Literature DB >> 35381576

Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Health-related quality-of-life results from KEYNOTE-048.

Danny Rischin1, Kevin J Harrington2, Richard Greil3, Denis Soulières4, Makoto Tahara5, Gilberto de Castro6, Amanda Psyrri7, Irene Braña8, Prakash Neupane9, Åse Bratland10, Thorsten Fuereder11, Brett G M Hughes12, Ricard Mesía13, Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon14, Tamara Rordorf15, Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak16, Ruey-Long Hong17, René Gonzalez Mendoza18, Liyi Jia19, Diana Chirovsky20, Josephine Norquist21, Fan Jin22, Barbara Burtness23.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with first-line pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, or cetuximab-chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial (NCT02358031).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-question quality-of-life (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level instruments (EQ-5D-3L). Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) at week 15 and time to deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing.
RESULTS: Of 882 enrolled participants, 844 received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment; adherence was ≥ 79% at week 15 across treatment groups. At week 15, EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores remained stable; no clinically meaningful between-group differences were observed (least squares mean difference, pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.24; 95% CI, -3.34 to 3.82; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.40; 95% CI, -3.46 to 4.26). Median TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores was not reached over 51 weeks across groups, showing stable HRQoL. TTD was similar between groups for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.95-2.00; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.94-2.00), as was TTD in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy extended OS while maintaining HRQoL, further supporting first-line use for R/M HNSCC.
Copyright © 2022 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy head and neck neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Patient reported outcome measures; Pembrolizumab; Phase III clinical trial; Quality of life; Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35381576     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  1 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Potential Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  Tuba M Ansary; M D Razib Hossain; Mayumi Komine; Mamitaro Ohtsuki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.