Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira1, Cassia Raquel Teatin Juliato1, Cristiane Martins de Almeida2, Isabella Salvetti Valente2, Kleber Cursino de Andrade2, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101-Cidade Universitária-Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-881, Brazil. 2. Division of Imaging, Women's Hospital-Professor Doutor José Aristodemo Pinotti-CAISM-University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101-Cidade Universitária-Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-881, Brazil. lgobrito@unicamp.br.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: An objective diagnostic method to understand vaginal laxity (VL) is still missing. The aim of our study is to determine whether vaginal wall thickness (VWT) measured by ultrasound may differ according to the abdominal or vaginal techniques and to assess whether clinical variables are associated with vaginal measurements of women with VL. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary hospital included 82 women aged ≥ 18 years with VL complaints assessed by the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire. Women who reported severe comorbidities or vulvovaginal disorders, previous treatment for VL, and use of vaginal estrogen in the last 6 months were excluded. Participants reporting VL underwent transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and physical examination and answered validated questionnaires. Descriptive data were given as mean and standard deviation, median (range), and absolute and relative frequency. The significance level adopted for this study was 5%. Sample size calculation was not performed for the present study. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.20 ± 8.64 years, and most participants were multiparous, with previous vaginal delivery and having vaginal intercourse. A statistically significant difference (up to 3 mm) between TAUS and TVUS measurements of the VWT was found in the proximal, middle-third, and distal compartments. A significant correlation was found between VWT and TAUS or TVUS in the mid-third and distal compartments. CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was found between the VWT measurements in TVUS and TAUS. Our findings might give the health professional more possibilities for investigating VWT according to patient characteristics.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: An objective diagnostic method to understand vaginal laxity (VL) is still missing. The aim of our study is to determine whether vaginal wall thickness (VWT) measured by ultrasound may differ according to the abdominal or vaginal techniques and to assess whether clinical variables are associated with vaginal measurements of women with VL. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary hospital included 82 women aged ≥ 18 years with VL complaints assessed by the Vaginal Laxity Questionnaire. Women who reported severe comorbidities or vulvovaginal disorders, previous treatment for VL, and use of vaginal estrogen in the last 6 months were excluded. Participants reporting VL underwent transabdominal (TAUS) and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and physical examination and answered validated questionnaires. Descriptive data were given as mean and standard deviation, median (range), and absolute and relative frequency. The significance level adopted for this study was 5%. Sample size calculation was not performed for the present study. RESULTS: Mean age was 41.20 ± 8.64 years, and most participants were multiparous, with previous vaginal delivery and having vaginal intercourse. A statistically significant difference (up to 3 mm) between TAUS and TVUS measurements of the VWT was found in the proximal, middle-third, and distal compartments. A significant correlation was found between VWT and TAUS or TVUS in the mid-third and distal compartments. CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was found between the VWT measurements in TVUS and TAUS. Our findings might give the health professional more possibilities for investigating VWT according to patient characteristics.
Authors: Adrian C Balica; Alexandria M Cooper; Mariah K McKevitt; Katherine Schertz; Daniella Wald-Spielman; Susan Egan; Gloria A Bachmann Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Lúcia Alves da Silva Lara; Alfredo Ribeiro da Silva; Júlio César Rosa-E-Silva; Fernando Chaud; Marcos Felipe Silva-de-Sá; Antônio Renato Meireles E Silva; Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa-E-Silva Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Stéphanie Thibault-Gagnon; Linda McLean; Corrie Goldfinger; Caroline Pukall; Susan Chamberlain Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Hans Peter Dietz; Martyna Stankiewicz; Ixora Kamisan Atan; Caroline Wanderley Ferreira; Maciej Socha Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 2.894