yansheng Hao; Shaokoon Cheng; Yo Tanaka; Yoichiroh Hosokawa; Yaxiaer Yalikun; Ming Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 14.227

8.  Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines.

Authors:  Jan Rother; Helen Nöding; Ingo Mey; Andreas Janshoff
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.411

9.  A tunable refractive index matching medium for live imaging cells, tissues and model organisms.

Authors:  Tobias Boothe; Lennart Hilbert; Michael Heide; Lea Berninger; Wieland B Huttner; Vasily Zaburdaev; Nadine L Vastenhouw; Eugene W Myers; David N Drechsel; Jochen C Rink
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Cisplatin enhances cell stiffness and decreases invasiveness rate in prostate cancer cells by actin accumulation.

Authors:  Martina Raudenska; Monika Kratochvilova; Tomas Vicar; Jaromir Gumulec; Jan Balvan; Hana Polanska; Jan Pribyl; Michal Masarik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.