| Literature DB >> 35386755 |
Marianne Lintz1, Remy E Walk2, Simon Y Tang2,3,4, Lawrence J Bonassar1,5.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes has long been implicated as a major risk factor for intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, interfering with molecular signaling and matrix biochemistry, which ultimately aggravates the progression of the disease. Glucose content has been previously shown to influence structural and compositional changes in engineered discs in vitro, impeding fiber formation and mechanical stability.Entities:
Keywords: annulus fibrosus; degenerative disc disease; diabetes; proteoglycans
Year: 2022 PMID: 35386755 PMCID: PMC8966876 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JOR Spine ISSN: 2572-1143
FIGURE 1(A) Fasting blood glucose level, (B) percent HbA1c content, and (C) body mass measured for each group. Significant differences (P < .05) are indicated using (*) and bars. Error bars represent SD. (n = 8‐9)
FIGURE 2(A) Whole disc sulfated glycosaminoglycan (s‐GAG) concentration, (B) whole disc collagen content, and (C) whole disc DNA content normalized to wet weight for each group. (D) Advanced glycation end products (AGE) content normalized to hydroxyproline for each group. Significant differences (P < .05) are indicated using (*) and bars. Error bars represent SD. (n = 8‐9)
FIGURE 3Representative histological images for Safranin‐O staining of wild‐type (top) and diabetic (bottom) discs of the (A) entire disc at 40× and (B) inner AF at 100× magnification. Significant differences (P < .05) are indicated using (*) and bars. Error bars represent SD while scale bars indicate 0.15 mm. (n = 5‐6)
FIGURE 4Representative second harmonic generation (SHG) images for wild‐type (top) and diabetic (bottom) discs of the (A) entire disc and (B) inner annulus fibrosus (AF). (C) Normalized fiber orientation distributions for wild‐type (top) and diabetic (bottom) discs. Scale bars indicate 200 (A) or 100 μm (B). (n = 6‐7)
FIGURE 5(A) Dynamic stiffness for each group over 13 frequencies. (B) Equilibrium modulus and (C) hydraulic permeability determined from stiffness and phase angle values following cyclic tests for each group. (D) Compressive modulus and (E) hydraulic permeability determined from stress/relaxation tests for each group. Significant differences (P < .05) are indicated using (*) and/or bars. Error bars represent SD. (n = 7‐9)