Rajshekhar Chakraborty1, Rabbia Siddiqi2, Gloria Willson3, Samiksha Gupta4, Noureen Asghar2, Muhammad Husnain5, Mohammed A Aljama6, Tapas Ranjan Behera7, Faiz Anwer7, Aurore Perrot8, Irbaz B Riaz9. 1. Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. 2. Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. 3. The Knowledge Center, August C. Long Health Sciences Library, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. 4. Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 5. Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. 6. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 7. Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 8. Hematology Service, University Cancer Institute Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France. 9. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite routine evaluation of cytogenetics in myeloma, little is known regarding the impact of high-dose therapy (HDT) consolidation on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who have high-risk cytogenetics. The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the heterogeneity of HDT efficacy according to cytogenetic risk. METHODS: All RCTs in patients who had newly diagnosed myeloma from 2000 to 2021 that compared upfront HDT versus standard-dose therapy (SDT) consolidation were included. The primary objective was to assess the difference in HDT efficacy between standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics in terms of the OS or PFS log(hazard ratio) (HR). The pooled OS and PFS HR was calculated according to cytogenetic-risk subgroup using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity (I2 ) (the percentage of total observed variability explained by between-study differences) was assessed using an interaction test. RESULTS: After screening 3307 citations, 6 RCTs were included for PFS analysis, and 4 were included for OS analysis. The median follow-up ranged from 3.1 to 7.8 years. The pooled OS HR for HDT versus SDT consolidation in patients with standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.17; I2 = 0%) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45-0.97; I2 = 0%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of OS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was statistically significant in favor of the high-risk group (P for interaction = .03). The pooled PFS HR for HDT versus SDT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.76; I2 = 0%) versus 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33-0.83; I2 = 55%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of PFS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was not significant (P for interaction = .25). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of OS benefit with upfront HDT is cytogenetics-dependent. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics should preferably receive upfront rather than delayed HDT consolidation. LAY SUMMARY: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation improves overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma harboring high-risk cytogenetics.
BACKGROUND: Despite routine evaluation of cytogenetics in myeloma, little is known regarding the impact of high-dose therapy (HDT) consolidation on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who have high-risk cytogenetics. The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the heterogeneity of HDT efficacy according to cytogenetic risk. METHODS: All RCTs in patients who had newly diagnosed myeloma from 2000 to 2021 that compared upfront HDT versus standard-dose therapy (SDT) consolidation were included. The primary objective was to assess the difference in HDT efficacy between standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics in terms of the OS or PFS log(hazard ratio) (HR). The pooled OS and PFS HR was calculated according to cytogenetic-risk subgroup using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity (I2 ) (the percentage of total observed variability explained by between-study differences) was assessed using an interaction test. RESULTS: After screening 3307 citations, 6 RCTs were included for PFS analysis, and 4 were included for OS analysis. The median follow-up ranged from 3.1 to 7.8 years. The pooled OS HR for HDT versus SDT consolidation in patients with standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.17; I2 = 0%) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45-0.97; I2 = 0%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of OS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was statistically significant in favor of the high-risk group (P for interaction = .03). The pooled PFS HR for HDT versus SDT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.76; I2 = 0%) versus 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33-0.83; I2 = 55%), respectively. The difference in HDT efficacy in terms of PFS between standard-risk and high-risk patients was not significant (P for interaction = .25). CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of OS benefit with upfront HDT is cytogenetics-dependent. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics should preferably receive upfront rather than delayed HDT consolidation. LAY SUMMARY: Upfront autologous stem cell transplantation improves overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma harboring high-risk cytogenetics.