Literature DB >> 35386273

Group Comparison of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of Diffusion Tensors.

Armin Schwartzman1, Robert F Dougherty2, Jonathan E Taylor3.   

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data differ from most medical images in that values at each voxel are not scalars, but 3 × 3 symmetric positive definite matrices called diffusion tensors (DTs). The anatomic characteristics of the tissue at each voxel are reflected by the DT eigenvalues and eigenvectors. In this article we consider the problem of testing whether the means of two groups of DT images are equal at each voxel in terms of the DT's eigenvalues, eigenvectors, or both. Because eigendecompositions are highly nonlinear, existing likelihood ratio statistics (LRTs) for testing differences in eigenvalues or eigenvectors of means of Gaussian symmetric matrices assume an orthogonally invariant covariance structure between the matrix entries. While retaining the form of the LRTs, we derive new approximations to their true distributions when the covariance between the DT entries is arbitrary and possibly different between the two groups. The approximate distributions are those of similar LRT statistics computed on the tangent space to the parameter manifold at the true value of the parameter, but plugging in an estimate for the point of application of the tangent space. The resulting distributions, which are weighted sums of chi-squared distributions, are further approximated by scaled chi-squared distributions by matching the first two moments. For validity of the Gaussian model, the positive definite constraints on the DT are removed via a matrix log transformation, although this is not crucial asymptotically. Voxelwise application of the test statistics leads to a multiple-testing problem, which is solved by false discovery rate inference. The foregoing methods are illustrated in a DTI group comparison of boys versus girls.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion tensor imaging; Likelihood ratio test; Manifold-valued data; Multiple testing; Random matrix; Satterthwaite approximation

Year:  2010        PMID: 35386273      PMCID: PMC8982984          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap07291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  17 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; J F Mangin; C Poupon; C A Clark; S Pappata; N Molko; H Chabriat
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate.

Authors:  Christopher R Genovese; Nicole A Lazar; Thomas Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A normal distribution for tensor-valued random variables: applications to diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  Peter J Basser; Sinisa Pajevic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Daniel B Rowe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cross-subject comparison of principal diffusion direction maps.

Authors:  Armin Schwartzman; Robert F Dougherty; Jonathan E Taylor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors.

Authors:  Vincent Arsigny; Pierre Fillard; Xavier Pennec; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Statistical group comparison of diffusion tensors via multivariate hypothesis testing.

Authors:  Brandon Whitcher; Jonathan J Wisco; Nouchine Hadjikhani; David S Tuch
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI.

Authors:  P J Basser; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1996-06

9.  Quantitative analysis of diffusion tensor orientation: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Yu-Chien Wu; Aaron S Field; Moo K Chung; Benham Badie; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  White matter asymmetry in the human brain: a diffusion tensor MRI study.

Authors:  C Büchel; T Raedler; M Sommer; M Sach; C Weiller; M A Koch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.