Literature DB >> 35373521

New Insight on Carbon Dioxide-Mediated Hydrogen Production.

Antoni W Morawski1, Ewelina Kusiak-Nejman1, Iwona Pełech1, Katarzyna Ćmielewska1, Daniel Sibera2, Piotr Staciwa1, Agnieszka Wanag1, Marcin Gano3, Ewa Ekiert1, Joanna Kapica-Kozar1, Kordian Witkowski1, Urszula Narkiewicz1.   

Abstract

A new approach to hydrogen production from water is described. This simple method is based on carbon dioxide-mediated water decomposition under UV radiation. The water contained dissolved sodium hydroxide, and the solution was saturated with gaseous carbon dioxide. During saturation, the pH decreased from about 11.5 to 7-8. The formed bicarbonate and carbonate ions acted as scavengers for hydroxyl radicals, preventing the recombination of hydroxyl and hydrogen radicals and prioritizing hydrogen gas formation. In the presented method, not yet reported in the literature, hydrogen production is combined with carbon dioxide. For the best system with alkaline water (0.2 m NaOH) saturated with CO2 under UV-C, the hydrogen production amounted to 0.6 μmol h-1 during 24 h of radiation.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbon dioxide fixation; carbon storage; hydrogen; photochemistry; photolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35373521      PMCID: PMC8977505          DOI: 10.1002/open.202100262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemistryOpen        ISSN: 2191-1363            Impact factor:   2.630


Introduction

The rapid development of the world economy and the growth in the number of people are leading to an increased demand for energy. According to the International Energy Agency, the energy demand is estimated to increase by 30 % by 2040.[ , ] Simultaneously, the scenario proposes reducing CO2 emissions by more than 40 % in 2015–2040. Currently, the EU Commission reports that global fossil CO2 emissions still increased by 0.9 % in 2019 to a total of 38 Gt CO2. Also, CO2 emissions per capita have increased by about 15 % from 4.26 t CO2/capita/year to 4.93 t CO2/capita/year between 1990 and 2019. Therefore, to reduce CO2 emissions, the search for new technologies with zero CO2 emissions is still attractive. One of the directions is the splitting of water to obtain hydrogen fuel. The milestone was the experiment conducted by Fujishima and Honda, in which water was more effectively split into hydrogen and oxygen when a p‐type semiconductor electrode containing TiO2 was irradiated with visible light. Since then, the photocatalytic research direction related to the decomposition of water (water splitting) into oxygen and hydrogen has developed intensively. Almost 3,000 publications can be found in the Scopus literature database under the heading “water photocatalytic decomposition”. One of the most important recent works describes a very active photocatalyst based on modified TiO2 with 1.5 % by mass of copper, which shows the hydrogen evolution rate of 101.7 mmol ⋅ g−1 ⋅ h−1 under simulated solar light irradiation, which is the highest among those described so far in the literature. The stability of the activity for 380 days with an apparent quantum efficiency of 56 % at 365 nm was also proven. Then, the decomposition of water was combined with the reduction of CO2 to obtain hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and useful hydrocarbons. In this case, too, almost 9,000 works were published. The main products of the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide can be hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide, methanol, and other hydrocarbons. The selectivity of the reaction depends on many factors, such as the type of photocatalyst, its crystallinity, introduced modifying elements, type of carrier, and others. In the publication of Soltani et al., selective photocatalysts for hydrogen production with reduction of CO2 were developed. Obtaining high selectivity to hydrogen is controversial because the hydrogen obtained from the decomposition of water is used immediately to reduce carbon dioxide, and it is challenging to implement in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Additionally, there are the costs of the photocatalyst and the operational costs associated with separating the photocatalyst from the product mixture. This paper proposes a simple and selective method of obtaining hydrogen without using a photocatalyst. An alkaline sodium hydroxide solution was used to perform the experiments because its role and action in the high‐temperature production processes of hydrogen have been presented and described. The obtained amounts of hydrogen are at the micromolar level, which is often found in non‐selective photocatalytic methods. This work takes advantage of the fact that the energy of radiation with a wavelength in the UV range is sufficient to excite the H−OH bond in water, which is 498 kJ mol−1. For example, a quantum of radiation with a wavelength of 200 nm has an energy of about 590 kJ mol−1. Another fact that was of great importance for these studies was using the inactivation capacity of ⋅OH hydroxyl radicals by HCO3 − and CO3 2− ions, formed when water is saturated with carbon dioxide, act as radical scavengers.

Results and Discussion

We have conducted some preliminary and comparative experiments. In the first experiment, 500 cm3 of water not saturated with gaseous CO2 was added to the reactor. Then, the water was irradiated with a UV‐C TQ 150 lamp. After 6 h of irradiation, no hydrogen was found in the reactor. Next, the analogical test was carried out for 0.2 m solution of NaOH, which was not saturated with gaseous CO2. Same as before, no hydrogen was obtained due to irradiating the reactor‘s content with UV radiation. In the second experiment, 500 cm3 of water were saturated with CO2 gas for 16 h. Then the UV‐C lamp was turned on. The hydrogen content was analysed in the gas phase above the water surface. The results obtained are shown below in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Hydrogen production from water saturated with CO2 under UV‐C TQ lamp radiation.

Hydrogen production from water saturated with CO2 under UV‐C TQ lamp radiation. The measured hydrogen content gradually increased and reached 6.4 μmol after 24 h of irradiation. These changes are not linear throughout the experimental period. After 2–6 h of irradiation, the hydrogen formation rate increased to 0.75 μmol h−1 and then decreased to about 0.2 μmol h−1. The average reaction rate of hydrogen production over 0–24 h can be estimated at 0.266 μmol h−1. At the same time, an increase in the oxygen concentration in the reactor was also observed. The next step of the experiment was as follows: 500 cm3 of alkaline water containing 0.2 m NaOH was saturated with CO2 for 16 h. The hydrogen content in the gas phase above the solution was measured during UV‐C irradiation with the TQ lamp. The results obtained are shown in Figure 2. A comparative experiment was performed using a UV‐A TQ 150 Z3 mercury lamp with a lower UV‐C content (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Hydrogen production by alkaline water (0.2 m NaOH) saturated with CO2 under UV‐C TQ lamp radiation.

Figure 3

Hydrogen production from alkaline water (0.2 m NaOH) saturated with CO2 under UV‐A TQ 150 Z3 mercury lamp radiation with lower UV‐C component.

Hydrogen production by alkaline water (0.2 m NaOH) saturated with CO2 under UV‐C TQ lamp radiation. Hydrogen production from alkaline water (0.2 m NaOH) saturated with CO2 under UV‐A TQ 150 Z3 mercury lamp radiation with lower UV‐C component. The results presented in Figure 2 show an almost straight line dependence of the hydrogen concentration on time, and the reaction rate can be estimated with a constant of about 0.6 μmol/h. In the first 6 h of the process, the rate was about 0.83 μmol/h. The measured hydrogen content gradually increased and reached 7.4 μmol after 24 h of irradiation. These changes are not linear over the entire experimental period. At 0–6 h of irradiation, the rate of hydrogen formation increased to 0.83 μmol/h and then decreased to about 0.14 μmol h−1. The overall average reaction rate of hydrogen production over 0–24 h can be estimated to be 0.31 μmol h−1. Table 1 summarises the coumarin‐based fluorescent products′ peak area with hydrogen production after 6 h of irradiation. It can be seen that hydrogen appeared only in samples saturated with carbon dioxide and a higher amount for samples that initially had a highly alkaline value of pH by introducing NaOH. Another interesting piece of information from Table 1 was the amount of hydroxyl radicals in the tested samples. Water saturation with carbon dioxide (sample H2O+coumarin+CO2 (UV‐C)) generated more than 2.5 times fewer hydroxyl radicals than the sample without CO2, which confirms the ability of carbonate and hydroxycarbonate ions to scavenge hydroxyl radicals. Almost the same behavior occurs in samples containing alkaline NaOH. The above‐discussed tendencies of hydroxyl radicals generation can be seen from Figures 4 and 5.
Table 1

Comparison of the intensity of the coumarin‐based fluorescent products with the production of hydrogen before and after 6 h of irradiation.

Sample name

Fluorescence peak area after 6 h of irradiation [a. u.]

Relative peak area

H2 production after 6 h of irradiation [μmol H2]

H2O+coumarin

1159

1.00

H2O+coumarin (UV‐C)

5313

4.58

H2O+coumarin+CO2 (UV‐C)

2203

1.90

3.06

H2O+coumarin+NaOH

1401

1.21

H2O+coumarin+NaOH (UV‐C)

10949

9.45

H2O+coumarin+NaOH+CO2 (UV‐C)

10085

8.70

4.97

H2O+coumarin+NaOH+CO2 (UV‐A)

5591

4.82

4.97

Figure 4

Fluorescent spectra of 7‐hydroxycoumarin obtained from: a) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution; b) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; c) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution saturated with CO2, and then irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h.

Figure 5

Fluorescent coumarin derivative spectra obtained from: a) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH; b) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; c) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH saturated with CO2, and irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; d) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH saturated with CO2, and irradiated with UV‐A lamp for 6 h.

Comparison of the intensity of the coumarin‐based fluorescent products with the production of hydrogen before and after 6 h of irradiation. Sample name Fluorescence peak area after 6 h of irradiation [a. u.] Relative peak area H2 production after 6 h of irradiation [μmol H2] H2O+coumarin 1159 1.00 H2O+coumarin (UV‐C) 5313 4.58 H2O+coumarin+CO2 (UV‐C) 2203 1.90 3.06 H2O+coumarin+NaOH 1401 1.21 H2O+coumarin+NaOH (UV‐C) 10949 9.45 H2O+coumarin+NaOH+CO2 (UV‐C) 10085 8.70 4.97 H2O+coumarin+NaOH+CO2 (UV‐A) 5591 4.82 4.97 Fluorescent spectra of 7‐hydroxycoumarin obtained from: a) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution; b) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; c) 10−3  m coumarin aqueous solution saturated with CO2, and then irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h. Fluorescent coumarin derivative spectra obtained from: a) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH; b) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; c) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH saturated with CO2, and irradiated with UV‐C lamp for 6 h; d) 10−3  m coumarin solution in 0.2 m NaOH saturated with CO2, and irradiated with UV‐A lamp for 6 h. Water is well known to be sensitive to solar radiation. The products of this process are hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals: Due to the short lifetime of the radicals, recombination of the products occurs to produce water: Other possible recombination pathways with a constant rate of k=4.7 m −1 ⋅ s−1 at 25 °C are as follows: or Reaction (2) supports why pure water without CO2 saturation did not produce hydrogen gas in the first experiment during UV‐C irradiation. If we are interested in hydrogen production, the hydroxyl radicals OH⋅ should be blocked to prevent water recombinations according to reaction (2). For this purpose, we used dissolved bicarbonate and carbonate ions formed according to the mechanism shown below. Dissolution of carbon dioxide in water leads to the formation of carbonic acid, which is in equilibrium according to the following reactions:[ , ] Reaction (5) dominates at pH less than 8.3, reaction (6) takes place at pH between 6–10, while reaction (7) takes place at pH from 8.3 to 11. In our reactor, the combined saturation reactions occur as follows: Both the bicarbonate and carbonate ions from reactions (6) and (7), respectively, are known to be fast acceptors (scavengers) of hydroxyl radicals in water at a constant rate: k=4.2 ⋅ 108 mol−1 ⋅ dm3 ⋅ s−1 for CO3 2− ions, and k=1.5 ⋅ 107 mol−1 ⋅ dm3 ⋅ s−1 for HCO3 − ions, corresponding to the following reactions: In reactions (10) and (11), forming hydroxyl radicals is impossible. Hydroxyl ions could react with Na+ to form NaOH and again with carbon dioxide, presented in reactions (8) and (9). According to the above mechanism, the split hydrogen radicals H⋅ from reaction (1) can freely participate (4) to form gaseous hydrogen H2. A common feature of all reactions with the production of highly active hydroxyl radicals, especially the OH radical, is the typical value of the reaction rate constants, which is in the range 108 to 1010  m −1 ⋅ s−1. In a specific reaction system, the reaction rate depends mainly on the concentration of OH radicals, which may vary depending on the various conditions of the aqueous surroundings matrices. For example, replacing oxygen with nitrogen during recombination of hydroxyl radicals lowers the rate constant by more than 2.5 times. Also, temperature radically influences the constant rate of recombination of hydroxyl radicals. The addition of small amounts of phosphorus oxides and acid to water increases the relaxation rate of OH radicals to equilibrium concentration following H2O photolysis. It seems to be the predominant path for OH recovery from recombination of H and OH radicals to form water. In our work, we used carbonates and hydrocarbons to achieve this goal.[ , ] The use of sodium hydroxide increases the concentration of bicarbonate and carbonate ions during CO2 saturation. In the case of our system, that is, an aqueous NaOH solution with an initial pH of around 11.5 and later saturated with CO2 to form Na(HCO3)2 and Na2CO3, we have a significant advantage in the concentration of sodium carbonates and bicarbonates and a high density of the solution, which determine the diffusion of low concentration radicals and their reactivity. The dominated concentration of carbonates and bicarbonates will determine the rate of the competitive reaction for capturing hydrophilic radicals, that is, bicarbonate and carbonate radicals form preferentially. The proposed mechanism of hydrogen formation with the trapping of hydroxyl radicals acts as a pump that continuously removes hydrogen from water.

Conclusion

An innovative approach to producing hydrogen from water under CO2 and UV radiation has been presented. In order to obtain hydrogen gas from water, a way to prevent the recombination of hydrogen and hydroxyl radicals formed in water during exposure to UV radiation is essential and dependent on the UV‐C radiation component. For this purpose, it is best to use bicarbonate and carbonate ions, which are formed in an alkaline environment when the water is saturated with carbon dioxide. When the pH is lowered, the hydroxyl radicals react with bicarbonate and carbonate ions, irreversibly inactivating the hydroxyl radicals. In this way, the hydrogen radicals of H⋅ combine to form hydrogen gas. The presented method is a new and straightforward method of producing hydrogen using CO2 as an “extraction pump” for hydrogen from water.

Experimental Section

The experiments were performed in a cylindrical quartz reactor with a working volume of 766 cm3. A medium‐pressure mercury lamp TQ 150 (Heraeus, Germany) with a power of 150 W and UV‐C radiation (or a mercury lamp UV‐A TQ 150 Z3 with lower UV‐C content) was located in a cooler inside the reaction vessel. The spectra of the lamps are shown in Figures 6a and 6b.
Figure 6

Emission spectra of lamps used in this study: a) UV‐C TQ 150; b) UV‐A TQ 150 Z3.

Emission spectra of lamps used in this study: a) UV‐C TQ 150; b) UV‐A TQ 150 Z3. The cooler was supplied with water during the experiments. The reactor was sealed in a thermostatic chamber to maintain stable temperature conditions and eliminate light sources. All experiments were performed at 20 °C. The initial pressure in the reactor was 0.2 bar. The scheme of the reactor is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Schematic of the reactor for liquid phase processes.

Schematic of the reactor for liquid phase processes. 500 cm3 of distilled water or 500 cm3 of 0.2 m sodium hydroxide solution (prepared from reagent grade NaOH; POCH, Poland) was poured into the reactor, and then the system was saturated with CO2 by bubbling for 16 h. The reactor was then tightly sealed, and the lamp and the magnetic stirrer were turned on. The content of the reactor was irradiated for 24 h. The gas phase above the liquid surface was analyzed by gas chromatography after 0, 2, 4, 6, and 24 h. All gas‐phase composition analyses were performed using a chromatographic method using SRI 310C gas chromatograph (SRI Instruments, USA), equipped with packed Porapak Q 100/120 column and HID detector (Helium Ionization Detector). The analyses were performed under isothermal conditions at 60 °C. Helium was used as the carrier gas. The gas flow through the column was 60 cm3 min−1, while the volume of the gas sample studied was 1 cm3. The hydrogen content in the gas phase volume was calculated from the calibration curve in the subsequent measurements. Determination of hydroxyl radicals was carried out using coumarin as a fast radical scavenger to obtain 7‐hydroxycoumarin or other coumarin‐based fluorescent products (excited at 332 nm, with maximum emission at ca. 500 nm). 10   m coumarin aqueous solution was irradiated in the reactor for 6 h. The amount of 7‐hydroxycoumarin and additional fluorescent coumarin derivative obtained in the tested solutions were measured by recording fluorescence spectra using a fluorescence spectrometer F‐2500FL (Hitachi, Japan) with 332 nm excitation (PMT voltage 400 V, scan speed 300 nm ⋅ min , EX/EM slits:2.5/5.0 nm).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Hydroxyl radical self-recombination reaction and absorption spectrum in water up to 350 degrees C.

Authors:  Ireneusz Janik; David M Bartels; Charles D Jonah
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Single-atom Cu anchored catalysts for photocatalytic renewable H2 production with a quantum efficiency of 56.

Authors:  Yumin Zhang; Jianhong Zhao; Hui Wang; Bin Xiao; Wen Zhang; Xinbo Zhao; Tianping Lv; Madasamy Thangamuthu; Jin Zhang; Yan Guo; Jiani Ma; Lina Lin; Junwang Tang; Rong Huang; Qingju Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Increased production of hydrogen with in situ CO2 capture through the process of water splitting using magnetic core/shell structures as novel photocatalysts.

Authors:  Mohamed S A Darwish; Ahmed M A El Naggar; Asmaa S Morshedy; Nils Haneklaus
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  OH radical monitoring technologies for AOP advanced oxidation process.

Authors:  S K Han; S N Nam; J W Kang
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

5.  Alkaline thermal treatment of seaweed for high-purity hydrogen production with carbon capture and storage potential.

Authors:  Kang Zhang; Woo-Jae Kim; Ah-Hyung Alissa Park
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.