| Literature DB >> 35380557 |
Julieta Aldana Salas Apaza1, Juan Víctor Ariel Franco2, Nicolás Meza3, Eva Madrid4, Cristobal Loézar5, Luis Garegnani6.
Abstract
This article is part of a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present basic concepts about the minimal clinically important difference and its use in the field of clinical research and evidence synthesis. The minimal clinically important difference is defined as the smallest difference in score in any domain or outcome of interest that patients can perceive as beneficial. It is a useful concept in several aspects since it links the magnitude of change with treatment decisions in clinical practice and emphasizes the primacy of the patients perception, affected by endless variables such as time, place, and current state of health, all of which can cause significant variability in results.Entities:
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice; GRADE Approach; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Evidence-Based Medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35380557 DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medwave ISSN: 0717-6384