| Literature DB >> 35382408 |
Pooja Bhadoria1, Kanchan Bisht1, Brijendra Singh1, Vandana Tiwari2.
Abstract
Introduction A normal atrioventricular valve complex of the heart consists of the atrioventricular (A-V) ring, cusps, chordae tendineae, and papillary muscles. The right ventricle contains three while the left ventricle contains only two papillary muscles, which are named according to their location. A thorough understanding of the normal anatomy as well as possible variations can help surgeons in various corrective surgeries involving papillary muscles. Material & methods The study included 50 formalin-preserved hearts procured from human cadavers of unknown age and cause of death. The number of papillary muscles along with their shape, size, and pattern were noted separately for each ventricle. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results The left and right ventricles contained two and three papillary muscles, respectively, in all the hearts. In the right ventricles, conical shape and the single base and divided apex (SBDA) pattern were found to be most prevalent. Anterior papillary muscles exhibited the mean length of 12.71±3.81 and 16.41±4.33 in the right and left ventricles, respectively. Similarly, posterior papillary muscles exhibited a mean length of 12.40±3.03 and 14.64±3.92 in the right and left ventricles, respectively. Both differences were found to be statistically significant Conclusion For the appropriate functioning of valves, both anatomical and mechanical coherence of the papillary muscles is required. A very keen understanding of this valvular complex is thus essential for anatomists, physiologists, and cardiologists to deal with normal as well as pathological valvular conditions.Entities:
Keywords: cadaveric study; chordae tendineae; cusp; papillary muscles; valve
Year: 2022 PMID: 35382408 PMCID: PMC8975613 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Conical-shaped anterior papillary muscle (APM) in the right ventricle
Figure 2Showing broad apex anterior papillary muscle (APM) in the left ventricle
Figure 3Comparison between the shape of anterior papillary muscle (APM) in the right and left ventricles
Figure 4Showing fan-shaped posterior papillary muscle of the left ventricle
Figure 5Comparison between the shape of the posterior papillary muscles in the right and left ventricles
Figure 6Conical-shaped septal papillary muscle in the right ventricle
Figure 7The most common type of anterior papillary muscle (APM) i.e. single base and divided apex (SBDA) in the right ventricle
Figure 8Comparison between the pattern of anterior papillary muscles (APMs) in the right and left ventricles
Figure 9Comparison between the pattern of posterior papillary muscles in the right and left ventricles
Comparison between the dimensions of papillary muscles in right and left ventricles
| S. No. | Parameter | Right | Left | Statistical difference | |
| 1. | Length (Anterior) | 12.71±3.81 | 16.41±4.33 | t=8.66; p<0.001 | |
| 2. | Width (Anterior) | 6.92±2.55 | 7.98±2.53 | t=2.55; p=0.014 | |
| 3. | Length (Posterior) | 12.40±3.03 | 14.64±3.92 | t=4.91; p<0.001 | |
| 4. | Width (Posterior) | 7.46±2.75 | 8.44±3.19 | t=2.57; p=0.013 | |
| 5. | Septal length | 1,67±0.48 | - | ||
| 6. | Septal width | 1.08±0.72 | - | ||
Comparison showing the presence of papillary muscles in right ventricles in different studies
APM: anterior papillary muscle; PPM: posterior papillary muscle; SPM: septal papillary muscle
|
| Studies | No. of cases | % of APM (Right) | % of PPM (Right) | % of SPM (Right) |
| 1. | Harsha et al. [ | 96 | 100 | 98.95 | 95.8 |
| 2. | Balchandra et al. [ | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 3. | Wafae et al. [ | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 4. | Begum et al. [ | 50 | 92 | 60 | 76 |
| 5. | Gerola et al. [ | 50 | 100 | 84 | 100 |
| 6. | Present study | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Comparison showing the measurement of papillary muscles in right ventricles in different studies
APM: anterior papillary muscle; PPM: posterior papillary muscle; SPM: septal papillary muscle
|
| Studies | No. of cases | Mean length (Right) | Mean width (Right) | ||||
| APM | PPM | SPM | APM | PPM | SPM | |||
| 1. | Harsha et al. [ | 96 | 1.49±0.44 | 1.05±0.37 | 0.7±0.22 | 0.82±0.21 | 0.63±0.17 | 0.48±0.16 |
| 2. | Priya et al. [ | 56 | 12.65±3.58 | - | - | 4.04±1.53 | - | - |
| 3. | Saha et al. [ | 52 | 2.19±0.59 | 1.39±0.63 | 0.95±0.38 | 0.76±0.26 | 0.67±0.43 | 0.59±0.09 |
| 4. | Hospatana et al. [ | 15 | 1.30±0.40 | 0.98±0.40 | 0.55±0.20 | - | - | - |
| 5. | Kumar et al. [ | 36 | 1.54±0.27 | 0.97±0.25 | 0.21±0.1 | 0.42±0.11 | 0.30±0.09 | 0.11±0.01 |
| 6. | Nigri et al. [ | 79 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.56 | - | - | - |
| 7. | Gerola et al. [ | 50 | 0.9±0.2 | 0.9±0.2 | 1.1±0.3 | 1.2±0.3 | 0.7±0.2 | 1.20±0.3 |
| 8. | Farzana et al. [ | 80 | 1.60±0.25 | 1.37±0.34 | 0.81±0.35 | - | - | - |
| 9. | Present study | 50 | 12.71±3.81 | 12.40±3.03 | 1.67±0.48 | 6.92±2.55 | 7.46±2.75 | 1.08±0.72 |