Literature DB >> 3538985

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following appendicectomy: the placebo effect.

I G Conn, A H Marshall, S N Yadav, J C Daly, M Jaffer.   

Abstract

A controlled trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with standard intramuscular opiate analgesia in the management of postoperative pain following appendicectomy. Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy were randomised into control, sham TENS and active TENS groups. There was a significant decrease in pain severity and analgesic intake in both active and sham TENS groups when compared with the control group (P less than 0.01). No difference was demonstrated in pain severity between active and sham TENS groups but the active TENS group required slightly less analgesia. These results suggest that the major benefit of TENS in the postappendicectomy patient is due to its 'placebo effect' and its use in this situation cannot be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3538985      PMCID: PMC2498376     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  The perception of pain.

Authors:  R MELZACK
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 2.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on postoperative pain and pulmonary function.

Authors:  J Ali; C S Yaffe; C Serrette
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Philip Taylor; Mark Hallett; Lorraine Flaherty
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Pethidine revisited: plasma concentrations and effects after intramuscular injection.

Authors:  L E Mather; M J Lindop; G T Tucker; A E Pflug
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in the control of postoperative pain.

Authors:  A M Cooperman; B Hall; K Mikalacki; R Hardy; E Sardar
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Prolonged relief of pain by brief, intense transcutaneous somatic stimulation.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Narcotic analgesics and delayed gastric emptying during labour.

Authors:  W S Nimmo; J Wilson; L F Prescott
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation for postoperative pain.

Authors:  R J Cuschieri; C G Morran; C S McArdle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Respiratory effects of analgesia after cholecystectomy: comparison of continuous and intermittent papaveretum.

Authors:  J A Catling; D M Pinto; C Jordan; J G Jones
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-16
  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following appendicectomy: the placebo effect.

Authors:  I G Conn
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The physician healer: ancient magic or modern science?

Authors:  D M Dixon; K G Sweeney; D J Gray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the control of pain during rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Barbara A Rakel; M Bridget Zimmerman; Katharine Geasland; Jennie Embree; Charles R Clark; Nicolas O Noiseux; John J Callaghan; Keela Herr; Deirdre Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 5.  Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 6.  Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Frida Emanuelsson; Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen; Jørgen Hilden; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Non-invasive interactive neurostimulation (InterX™) reduces acute pain in patients following total knee replacement surgery: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ashok K Nigam; Drena M Taylor; Zulia Valeyeva
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: Prospective Case Series With 1 Year of Sustained Relief Following Short-Term Implant.

Authors:  Christopher A Gilmore; Leonardo Kapural; Meredith J McGee; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Brain activation during the expectations of sensory experience for cutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Won-Mo Jung; Yeonhee Ryu; Hi-Joon Park; Hyejung Lee; Younbyoung Chae
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.881

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.