Literature DB >> 35381898

Repeatability of i.Profiler for measuring wavefront aberrations in healthy eyes.

Xuan Liao1,2, Mei-Jie Wang2, Qing-Qing Tan1,2, Chang-Jun Lan3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the repeatability of wavefront aberration measurements and the correlation between corneal aberration and pupil size in normal eyes using a wavefront-based autorefractor (i.ProfilerPlus; Carl Zeiss Vision, Germany).
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study. Wavefront aberrations, including spherical aberration (SA) (Z40), coma (Z3-1, Z31), trefoil (Z3-3, Z33) and total higher-order aberrations (tHOA), were measured at different pupil diameters. The repeatability was evaluated using one-way ANOVA method, and statistical indicators including within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability (TRT), and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The correlations between corneal aberrations and pupil sizes were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 96 healthy young volunteers were enrolled. Corneal and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOA) measured by i.Profiler showed Sw < 0.01 μm, TRT < 0.10 μm, ICC > 0.90. There was a linear positive correlation between the corneal HOA and pupil size. The correlation coefficient between SA and tHOA was the largest (r = 0.996, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The measurements of wavefront aberrations by i.Profiler are highly repeatable. Corneal HOA was significantly dependent on pupil size. SA was the most influential aberration for visual quality in this study.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal aberration; I.profiler; Ocular aberration; Pupil diameter; Repeatability

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35381898     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02300-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.029


  19 in total

1.  Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation.

Authors:  Colm McAlinden; Jyoti Khadka; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and aberrometer-based autorefraction.

Authors:  Nuria Garzón; María García-Montero; Esther López-Artero; Francisco Poyales; César Albarrán-Diego
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Higher order aberrations, refractive error development and myopia control: a review.

Authors:  Rohan Pj Hughes; Stephen J Vincent; Scott A Read; Michael J Collins
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Ali Jahanrad; Mahgol Farjadnia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Higher-order aberrations and anisometropia.

Authors:  Andreas Hartwig; David A Atchison; Hema Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.

Authors:  Kenneth A Lebow; Charles E Campbell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Comparison of higher order aberrations in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes in pediatric patients with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Abhishek Hoshing; Monica Samant; Seema Bhosale; Anaya M Naik
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.

Authors:  Franziska G Rauscher; Heike Lange; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Helmut Tegetmeyer; Ina Sterker; Andreas Hinz; Siegfried Wahl; Peter Wiedemann; Arne Ohlendorf; Ralf Blendowske
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  A review of corneal imaging methods for the early diagnosis of pre-clinical Keratoconus.

Authors:  Lynett Erita Masiwa; Vanessa Moodley
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-01-05

10.  Comparison of outcomes after topography-modified refraction versus wavefront-optimized versus manifest topography-guided LASIK.

Authors:  Jaeryung Kim; Sung-Ho Choi; Dong Hui Lim; Gil-Joong Yoon; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.