| Literature DB >> 35384471 |
Zhijun Wu1, Haijiao Li1, Yizhe Zhang1, Chunguang Ding2, Wenjin Zhao1, Jing Dai2, Chengmin Yu3, Qunmei Yao3, Fenshuang Zheng4, Jingguang Fan5, Chengye Sun6.
Abstract
Approximately 70-90% of mushroom poisoning deaths are caused by α-amanitin-induced liver injury resulting from RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) inhibition. Liver regeneration ability may contribute greatly to individual survival after α-amanitin poisoning. However, it is unclear what cellular pathways are activated to stimulate regeneration. We conducted dose-effect and time-effect studies in mice that were intraperitoneally injected with 0.33-0.66 mg/kg α-amanitin to establish a poisoning model. The liver/body weight ratio, serological indices, and pathology were evaluated to characterize the liver injury. In the time-effect study, the liver transcriptome was analyzed to explore the mRNA changes resulting from RNAP II inhibition and the underlying pathways associated with recovery. Based on the two animal studies, we established a poisoning model with three sequential liver states: early injury, regulation, and recovery. The mRNA changes reflected by the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the transcriptome could be used to illustrate the inhibition of RNAP II by α-amanitin. DEGs at four key time points were well matched with the three liver states, including 8-h downregulated genes in the early injury state, 16-h and 72-h upregulated genes in the regulation state, and 96-h upregulated/downregulated genes in the recovery state. By clustering analysis, the mTOR signaling pathway was screened out as the most promising potential pathway promoting recovery. The results of our investigations of the pathways and events downstream of the mTOR pathway indicated that the activation of mTOR probably contributes crucially to liver regeneration, which could be a promising basis for drug development.Entities:
Keywords: RNA polymerase II (RNAP II); Regeneration; Transcriptome; mTOR; α-Amanitin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35384471 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03278-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 6.168