Junren Zhang1, Qi Han Aaron Chua2, Xuanrong Michael Shen3, Jiva Ananthan Viseikumaran3, Timothy Teoh1, Nan Guang Tan3,4. 1. Singapore Armed Forces Military Medicine Institute, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Republic of Singapore Air Force Medical Service, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Singapore Armed Forces Army Medical Services, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Singapore Armed Forces Medical Training Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
Introduction: This article describes the experience of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) implementing telemedicine consultations for COVID-19-positive patients recovering within community recovery facilities (CRFs) in a semi-inpatient setting. Materials and Methods: The SAF adopted a systematic approach to telemedicine implementation and scaling up, with Phase 1 being the deployment of medical teams operating on-site clinics daily at six CRFs and telemedicine only provided for after-hours medical consultations on an ad hoc basis. Subsequently in Phase 2, most clinical consultations in the CRFs were conducted virtually. Results: Phases 1 and 2 recorded 1,902 and 449 clinical consultations, respectively. The mean number of clinical encounters was 33 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 1, and 12 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 2 (p < 0.001). Acute respiratory illness (52.3% in Phase 1 and 46.7% in Phase 2) was the most common reason for consultations. With full telemedicine in Phase 2, there was reduction in the mean number of clinical encounters per 1,000 occupants per day (p = 0.001), lower man-hours in personal protective equipment (PPE) (p < 0.001), and rise in escalation of care (p < 0.001) but without adverse events reported. Conclusions: Telemedicine for patients was safe, improved medical manpower efficiency, and reduced man-hours in PPE. The increased escalation of care in Phase 2 due to the lack of physical examination capabilities was to be expected to ensure patients' safety. Overall, it is recommended that for stable and mild medical conditions, telemedicine is a viable, safe, and efficient health care delivery tool in crisis situations similar to COVID-19.
Introduction: This article describes the experience of the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) implementing telemedicine consultations for COVID-19-positive patients recovering within community recovery facilities (CRFs) in a semi-inpatient setting. Materials and Methods: The SAF adopted a systematic approach to telemedicine implementation and scaling up, with Phase 1 being the deployment of medical teams operating on-site clinics daily at six CRFs and telemedicine only provided for after-hours medical consultations on an ad hoc basis. Subsequently in Phase 2, most clinical consultations in the CRFs were conducted virtually. Results: Phases 1 and 2 recorded 1,902 and 449 clinical consultations, respectively. The mean number of clinical encounters was 33 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 1, and 12 per 1,000 occupants per day in Phase 2 (p < 0.001). Acute respiratory illness (52.3% in Phase 1 and 46.7% in Phase 2) was the most common reason for consultations. With full telemedicine in Phase 2, there was reduction in the mean number of clinical encounters per 1,000 occupants per day (p = 0.001), lower man-hours in personal protective equipment (PPE) (p < 0.001), and rise in escalation of care (p < 0.001) but without adverse events reported. Conclusions: Telemedicine for patients was safe, improved medical manpower efficiency, and reduced man-hours in PPE. The increased escalation of care in Phase 2 due to the lack of physical examination capabilities was to be expected to ensure patients' safety. Overall, it is recommended that for stable and mild medical conditions, telemedicine is a viable, safe, and efficient health care delivery tool in crisis situations similar to COVID-19.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; community recovery facilities; telehealth; telemedicine
Authors: Sabrina Haroon; Teck Chuan Voo; Hillary Chua; Gan Liang Tan; Titus Lau Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Ta Wei Kevin Kok; Si Jack Chong; Wen Kien Joachim Yau; Praveen Raj Kumar; Swee Boon Raymond Chua Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 6.344