| Literature DB >> 35378874 |
J S Singh1, Mohd Shahid Khan1, Saeed Uddin1.
Abstract
The density functional theory calculation has been carried out for the analysis of 5-chlorouracil using DFT/Gaussian 09 with GAR2PED. Recorded experimental spectra for Raman and IR of 5-chlorouracil have been analyzed all fundamental vibrational modes using the outcome results of DFT at 6-311++G** of Gaussian 09 calculations and the GaussView 5.09. To help the analysis of vibrational modes, GAR2PED program has been used in the calculation of PEDs. The charge transfer properties of 5-chlorouracil have been analyzed using HOMO and LUMO level energy analysis. HOMO and LUMO energy gap study supports the charge transfer possibility in molecule. These have been made to study for reactivity and stability of heterocyclic molecules for the analysis of antiviral drugs against the new corona virus: COVID-19. Here, the smaller energy gap of 5-chlorouracil is more responsible for charge transfer interaction in the heterocyclic drug molecules and a reason of more bioactivity. The electron density mapping within molecular electrostatic potential plot and electrostatic potential plotting within iso-surface plot have been evaluated the charge distribution concept in the molecule as the nucleophilic reactions and electrophilic sites. These computations have been used to produce the molecular charges, structure and thermodynamic functions of biomolecule. This study has been made to all internal modes of chloro group substituent at pyrimidine ring of C5 atom. The splitting of frequencies has arisen in the two species for the normal distribution modes.Entities:
Keywords: DFT/G-09; HOMO–LUMO; MEPs/ESPs; Thermodynamics; Vibrational spectra
Year: 2022 PMID: 35378874 PMCID: PMC8968244 DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04181-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polym Bull (Berl) ISSN: 0170-0839 Impact factor: 2.870
Fig. 1a IR spectrum of 5-chlorouracil, b calculated IR spectrum of 5-chlorouracil
Fig. 2a Raman spectrum of 5-chlorouracil, b calculated Raman spectrum of 5-chlorouracil
Fig. 3a Numbering for nomenclature of pyrimidine ring of 5-chlorouracil, b numbering scheme for optimization of 5-chlorouracil
Optimized atomic polar tensor$ and Mulliken charges$ at atomic sites of 5-chlorouracil
| No | Atoms# | ATP charges$ | Mulliken charges$ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C1 | 1.353079 | 0.332236 |
| 2 | N2 | − 0.728977 | − 0.406186 |
| 3 | C3 | 1.111933 | − 0.088012 |
| 4 | C4 | − 0.036774 | 0.317438 |
| 5 | C5 | 0.439128 | − 0.457703 |
| 6 | H6 | 0.081201 | 0.198048 |
| 7 | H7 | 0.224456 | 0.365097 |
| 8 | N8 | − 0.752779 | − 0.361195 |
| 9 | H9 | 0.250381 | 0.344104 |
| 10 | O10 | − 0.918364 | − 0.333142 |
| 11 | O11 | − 0.793447 | − 0.269039 |
| 12 | Cl12 | − 0.229838 | 0.358353 |
#The numbering of atom is shown in Fig. 3 (b)
$unit of e
Optimization of structural parameters of 5-chlorouracil
| Definition# | 5-chlorouracil |
|---|---|
| Bond lengths (r) in | |
| r(N2–C1) | 1.3852 |
| r(N8–C1) | 1.3916 |
| r(C1–O10) | 1.2111 |
| r(N2–C3) | 1.4093 |
| r(N2–H7) | 1.0129 |
| r(C3–C4) | 1.4692 |
| r(C3–O11) | 1.2098 |
| r(C4=C5) | 1.3484 |
| r(C4–Cl12) | 1.734 |
| r(C5–H6) | 1.0817 |
| r(C5–N8) | 1.3745 |
| r(N8–H9) | 1.0092 |
| Bond angles ( | |
| 112.6902 | |
| 124.2475 | |
| 123.0621 | |
| 128.8584 | |
| 115.5275 | |
| 115.614 | |
| 112.6205 | |
| 120.9095 | |
| 126.47 | |
| 120.3401 | |
| 118.1483 | |
| 121.5116 | |
| 122.2265 | |
| 121.6007 | |
| 116.1728 | |
| 123.89 | |
| 115.4067 | |
| 120.7033 | |
| Dihedral angles ( | |
| − 0.16 | |
| − 179.97 | |
| 180.01 | |
| 0.13 | |
| 0.12 | |
| 180.04 | |
| − 180.03 | |
| − 0.11 | |
| 0.11 | |
| − 180.14 | |
| 180.02 | |
| − 0.00 | |
| − 0.01 | |
| 180.03 | |
| 180.04 | |
| − 0.0 5 | |
| − 180.02 | |
| − 0.02 | |
| − 0.00 | |
| − 180.00 | |
| − 0.04 | |
| − 179.96 | |
| 179.96 | |
| 0.04 | |
#The numbering scheme is shown in Fig. 3 (b)
Vibrational frequencies* of 5-chlorouracil
| S. No | Distribution of vibrational modes | Exp. recorded spectra (cm−1) | Theoretically calculated frequencies at the DFT/B3LYP/6–311 + + G**-09 level | PEDs | Assignments$ for the characterizations of modes | Species | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figure | Figure | |||||||
| IR | Raman | 5-chlorouracil | 5-chlorouracil | In-plane | Out-of-plane | |||
| 1 | 30 vibrational modes as uracil skeleton = ( 21 a’ + 9 a”) | 3180 (m) | –– | 3636 (120.5,109.6) 0.19 | ν ( N8–H9) | |||
| 2 | 3160 (s) | 3158 (s) | 3593 (77.65, 80.91) 0.23 | a’ | ||||
| 3 | 3060 (m) | 3060 (s) | 3217 (01.40, 85.33) 0.31 | a’ | ||||
| 4 | 1792 (vs) | 1810 (s) | 1806 (765.4, 34.16) 0.17 | a’ | ||||
| 5 | 1772 (vs) | 1772 (vs) | 1776 (632.1, 45.98) 0.33 | α (C1–C2–C3) ( 45.)—α (C2–C3–C4) (29)— | a’ | |||
| 6 | 1666 (s) | 1665 (vs) | 1668 (79.37, 52.05) 0.13 | a’ | ||||
| 7 | 1496 (ms) | 1496 (s) | 1491 (51.41, 14.69) 0.50 | a’ | ||||
| 8 | 1420 (s) | 1425 (ms) | 1414 (12.52, 03.10) 0.74 | a’ | ||||
| 9 | 1402 (s) | 1400 (s) | 1398 (109.9, 01.64) 0.74 | a’ | ||||
| 10 | 1340 (s) | 1346 (vs) | 1343 (12.53, 29.20) 0.29 | a’ | ||||
| 11 | 1080 (s) | 1050 (sh) | 1075 (80.96, 00.66) 0.61 | 15 | a’ | |||
| 12 | 1190 (vs) | –– | 1191 (126.3, 01.44) 0.54 | a’ | ||||
| 13 | 1170 (ms) | 1160 (ms) | 1161 (11.44, 02.83) 0.68 | ν (N2 –C3) (23) + | a’ | |||
| 14 | 960 (ms) | 930 (ms) | 970 (19.30, 03.17) 0.57 | a’ | ||||
| 15 | 880 (vs | 900 (ms) | 910 (18.31, 01.18) 0.75 | a” | ||||
| 16 | 775 (vs) | 776 (vs) | 776 (07.90, 19.01) 0.07 | a’ | ||||
| 17 | 760 (s) | 760 (s) | 764 (08.55, 00.31) 0.75 | a” | ||||
| 18 | 750 (s) | 750 (sh) | 749 (55.07, 00.02) 0.75 | a” | ||||
| 19 | 670 (vs) | 670 (ms) | 661 (82.71, 01.04) 0.75 | a” | ||||
| 20 | 670 (s) | 661 (s) | 660 (47.30, 02.78) 0.06 | a’ | ||||
| 21 | 610 (ms) | 630 (s) | 607 (00.16, 06.28) 0.43 | α (C1–C2–C3) (52)— | a’ | |||
| 22 | 550 (vs) | 555 (m) | 548 (54.12, 00.11) 0.75 | a” | ||||
| 23 | 540 (sh) | 535 (ms) | 538 (08.45, 04.62) 0.27 | 13 | a’ | |||
| 24 | 420 (vs) | 420 (ms) | 405 (16.74, 04.65) 0.44 | a’ | ||||
| 25 | –––- | 410 (m) | 382 (22.35, 00.69) 0.75 | δ (ring) | a” | |||
| 26 | ––– | 380 (m) | 362 (06.36, 02.57) 0.36 | a’ | ||||
| 27 | 290 (s) | 286 (00.44, 00.09) 0.75 | a” | |||||
| 28 | 260 (m) | 227 (00.42, 01.08) 0.73 | a’ | |||||
| 29 | 240 (m) | 143 (00.79, 00.01) 0.75 | a” | |||||
| 30 | 200 (ms) | 94 (01.33, 00.23) 0.75 | a” | |||||
[#after the respective mode, in parentheses is % PED, but mode values < 3% are omitted of given Fig. 3 b.]
[*v = very, w = weak, m = medium s = strong, sh = shoulder]
[$ν = stretching, α = angle bending, β = in-plane bending, γ = out-of-plane bending, δ = deformation.]
[+first and second values in parentheses show IR intensity (km/ mole) and Raman scattering activity ( u−1; as = 1 × 10—10 m and 1u = 1 atomic mass unit = 1.6606 × 10–27 kg) but respective value above and below the parentheses shows the calculated frequency (in wave number ; cm−1) and Raman band depolarization ratios.]
Fig. 4Electronic energy levels with frontier MOs for 5-chlorouracil
Lowest level energy value of HOMO and LUMO of 5-chlorouracil
| Parameter | Energy (eV) |
|---|---|
| HOMO (for the ground level) | − 7.197932 eV |
| LUMO (for the first excited level) | − 2.037426 eV |
| HOMO–LUMO = the energy gap(Δ E) |
Fig. 5a Molecular electrostatic potentials (MEP) plot of 5-chlorouracil, b contour map plot of ESP iso-surface of 5-chlorouracil, c visualization for the mapping of total density of 5-chlorouracil, d visualization of the ESP array plot for 5-chlorouracil, e visualization of the total density array plot for 5-chlorouracil.
Optimized thermodynamic functions (parameters) of 5-chlorouracil
| Parameter | 5-chlorouracil |
|---|---|
| (a)-Total energy and ZPE(AU) | − 874.482643 |
| (b)-Gibb free energy (AU) | − 874.515362 |
| ©-Rotational constants (GHz): | 3.04577 |
| 0.98092 | |
| 0.74196 | |
| (d)-Entropy (Calmol−1 K−1): | |
| Total: | 86.502 |
| (i)-Translational | 40.846 |
| (ii)-Rotational | 29.363 |
| (iii)-Vibrational | 16.293 |
| (e)-Dipole moments (Debyes) | 4.1616 |