Literature DB >> 35380346

The Effectiveness of a Specialized Primary Care Medical Home for Patients with Serious Mental Illness.

Alexander S Young1,2, Evelyn T Chang3,4, Amy N Cohen5, Rebecca Oberman3, Dennis T Chang6, Alison B Hamilton3,4, Laurie A Lindamer7, Jesse Sanford4, Fiona Whelan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are unmet primary care needs among people with serious mental illness that might be improved with integrated care and medical care management. Many healthcare organizations have attempted to address this problem, but few interventions have been rigorously studied and found to be effective.
OBJECTIVE: Study the implementation and effectiveness of a novel, specialized primary care medical home designed to improve the healthcare of patients with serious mental illness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Clustered controlled trial for a median of 401 days. One Veterans Health Administration medical center was assigned to intervention and two were assigned to usual care (control). Thirty-nine clinicians and managers were included in the study, as well as 331 patients who met eligibility criteria. INTERVENTION: A specialized medical home with systematic patient engagement, proactive nurse panel management, a collaborative care psychiatrist, and a primary care physician providing care that included psychiatric treatment. MAIN MEASURES: Quality of care, chronic illness care and care experience, symptoms, and quality of life. KEY
RESULTS: Sixty-five intervention patients (40%) moved all psychiatric care to the primary care team. No adverse events were attributable to the intervention. Compared with control, intervention patients had greater improvement over time in appropriate screening for body mass index, lipids, and glucose (χ2 = 6.9, 14.3, and 3.9; P's < .05); greater improvement in all domains of chronic illness care (activation, decision support, goal-setting, counseling, coordination) and care experience (doctor-patient interaction, shared decision-making, care coordination, access; F for each 10-24, P's < .05); and greater improvement in mental health-related quality of life (F = 3.9, P = .05) and psychotic symptoms (F = 3.9, P = .05).
CONCLUSION: A primary care medical home for serious mental illness can be feasible to implement, safe, and more effective than usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01668355.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral health; Care coordination; Disparities; Health system, hospital or practice redesign; Patient centered medial home; Screening; Veteran care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35380346      PMCID: PMC9550991          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07270-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  31 in total

Review 1.  An evidence synthesis of care models to improve general medical outcomes for individuals with serious mental illness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel W Bradford; Natasha T Cunningham; Monica N Slubicki; Jennifer R McDuffie; Amy M Kilbourne; Avishek Nagi; John W Williams
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Quality of preventive medical care for patients with mental disorders.

Authors:  Benjamin G Druss; Robert A Rosenheck; Mayur M Desai; Jonathan B Perlin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Veterans Health Administration primary care-mental health integration initiative.

Authors:  Edward P Post; William W Van Stone
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

4.  Collaborative care for bipolar disorder: Part II. Impact on clinical outcome, function, and costs.

Authors:  Mark S Bauer; Linda McBride; William O Williford; Henry Glick; Bruce Kinosian; Lori Altshuler; Thomas Beresford; Amy M Kilbourne; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Use of medical homes by patients with comorbid physical and severe mental illness.

Authors:  Jesse C Lichstein; Marisa E Domino; Christopher A Beadles; Alan R Ellis; Joel F Farley; Joseph P Morrissey; Gordon W Gauchat; C Annette Dubard; Carlos T Jackson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Predicting risk of hospitalization or death among patients receiving primary care in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Li Wang; Brian Porter; Charles Maynard; Ginger Evans; Christopher Bryson; Haili Sun; Indra Gupta; Elliott Lowy; Mary McDonell; Kathleen Frisbee; Christopher Nielson; Fred Kirkland; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Integrated medical care for patients with serious psychiatric illness: a randomized trial.

Authors:  B G Druss; R M Rohrbaugh; C M Levinson; R A Rosenheck
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-09

Review 8.  Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Reisinger Walker; Robin E McGee; Benjamin G Druss
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.596

9.  Effect of Enhanced Primary Care for People with Serious Mental Illness on Service Use and Screening.

Authors:  Lexie R Grove; Alex K Gertner; Karen E Swietek; Ching-Ching Claire Lin; Neepa Ray; Tyler L Malone; David L Rosen; Theodore R Zarzar; Marisa Elena Domino; Brian Sheitman; Beat D Steiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Grounded theory of barriers and facilitators to mandated implementation of mental health care in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Justin K Benzer; Sarah Beehler; Christopher Miller; James F Burgess; Jennifer L Sullivan; David C Mohr; Mark Meterko; Irene E Cramer
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.