Literature DB >> 35377112

The Direct Reproductive Cost of Same-Sex Attraction: Evidence from Two Nationally Representative U.S. Samples.

Menelaos Apostolou1.   

Abstract

Same-sex attraction is associated with a direct reproductive cost, i.e., a reduced number of biological children. The current study aimed to assess this cost for different forms of sexual attraction (i.e., only attracted to opposite sex, mostly attracted to opposite sex, equally attracted to both sexes, mostly attracted to same-sex, only attracted to same-sex), using two large nationally representative datasets (N = 15,208) from the USA. The results indicated that same-sex attraction was associated with substantial loss in direct reproductive output. More specifically, significant differences between the different types of same-sex attraction were found: Exclusive and mostly homosexual orientation identities were associated with the highest direct reproductive cost, while mostly attracted to opposite sex orientation and bisexuality identities were associated with lower direct reproductive costs. In addition, bisexual women did not differ significantly from exclusively heterosexual women in terms of their reproductive output. The implications of these findings for the evolutionary origins of same-sex attraction are further discussed.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisexuality; Direct reproductive cost; Homosexuality; Lesbianism; Same-sex attraction; Sexual orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35377112     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02199-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  17 in total

1.  New evidence of genetic factors influencing sexual orientation in men: female fecundity increase in the maternal line.

Authors:  Francesca Iemmola; Andrea Camperio Ciani
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-06-17

2.  Possible Balancing Selection in Human Female Homosexuality.

Authors:  Andrea Camperio Ciani; Umberto Battaglia; Linda Cesare; Giorgia Camperio Ciani; Claudio Capiluppi
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2018-03

3.  Family size in white gay and heterosexual men.

Authors:  Michael King; John Green; David P J Osborn; Jamie Arkell; Jacqueline Hetherton; Elizabeth Pereira
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2005-02

4.  Developmental Latent Patterns of Identification as Mostly Heterosexual Versus Lesbian, Gay, or Bisexual.

Authors:  Jerel P Calzo; Katherine E Masyn; S Bryn Austin; Hee-Jin Jun; Heather L Corliss
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2016-05-14

Review 5.  Possible evolutionary origins of human female sexual fluidity.

Authors:  Satoshi Kanazawa
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-05-16

6.  Coparenting among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples: associations with adopted children's outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel H Farr; Charlotte J Patterson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-01-21

7.  Same-sex attraction in a birth cohort: prevalence and persistence in early adulthood.

Authors:  Nigel Dickson; Charlotte Paul; Peter Herbison
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Genetic and environmental influences on female sexual orientation, childhood gender typicality and adult gender identity.

Authors:  Andrea Burri; Lynn Cherkas; Timothy Spector; Qazi Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Lesbian and bisexual women's likelihood of becoming pregnant: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Hodson; C Meads; S Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Sexually antagonistic selection in human male homosexuality.

Authors:  Andrea Camperio Ciani; Paolo Cermelli; Giovanni Zanzotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.