Literature DB >> 35385107

Sequential loss of dynein sequences precedes complete loss in land plants.

Jessica Lucas1, Matt Geisler2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35385107      PMCID: PMC9237703          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Cytoskeletal motor proteins are essential to eukaryotes by facilitating cell division, cytoplasmic organization, and locomotion. Although plant genomes encode numerous kinesin and myosin motors (Zhu and Dixit, 2012; Lee et al., 2015), the presence of dyneins in land plants has been unclear in the scientific literature. Here, we summarize the debate regarding plant dyneins and clarify the presence of plant dyneins through analysis of recent and updated genomes. Initially, dynein was identified by RT-PCR and in early genome annotations rice (Oryza sativa) and Nicotiana benthamiana (King, 2002; Moscatelli et al., 2003; Scali et al., 2003). Subsequently, those dynein sequences were removed from the NCBI and retracted from the rice genome. We determined that these initially reported “plant” sequences likely originated from fungal and algal contaminants. Dyneins were not found in seed plants Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), rice, or cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) (Lawrence et al., 2001; Wickstead and Gull, 2007; Kollmar, 2016). Dynein transport proteins were reported absent in the moss Physcomitrium patens (Rensing et al., 2008). Understandably, dyneins were considered absent in land plants and kinesins were hypothesized to compensate for that loss (Zhu and Dixit, 2012; Lee et al., 2015; Gicking et al., 2018). The absence of plant dyneins was corroborated by a recent genome analysis (Brawley et al., 2017), while other investigations identified dyneins in the gymnosperm Ginkgo biloba and other plants (Kollmar, 2016; Cheng et al., 2019, 2021; Liu et al., 2021). We sought to resolve these conflicting reports through analysis of key genomes representing major branches of plant evolutionary history. Our survey of Viridiplantae for conserved dynein components revealed a gradual loss of specific dynein subunits along the evolutionary path from the ancestor of green algae to land plants with flagellated sperm and the complete loss of dynein heavy chains (DHC) in plants without flagella. We conclude that a core set of dyneins is found in plants that depend upon flagellated sperm for reproduction and these data help clarify an important cytological aspect of evolutionary genomics. Dyneins are multi-subunit protein complexes and each complex contains at least one conserved heavy chain responsible for motor activity (Wickstead and Gull, 2007; Kollmar, 2016). We surveyed Chlorophycean algae, Charaphycean algae, and all land plants with assembled genomes in JGI, NCBI, and 1KP databases using BLAST and HMM searches for the conserved Dynein Heavy Chain (DHC) PFAM model PF:3028 (Wickstead and Gull, 2007; Kollmar, 2016). Multiple DHCs were identified in bryophytes, lycophytes, ferns, and the gymnosperm G. biloba (Figures 1A and 2). DHCs were not found in any angiosperm or conifer, and we confirmed this absence through TBLASTN searches using Selaginella and Ginkgo DHCs as query sequences.
Figure 1

DHCs in select land plants and Chlorophycean and Charaphycean Algae. A, Presence of DHCs in key Viridiplantae species and Homo sapiens, for comparison. Table of DHCs represents data from maximum parsimony analysis (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure S2). Fragments (F) may be an artifact of sequencing. Light chain presence was determined through BLAST searches and colored boxes signify e values less than 10^−10, and “P” represents larger e values. Asterisks indicate organisms that do not produce flagella or cilia. B, Comparison of DHCs within axonemes of key plant and algal groups. In each panel, swimming cells and sperm (upper left) and axonemes are diagrammed in cross section (upper right) and longitudinal section (bottom). Four monomeric DHCs are considered “minor” and localize close to cell body (colored regions of flagella indicated with small arrow), while the localization of DHC12 is undetermined (*) (Yagi et al., 2009). C, Viridiplantae phylogeny showing loss of DHCs and axonemal structures.

Figure 2

Topology of maximum parsimony tree showing DHC subcategories in Viridiplantae and humans. Amino acid sequences of 169 DHCs were sorted into classes by maximum-parsimony analysis of their evolutionary history. Groups in bold text are found in all plants with flagellated sperm and asterisks on DHC12 and DHC16 indicate these are found only in hornworts and liverwort but not other land plants. Three outer arm dynein sequences are found in C. reinhardtii: α, β, and γ. Additional moss (Ceratodon purpureus and Sphagnum magellanicum) genomes were searched to corroborate this loss. Proteins were classified based upon the identity of Homo sapiens and the C. reinhardtii protein within each color-coded clade (human sequences are noted with a black dot for comparison). Sequences were aligned in ALIVIEW and analyzed using MEGAX (Kumar et al., 2018). Sequence fragments less than 1.5 kb were removed prior to alignment. All sites with less than 50% coverage were eliminated leaving a total of 3,766 positions. The bootstrap consensus tree topology of 500 replicates is presented using circular format. A linear format version of this tree including individual sequence accessions and bootstrap replicate values is included as Supplemental Figure S1.

DHCs in select land plants and Chlorophycean and Charaphycean Algae. A, Presence of DHCs in key Viridiplantae species and Homo sapiens, for comparison. Table of DHCs represents data from maximum parsimony analysis (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure S2). Fragments (F) may be an artifact of sequencing. Light chain presence was determined through BLAST searches and colored boxes signify e values less than 10^−10, and “P” represents larger e values. Asterisks indicate organisms that do not produce flagella or cilia. B, Comparison of DHCs within axonemes of key plant and algal groups. In each panel, swimming cells and sperm (upper left) and axonemes are diagrammed in cross section (upper right) and longitudinal section (bottom). Four monomeric DHCs are considered “minor” and localize close to cell body (colored regions of flagella indicated with small arrow), while the localization of DHC12 is undetermined (*) (Yagi et al., 2009). C, Viridiplantae phylogeny showing loss of DHCs and axonemal structures. We categorized plant DHCs by subclass using neighbor joining and maximum parsimony analyses (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure S1). We rooted these analyses with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a close relative to land plants and model system with well-characterized dynein complexes. The C. reinhardtii genome contains 16 distinct DHCs, all involved in flagellar beating (King, 2016). Most DHCs form inner and outer axonemal arms that slide microtubule doublets to create movement. Chlamydomonas reinhardtti DHC1-12 form inner arms and three subunits (α, β, and γ) comprise the outer arms (Figure 1B). We found no outer arm sequences in any land plant, which aligns with studies showing plant sperm flagella lack outer arms (Hyams and Campbell, 1985). Interestingly, the Charophycean algae, Chara braunii and Klebsormidium flaccidum, contained sequences homologous to β and γ (Figure 1B), despite the lack of visible outer arms (Jin and Hasenstein, 2009). Topology of maximum parsimony tree showing DHC subcategories in Viridiplantae and humans. Amino acid sequences of 169 DHCs were sorted into classes by maximum-parsimony analysis of their evolutionary history. Groups in bold text are found in all plants with flagellated sperm and asterisks on DHC12 and DHC16 indicate these are found only in hornworts and liverwort but not other land plants. Three outer arm dynein sequences are found in C. reinhardtii: α, β, and γ. Additional moss (Ceratodon purpureus and Sphagnum magellanicum) genomes were searched to corroborate this loss. Proteins were classified based upon the identity of Homo sapiens and the C. reinhardtii protein within each color-coded clade (human sequences are noted with a black dot for comparison). Sequences were aligned in ALIVIEW and analyzed using MEGAX (Kumar et al., 2018). Sequence fragments less than 1.5 kb were removed prior to alignment. All sites with less than 50% coverage were eliminated leaving a total of 3,766 positions. The bootstrap consensus tree topology of 500 replicates is presented using circular format. A linear format version of this tree including individual sequence accessions and bootstrap replicate values is included as Supplemental Figure S1. All plants with flagella encode a core set of seven inner arm DHCs sequences. We identified full length orthologs for five of 12 C. reinhardtii DHC inner arms (Supplemental Table S1). Inner arm DHCs are subcategorized as double-headed heterodimers or single-headed monomers that bind either centrin or p28 (King, 2016; Figure 1A). All land plants genomes evaluated with flagellated sperm and charophytes encode orthologs for each inner arm DHC type: double-headed DHC1 and DHC10, two DHCs that bind centrin (DHC7 and DHC8), and one that associates with p28 (DHC2). Charophytes and land plants also contain a potential ortholog for DHC6 and an out-paralog of C. reinhardtii DHC9 and DHC11 (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure S1). Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that C. reinhardtii DHC9 and DHC11 arose from duplication and are out-paralogs in the Chlorophycean algae, while charophytes and land plants contain DHC sequences derived from the common ancestor. Two DHCs were found in a subset of flagellated plants. Orthologs of C. reinhardtii DHC12 and DHC16 were found in charophytes, liverwort Marchantia polymorpha, hornwort Antheroceros angustus, but no other land plant. DHC12 is considered a “minor” DHC with unknown function (Yagi et al., 2009). DHC16 is often called “cytoplasmic dynein 2” due to sequence similarity to cytoplasmic dynein 1 needed for mitosis (Kollmar, 2016; Braschi et al., 2022). Our study confirms that C. reinhardtii and land plants do not possess a true cytoplasmic dynein 1 (Figure 1; Wickstead and Gull, 2007). Chlamydomonas reinhardtii DHC16 is needed for flagellar synthesis, maintenance, and transport (Porter et al., 1999). DHC16 orthologs contain all six required AAA domains and sequence relationship was supported by maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis (Supplemental Figure S2). In this regard, hornworts and liverworts are more similar to algae than other land plants. Multiple light and intermediate-light chains associate with DHCs to modulate motor activity. We surveyed Viridiplantae genomes for eight dynein light and intermediate light chains known to complex with C. reinhardtii DHCs (Figure 1). We found centrin and actin orthologs in all organisms. Other light chains, such as light intermediate chain 8, have been found in organisms without flagella and these light chains are speculated to participate in non-motor activities (Wickstead and Gull, 2007). The presence of six light chains reflected the patterns observed in the plant DHCs. Similar to DHC12 and DHC16, orthologs of C. reinhardtii intraflagellar transport 43 (IFT43) and dynein 2 light intermediate chain 1 (DYNC2LI1) were found in many green algae, charophytes, and only two bryophytes (Figure 1). The presence of intermediate chains 138 and 140, p28, and intraflagellar transport B (IFT B) orthologs nearly mimicked the core set of inner arm DHCs. These four chains were found in all land plants except G. biloba, conifers, and angiosperms. In conclusion, we identified a core dynein set in major groups of land plants that reproduce with swimming sperm. Flagellated sperm is ancestral in land plants and was lost within gymnosperms and before angiosperms divergenced (Hodges et al., 2012). DHCs are completely absent from seed plants that reproduce without swimming sperm.

Supplemental data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article. Dynein sequences used for phylogenetic reconstruction. Topology of linear maximum parsimony tree of Viridiplantae and human DHCs. Maximum-likelihood tree of cytoplasmic DHCs. Click here for additional data file.
  20 in total

1.  Molecular evidence for a cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain from Nicotiana tabacum L.

Authors:  M Scali; R Vignani; A Moscatelli; S Jellbauer; M Cresti
Journal:  Cell Biol Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Dyneins have run their course in plant lineage.

Authors:  C J Lawrence; N R Morris; R B Meagher; R K Dawe
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.215

Review 3.  Functions of the Arabidopsis kinesin superfamily of microtubule-based motor proteins.

Authors:  Chuanmei Zhu; Ram Dixit
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Insights into the red algae and eukaryotic evolution from the genome of Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta).

Authors:  Susan H Brawley; Nicolas A Blouin; Elizabeth Ficko-Blean; Glen L Wheeler; Martin Lohr; Holly V Goodson; Jerry W Jenkins; Crysten E Blaby-Haas; Katherine E Helliwell; Cheong Xin Chan; Tara N Marriage; Debashish Bhattacharya; Anita S Klein; Yacine Badis; Juliet Brodie; Yuanyu Cao; Jonas Collén; Simon M Dittami; Claire M M Gachon; Beverley R Green; Steven J Karpowicz; Jay W Kim; Ulrich Johan Kudahl; Senjie Lin; Gurvan Michel; Maria Mittag; Bradley J S C Olson; Jasmyn L Pangilinan; Yi Peng; Huan Qiu; Shengqiang Shu; John T Singer; Alison G Smith; Brittany N Sprecher; Volker Wagner; Wenfei Wang; Zhi-Yong Wang; Juying Yan; Charles Yarish; Simone Zäuner-Riek; Yunyun Zhuang; Yong Zou; Erika A Lindquist; Jane Grimwood; Kerrie W Barry; Daniel S Rokhsar; Jeremy Schmutz; John W Stiller; Arthur R Grossman; Simon E Prochnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Functional diversification of the kinesin-14 family in land plants.

Authors:  Allison M Gicking; Kyle W Swentowsky; R Kelly Dawe; Weihong Qiu
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Dyneins motor on in plants.

Authors:  Stephen M King
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.215

Review 7.  The evolution of land plant cilia.

Authors:  Matthew E Hodges; Bill Wickstead; Keith Gull; Jane A Langdale
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  Axonemal Dynein Arms.

Authors:  Stephen M King
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Consensus nomenclature for dyneins and associated assembly factors.

Authors:  Bryony Braschi; Heymut Omran; George B Witman; Gregory J Pazour; K Kevin Pfister; Elspeth A Bruford; Stephen M King
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.077

10.  The nearly complete genome of Ginkgo biloba illuminates gymnosperm evolution.

Authors:  Hailin Liu; Xiaobo Wang; Guibin Wang; Peng Cui; Shigang Wu; Cheng Ai; Nan Hu; Alun Li; Bing He; Xiujuan Shao; Zhichao Wu; Hu Feng; Yuxiao Chang; Desheng Mu; Jing Hou; Xiaogang Dai; Tongming Yin; Jue Ruan; Fuliang Cao
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 15.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.