| Literature DB >> 35377216 |
Lei Han1, Yiyuan Gao1, Yuqing Liu1, Siyu Yao1, Shuyan Zhong1, Sirui Zhang1, Jingdan Wang2, Peng Mi1,3, Yurong Wen4,5, Zhenlin Ouyang4,5, Jing Zhang6, Mona Mohamed Al-Shamiri1, Pu Li2, Shaoshan Han7.
Abstract
Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen that can develop various resistance mechanisms to many antibiotics. However, little is known about how it evolves from an antibiotic sensitive to a resistant phenotype. In this study, we investigated the transition of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) under antibiotic stress and identified YiaD as an OMP marker involved in the development of adaptive resistance to meropenem (MEM) in A. baumannii. Following stimulation of a carbapenem-sensitive strain AB5116 with sub-MIC of MEM, yiaD showed significantly decreased expression, and this decrease continued with prolonged stimulation for 8 h. The downregulation of yiaD was not only observed in clinically sensitive strains but also in 45 carbapenem-resistant isolates that produced the β-lactamases TEM and OXA-23. However, the extent of the reduction of yiaD expression in resistant strains was less than that in sensitive strains. Lack of yiaD resulted in a 4-fold increase in the MIC of AB5116 to MEM. The same level of depressed susceptibility induced by yiaD deletion was observed in both a growth curve test and a survival rate assay. Moreover, the colony shape became enlarged and irregular after loss of yiaD, and the biofilm formation ability of A. baumannii was influenced by YiaD. These results suggest that YiaD could respond to the stimulus of MEM in A. baumannii with a downregulation trend that kept pace with the prolonged stimulation time, indicating that it participates in various routes to benefit MEM resistance evolution in both carbapenem-sensitive and -resistant A. baumannii strains. IMPORTANCE Acinetobacter baumannii can develop various resistance mechanisms to carbapenems. However, the factors involved in the evolutionary process that leads from transition to the sensitive to resistant phenotype are not clear. The outer membrane protein YiaD of A. baumannii was downregulated under the stress of meropenem (MEM), and its expression level was continuously reduced with prolonged stimulation time. The downregulation of yiaD was not only observed in sensitive strains but also in carbapenem-resistant isolates producing the β-lactamases TEM and OXA-23. However, the extent of yiaD reduction was less in resistant strains than in sensitive strains. Lack of yiaD resulted in an increased MEM MIC, enlarged and irregular colonies, and decreased biofilm formation ability. These results suggest that YiaD responds to MEM stimulus in A. baumannii and participates in the adaptive resistance of MEM in both carbapenem-sensitive and -resistant strains.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; YiaD; adaptive resistance; meropenem; resistance evolution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35377216 PMCID: PMC9045393 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00173-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Analysis of RNA-Seq results and changes in the expression of outer membrane proteins (OMPs). (A) Statistics of differential expressed genes in AB5116 after treatment with 0.5 × MIC MEM. (B) Expressional heatmap of 12 OMP genes in three replicate RNA-Seq samples. The fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) values were standardized based on the Z-score using the formula Z = (x − μ)/σ. (C) Volcano plot of gene expression changes after treatment with MEM. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected using the standard of |log2(FC)| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05.
FIG 2Time-dependent and strain-dependent features of yiaD expression under MEM stress. (A) Changes in yiaD expression after exposure of AB5116 to MEM for different times. (B) Decreased expression of yiaD in clinical strains under MEM stress for 2 h. ***, P < 0.001. (C) Correlation between MIC value and decreased yiaD expression level in clinical isolates under MEM stress.
Detection of β-lactamases in 50 clinical isolates
| PCR positive ( | RT-qPCR positive ( | MIC of MEM (μg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbapenem-resistant | Carbapenem-sensitive | |||||||
| 16 | 8 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.06 | |||
| TEM, OXA-23-like, OXA-51-like (37, 74%) | TEM, OXA-23-like (37, 74%) | 5 | 14 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| TEM, OXA-51-like (4, 8%) | TEM (4, 8%) | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| OXA-23-like, OXA-51-like (4, 8%) | OXA-23-like (4, 8%) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| OXA-51-like (5, 10%) | None (5, 10%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
MIC of strains used in this study to MEM
| Strain | MIC (μg/mL) |
|---|---|
| AB5116 | 0.125 |
| AB5116Δ | 0.5 |
| AB5116Δ | 0.125 |
FIG 3Growth of AB5116 (A), yiaD deletion mutant (B), and yiaD complementary bacteria (C) on agar plates and in LB broth. Bacteria were inoculated on LB agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C. The arrow points to a typical irregular colony of the strain after loss of the yiaD gene. Growth curves were generated for bacteria cultivated in LB broth supplemented with 1 ×, 2 ×, and 4 × MIC of MEM, as well as without MEM at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. The OD600 was recorded every hour. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and the results are presented as the means ± SD.
FIG 4Survival rate assay of AB5116, yiaD deletion mutant, and complementary strain when cells were challenged with 1 ×, 2 ×, and 4 × MIC of MEM. (A) Overnight cultured bacterial cells were diluted to 10−4, and 100 μL of each dilution was spread on LB plates supplemented with different concentrations of MEM. Bacteria grown on plates without added antibiotics were used as controls. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, after which the results for the 10−4 dilution were recorded. (B) The number of colonies on each plate was counted. Survival rate was calculated by dividing the CFU/mL on the MEM plate by that on the control plate. The experiment was repeated in triplicate, and the results shown are the means ± SD. ***, P < 0.001.
FIG 5Sequence alignment of YiaD with OmpA and biofilm formation assay of AB5116 wild-type, ΔyiaD::kan, and ΔyiaD::kan + yiaD strains. (A) Protein sequences of OmpA and YiaD were compared using ClustalW. Sequences were analyzed based on information published in the NCBI protein database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein). The deep blue background denotes the same amino acids between two sequences. The red bar represents the OmpA_C-like structure, which has peptidoglycan binding domains similar to the C-terminal domain of the outer membrane protein OmpA. Yellow boxes indicate the ligand binding site (chemical binding) on OmpA. (B) Crystal violet staining of strains grown in plastic culture tubes at 37°C for 24 h. (C) Biofilm biomass measured by crystal violet staining at OD570. Asterisks denote significant differences in biofilm formation (P < 0.05).
Primers used in this study
| Primer | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Application | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| yiaDqPCR-F | TGGCTGAAGATAACAAGAGCGC | RT-qPCR for | This study |
| yiaDqPCR-R | CGATACGGCTAGATGGAACACC | ||
| 16S rRNA-F | CAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGT | RT-qPCR for 16S rRNA | This study |
| 16S rRNA-R | CGTAAGGGCCATGATGACTT | ||
| yiaDup-F | GTGATGAGTGCACACCTTAAAGTG | Construction of Δ | This study |
| yiaDup-R | TCCAGCCTACACAATCATTGCATGCCTCCT | ||
| yiaDdw-F | GGAGGATATTCATATGGACCTAAGATCTAGTT | Construction of Δ | This study |
| yiaDdw-R | GGCAGATGACATCGTGTATTACC | ||
| kanFRT-F | ATTGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC | Construction of Δ | This study |
| kanFRT-R | GGTCCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAGTTCC | ||
| yiaDscreen-F | GGCCCCGAATATCCAAAATCC | Confirmation of Δ | This study |
| yiaDscreen-R | CCAGCAAGCACCAATAAAGGG | ||
| yiaDcomp-F | GGTACCGTTGACATATAAATGGCCCC | Complementation of | This study |
| yiaDcomp-R | GTCGACAAAACCACCCGAAGGT | ||
| TGTCACTGTATCGCCGTC | Detection of | ( | |
| CTCAGTGCTCTACAGAAAACC | |||
| GTTTTTGCAATGTGCTCAACG | Detection of | ( | |
| TGCCATAGCAATAGGCGTAG | |||
| ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA | Detection of | ( | |
| GACAGTTAGCAATGCTTAATCA | |||
| GCCTTTATCGGCCCTCACTCAAG | Detection of | This study | |
| TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTCGATCA | |||
| CGTCACGCTGTTGTTAGGAA | Detection of | ( | |
| ACCGTCGGTGACGATTTTAG | |||
| GAAGGCGTTTATGTTCATAC | Detection of | ( | |
| GTACGTTTCAAGAGTGATGC | |||
| GTTTGGTCGCATATCGCAAC | Detection of | ( | |
| AATGCGCAGCACCAGGATAG | |||
| TACAAGGGATTCGGCATCG | Detection of | ( | |
| TAATGGCCTGTTCCCATGTG | |||
| GCAGCTTGTCGGCCATGCGGGC | Detection of | ( | |
| GGTCGCGAAGCTGAGCACCGCAT | |||
| GATGTGTCATAGTATTCGTCG | Detection of | ( | |
| TCACAACAACTAAAAGCACTG | |||
| GGTTAGTTGGCCCCCTTAAA | Detection of | ( | |
| AGTTGAGCGAAAGGGGATT | |||
| GCGTGGTTAAGGATGAACAC | Detection of | ( | |
| CATCAAGTTCAACCCAACCG | |||
| ATGAACATTAAAGCACTC | Detection of | ( | |
| CTATAAAATACCTAATTGTTC | |||
| AAGTATTGGGGCTTGTGCTG | Detection of | ( | |
| CCCCTCTGCGCTCTACATAC | |||
| TEMqPCR-F | TTCCGGCTGGCTGGTTTATT | RT- qPCR for TEM | This study |
| TEMqPCR-R | TGACTCCCCGTCGTGTAGAT | ||
| OXA-23-likeqPCR-F | TAATGCTCTAAGCCGCGCAA | RT-qPCR for OXA-23-like | This study |
| OXA-23-likeqPCR-R | TTCTCCAATCCGATCAGGGC | ||
| OXA-51-likeqPCR-F | TCGGCCTTGAGCACCATAAG | RT-qPCR for OXA-51-like | This study |
| OXA-51-likeqPCR-R | GCCATAACCAACACGCTTCA |