| Literature DB >> 35388323 |
Wensong Li1, Zhidong Liu1, Tao Song1, Chunlong Zhang1, Jianzhen Xue1.
Abstract
Asthma in children has a long duration and is prone to recurring attacks. Children will feel chest tightness, shortness of breath, cough, and difficulty breathing when they are onset, which has a serious impact on their health. Clinical nursing is of great significance in the treatment of childhood asthma. At present, the electronic health PDCA nursing model is widely used in clinical nursing as a common and effective nursing method. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate the efficacy of the PDCA nursing model in the treatment of childhood asthma. With the development of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence can be used to evaluate the effect of the PDCA nursing model in the treatment of childhood asthma. The BP network can effectively perform data training and discrimination, but its training efficiency is low, and it is easily affected by initial weights and thresholds. Aiming at this defect, this work uses the genetic simulated annealing (GSA) algorithm to improve it. In view of the problems that the genetic algorithm falls into local minimum and simulated annealing algorithm has a slow convergence speed, the improved genetic simulated annealing algorithm is used to optimize the BP neural network, and an improved genetic simulated annealing BP network (IGSA-BP) is proposed. The algorithm not only reduces the problem that the BP network has an influence on initial weight and threshold on the algorithm but also improves the population diversity and avoids falling into local optimum by improving the crossover and mutation probability formula and improving Metropolis criterion. The proposed method has more efficient performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35388323 PMCID: PMC8979696 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2005196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparison of literature.
| Aim and reference | Problem-solving technique | Application | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individualized interventional pain management technique in early stage of cancer pain: a desirable protocol for improving quality of life (J). [ | PDCA | Education of nursing | Improved |
|
| |||
| Prospective, observational study of pain and analgesic prescribing in medical oncology outpatients with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer (J). [ | PDCA | Blood glucose testing | Improved |
|
| |||
| Morphine as the first drug for the treatment of cancer pain (J). [ | PDCA | In ICU for reducing the rate of catheter-related blood infection. | Good |
|
| |||
| Models of palliative care delivery in the United States (J). [ | FOCUS-PDCA | Solving multifaceted and complex clinical nursing quality problems | Good |
|
| |||
| Minnesota rural palliative care initiative: building palliative care capacity in rural Minnesota (J). [ | PDCA | Severe traumatic brain injury | Good |
|
| |||
| Analysis of PDCA circulation guidance in the whole-course diabetes health education (J). [ | PDCA | Diabetes-health-education-research | Remarkable |
|
| |||
| Effect of follow-up management based on PDCA circulation combined with PIO in diabetic patients complicated with non-alcoholic fatty liver (J). [ | PDCA | Management of T2DM patients with NAFLD | Improved |
|
| |||
| Effect evaluation of PDCA cycle on postoperative rehabilitation health education among patients with lumbar minimally invasive surgery (J). [ | PDCA | Postoperative rehabilitation health education | Improved |
|
| |||
| Effects of PDCA circulation health education on children's asthma control level (J). [ | PDCA | Control of childhood asthma | Good |
|
| |||
| Effect of PDCA nursing mode on angina pectoris and quality of life after discharge in patients with myocardial infarction (J). [ | PDCA | Patients with myocardial infarction | Improved |
|
| |||
| Application of PDCA nursing mode in the course of nursing the patients with pernicious placenta previa (J). [ | PDCA | Implemented nursing intervention | Improved |
|
| |||
| Effect of health education in occupational population with high-blood pressure based on PDCA model (J). [ | PDCA | Blood pressure level | Good |
|
| |||
| Effects of PDCA circulation health education on children's asthma control level (J). [ | PDCA | Implementation of gastroenterology health education | Satisfactory |
|
| |||
| Application of PDCA circulation theory in buccal clinical nursing teaching (J). [ | PDCA | Oral and gynecology clinical teaching | Good |
|
| |||
| Using PDCA cycle to improve the quality of nursing records (J). [ | PDCA | Nursing record quality management | Improved |
|
| |||
| The value analysis of PDCA cycle in the application of management of the quality of emergency care (J). [ | PDCA | Emergency department | Improved |
|
| |||
| Effect of PDCA circulation on improving quality of nursing quality in outpatient operation room (J). [ | PDCA | Oral diagnosis and nursing management | Good |
Figure 1The structure of BP.
Figure 2Genetic algorithm flowchart.
Figure 3The structure of IGSA.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of IGSA-BP treatment effect evaluation.
The detailed information of CAA and CAB.
| Dataset | Training set | Test set |
|---|---|---|
| CAA | 589 | 206 |
| CAB | 817 | 398 |
The detailed efficacy indicators.
| Item | Index |
|---|---|
|
| Relief of wheezing symptoms |
|
| Relief of shortness of breath symptoms |
|
| Relief of hypoxia symptoms |
|
| Relief of chest tightness symptoms |
|
| Relief of lung function symptoms |
|
| Exhaled nitric oxide concentration |
|
| Induces the concentration of eosinophils |
|
| Peripheral blood eosinophil concentration |
Figure 5The training loss on (a) CAA and (b) CAB.
Comparison with other methods.
| Method | CAA | CAB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Recall | Precision | Recall | |
| LR | 83.7 | 81.1 | 85.9 | 82.6 |
| DT | 87.2 | 84.6 | 89.5 | 86.7 |
| SVM | 91.7 | 89.8 | 93.2 | 91.1 |
| IGSA-BP | 94.5 | 92.2 | 96.7 | 94.9 |
Comparison of tuned parameters for AI algorithms.
| Sr. No. | Ai algorithm | Tuned parameters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Logistic regression | Penalty-l2, tol-0.0001, C-(0.1–1.0), max_iter-(50–100) |
| 2 | Decision tree | Max_depth-(100–200), min_samples_split-2, min_samples_leaf-1 |
| 3 | Support vector machine | n-estimators, max_depth-(100–200), min_samples_split-2 |
| 4 | IGSA-BP | n_iterations-(100–200), step_size-(0.1–1.0), min-0.1, max-0.1 |
Figure 6Evaluation on SA.
Figure 7Comparison of (a) GSA-BP and (b) IGSA-BP.