Alessia Arrigoni1, Gianluca Serra1, Jacopo Manidi1, Chiara Bertarelli1,2, Chiara Castiglioni1. 1. Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica Giulio Natta, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy. 2. Center for Nano Science and Technology@PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Abstract
In this study, we describe a host-guest system consisting of a push-pull dye, the 4-amino-4'-nitroazobenzene (Disperse Orange 3, DO3), mixed with the copolymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) [P(VDF-TrFE)] as a potential candidate for nonlinear optics (NLO) applications. We developed electrospun nanofibers of the polymer/dye blend, showing a highly anisotropic molecular structure, where DO3 molecules are mostly oriented parallel to the polymer chain, running in the fiber axis direction. The technique opens a way for obtaining non-centrosymmetric ordering of the NLO chromophore without requiring further poling. The supramolecular architecture is deeply investigated through infrared vibrational spectroscopy, which allows detecting a new phase involving DO3 molecules linked together by strong directional H-bonds. Electron microscopies highlight peculiar nanofiber morphologies with a preferred localization of DO3 at the surface layers.
In this study, we describe a host-guest system consisting of a push-pull dye, the 4-amino-4'-nitroazobenzene (Disperse Orange 3, DO3), mixed with the copolymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) [P(VDF-TrFE)] as a potential candidate for nonlinear optics (NLO) applications. We developed electrospun nanofibers of the polymer/dye blend, showing a highly anisotropic molecular structure, where DO3 molecules are mostly oriented parallel to the polymer chain, running in the fiber axis direction. The technique opens a way for obtaining non-centrosymmetric ordering of the NLO chromophore without requiring further poling. The supramolecular architecture is deeply investigated through infrared vibrational spectroscopy, which allows detecting a new phase involving DO3 molecules linked together by strong directional H-bonds. Electron microscopies highlight peculiar nanofiber morphologies with a preferred localization of DO3 at the surface layers.
Push–pull organic molecules are promising candidates for
nonlinear optics (NLO) offering several advantages when compared to
traditional inorganic materials such as LiNbO3.[1−6] A key requirement to induce first-order nonlinear optical properties
in a material is to prevent the formation of structures with inversion
symmetry, both considering the supramolecular architecture and the
intermolecular interactions.[5,6] Unfortunately, push–pull
compounds often give rise to architectures with molecules arranged
as closely packed dimers, forming pairs with antiparallel dipoles.[3,4] These geometries usually confer to crystal structures characterized
by inversion symmetry; moreover, even in disordered (e.g., amorphous)
matter, the NLO activity is completely lost because of the cancelation
of β in the pairs and/or bulk isotropy.Aggregation of
the molecules into dimers can be hindered by embedding
the active molecules in a polymeric matrix, forming a host–guest
system. In this case, the macroscopic orientation of the active molecules
is generally achieved by electric poling above the polymer glass transition
temperature Tg > Tamb, and it is then frozen at ambient temperature.[6,7] In such systems, NLO performances such as second harmonic generation
have been demonstrated.[8,9] Polymers containing NLO dyes are
of great interest due to several advantages, such as: (i) they are
cost-effective and easy to process; (ii) organic materials are easy
to tailor to meet specific application requirements; and (iii) they
are compatible with existing semiconductor technologies.[5−9] Also, the specific design of the host polymer and the guest molecule
and their possible combinations add a further degree of versatility.[9] Therefore, non-covalent supramolecular interactions
play a key role in the design of host–guest polymeric materials
with NLO activity. In fact, they influence the efficiency and the
retaining of the long-term stability of the NLO response of the material
by keeping the orientational order of the non-centrosymmetric organization
of the dye.[6−8,10−14] Both interactions among polymer chains and those involving host–guest
pairs can contribute to the stabilization of the final material architecture.[7,11] As guest molecules, azobenzenes with a push–pull character
(i.e., π-conjugated azobenzene units bearing electron-donor
and electron-acceptor substituents) are attractive candidates.[7,8,10,12−15]In this framework, we present a host–guest system where
the push–pull azobenzene 4-amino-4′-nitroazobenzene
(Disperse Orange 3, DO3) is blended with the copolymer
poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) P(VDF-TrFE). The DO3 dye exhibits a strong charge separation induced
by its electron-withdrawing nitro group and electron-donor amino group,
and it has been recently proposed for NLO applications in blends with
polymers.[7,10] In these works, infrared (IR) and Raman
vibrational spectroscopies have allowed for a deep study of the relevant
role of the intermolecular interactions between the DO3 dye and the host polymer matrix.Here, we deposit the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blend by electrospinning,
where the high applied electric field drives the formation of nanofibers
with both the polymer chains and the dye oriented in the as-spun material
without the need of any post-processing poling to induce NLO chromophore
ordering. We select the copolymer P(VDF-TrFE) as the
host as fluorinated polymers and copolymers have been applied in many
technological fields, including polymer optical fibers (POFs) and
waveguides.[16−19] It is worth noting that P(VDF-TrFE) carries both electron-rich
(fluorine) and electron-poor (hydrogen) atoms, which can give non-negligible
electrostatic interactions with polar groups, thus allowing the formation
of stable interacting polymer–DO3 molecular complexes.
We recently developed P(VDF-TrFE) electrospun nanofibers
exhibiting high orientational order, with polymer chains well aligned
with the fiber axis.[20] In the same work,
we put together a set of tools for a thorough characterization of
the polymer structure and morphology by means of vibrational spectroscopies,
in conjunction with quantum chemical calculations.[20] This preceding study forms the basis for the development
of the blend material and for its structural characterization.In this paper, we show that both the electrospinning feed solution
and the process parameters play a relevant role in generating peculiar
fiber morphologies of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blend. These
morphologies are characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), showing that the
fibers are characterized by a superficial cladding of the DO3-enriched material. We exploit IR spectroscopy to monitor changes
in the molecular structure and intermolecular interactions while varying
the relative dye/polymer concentration of the feed solution and the
applied voltage. Moreover, IR analysis allows us to investigate the
effect of subsequent treatments on the electrospun samples, for example,
annealing and prolonged water rinsing. By means of quantum chemical
simulations, we provide a coherent interpretation of the whole set
of collected experimental data. Interestingly, we highlight the formation
of a peculiar metastable phase of the blend, which is promoted by
the electrospinning process and possibly related to effective molecular
orientation phenomena.
Results and Discussion
P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 Blends: IR Spectra
of Nanofibers and Films
IR spectra of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blend processed as nanofibers and thin films show the spectral features
of the copolymer together with several absorption peaks attributed
to the DO3 dye, see Figure a. In the region 1800–700 cm–1, the spectral features of the copolymer in the blend do not show
significant alterations in band shapes and peak frequencies with respect
to the IR spectra of the electrospun neat copolymer (blue dashed spectra),
except for the appearance of peaks related to the DO3 dye (Figure b).
In this region, most of the DO3 peaks in the blend—highlighted
by black lines in Figure b and listed in Table —find an excellent frequency match with the spectrum
of the DO3 powder. DO3 peaks present in
the powder spectrum but not highlighted in Figure b fall under the copolymer absorption bands,
slightly modifying their shapes.
Figure 1
(a) Experimental IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends
with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange) and films (green);
experimental IR spectra of DO3 in CCl4 (blue)
and crystal (red). Zoom inset: region of NH2 stretching
bands, showing major changes in different samples. Peak (A) NH2 asymmetric stretching νas, NH ≈ 3496 cm–1, peak (B) NH2 symmetric stretching vsym, NHI ≈ 3405 cm–1, and peak (C) low-frequency NH2 symmetric stretching
vsym, NHII ≈ 3386 cm–1. (b) Experimental IR
spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange), of the DO3 crystal
(red), and P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers (dashed blue spectra);
straight lines indicate DO3 spectral features that appear
in the blend spectra in the copolymer region; D, E, E*, and F are
bands of DO3 occurring in a region free from absorptions
of the copolymer (see Table for the vibrational assignment). The absorbance scale of
all spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
Table 1
Band Assignment of DO3 Spectra in the Spectral Range Free from P(VDF-TrFE) IR Transitions (3700–1400 cm–1), See Figure a; The Assignment
Is Based on DFT Simulations (See Section )
exp wavenumbers [cm–1]
label
polarization
vibrational
assignment
3496
A
np
νas NH2 anti-symm stretching
3405
B
//
νsymI NH2 symm stretching
3386
C
//
νsymII NH2 symm stretching
1639
D
//
CC stretching of the aniline
unit + NH2 bending + CN stretching
1600
E
//
CC stretchings
of the nitrobenzene
unit + NH2 bending
1590
E*
//
CC stretchings of the nitrobenzene
unit + NN stretching + anti-symm NO2 stretching
1509
F
np
NO2 anti-symm
stretching + CC stretchings + NH2 bending
(a) Experimental IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends
with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange) and films (green);
experimental IR spectra of DO3 in CCl4 (blue)
and crystal (red). Zoom inset: region of NH2 stretching
bands, showing major changes in different samples. Peak (A) NH2 asymmetric stretching νas, NH ≈ 3496 cm–1, peak (B) NH2 symmetric stretching vsym, NHI ≈ 3405 cm–1, and peak (C) low-frequency NH2 symmetric stretching
vsym, NHII ≈ 3386 cm–1. (b) Experimental IR
spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange), of the DO3 crystal
(red), and P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers (dashed blue spectra);
straight lines indicate DO3 spectral features that appear
in the blend spectra in the copolymer region; D, E, E*, and F are
bands of DO3 occurring in a region free from absorptions
of the copolymer (see Table for the vibrational assignment). The absorbance scale of
all spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.Nevertheless, the spectral
region around 3550–3300 cm–1—where
νsym, NH and νas, NH bands lie (see
the zoom inset in Figure a)—shows some interesting phenomena. These NH2 stretching vibrational modes are related only to DO3, and they show some remarkable variations in electrospun P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 samples with respect to the spin-coated film. These differences
mainly involve the lower frequency transitions (bands around 3400
cm–1), which are assigned to the NH2 symmetric
stretching νsym, NH. In particular,
the νsym, NH peak appears at the
same frequency, namely, at 3405 cm–1, for the DO3 powder and the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 spin-coated
film (band B, Figure a), while for electrospun fibers, we clearly identify two distinct
components. The higher frequency one, with maximum at about 3405 cm–1—band B in Figure a—coincides with the main absorption
of the other samples, while a stronger, lower frequency component
(band C) arises at 3386 cm–1. Figure shows the spectrum of a crystalline DO3 powder. Although the crystal structure of DO3 is still unknown, quantum chemical simulations suggest that it contains
stacked DO3 dimers, with antiparallel dipole moments.[7]DO3 dissolved in CCl4 presents a νsym, NH peak, showing
just a small shift to higher wavenumbers with respect to the solid,
see the zoom inset in Figure a. This observation suggests that, for neat DO3, the crystal packing only slightly affects the vibrational frequencies
of the -NH2 group, thus supporting the hypothesis that
intermolecular interactions mainly involve the π-electron system.The new component identified for P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers,
namely, the peak C (hereafter referred to as νsym, NHII), shows
a noticeable wavenumber shift (of 20 cm–1) with
respect to the , B peak. The low wavenumber of the νsym, NHII peak is related to DO3 molecules in a peculiar
phase and/or P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 interactions, both involving
strong interactions of the NH2 group, which are promoted
by electrospinning.It is worth noting that the anti-symmetric
stretching band (νas, NH,peak A)
is located at about the same
position for all the samples analyzed, only showing a shoulder at
the lower wavenumber side in the case of nanofibers.
Effects of the Process Parameters
DO3 Concentration
Polymer samples containing a different
amount of dye show a very
interesting behavior on the appearance of νsym, NHII (see
the IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers and spin-coated
films at different dye concentrations in Figure ). The νsym, NHII peak arises in the films
at the lower DO3 concentrations, whereas for nanofibers,
the intensity of the νsym, NHII peak increases with the
increase of the concentration of the dye. In particular, the νsym, NHII peak is absent at very low DO3 concentration
(2.5% w/w), where only the νsym, NHI component is present. At
a 5% w/w dye concentration, the νsym, NH band is split into two contributions, with the arising of
the νsym, NHII peak. By further increasing the concentration
from 10 to 15% w/w, the intensity of the lower frequency νsym, NHII peak increases with respect to the νsym, NHI peak.
Conversely, in the case of the films, the maximum intensity of the
νsym, NHII peak corresponds to the lowest dye concentration
(2.5% w/w). By increasing the DO3 concentration, this
peak gradually disappears: at 10% w/w, it can be hardly detected as
a weak shoulder of the main band, and at a 15% w/w concentration,
only one sharp B peak νsym, NHI is present (see Figure c).
Figure 2
Experimental IR spectra
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends
at different dye concentrations. Samples are nanofibers (a, b) and
films (c, d). The absorbance scale of all spectra is normalized to
the 1509 cm–1 peak.
Experimental IR spectra
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends
at different dye concentrations. Samples are nanofibers (a, b) and
films (c, d). The absorbance scale of all spectra is normalized to
the 1509 cm–1 peak.Interestingly, nanofibers and thin films show an opposite trend
with the increase of DO3 concentration, and the above
observations suggest that two different phenomena, taking place in
different concentration regimes, lead to the rise of the same (i.e.,
same wavenumber) νsym, NHII peak in films and nanofibers.The behavior of the spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 films
at different dye concentrations has been already observed in an analogous
spin-coated film of DO3 in PMMA in ref (7), with an increasing intensity
of a low wavenumber band (corresponding to the νsym, NHII band) while lowering the DO3 concentration.
The authors suggested that here the νsym, NHII band is the marker of
a specific polymer–dye interaction, characterized by hydrogen
bond formation. These interactions take place only at very low DO3 concentrations, namely, when π–π interactions
between DO3 pairs are prevented. Conversely, in films
prepared with high concentrations of DO3, the νsym, NH peak, located at the frequency characteristic
of the crystalline phase of DO3, is compatible with DO3 π-stacked dimers formed by the aggregation of the
dye.[7]Although the behavior of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 films could
be justified following ref (7), actually the above explanation cannot be applied in the
case of the blend nanofibers analyzed here, since at the highest concentrations,
they almost show only the νsym, NHII peak. This suggests that
the phenomena underlying the appearance of νsym, NHII have
a different origin related to the electrospinning process, which drives
the appearance of a peculiar P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 phase highlighted
by the marker band νsym, NHII.Considering the electrospinning
instability phenomena, we analyzed
a set of 16 P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 electrospun samples with
10% w/w DO3 to assess the reliability of the experimental
data so far commented. For all the samples, we show the intensity
ratios of several DO3 peaks with respect to the band
at 1509 cm–1 (F band), which is selected as a reference,
since it is poorly sensitive, both in peak wavenumber and band shape,
to the sample preparation condition (Figure ). Regardless of some spreading of the data,
the remarkable result is that the C band is always present and it
is stronger than the B band in all samples. This definitely confirms
that the phase associated with νsym, NHII is predominant in all
the electrospun mats.
Figure 3
(a) Box plot of the intensity ratios of the peaks X with
respect
to the reference peak F. The intensity ratios (X/F) are obtained from
peak heights after baseline correction. The analysis is carried out
on the IR spectra of 16 P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 electrospun samples
at the 10% w/w DO3 concentration. Peak labels are defined
according to (b), which show a representative IR spectrum, and Table .
(a) Box plot of the intensity ratios of the peaks X with
respect
to the reference peak F. The intensity ratios (X/F) are obtained from
peak heights after baseline correction. The analysis is carried out
on the IR spectra of 16 P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 electrospun samples
at the 10% w/w DO3 concentration. Peak labels are defined
according to (b), which show a representative IR spectrum, and Table .
Applied Voltage
Spin-coating and
electrospinning are wet processing techniques, both characterized
by fast solvent evaporation. However, in electrospinning, materials
are also subjected to external forces driven by the strong applied
electric field, where the polymer jet is stretched along the complex
looped flight, while it shrinks due to solvent evaporation. It follows
that macromolecular chains often tend to be preferentially oriented
along the fiber axis, as well as small molecules dispersed into the
feed solution.[33] Here, having a strong
dipole moment, we expect that DO3 effectively experiences
the electric field, inducing molecular orientation (see the discussion
on molecular orientation, Section ).In order to investigate the
effect of the applied voltage on the strength of the νsym, NHII band, we decided to prepare samples at a low dye concentration
(5% w/w) which presents a low intensity of the νsym, NHII peak at the standard processing voltage (17 kV). The IR
spectra of nanofibers deposited at increasing processing voltages
(see Figure ) show
a remarkable dependence of the spectral pattern on the applied electric
field. At lower voltages, the νsym, NHII peak is rather weak, while
at the higher voltages, a huge amount of the new phase gives rise
to a very strong νsym, NHII peak. Such evidence supports
the hypothesis that the growth of the new phase is favored by the
strong applied electric field the electrospinning is based on.
Figure 4
Experimental
IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber
blends with 5% w/w DO3, processed at different operating
voltages: (a) from 3550 to 3300 cm–1 and (b) from
1700 to 1450 cm–1. The absorbance scale of all spectra
is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
Experimental
IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber
blends with 5% w/w DO3, processed at different operating
voltages: (a) from 3550 to 3300 cm–1 and (b) from
1700 to 1450 cm–1. The absorbance scale of all spectra
is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 Fiber Morphology
SEM Analysis
SEM micrographs of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers show a peculiar morphology, with
small branches emerging from the fiber surface (see Figures and S5). These features have never been observed in our previous study
on electrospun nanofibers of neat P(VDF-TrFE) at any
process condition.[20] This implies that
such a morphology is strictly related to the presence of the dye.
It is known that the formation of branched jets in electrospinning
occurs because of local instabilities: the simultaneous elongation
of the flying jet and the rapid evaporation of the solvent can locally
modify the charge per unit area carried by the jet.[34−36] The surface
of the charged flying fluid jet can acquire a complex structure that
becomes unstable at the sites of the highest local surface curvature.[34,37] To reduce the local charge accumulation, smaller secondary jets
are formed from the main jet surface, creating branches. It is also
noteworthy that the branched nanofibers obtained in this study have
significantly smaller average diameters (around 200–300) than
those deposited starting from a solution of P(VDF-TrFE) (around 600 nm), with the same electrospinning parameters.[20] This suggests that the high dielectric constant
of DO3 allows not only for a thinning of the spun fibers
but also for an effective accumulation of charges on the flying jet,
leading to branch formation.[35,38]
Figure 5
SEM micrographs of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers at different DO3 concentrations,
namely, (a) 2.5% w/w, (b) 5% w/w, (c)
10% w/w, and (d) 15% w/w. Diameter distributions are reported in SI
from Figures S1 to S4.
SEM micrographs of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers at different DO3 concentrations,
namely, (a) 2.5% w/w, (b) 5% w/w, (c)
10% w/w, and (d) 15% w/w. Diameter distributions are reported in SI
from Figures S1 to S4.The amount of branches observed in SEM images at increasing DO3 concentration (see Figure ) nicely follows the trend of the νsym, NHII peak intensity. Indeed, branches are almost absent for the
fibers spun from solutions with the lowest dye concentrations (2.5%
w/w), which show a rather weak νsym, NHII band (Figure a). Instead, branches are more
evident and thicker in the samples with higher dye concentrations
(5, 10% w/w), showing a stronger νsym, NHII IR peak. This suggests
an existing correlation between the supramolecular structure/intermolecular
interactions of the DO3 dye and electrospinning; moreover,
it suggests that the thin branches are enriched in the new phase as
it will be proven by the EDS analysis (see below).
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
To complement
SEM observations, EDS/SEM elemental analyses were carried
out. From the line profile shown in Figure , it can be observed that the relative intensity
of the F signal, which is characteristic of the polymer,
compared to the N and O signals, is significantly
more intense in the main fiber (at 1.60 μm) with respect to
the secondary branch (at 2.25 μm). This means that the concentration
of the dye in the mat is not constant, and DO3 is more
concentrated in the branches rather than in the fiber, suggesting
that a partial DO3 segregation on surfaces occurs.
Figure 6
EDS line profile
for the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers.
(a) SEM image of the electrospun nanofibers. The arrow crosses the
main fiber at about 1.6 μm and a thin branch at about 2.25 μm.
(b) Elemental profile of F, N, and O atoms along the probed path.
EDS line profile
for the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers.
(a) SEM image of the electrospun nanofibers. The arrow crosses the
main fiber at about 1.6 μm and a thin branch at about 2.25 μm.
(b) Elemental profile of F, N, and O atoms along the probed path.
TEM Analysis
TEM micrographs of
nanofibers (see Figure ) indicate the presence of a core-sheath structure, with a porous
and irregular surface outer layer. Branches are not detected by TEM,
probably due to the damage of the extremely thin structures caused
by the high acceleration voltage (200 kV). A similar core-sheath structure
has been already reported for the nanofibers of PVDF blended with
small molecules.[39,40] A brighter (less electron-dense)
shell surrounds a darker (more electron-dense) region, suggesting
that the polymer, which is rich in the fluorine atom, is more present
in the core of the nanofibers, whereas a dye-rich phase is located
at the outer region of the fiber.[39,40]
Figure 7
TEM micrographs
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers. (a,
b) Nanofiber with 10% w/w DO3; c) nanofiber with 2.5%
w/w DO3; (d) the same sample with 10% w/w DO3 shown in (a, b) after thermal annealing at 90 °C.
TEM micrographs
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers. (a,
b) Nanofiber with 10% w/w DO3; c) nanofiber with 2.5%
w/w DO3; (d) the same sample with 10% w/w DO3 shown in (a, b) after thermal annealing at 90 °C.In our study, a brighter surface is clearly visible at any DO3 concentration (see Figure a–c). To understand whether it is correlated
with the abundance of DO3 or specifically to the new DO3 phase responsible of the νsym, NHII peak, samples with a very
low νsym, NHIIIR band intensity were also analyzed. In particular,
we considered:P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers
with a very low concentration of the dye (2.5% w/w) (Figure c);P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 (10%
w/w) nanofibers subjected to thermal annealing up to 90 °C (Figure d), which also show
a drastic reduction of the new phase, according to IR measurements
(see Section for details).In both the as-spun and
in the annealed mats, TEM images show the
core-sheath fiber morphology, not highlighting any evident morphological
change.This indicates that (i) the core-sheath structure is
not specifically
ascribed to the new DO3 phase but to dye segregation
phenomena, (ii) even at a low dye concentration, DO3 undergoes
segregation on the fiber surface, but the new DO3 phase
is not formed, and (iii) the structural rearrangements of the DO3 supramolecular architecture occurring by annealing (see Section and Figure ) do not cause
any evident modification of the fiber morphology.
Figure 11
(1.a, b)
Experimental IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers
with 5% w/w DO3 before, during, and after
thermal annealing. (2.a, b) Experimental IR spectra of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber with 10% w/w DO3 as spun (orange line) and
after immersion in distilled water for 1 week (light blue line). The
absorbance scale of all spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
Theoretical Models and Discussion
A shift to low vibrational
frequencies of X–H stretching IR
bands usually happens when a polar X–H bond is involved in
a hydrogen bond (X–H...Y) with an acceptor atom Y belonging
to another molecule or chemical group. This phenomenon can be ascribed
to the weakening of the X–H bonds, as expected considering
the limiting structure with a proton perfectly shared by the X and
Y atoms.[41] Moreover, the H-bond formation
is often accompanied by a raise of the X–H stretching intensity
because of the increased electron charge mobility across the H bridge.[42] The above observations suggest to focus on H-bonded
complexes possibly formed in the blend with the NH2 group
of DO3 acting as the proton donor.DO3 molecules could form H-bonds with electron-rich fluorine atoms of
the CF2 groups of the copolymer; therefore, the first suggestion
is that the IR shift of the NH stretching band is due to guest DO3 H-bonded to the host polymer matrix, as previously observed
in the host–guest system with PMMA/DO3.[7]To assign the NH stretching region of the observed IR spectra,
DFT simulations have been applied to the following three classes of
in vacuo molecular models:a DO3 monomer (M);two head-to-tail (HTT)
dimers of DO3 interacting through their NH2 groups and already
considered in the literature: one featuring a directional H...O interaction
(DH) and the other with no directional interaction(D).[7,10] These dimers correspond to the
only two stable geometries we obtained for quasi-planar DO3 HTT dimers at the level of theory selected;two complexes containing a DO3 monomer interacting through its NH2 group with
a PVDF oligomer with 10 repeating units, namely, CH3(CF2CH2)10CF3 (DP1 and DP2).These five models
are sketched in Figure .
Figure 8
DFT equilibrium geometries of the in vacuo molecular models considered
in this study (carbon is indicated in brown, hydrogen in white, nitrogen
in light blue, fluorine in green, oxygen in red): the DO3 monomer (indicated as M, (a)); an HTT dimer of DO3 with a directional hydrogen interaction (DH, (b)); an HTT dimer of DO3 with no directional interaction
(D, (c)); two views of complexes of the DO3 monomer and a CH3(CF2CH2)10CF3, mimicking a PVDF sequence of the P(VDF-TrFE) copolymer (DP1, (d, e)); two views of another possible
interacting system with DO3 and PVDF (DP2, (f, g)). Asterisks mark the closest neighbor atoms involved in
the interaction (geometrical parameters described in Table ).
DFT equilibrium geometries of the in vacuo molecular models considered
in this study (carbon is indicated in brown, hydrogen in white, nitrogen
in light blue, fluorine in green, oxygen in red): the DO3 monomer (indicated as M, (a)); an HTT dimer of DO3 with a directional hydrogen interaction (DH, (b)); an HTT dimer of DO3 with no directional interaction
(D, (c)); two views of complexes of the DO3 monomer and a CH3(CF2CH2)10CF3, mimicking a PVDF sequence of the P(VDF-TrFE) copolymer (DP1, (d, e)); two views of another possible
interacting system with DO3 and PVDF (DP2, (f, g)). Asterisks mark the closest neighbor atoms involved in
the interaction (geometrical parameters described in Table ).
Table 2
DFT Equilibrium Properties of the
Molecular Models, Where rW Is a van der
Waals Radiusa
model
N–H bond length [Å]
H...O distance [Å]
rW(H) + rW(O) [Å]
N–H...O angle
[°]
DFT relative
energy per molecule [kcal/mol]
M
1.009
5.07
DH
1.012
2.055
2.72
179.6
0.00
D
1.010
2.156
2.72
164.1
0.01
When meaningful, the first two columns
refer to the interacting chemical groups defined in Figure ; in both parts of the table,
the DFT relative energies of the most stable systems (DH and DP1) have been arbitrarily set to zero.
Concerning DP1 and DP2, an empirical
force field (MMFF94) was used to determine the most stable structures
starting from an initial set of guess conformations (see the Supporting Information for details). Theoretical
IR spectra have been plotted as sums of Lorentzian functions. A full
width at half-maximum of 10 cm–1 has been chosen
in accordance with the experimental data.
DO3 Dimers
Inspired
by previous studies concerning DO3 dimers (see refs (7, 10)), we consider HTT DO3 systems
within the level of theory adopted for the study of the large molecular
complexes mimicking DO3...PVDF interactions.The
isolated monomer of DO3 and its two HTT dimers, namely,
structures M, DH, and D, are
represented in Figure a–c, with asterisks marking the closest neighbor atoms involved
in the interaction. As reported in Table , the two dimers D and DH have similar energies and DO3...DO3 interaction results in a stabilization of the system, as well as
in small variations of the N–H and N–O bond lengths.
Moreover, the comparison of the length of the H...O intermolecular
bond with the van der Waals radii of H and O atoms suggests that both
the DO3 dimers interact not only by dispersion forces
but also through electrostatic forces. However, besides the shorter
H...O distance in the DH complex, the most remarkable
difference between the two dimers is the N–H...O angle, which
determines an almost perfect alignment of the three atoms only in
the case of DH, which is typical of strong, directional
hydrogen bonds. Interestingly, even if the initial guess geometry
for DH was a quasi-planar structure, after geometry optimization,
the DH dimer exhibits a remarkably distorted structure,
with phenyl rings of the two DO3 partners lying on different
planes.When meaningful, the first two columns
refer to the interacting chemical groups defined in Figure ; in both parts of the table,
the DFT relative energies of the most stable systems (DH and DP1) have been arbitrarily set to zero.Concerning the dimer D, we can infer that its structure
is stabilized by an effective electrostatic interaction of the H*
atom with both oxygen atoms of the NO2 group: the distances
between H* and the two oxygen atoms are indeed close in dimer D, with intermolecular bond lengths r(H*...O*)
= 2.156 Å and r(H*...O) = 2.374 Å. A comparable
stabilization energy of DH comes by the stronger, directional
bond of H* with O* and a less effective electrostatic interaction
with the second, more distant oxygen atom, with r(H*...O) = 2.506 Å. Interestingly, the two equilibrium geometries
of the DO3 dimers correspond to the only two minima of
the potential energy surface of (DO3) HTT
structures, while—at the level of theory adopted—a more
symmetric “chelated” geometry, where each H atom of
the NH2 group forms non-directional H bonds with a different
atom of NO2, results to be not stable. This finding is
in partial disagreement with the results reported in ref (10). In that work, besides
a H-bonded dimer showing a structure very similar to DH, a second, quasi-chelated DO3 dimer is identified as
further equilibrium structures of (DO3),
showing an HTT configuration.Based on this fact and noticing
the similar energies of D and DH as well
as the existence of stable non-HTT DO3 dimers,[7] we realize that the
potential energy landscape around a DO3 molecule is rather
complex, and its description is very sensitive to the theoretical
method adopted. Moreover, simply considering the peculiar chemical
structure of DO3, we can infer that many minimum-energy
conformations are available for supramolecular complexes involving DO3. Indeed, DO3 exhibits a large dipole moment,
and it shows electron-rich regions near the N=N bond and NO2 group, together with electron-poor hydrogen atoms of the
NH2 group. Moreover, delocalized π electrons of the
phenyl rings and a quasi-flat molecular backbone can stabilize supramolecular
architectures through effective π–π stacking.The DFT-simulated IR spectra of M, D,
and DH are reported in Figure . The IR band of DH, related
to the symmetric NH stretching, indicated with “s”,
is substantially red-shifted with respect to M. We identify
this as the main spectroscopic marker of directional hydrogen bond
in DO3 dimers. In addition, Table lists the values of the ratio Is/Ia between IR intensities
related to symmetric and anti-symmetric NH stretching vibrational
modes. We observe that the formation of DH also results
in a non-negligible increase of Is/Ia, which consequently provides another spectroscopic
marker of directional hydrogen bond interaction in DO3 dimers.
Figure 9
DFT IR spectra in the NH stretching wavenumber region. (a) Spectra
normalized to unity and vertically translated as a matter of clarity,
with the “s” and “a” labels marking the
peaks assigned to symmetric and anti-symmetric NH2 stretching
modes localized in the interacting region defined in Figure . (b) The same spectra as in
(a) are compared without normalization of the computed IR intensities.
Table 3
DFT-Computed Frequencies and IR Intensities
of Symmetric and Anti-Symmetric NH Stretching Vibrational Normal Modesa
model
Is
Ia
Is/Ia
νs
νa
DP2
323.50
84.49
3.83
3514
3627
DP1
248.60
67.04
3.71
3515
3629
DH
1876.00
198.90
9.43
3486
3638
D
1657.00
275.60
6.01
3519
3662
M
122.60
22.33
5.49
3527
3641
IR intensities are labeled with I and
given in units of km/mol; scaled frequencies are indicated
with ν and given in units of cm–1; subscripts
“a” and “s” Refer to the anti-symmetric
and symmetric NH stretching modes, respectively.
DFT IR spectra in the NH stretching wavenumber region. (a) Spectra
normalized to unity and vertically translated as a matter of clarity,
with the “s” and “a” labels marking the
peaks assigned to symmetric and anti-symmetric NH2 stretching
modes localized in the interacting region defined in Figure . (b) The same spectra as in
(a) are compared without normalization of the computed IR intensities.IR intensities are labeled with I and
given in units of km/mol; scaled frequencies are indicated
with ν and given in units of cm–1; subscripts
“a” and “s” Refer to the anti-symmetric
and symmetric NH stretching modes, respectively.To summarize, D and DH are both equally
stable with respect to M, but the directionality of the
interaction featured by DH results in a strong frequency
shift and IR intensity increase of the band related to symmetric NH
stretching.
DO3—PVDF Clusters
We now focus on models DP1 and DP2, where
a monomer of DO3 interacts with an oligomer of PVDF (see Figure d–g). This
should mimic the interaction between a P(VDF-TrFE) and DO3 molecules, occurring in the blend.Looking again
at Table , we see
that both DP1 and DP2 are characterized
by strong electrostatic intermolecular interactions that are not directional
hydrogen bonds due to the absence of nuclear alignment. The absence
of H-bond directionality reflects in the IR spectra shown in Figure , where only a minor
red shift with reference to M results for the symmetric
NH stretching band. Moreover, the frequency of this band is very close
to that of the D model (see Table ). This means that the NH stretching region
of the IR spectrum is quite insensitive with respect to the formation
of DO3-PVDF complexes.Figure and Table also show a significant
blue shift for the IR band related to the NH anti-symmetric stretching
in the D model: this property is peculiar of D, and it can be considered its spectroscopic marker. This feature,
however, seems to be completely absent in the experimental spectra
of DO3 blends: we thus conclude that our samples do not
contain HTT D dimers with no directional interactions,
or they are present only in a small amount.We thus conclude
thatthe red
shift of the IR band of DH is related to the symmetric
NH stretching involving a H-bond
which forms a directional NH...O bridge;the increase of relative IR intensity
of the symmetric NH stretching band with respect to the one associated
with anti-symmetric NH stretching is also a spectroscopic marker for
the directional hydrogen interaction between DO3 monomers.According to the above results from DFT
predictions, the peak νsym, NHII observed in the experimental
IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends is ascribed to the
occurrence of strong directional H-bonds
involving the NH2 group of DO3.In other
words, our modeling suggests that DO3 dimers
(or possibly oligomers) can exhibit such a low νsym, NHII wavenumber, only if they adopt a local conformation as that
of the DH model. Accordingly, a chelated dimer (not found
among the stable structures at the level of theory here adopted but
proposed in ref (10).) as the stable HTT structure is expected not to show a significant
red shift of the symmetric NH stretching band because directional
H bonds are incompatible with a cyclic NH2....NO2 arrangement.Moreover, our modeling of complexes shows that
NH2 units
could be involved in electrostatic interactions with fluorine atoms
belonging to PVDF units, but, also in this case, without the formation
of any directional hydrogen bonds.In conclusion, the observed
occurrence of νsym, NHII is due
to the presence of HTT DO3 dimers—or oligomers—with
a structure like the DH model, and it is associated with
a peculiar phase that, indeed, is abundant in nanofibers collected
from solutions at high DO3 content.Its formation
is likely related to the effective alignment of DO3 molecules
caused by the applied electric field during
electrospinning, which promotes the formation of hydrogen-bonded dimers.
Because of the rapid solidification, the preferential orientation
and the HTT configuration of DH dimers could be almost
quenched, thus preventing the formation of stacked dimers with an
antiparallel orientation of the molecules.The experimental
evidence of the remarkable orientation of the DO3 dye
by the effect of the electric field and the proof
that the freezing of the H-bonded phase is related to the rapid solvent
evaporation of the electrospun jet are discussed in Section . Moreover, the previously
observed segregation phenomena (Section ) suggest that regions rich in DO3 develop, possibly forming an extended network involving DO3 molecules linked together by strong H-bonds.It is noteworthy
that the νsym, NHI peak at 3405 cm–1 does
not completely disappear also for highly DO3 concentrated
nanofibers (Section ), indicating that the dyes not forming DH dimers
are also present in nanofiber samples. Unfortunately, the analysis
of the NH2 stretching region cannot help in recognizing
possible complexes different from DH because the vibrational
frequencies result to be rather insensitive to non-directional electrostatic
interactions as those occurring in dimer D and in complexes
with the polymer. Moreover, according to ref (7)., π-stacked dimers
do not exhibit appreciable frequency shifts, as experimentally proven
by the fact that DO3 powders show frequencies close to
those of DO3 in solution, as shown in Figure a.
Molecular Orientation and Fibers Post-Processing
Macroscopically Oriented Fibers
The molecular orientation
can be investigated through polarized IR
spectra of nanofibrous mats with a macroscopic alignment of the nanofibers
(Figure ). According
to our previous study on P(VDF-TrFE) nanofibers,[20] some IR peaks of the copolymer in P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers show dichroism, as expected: in particular, the high
intensity shown by the band at about 1402 cm–1 in
parallel polarization proves that polymer chains are mainly aligned
along the main fiber axis.1 Nevertheless, also DO3 IR peaks show strong dichroism (see Figure b,c). In particular, the νsym, NH and the peaks related to the NH bending–CC
stretching at 1640 cm–1 and around 1600 cm–1 show an increase in intensity when the sample is irradiated with
light linearly polarized in the direction of the nanofiber axis. The
behavior of the NH2 stretching mode can be easily explained
considering that it is a localized vibration, with the associated
dipole moment vector oscillation roughly parallel to the long molecular
axis of DO3. As the long axis of DO3 almost
coincides with the direction of the equilibrium molecular dipole,
the molecules should orient in the field direction when subjected
to the electric field during electrospinning. This results in the
alignment of the DO3 major axis in the same direction
of polymer chains, that is, all parallel to the fiber axis. In this
case, the dipole oscillation associated with the NH2 symmetric
stretching mode results to be directed along the fiber axis, and the
associated band has parallel polarization.
Figure 10
Experimental IR spectra
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber
blends with a macroscopic orientation of the fiber axes. Spectra are
recorded in polarized light in the direction parallel (orange line)
and perpendicular (green line) to the fiber axis. The dashed spectrum
is recorded in non-polarized light. (a) shows the whole spectra, while
(b, c) highlights regions peculiar of the DO3 molecule,
from 3550 to 3300 cm–1 and from 1700 to 1450 cm–1, respectively. The absorbance scale of all spectra
is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
Experimental IR spectra
of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber
blends with a macroscopic orientation of the fiber axes. Spectra are
recorded in polarized light in the direction parallel (orange line)
and perpendicular (green line) to the fiber axis. The dashed spectrum
is recorded in non-polarized light. (a) shows the whole spectra, while
(b, c) highlights regions peculiar of the DO3 molecule,
from 3550 to 3300 cm–1 and from 1700 to 1450 cm–1, respectively. The absorbance scale of all spectra
is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.Additionally, it is interesting to note that in non-polarized
IR
spectra of non-aligned fiber mats, the high intensity shown by νsym, NHIIcomes from two different contributions:an increase in intensity is due to
the fact that the molecules are aligned to the fiber axis, thus resulting
in a dipole derivative vector parallel to the substrate plane;the directional H-bond
itself produces
a remarkable enhancement of the intrinsic intensity of the NH2 symmetric stretching, as inferred through DFT modeling of
the DH dimer.These two
effects are strongly interconnected since they both come
from the electrospinning process, which induces the DO3 molecular alignment and favors the formation of the here discussed
new DO3 phase with directional H-bonds. In addition,
this metastable supramolecular architecture is stabilized by the fast
solidification of the flying polymer jet.
Fiber
Annealing and Water Rinsing
The H-bonded electrospinning-induced
phase of DO3 is
a metastable condition. Figure (1) shows the IR spectra
of nanofibers with 5% w/w DO3 heated up to the Curie
temperature of the copolymer (about 130 °C) and then cooled down
to room temperature. In the as-spun samples, the νsym, NH band is split into two peaks with almost the same height,
in agreement with what was observed in Section . However, during the annealing, a transition
is observed. In fact, at 90 °C, the νsym, NHIIband completely
disappears (dashed spectra in Figure (1)). Moreover, when the sample is cooled down to
room temperature, the only contribution to the symmetric NH stretching
region is νsym, NHI, without any recovery of the phase with
νsym, NHII. Similarly, in the region between 1600 and
1640 cm–1, a weakening of the DO3 features
is observed upon annealing, which should be related to a different
intrinsic intensity of these bands after the structural rearrangement
of DO3. This interpretation is corroborated by the comparison
of the IR spectra of the neat DO3 in the solid state
with the spectra of the blends in the form of films and of nanofibers,
as shown in Figure . In the powder and in the film, the two bands (bands D and E, see Table for peak labels)
are always weaker with respect to the nanofibrous mat. The observed
behavior indicates that the presence of directional H-bonding between DO3 molecules in nanofibers (phase characterized by νsym, NHII) leads to an increase of the intensity of bands D and E.
Thus, the weakening of these two peaks observed after annealing can
be taken as further evidence of the disappearance of the DO3 H-bonded phase in nanofibers in favor of a supramolecular structure
more similar to the one observed in crystalline powders.
Figure 12
Experimental IR spectra in the region
1700–1400 cm–1 of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange) and
film (green); experimental IR spectra
of the DO3 crystal (red). The absorbance scale of all
spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.
(1.a, b)
Experimental IR spectra of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers
with 5% w/w DO3 before, during, and after
thermal annealing. (2.a, b) Experimental IR spectra of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber with 10% w/w DO3 as spun (orange line) and
after immersion in distilled water for 1 week (light blue line). The
absorbance scale of all spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.Experimental IR spectra in the region
1700–1400 cm–1 of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 blends with 10% w/w DO3 as nanofibers (orange) and
film (green); experimental IR spectra
of the DO3 crystal (red). The absorbance scale of all
spectra is normalized to the 1509 cm–1 peak.Interestingly, despite the evident structural rearrangement
of
the blend at the molecular level, TEM images indicate that the core-sheath
structure, observed before the annealing, is preserved after the thermal
treatment (see Section ). The collection of the experimental findings allows to conclude
that the thermal energy modifies the architecture of the superficial
phase, enriched in DO3, in the annealed sample. In the
outermost layers, DO3 molecules lose their directional
H bonds and relax into a more stable supramolecular arrangement, still
maintaining their concentration profile with an enriched DO3 concentration on the superficial layers. Since the annealing determines
a change of the DO3 supramolecular structure (disappearance
of H-bonded dimers), we cannot exclude variation of the average fiber
diameter.Such a local rearrangement does not likely cause a
meaningful reduction
of the orientation order typical of chains and dye molecules in the
fibers.In addition, upon immersion of the nanofibrous mat in
distilled
water (for 1 week), almost no loss of material is evidenced. However,
an important structural rearrangement is shown by the evolution of
the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 IR spectrum (Figure (2)), where a remarkable weakening of the ν peak
is observed. The soaked sample has a high concentration of DO3 (10% w/w), that is, it shows a noticeable initial contribution of
the ν peak. Nonetheless, a remarkable depletion of the νband intensity
and an increase of the ν peak follow the immersion
in water. The dye is not dissolved by water, as proven by the fact
that the intensity ratio (R) between the 1509 cm–1 band of DO3 and of a polymer band (883
cm–1 peak) is almost not affected. The intensity
ratio is R = 0.311 before water immersion and R = 0.323 after the treatment. Therefore, DO3 undergoes a structural rearrangement when nanofibers are in contact
with water, probably due to swelling with water molecules acting as
plasticizers, thus leading to a more stable supramolecular architecture.
Although the NH2 symmetric stretching region shows the
most evident variations, also NH2 bending–CC stretching
bands in the region of 1600–1640 cm–1 show
a decrease in intensity after water immersion, as observed by annealing.
These intensity variations further suggest a structural relaxation
of the dye environment.Interestingly, SEM images of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers
show the disappearance of branches after water immersion (see SI, Figure S6). Since we have evidence that branches
are not dissolved by water, they likely undergo a morphology rearrangement,
favored by the high surface to volume ratio. This phase rearrangement
is significant if we consider that the amount of the peculiar H-bonded DO3 phase is very abundant in the branches, as previously
discussed from IR spectroscopy and SEM/EDS analysis (see Section ).
Conclusions
In this study, we deeply analyzed the supramolecular
organization
of dye molecules of interest for second-order NLO (DO3) embedded in a fluorinated polymer. The blended material is processed
by electrospinning, resulting in core-sheath nanofibers with a preferential
segregation of the dye at the fiber surface. Depending on the concentration
of the dye in the polymer fiber, a peculiar phase involving DO3 molecules linked by a strong directional H bond through
their donor (NH2) and acceptor (NO2) groups
is formed, resulting inthe appearance of a new low-frequency
IR peak for the NH2 symmetric stretching vibrational mode,
namely, νsym, NHII, at 3386 cm–1;a significant intensity
enhancement
of the NH2 stretching region because of the high intensity
of the νsym, NHII band.Specifically,
this peculiar DO3 phase:is predominant at DO3 concentration
≥ 10% w/w;is strongly related and influenced
by the voltage applied during electrospinning.The assignment of the low-frequency νsym, NHII band
to DO3 in the peculiar H-bonded arrangement is supported
by quantum chemical calculations. The calculations revealed that only
when an NH bond belonging to an NH2 group is involved in
a strong directional hydrogen bond with an oxygen atom of the DO3 partner, a red shift of the symmetric NH2 stretching
occurs, together with a remarkable increase of its IR intensity. Interestingly,
the observed intensity enhancement (point (b) above) of the band νsym, NHII is a marker of the formation of directional H-bonds in the DO3 phase, and it is also related to orientation phenomena.
The remarkable anisotropy demonstrated by IR spectra in polarized
light shows that the long axis of the DO3 dye is aligned
to the fiber axis. Being peculiar of the P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofiber, this phase is a consequence of the strong electric field
experienced by DO3 molecules during electrospinning.Furthermore, SEM images of P(VDF-TrFE)/DO3 nanofibers
show thin lateral branches which EDS analysis proved to be rich in DO3, thus indicating preferential segregation of DO3. TEM analysis clearly demonstrates a core-sheath structure of the
fiber, with DO3 phase segregation onto the outer region
at any dye concentration, independently of the dye content and of
the formation of the peculiar H-bonded DO3 phase. Interestingly,
the new phase undergoes a rearrangement upon thermal annealing or
water rinsing without any loss of material and/or modifications in
the fiber morphology.In conclusion, we demonstrate that electrospinning P(VDF-TrFE) with an appropriate DO3 concentration
is effective
for the formation of a segregated metastable phase of the dye in an
outer fiber sheath. This sheath consists of DO3 HTT structures
highly oriented along the fiber axis and characterized by a strong
and directional H-bond. The peculiar arrangement of the dye in the
10% w/w DO3 core-sheath fibers allows the intrinsic nonlinear
optical properties of the push–pull azobenzene molecule to
be retained in the final material, without requiring any post-processing
poling.
Experimental and Theoretical Methods
Materials
Solution Preparation
All the materials
were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification,
specifically Solvene 200/P400, namely, P(VDF-TrFE) (80/20)
(Mw = 400,000 g mol–1), DO3 (90% dye content), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%), and acetone (99.9%). The
polymer was dissolved in a (4:6) volume ratio of DMF/acetone at a
polymer/solvent concentration of 20% w/v. The solution was stirred
at room temperature for about 1 h until a uniform and clear solution
was obtained. For the preparation of host–guest polymeric samples, DO3 was added to P(VDF-TrFE) 20% w/v solution
in different % w/w with respect to the polymer content. The same cosolvent
mixture of (4:6) volume ratio of DMF/acetone was used, and the polymer/dye
solution was stirred at room temperature until a uniform and clear
solution was obtained.
Films
Thin films
were prepared
by spin-coating the polymer/dye solutions using a spin coater (Laurell
Technologies, model WS–400B–6NPP/lite) at 3000 rpm for
50 s.
Nanofiber Mats
Nanofiber mats were
prepared by electrospinning using a horizontal electrospinning setup.
The voltage was applied using a Spellman Sl-150 High Voltage Power
Supply. The prepared solution (see above) was loaded into a 1 mL glass
syringe (Hamilton Gastight, model 1002 TLL) with a stainless-steel
needle (inner diameter = 22 gauge). The syringe was mounted on a mobile
infusion pump (KDS Scientific, model series 200), which allowed us
to set the flow rate. Nanofibers were randomly collected on a rectangular
static collector, electrically grounded. Aligned nanofibers were deposited
onto a cylindrical rotating collector. Samples were processed using
the following parameters: needle-to-collector distance of 20 cm,
applied voltage from 15 to 20 kV, and a solution flow rate of 0.05
mL h–1.
Characterization
FT-IR Spectroscopy
The IR absorption
spectra were recorded using a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS FT-IR spectrometer
(4 cm–1 resolution, 128 scans) equipped with a Thermo
Electron Corporation Continuμm FT-IR Microscope. Dye powder
samples were analyzed through a Diamond Anvil Cell (DAC) in transmission
mode. Dye spectra in CCl4 solution were recorded using
a sealed cell type with a path length of 0.05 mm with KBr windows.
Film spectra were recorded in transmission mode after depositing the
solution on Si substrates. Spectra of nanofibers were recorded at
room temperature in double reflection mode using reflecting aluminum
substrates. For dichroism analysis of aligned nanofibers, a ZnSe wire
grid IR polarizer was used with the same setup. For spectroscopic
studies during thermal cycles on nanofiber samples, a Linkam heating
cell (FT-IR 600) operating in a nitrogen atmosphere was used. In this
case, the FT-IR analysis was carried out in transmission mode using
the ZnSe window; nanofibrous mats previously deposited on aluminum
foil during electrospinning were carefully cut with a lancet and transferred
onto the ZnSe window.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
and Energy-Dispersive
Spectrometry
SEM images were taken by means of a Tescan scanning
electron microscope (Tescan, MIRA3); for elemental analysis, a Zeiss
scanning electron microscope (EVO 50 EP) equipped with an energy-dispersive
spectrometer has been used. The accelerating voltages applied were
ranging from 3 to 5 kV for imaging and from 15 to 20 kV for the elemental
analysis. Fibers were directly deposited onto a silicon substrate,
and no metallization was needed. The measurements of the nanofiber
diameters were carried out by processing SEM images with the software
ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2016). The statistical analysis of diameter distribution
has been carried out with Origin software (ver. 2021) considering
for each sample 100 independent measurements of fiber diameters.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
The
microstructure of the nanofibers was examined by high-resolution
TEM using a Philips CM200 field emission gun microscope. Fibers were
deposited directly onto lacey carbon-coated copper grids and examined
at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
Computational
Methods
To investigate
the behavior of DO3 when blended with P(VDF-TrFE), density functional theory (DFT)[21−24] calculations were performed on
selected in vacuo molecular models with the Gaussian09 code[25] at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory,[26−29] a common choice for the calculation of equilibrium geometries, vibrational
frequencies, and IR intensities of organic molecules. The D3 version
of Grimme’s dispersion with the Becke–Johnson damping
was employed.[30] The choice of the 6-31G(d,p)
basis set instead of more extended ones allowed us to study structures
with several atoms within acceptable computational times. Geometry
optimization of the molecular models was performed starting from guess
geometries obtained through MMFF94, a Merck molecular force field,
as implemented in the Open Babel Toolbox.[31,32] DFT vibrational normal mode frequencies and IR intensities were
computed within the harmonic approximation.