Literature DB >> 35388897

Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression-body mass index genetic risk score interactions.

Francesco Casanova1, Jessica O'Loughlin1, Cathryn Lewis2,3, Timothy M Frayling1, Andrew R Wood1, Jessica Tyrrell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression and obesity are complex global health problems. Recent studies suggest that a genetic predisposition to obesity might be accentuated in people with depression, but these analyses are prone to bias. Here, we tested the hypothesis that depression accentuates genetic susceptibility to obesity and applied negative control experiments to test whether any observed interactions were real or driven by confounding and statistical biases.
METHODS: We used data from up to 378 000 Europeans in UK Biobank, a 73 variant body mass index (BMI) genetic risk score, two depression measures [depression symptoms (DS), major depression (MD)] and an antidepressant usage variable available. We tested whether (i) depression and (ii) antidepressant treatment accentuated genetic susceptibility to obesity. Finally, we performed negative control experiments by sampling individuals at random so that they had BMI distributions identical to depression cases and controls.
RESULTS: Depression was associated with an accentuation of an individual's genetic risk of obesity with evidence of interactions for both DS and MD (Pinteraction = 7 × 10-4 and 7 × 10-5 respectively). Antidepressant usage within DS cases accentuated genetic obesity risk (Pinteraction = 9 × 10-4), but not for MD (Pinteraction = 0.13). Negative control experiments suggested that the observed interactions for MD (empirical-P = 0.067) may be driven by statistical biases or confounding factors but were not possible with the larger DS groups. Antidepressant usage interaction also appears to be driven by statistical artefacts (empirical-P = 0.510 using MD and 0.162 using DS).
CONCLUSION: We have highlighted the importance of running negative experiments to confirm putative interactions in gene-environment studies. We provide some tentative evidence that depression accentuates an individual's genetic susceptibility to higher BMI but demonstrated that the BMI distributions within cases and controls might drive these interactions.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; UK Biobank; gene–environment interaction; obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35388897      PMCID: PMC9557895          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   9.685


  21 in total

Review 1.  Is there a "metabolic-mood syndrome"? A review of the relationship between obesity and mood disorders.

Authors:  Rodrigo B Mansur; Elisa Brietzke; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution.

Authors:  Matthew C Keller
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Gene-obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study.

Authors:  Jessica Tyrrell; Andrew R Wood; Ryan M Ames; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Robin N Beaumont; Samuel E Jones; Marcus A Tuke; Katherine S Ruth; Rachel M Freathy; George Davey Smith; Stéphane Joost; Idris Guessous; Anna Murray; David P Strachan; Zoltán Kutalik; Michael N Weedon; Timothy M Frayling
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Antidepressant utilisation and incidence of weight gain during 10 years' follow-up: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Rafael Gafoor; Helen P Booth; Martin C Gulliford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  Interaction between an ADCY3 Genetic Variant and Two Weight-Lowering Diets Affecting Body Fatness and Body Composition Outcomes Depending on Macronutrient Distribution: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Leticia Goni; Jose Ignacio Riezu-Boj; Fermín I Milagro; Fernando J Corrales; Lourdes Ortiz; Marta Cuervo; J Alfredo Martínez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Using genetics to understand the causal influence of higher BMI on depression.

Authors:  Jessica Tyrrell; Anwar Mulugeta; Andrew R Wood; Ang Zhou; Robin N Beaumont; Marcus A Tuke; Samuel E Jones; Katherine S Ruth; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Seth Sharp; William D Thompson; Yingjie Ji; Jamie Harrison; Rachel M Freathy; Anna Murray; Michael N Weedon; Cathryn Lewis; Timothy M Frayling; Elina Hyppönen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Factors associated with sharing e-mail information and mental health survey participation in large population cohorts.

Authors:  Mark J Adams; W David Hill; David M Howard; Hassan S Dashti; Katrina A S Davis; Archie Campbell; Toni-Kim Clarke; Ian J Deary; Caroline Hayward; David Porteous; Matthew Hotopf; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  A genome-wide association study implicates multiple mechanisms influencing raised urinary albumin-creatinine ratio.

Authors:  Francesco Casanova; Jessica Tyrrell; Robin N Beaumont; Yingjie Ji; Samuel E Jones; Andrew T Hattersley; Michael N Weedon; Anna Murray; Angela C Shore; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew R Wood
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Minimal phenotyping yields genome-wide association signals of low specificity for major depression.

Authors:  Na Cai; Joana A Revez; Mark J Adams; Till F M Andlauer; Gerome Breen; Enda M Byrne; Toni-Kim Clarke; Andreas J Forstner; Hans J Grabe; Steven P Hamilton; Douglas F Levinson; Cathryn M Lewis; Glyn Lewis; Nicholas G Martin; Yuri Milaneschi; Ole Mors; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Brenda W J H Penninx; Roy H Perlis; Giorgio Pistis; James B Potash; Martin Preisig; Jianxin Shi; Jordan W Smoller; Fabien Streit; Henning Tiemeier; Rudolf Uher; Sandra Van der Auwera; Alexander Viktorin; Myrna M Weissman; Kenneth S Kendler; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank.

Authors:  Jessica Tyrrell; Jie Zheng; Robin Beaumont; Kathryn Hinton; Tom G Richardson; Andrew R Wood; George Davey Smith; Timothy M Frayling; Kate Tilling
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.