Roksana Karim1,2, Wenrui Xu1, Naoko Kono1,2, Yanjie Li2,3, Mingzhu Yan2,3, Frank Z Stanczyk4, Howard N Hodis1,2,3, Wendy J Mack1,2. 1. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Atherosclerosis Research Unit, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) is a widely used determinant of subclinical atherosclerosis, gray-scale median of the intima-media complex (IM-GSM) of the common carotid artery is a relatively novel measure of echogenicity reflecting composition of the arterial wall. It is important to compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor correlates across CIMT and IM-GSM to determine whether these measures reflect distinct aspects of atherosclerosis. METHODS: Baseline information from a completed randomized clinical trial of 643 healthy postmenopausal women without clinically apparent CVD was included in this cross-sectional study. The women were on average ± SD 61 ± 7 years old, and predominantly non-Hispanic White. CIMT and IM-GSM were measured by high-resolution B-mode ultrasonogram in the far wall of the right common carotid artery. CVD risk factors including age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking, weekly hours of physical activity, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipids, glucose, and inflammatory markers were measured at baseline. Linear regression models were used to assess associations of CVD risk factors with CIMT and IM-GSM. Multivariable models included groups of risk factors added one at a time with and withoutbasic demographic factors (age, race, BMI, physical activity) with model R2 values compared between CIMT and IM-GSM. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, age, Black race, BMI, SBP, and DBP were associated with CIMT (all P < .05), whereas age, Hispanic race, BMI, SBP, physical activity, LDL-cholesterol, and leptin were correlates of IM-GSM (all P < .05). Adjusted for age, race, BMI, and physical activity, the R2 value for SBP was greater for CIMT association, whereas R2 values for lipids, glucose, inflammatory markers, and adipokines were greater for IM-GSM associations. CONCLUSIONS: CIMT and IM-GSM assess different attributes of subclinical atherosclerosis. Integrating both measures may provide improved assessment of atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals.
OBJECTIVES: Although carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) is a widely used determinant of subclinical atherosclerosis, gray-scale median of the intima-media complex (IM-GSM) of the common carotid artery is a relatively novel measure of echogenicity reflecting composition of the arterial wall. It is important to compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor correlates across CIMT and IM-GSM to determine whether these measures reflect distinct aspects of atherosclerosis. METHODS: Baseline information from a completed randomized clinical trial of 643 healthy postmenopausal women without clinically apparent CVD was included in this cross-sectional study. The women were on average ± SD 61 ± 7 years old, and predominantly non-Hispanic White. CIMT and IM-GSM were measured by high-resolution B-mode ultrasonogram in the far wall of the right common carotid artery. CVD risk factors including age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking, weekly hours of physical activity, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipids, glucose, and inflammatory markers were measured at baseline. Linear regression models were used to assess associations of CVD risk factors with CIMT and IM-GSM. Multivariable models included groups of risk factors added one at a time with and withoutbasic demographic factors (age, race, BMI, physical activity) with model R2 values compared between CIMT and IM-GSM. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, age, Black race, BMI, SBP, and DBP were associated with CIMT (all P < .05), whereas age, Hispanic race, BMI, SBP, physical activity, LDL-cholesterol, and leptin were correlates of IM-GSM (all P < .05). Adjusted for age, race, BMI, and physical activity, the R2 value for SBP was greater for CIMT association, whereas R2 values for lipids, glucose, inflammatory markers, and adipokines were greater for IM-GSM associations. CONCLUSIONS: CIMT and IM-GSM assess different attributes of subclinical atherosclerosis. Integrating both measures may provide improved assessment of atherosclerosis in asymptomatic individuals.
Authors: Carol C Mitchell; Claudia E Korcarz; Matthew C Tattersall; Adam D Gepner; Rebekah L Young; Wendy S Post; Joel D Kaufman; Robyn L McClelland; James H Stein Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: H N Hodis; W J Mack; R A Lobo; D Shoupe; A Sevanian; P R Mahrer; R H Selzer; C R Liu Cr; C H Liu Ch; S P Azen Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-12-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Howard N Hodis; Wendy J Mack; Donna Shoupe; Stanley P Azen; Frank Z Stanczyk; Juliana Hwang-Levine; Matthew J Budoff; Victor W Henderson Journal: Menopause Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: S A E Peters; L Lind; M K Palmer; D E Grobbee; J R Crouse; D H O'Leary; G W Evans; J Raichlen; M L Bots; H M den Ruijter Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Jessika Andersson; Johan Sundström; Thomas Gustavsson; Johannes Hulthe; Anders Elmgren; Kersti Zilmer; Mihkel Zilmer; Lars Lind Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Kunihiko Aizawa; Salim Elyas; Damilola D Adingupu; Francesco Casanova; Kim M Gooding; Angela C Shore; W David Strain; Phillip E Gates Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Peter Willeit; Lena Tschiderer; Michael J Sweeting; Simon G Thompson; Matthias W Lorenz; Elias Allara; Kathrin Reuber; Lisa Seekircher; Lu Gao; Ximing Liao; Eva Lonn; Hertzel C Gerstein; Salim Yusuf; Frank P Brouwers; Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek van Gilst; Sigmund A Anderssen; Diederick E Grobbee; John J P Kastelein; Frank L J Visseren; George Ntaios; Apostolos I Hatzitolios; Christos Savopoulos; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Erik Stroes; Matthew Walters; Peter Higgins; Jesse Dawson; Paolo Gresele; Giuseppe Guglielmini; Rino Migliacci; Marat Ezhov; Maya Safarova; Tatyana Balakhonova; Eiichi Sato; Mayuko Amaha; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kostas Kapellas; Lisa M Jamieson; Michael Skilton; James A Blumenthal; Alan Hinderliter; Andrew Sherwood; Patrick J Smith; Michiel A van Agtmael; Peter Reiss; Marit G A van Vonderen; Stefan Kiechl; Gerhard Klingenschmid; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Heiko Uthoff; Zhi-Yong Zou; Ana R Cunha; Mario F Neves; Miles D Witham; Hyun-Woong Park; Moo-Sik Lee; Jang-Ho Bae; Enrique Bernal; Kristian Wachtell; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael H Olsen; David Preiss; Naveed Sattar; Edith Beishuizen; Menno V Huisman; Mark A Espeland; Caroline Schmidt; Stefan Agewall; Ercan Ok; Gülay Aşçi; Eric de Groot; Muriel P C Grooteman; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carol C Mitchell; Claudia E Korcarz; Adam D Gepner; Rebecca Nye; Rebekah L Young; Mika Matsuzaki; Wendy S Post; Joel D Kaufman; Robyn L McClelland; James H Stein Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 5.501