| Literature DB >> 35381977 |
Yonghan Zhu1, Rui Wang2, Chengyan Pu3.
Abstract
Introduction: In order to address the psychological problems during the COVID-19 pandemic, mental health chatbots have been extensively used by public sectors. According to Theory of Consumption Values, this paper proposed an analytical framework to investigate the determinants behind users' satisfaction and continuance intention toward mental health chatbots.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Mental health chatbots; Theory of Consumption Values; continuance intention; user satisfaction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35381977 PMCID: PMC8971968 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221090031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Digit Health ISSN: 2055-2076
Figure 1.The research model in this study.
Figure 2.A case of mental health care supervised by Xiaolv. It will analyze users’ problems via a two-way communication and offer personalized services accordingly.
The information of the research samples.
| Category | Number | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 217 | 58.5% |
| Female | 154 | 41.5% | |
| Age | 18–30 | 63 | 17.0% |
| 31–40 | 212 | 57.1% | |
| 41–50 | 79 | 21.3% | |
| Over 50 | 17 | 4.6% | |
| Education | Under high school | 71 | 19.1% |
| High school | 82 | 22.1% | |
| Bachelor degree | 202 | 54.5% | |
| Master's degree and above | 16 | 4.3% | |
| Annual income | $0–$4500 | 77 | 20.8% |
| $4501–$15,000 | 200 | 53.9% | |
| $ 15,001–$45,000 | 81 | 21.8% | |
| Over $45,001 | 13 | 3.5% | |
| User frequency | Once within a week | 43 | 11.6% |
| Twice within a week | 105 | 28.3% | |
| 3–5 times within a week | 173 | 46.6% | |
| More than 5 times within a week | 50 | 13.5% | |
| Duration | Less than 5 min once | 118 | 31.8% |
| 5–10 min once | 203 | 54.7% | |
| 10–20 min once | 41 | 11.1% | |
| Over 20 min once | 9 | 2.4% |
The reliability and validity of the measurement.
| Constructs | Items | Factor loading | Mean | Cronbach's alphas | CR | AVE | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personalization (P) | P1 | 0.817 | 4.299 | 0.839 | 0.892 | 0.674 | 2.925 |
| P2 | 0.765 | 4.814 | 2.530 | ||||
| P3 | 0.876 | 4.445 | 3.244 | ||||
| P4 | 0.822 | 4.774 | 2.684 | ||||
| Voice interaction (VI) | VI1 | 0.791 | 4.647 | 0.702 | 0.835 | 0.628 | 1.445 |
| VI2 | 0.746 | 4.776 | 1.269 | ||||
| VI3 | 0.838 | 4.752 | 1.636 | ||||
| Enjoyment (E) | E1 | 0.785 | 4.437 | 0.752 | 0.858 | 0.669 | 1.429 |
| E2 | 0.797 | 4.501 | 1.509 | ||||
| E3 | 0.870 | 4.685 | 1.722 | ||||
| Learning (L) | L1 | 0.795 | 4.631 | 0.746 | 0.856 | 0.664 | 1.463 |
| L2 | 0.792 | 4.679 | 1.435 | ||||
| L3 | 0.856 | 4.863 | 1.723 | ||||
| Condition (C) | C1 | 0.804 | 4.892 | 0.784 | 0.875 | 0.701 | 1.678 |
| C2 | 0.800 | 4.644 | 1.624 | ||||
| C3 | 0.903 | 4.752 | 2.312 | ||||
| User satisfaction (SA) | SA1 | 0.831 | 4.655 | 0.805 | 0.886 | 0.721 | 1.845 |
| SA2 | 0.810 | 4.749 | 1.612 | ||||
| SA3 | 0.904 | 4.580 | 2.365 | ||||
| Continuance intention (CI) | CI1 | 0.824 | 4.663 | 0.811 | 0.889 | 0.728 | 1.815 |
| CI2 | 0.818 | 4.690 | 1.746 | ||||
| CI3 | 0.914 | 4.666 | 2.546 |
Cross-factor loadings of all variables.
| P | VI | E | L | C | SA | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 |
| 0.404 | 0.645 | 0.635 | 0.629 | 0.683 | 0.660 |
| P2 |
| 0.404 | 0.508 | 0.516 | 0.588 | 0.510 | 0.640 |
| P3 |
| 0.429 | 0.677 | 0.656 | 0.662 | 0.702 | 0.689 |
| P4 |
| 0.430 | 0.552 | 0.555 | 0.614 | 0.523 | 0.651 |
| VI1 | 0.393 |
| 0.369 | 0.412 | 0.414 | 0.421 | 0.412 |
| VI2 | 0.424 |
| 0.408 | 0.388 | 0.410 | 0.387 | 0.429 |
| VI3 | 0.385 |
| 0.411 | 0.396 | 0.405 | 0.388 | 0.399 |
| E1 | 0.588 | 0.375 |
| 0.570 | 0.590 | 0.563 | 0.619 |
| E2 | 0.551 | 0.410 |
| 0.550 | 0.582 | 0.573 | 0.592 |
| E3 | 0.649 | 0.440 |
| 0.606 | 0.670 | 0.677 | 0.708 |
| L1 | 0.595 | 0.418 | 0.555 |
| 0.620 | 0.604 | 0.634 |
| L2 | 0.612 | 0.357 | 0.579 |
| 0.625 | 0.582 | 0.661 |
| L3 | 0.562 | 0.458 | 0.585 |
| 0.611 | 0.601 | 0.672 |
| C1 | 0.611 | 0.445 | 0.593 | 0.601 |
| 0.626 | 0.683 |
| C2 | 0.620 | 0.430 | 0.625 | 0.625 |
| 0.655 | 0.672 |
| C3 | 0.676 | 0.426 | 0.670 | 0.678 |
| 0.660 | 0.728 |
| SA1 | 0.627 | 0.386 | 0.623 | 0.595 | 0.633 |
| 0.661 |
| SA2 | 0.618 | 0.460 | 0.625 | 0.605 | 0.659 |
| 0.676 |
| SA3 | 0.648 | 0.438 | 0.641 | 0.660 | 0.677 |
| 0.725 |
| CI1 | 0.662 | 0.419 | 0.661 | 0.669 | 0.681 | 0.674 |
|
| CI2 | 0.683 | 0.446 | 0.641 | 0.662 | 0.693 | 0.669 |
|
| CI3 | 0.712 | 0.472 | 0.704 | 0.728 | 0.749 | 0.728 |
|
Discriminant validity.
| P | VI | E | L | C | SA | CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P |
| ||||||
| VI | 0.507 |
| |||||
| E | 0.731 | 0.500 |
| ||||
| L | 0.723 | 0.505 | 0.704 |
| |||
| C | 0.760 | 0.518 | 0.753 | 0.759 |
| ||
| SA | 0.743 | 0.504 | 0.742 | 0.731 | 0.773 |
| |
| CI | 0.804 | 0.523 | 0.785 | 0.805 | 0.830 | 0.810 |
|
Figure 3.Hypotheses testing. Path significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Results of hypotheses testing.
| Hypothesis | Path | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1a | P → SA | 2.547 | Supported |
| H1b | P → CI | 2.811 | Supported |
| H2a | VI → SA | 1.078 | Not supported |
| H2b | VI → CI | 0.329 | Not supported |
| H3a | E → SA | 2.471 | Supported |
| H3b | E → CI | 2.232 | Supported |
| H4a | L → SA | 2.037 | Supported |
| H4b | L → CI | 2.470 | Supported |
| H5a | C → SA | 2.905 | Supported |
| H5b | C → CI | 3.063 | Supported |
| H6 | SA → CI | 2.150 | Supported |
| Variables | Measurement items | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Personalization | P1. The chatbot knows my specific moods and needs. | Roy et al.
|
| P2. The chatbot offers personalized recommendations according to my demands. | ||
| P3. The services provided by the chatbot are customized to my needs. | ||
| P4. I can get personalized therapies that are tailored to my mental issues by using the chatbot. | ||
| Voice interaction | VI1. The chatbot can communicate with me like a human. |
|
| VI2. The chatbots’ voice sounds like a real human. | ||
| VI3. The chatbot can fluently use human voice to talk with me. | ||
| Enjoyment | E1. Interacting with the chatbot makes me feel pleasant. | Lee et al.
|
| E2. I feel relaxed when I interact with the chatbot. | ||
| E3. The use of the chatbot is enjoyable. | ||
| Learning | L1. I can enrich my knowledge about AI through the use of the chatbot. | Teng
|
| L2. I can learn more about AI by interacting with the chatbot. | ||
| L3. The use of the chatbot can satisfy my desire to learn. | ||
| The condition of the COVID-19 pandemic | C1. The mental health hotline is overtaxed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. | Omigie et al.
|
| C2. I cannot go outside to receive therapy due to the impact of the COVID-19-related lockdown. | ||
| C3. I cannot find any professionals to help me due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
| User satisfaction | SA1. Using this chatbot is wise choice. | Li and Fang
|
| SA2. This chatbot can hardly make me feel disappointed. | ||
| SA3. Overall, I feel satisfied with this chatbot. | ||
| Continuance intention | CI1. I will continue to use mental health chatbots in the future. | Ashfaq |
| CI2. Mental health chatbots become one of my first choices when I experience psychological problems. | ||
| CI3. I will recommend mental health chatbots to others. |