Literature DB >> 35388177

Patient preference for renal denervation therapy in hypertension: A cross-sectional survey in Chengdu, China.

Zhipeng Zhang1, Xin Zhang1, Runyu Ye1, Xinran Li1, Xiaoping Chen2.   

Abstract

This study investigated patient preferences for renal denervation (RDN) therapy in hypertension patients in Chengdu, China. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted between August and December 2020. First, we collected and analyzed information on demographics, the duration of hypertension, the presence or absence of medication, the medication regimen, the duration of medication, maximal and minimal blood pressure levels, self-reported comorbidities, the willingness of patients to choose RDN as a blood pressure control strategy, choice determinants and expectations for RDN. In total, 485 patients were interviewed, and 402 questionnaires were eligible for analysis. The mean age of the participants was 61 years, 53.9% of the participants were male, and 32.6% of the patients demonstrated a willingness to choose RDN as a blood pressure control strategy. The proportion of patients who were already on medication was 34.7%, whereas the proportion of those who were not on medication was 23.3%. Furthermore, 47.3% of the patients would choose RDN treatment if the procedure could decrease their blood pressure by over 20 mmHg, while no patient would choose the device treatment if their blood pressure would decrease by less than 5 mmHg. In addition, 56.5% of the patients expected that they could take one less medication after RDN. Approximately 70% of the patients expected that RDN could consistently decrease their blood pressure for at least 15 years. In summary, among hypertensive patients in Chengdu, an estimated one-third were willing to choose RDN therapy as a blood pressure control approach; these patients were younger, more likely to be male, took more antihypertensive drugs, and had concomitant metabolic disorders. The perspectives of patients on RDN were not dependent on their education levels; also, their expectations for RDN were high.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Hypertension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; Hypertension; Patient preference; Renal denervation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35388177     DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00912-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   5.528


  15 in total

1.  Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: a pilot study.

Authors:  Felix Mahfoud; Markus Schlaich; Ingrid Kindermann; Christian Ukena; Bodo Cremers; Mathias C Brandt; Uta C Hoppe; Oliver Vonend; Lars C Rump; Paul A Sobotka; Henry Krum; Murray Esler; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Adherence in Hypertension.

Authors:  Michel Burnier; Brent M Egan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  A Three-Arm Randomized Trial of Different Renal Denervation Devices and Techniques in Patients With Resistant Hypertension (RADIOSOUND-HTN).

Authors:  Karl Fengler; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Stephan Blazek; Christian Besler; Philipp Hartung; Maximilian von Roeder; Martin Petzold; Sindy Winkler; Robert Höllriegel; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele; Philipp Lurz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnea course, and glycemic control in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea.

Authors:  Adam Witkowski; Aleksander Prejbisz; Elżbieta Florczak; Jacek Kądziela; Paweł Śliwiński; Przemysław Bieleń; Ilona Michałowska; Marek Kabat; Ewa Warchoł; Magdalena Januszewicz; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Virend K Somers; Paul A Sobotka; Andrzej Januszewicz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  European Society of Hypertension position paper on renal denervation 2021.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder; Felix Mahfoud; Giuseppe Mancia; Michael Azizi; Michael Böhm; Kyriakos Dimitriadis; Kazuomi Kario; Abraham A Kroon; Melvin D Lobo; Christian Ott; Atul Pathak; Alexandre Persu; Filippo Scalise; Markus Schlaich; Reinhold Kreutz; Costas Tsioufis
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael Böhm; Kazuomi Kario; David E Kandzari; Felix Mahfoud; Michael A Weber; Roland E Schmieder; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Stuart Pocock; Dimitris Konstantinidis; James W Choi; Cara East; David P Lee; Adrian Ma; Sebastian Ewen; Debbie L Cohen; Robert Wilensky; Chandan M Devireddy; Janice Lea; Axel Schmid; Joachim Weil; Tolga Agdirlioglu; Denise Reedus; Brian K Jefferson; David Reyes; Richard D'Souza; Andrew S P Sharp; Faisal Sharif; Martin Fahy; Vanessa DeBruin; Sidney A Cohen; Sandeep Brar; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial.

Authors:  David E Kandzari; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud; Raymond R Townsend; Michael A Weber; Stuart Pocock; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Dimitrios Tousoulis; James W Choi; Cara East; Sandeep Brar; Sidney A Cohen; Martin Fahy; Garrett Pilcher; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  May Measurement Month 2019: The Global Blood Pressure Screening Campaign of the International Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Thomas Beaney; Aletta E Schutte; George S Stergiou; Claudio Borghi; Dylan Burger; Fadi Charchar; Suzie Cro; Alejandro Diaz; Albertino Damasceno; Walter Espeche; Arun Pulikkottil Jose; Nadia Khan; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Anuj Maheshwari; Marcos J Marin; Arun More; Dinesh Neupane; Peter Nilsson; Mansi Patil; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Agustin Ramirez; Pablo Rodriguez; Markus Schlaich; Ulrike M Steckelings; Maciej Tomaszewski; Thomas Unger; Richard Wainford; Jiguang Wang; Bryan Williams; Neil R Poulter
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  One year follow-up effect of renal sympathetic denervation in patients with resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Masoud Pourmoghaddas; Alireza Khosravi; Mohammadreza Akhbari; Mojtaba Akbari; Mohamadreza Pourbehi; Fereshteh Ziaei; Leila Salehizade; Nahid Sistan; Masoumeh Esmaeili; Peyman Bidram
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2016-03

10.  Differences in patient and physician perspectives on pharmaceutical therapy and renal denervation for the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder; David E Kandzari; Tzung-Dau Wang; Ying-Hsiang Lee; Gabriel Lazarus; Atul Pathak
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.776

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Present Evidence of Determinants to Predict the Efficacy of Renal Denervation.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Yanping Xu; Weijie Chen; Liang Wang; Huaan Du; Hang Liu; Zhiyu Ling; Yuehui Yin
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.434

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.