Literature DB >> 35373416

Disparities in use of disciplinary solitary confinement by mental health diagnosis, race, sexual orientation and sex: Results from a national survey in the United States of America.

Brandy F Henry1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Solitary confinement is still used in prisons in the USA, despite its links to poor health. Past research suggests that there may be disparities by race, ethnicity, sex and mental disorders regarding who is placed in solitary confinement, although nationwide studies have been sparse. AIMS: To explore possible disparities by race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, adverse childhood experiences and mental disorders in solitary confinement as a disciplinary action for adults incarcerated in USA prisons.
METHODS: Data come from a recently released national survey of 24,848 adults incarcerated in the USA-the 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates. Logistic regression models were used to identify disparities in the use of disciplinary action and solitary confinement as a disciplinary action, while controlling for type of rule violation.
RESULTS: After controlling for rule violation type, solitary confinement was used as a disciplinary action at higher rates for people who: were multiracial, as compared to white (aOR = 1.30), male, as compared to female (aOR = 1.46), bisexual, as compared to heterosexual (aOR = 1.64), had multiple mental disorders, as compared to none (aOR = 1.22) or had more adverse childhood experiences (aOR = 1.13).
CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight demographic and health disparities in the use of solitary confinement, which may further widen health disparities. More effective implementation of policies to reduce the use of solitary confinement are still needed. Mental health professionals should have an active role in advising on measures when mental disorder is a factor and must ensure adequate treatment of disorders in prison or transfer to health facilities.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health equity; mental health; prison; rule violation; solitary confinement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35373416      PMCID: PMC9373232          DOI: 10.1002/cbm.2240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health        ISSN: 0957-9664


  8 in total

1.  The role of mental health in the inmate disciplinary process: a national survey.

Authors:  Michael S Krelstein
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2002

2.  Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants.

Authors:  John R Sutton
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2013-04-28

3.  Public Health and Solitary Confinement in the United States.

Authors:  David H Cloud; Ernest Drucker; Angela Browne; Jim Parsons
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reducing the use and impact of solitary confinement in corrections.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahalt; Craig Haney; Sarah Rios; Matthew P Fox; David Farabee; Brie Williams
Journal:  Int J Prison Health       Date:  2017-03-13

5.  Psychological Distress in Solitary Confinement: Symptoms, Severity, and Prevalence in the United States, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Keramet Reiter; Joseph Ventura; David Lovell; Dallas Augustine; Melissa Barragan; Thomas Blair; Kelsie Chesnut; Pasha Dashtgard; Gabriela Gonzalez; Natalie Pifer; Justin Strong
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  ADVERSITY, MENTAL HEALTH, AND SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS AS PREDICTORS AND MEDIATORS OF RULE VIOLATIONS IN U.S. PRISONS.

Authors:  Brandy F Henry
Journal:  Crim Justice Behav       Date:  2019-12-29

7.  Association of violence with emergence of persecutory delusions in untreated schizophrenia.

Authors:  Robert Keers; Simone Ullrich; Bianca L Destavola; Jeremy W Coid
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 18.112

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.