Literature DB >> 35385101

Ancestry adjustment improves genome-wide estimates of regional intolerance.

Tristan J Hayeck1,2, Nicholas Stong3, Evan Baugh3, Ryan Dhindsa3, Tychele N Turner4, Ayan Malakar3, Timothy L Mosbruger1, Grace Tzun-Wen Shaw1, Yuncheng Duan5, Iuliana Ionita-Laza6, David Goldstein3, Andrew S Allen5.   

Abstract

Genomic regions subject to purifying selection are more likely to carry disease-causing mutations than regions not under selection. Cross species conservation is often used to identify such regions but with limited resolution to detect selection on short evolutionary timescales such as that occurring in only one species. In contrast, genetic intolerance looks for depletion of variation relative to expectation within a species, allowing species-specific features to be identified. When estimating the intolerance of noncoding sequence, methods strongly leverage variant frequency distributions. As the expected distributions depend on ancestry, if not properly controlled for, ancestral population source may obfuscate signals of selection. We demonstrate that properly incorporating ancestry in intolerance estimation greatly improved variant classification. We provide a genome-wide intolerance map that is conditional on ancestry and likely to be particularly valuable for variant prioritization.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; genetic epidemiology; genetic intolerance; intolerance to variation; negative selection; population genetics; statistical genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35385101      PMCID: PMC9157129          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  37 in total

Review 1.  The logrank test.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-01

2.  Comparisons of the performance of different statistical tests for time-to-event analysis with confounding factors: practical illustrations in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Florent Le Borgne; Bruno Giraudeau; Anne Héléne Querard; Magali Giral; Yohann Foucher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Negative selection on complex traits limits phenotype prediction accuracy between populations.

Authors:  Arun Durvasula; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes.

Authors:  Slavé Petrovski; Quanli Wang; Erin L Heinzen; Andrew S Allen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  A spectral approach integrating functional genomic annotations for coding and noncoding variants.

Authors:  Iuliana Ionita-Laza; Kenneth McCallum; Bin Xu; Joseph D Buxbaum
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Orion: Detecting regions of the human non-coding genome that are intolerant to variation using population genetics.

Authors:  Ayal B Gussow; Brett R Copeland; Ryan S Dhindsa; Quanli Wang; Slavé Petrovski; William H Majoros; Andrew S Allen; David B Goldstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.

Authors:  Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Mutations in Human Accelerated Regions Disrupt Cognition and Social Behavior.

Authors:  Ryan N Doan; Byoung-Il Bae; Beatriz Cubelos; Cindy Chang; Amer A Hossain; Samira Al-Saad; Nahit M Mukaddes; Ozgur Oner; Muna Al-Saffar; Soher Balkhy; Generoso G Gascon; Marta Nieto; Christopher A Walsh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Global genetic differentiation of complex traits shaped by natural selection in humans.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Yang Wu; Zhihong Zhu; Zhili Zheng; Maciej Trzaskowski; Jian Zeng; Matthew R Robinson; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Population genetic models of GERP scores suggest pervasive turnover of constrained sites across mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.