| Literature DB >> 35386481 |
Vikram Kumar1, Bibi Shazia Ali2, Erum Choudry3, Sheharyar Khan4, Kamran Baig5, Naveed Ur Rehman Durrani6, Syed Rehan Ali1.
Abstract
Introduction Balochistan is the largest of Pakistan's four provinces, yet it is also the poorest and most impoverished, particularly in terms of neonatal healthcare. In order to build and tailor strategies to improve neonatal outcomes, it is necessary to identify barriers and facilitators for interventions. Therefore, we conducted this study to provide an overview of neonatal healthcare quality and assess the structural capacity for the improvement and further development of neonatal healthcare facilities in Balochistan. Methods A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in Balochistan, a province of Pakistan. The survey was designed to assess the level of staffing and facilities in the neonatal health care units. Data were gathered through trained staff either by in-person visits to the facility or via telephone. Results A total of 177 facilities were assessed in 25 districts of Balochistan. A majority (88.7%) of the facilities were from the public sector. Birth and neonatal care services were provided at only 63 (36%) of the assessed facilities and only three had newborn intensive care units (NICUs) with a 1:5 staff: patient ratio. Unfortunately, all NICUs lacked the basic advanced facilities. None of the hospitals had an infection control policy or staff nor any training program for doctors. Conclusion In conclusion, healthcare facilities to manage neonatal patients requiring hospital care are extremely limited in Balochistan and the ones that are available have very limited resources. To improve the healthcare system in Balochistan, all stakeholders should be involved in the planning, decision-making, and implementation of healthcare programs at all levels to ensure sustainability and efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: balochistan; health facility; neonatal health; pakistan; quality patient care
Year: 2022 PMID: 35386481 PMCID: PMC8970319 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Characteristics of available healthcare facilities
| Characteristics | n (%) |
| Category of facilities | |
| Government | 157(88.7) |
| Private | 15(8.5) |
| Semi-private and charity based | 5(2.8) |
| Level of facilities | |
| Primary care | 145 (82) |
| Secondary care | 27 (15.2) |
| Tertiary care | 5 (2.8) |
| Number of deliveries per month | |
| No of deliveries | 114 (64.41) |
| <50 | 25 (14.1) |
| 50 - 100 births | 11 (6.2) |
| More than 100 births | 27 (15.2) |
| Labor room | |
| Yes | 46 (26.0) |
| No | 131 (74.0) |
| Operation theater | |
| Yes | 25(14.1) |
| No | 152 (85.6) |
| Well newborn nursery | |
| Yes | 28 (15.8) |
| No | 149 (84.2) |
| Special care nursery | |
| Yes | 9 (5.1) |
| No | 168 (94.9) |
| NICU | |
| Yes | 3 (1.7) |
| No | 174 (98.3) |
| Available support facilities | |
| Blood bank | |
| Yes | 3(1.7) |
| No | 174(98.3) |
| Laboratory & advanced imaging (Ultrasound, MRI, CT scan) services | |
| Yes | 2 (1.1) |
| No | 175 (98.9) |
| Adult ICU | |
| Yes | 2 (1.1) |
| No | 175 (98.9) |
| Dedicated emergency department | |
| Yes | 1 (0.6) |
| No | 176 (99.4) |
Availability of birth services
| If the Facility Provides Birth Services | Type of Facilities | |||||||
| Primary | Secondary | Tertiary | Total | |||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| No | 112 | 77.2% | 2 | 7.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 114 | 64.4% |
| Yes | 33 | 22.8% | 25 | 92.5% | 5 | 100.0% | 63 | 35.6% |
| Total | 145 | 100.0% | 27 | 100.0% | 5 | 100.0% | 177 | 100.0% |
Service providers at neonatal healthcare facilities
| Services | Providers | Type of Facilities | |||||||
| Primary | Secondary | Tertiary | Total | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Birth services | Trained Obstetrician | 5 | 15.2% | 17 | 70.8% | 2 | 66.7% | 24 | 40.0% |
| Qualified Obstetrician | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 20.8% | 1 | 33.3% | 6 | 10.0% | |
| Trained Birth Attendant | 27 | 81.8% | 2 | 8.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 29 | 48.3% | |
| Unskilled Attendant | 1 | 3.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.7% | |
| Total | 33 | 100.0% | 24 | 100.0% | 3 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | |
| Neonatal care services | Birth Attendant | 6 | 18.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 9.5% |
| General Practitioner | 5 | 15.2% | 11 | 40.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 16 | 25.4% | |
| Lady Health Worker | 16 | 48.5% | 2 | 7.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 18 | 28.6% | |
| Qualified Obstetrician | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 3.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.6% | |
| Qualified Neonatologist/Pediatrician | 2 | 6.1% | 5 | 18.5% | 2 | 66.7% | 9 | 14.3% | |
| Trained Obstetrician | 2 | 6.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.2% | |
| Trained Pediatrician | 2 | 6.1% | 8 | 29.6% | 1 | 33.3% | 11 | 17.5% | |
| Total | 33 | 100.0% | 27 | 100.0% | 3 | 100.0% | 63 | 100.0% | |
Practices and available facilities at NICUs
NICU: newborn intensive care unit; PDA: patent ductus arteriosus; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; HBB: Helping Babies Breathe; NRP: Neonatal Resuscitation Program; HBS: Helping Babies Survive; ECEB: Essential Care for Every Baby; TPN: total parenteral nutrition; IVH: intraventricular hemorrhage
| Characteristics of NICU | N (%) | Characteristics of NICU | N (%) |
| NICU staff: patient ratio in all three NICUs | 1:5 | Number of NICU beds | |
| < 5 | 1 (33.3) | ||
| 10 to 15 | 2 (66.7) | ||
| Practices | |||
| Do you resuscitate preterm neonates less than 28 weeks | Use probiotics/prophylactic fluconazole | ||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | Yes | 0 (0.0) |
| No | 3 (100.0) | No | 3 (100.0) |
| Percentage of staff trained/certified for neonatal resuscitation (HBB/NRP/HBS/ECEB or other) | Percentage of doctors trained/certified for neonatal resuscitation (HBB/NRP/HBS/ECEB or other) | ||
| <10% | 1 (33.3) | <10% | 1 (33.3) |
| 10-20% | 0 (0.0) | 10-20% | 1 (33.3) |
| None | 2 (66.7) | None | 1 (33.3) |
| Use of aminophylline for apnea | Use of TPN | ||
| Yes | 2 (66.7) | Yes | 1 (33.3) |
| No | 1 (33.3) | No | 2 (66.7) |
| Use of caffeine for apnea | Use of surfactant | ||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | Yes | 1 (33.3) |
| No | 3 (100.0) | No | 2 (66.7) |
| Use of ibuprofen/paracetamol as first-line for PDA | Medications given via infusion/syringe pump/s | ||
| Yes | 1 (33.3) | Yes | 2 (66.7) |
| No | 2 (66.7) | No | 1 (33.3) |
| Available facilities | |||
| Echocardiography services | Units with CPAP/ventilators/patient monitors | ||
| Yes | 2 (66.7) | Yes | 2 (66.7) |
| No | 1 (33.3) | No | 1 (33.3) |
| Transillumination light for pneumothorax | Units to screen red reflex and hearing ability | ||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | Yes | 2 (66.7) |
| No | 3 (100.0) | No | 1 (33.3) |
| Ability to perform an exchange transfusion for hyperbilirubinemia | Ultrasound head for IVH screening or ROP (Retinopathy of prematurity) screening facility | ||
| Yes | 2 (66.7) | Yes | 0 (0.0) |
| No | 1 (33.3) | No | 3 (100.0) |
| Umbilical arterial line/PICC line insertion | Umbilical venous line insertion | ||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | Yes | 3 (100.0) |
| No | 3 (100.0) | No | 0 (0.0) |
| Neonatal surgery facilities | Units with a centralized oxygen system | ||
| Yes | 3 (100.0) | Yes | 3 (100.0) |
| No | 0 (0.0) | No | 0 (0.0) |
| Does your hospital/unit have an infection control department? | Does your hospital have a training program for doctors (Pediatrics/Neonatology) | ||
| Yes | 0 (0.0) | Yes | 0 (0.0) |
| No | 3 (100.0) | No | 3 (100.0) |