| Literature DB >> 35373151 |
Kaitlyn Zenner1,2, Dana M Jensen3, Victoria Dmyterko3, Giridhar M Shivaram4, Candace T Myers5, Cate R Paschal5, Erin R Rudzinski5, Minh-Hang M Pham6, V Chi Cheng6, Scott C Manning1, Randall A Bly1,2, Sheila Ganti1,2,7, Jonathan A Perkins1,2, James T Bennett2,3,8.
Abstract
Somatic activating variants in PIK3CA, the gene that encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), have been previously detected in ∼80% of lymphatic malformations (LMs).1 , 2 We report the presence of somatic activating variants in BRAF in individuals with LMs that do not possess pathogenic PIK3CA variants. The BRAF substitution p.Val600Glu (c.1799T>A), one of the most common driver mutations in cancer, was detected in multiple individuals with LMs. Histology revealed abnormal lymphatic channels with immunopositivity for BRAFV600E in endothelial cells that was otherwise indistinguishable from PIK3CA-positive LM. The finding that BRAF variants contribute to low-flow LMs increases the complexity of prior models associating low-flow vascular malformations (LM and venous malformations) with mutations in the PI3K-AKT-MTOR and high-flow vascular malformations (arteriovenous malformations) with mutations in the RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.3 In addition, this work highlights the importance of genetic diagnosis prior to initiating medical therapy as more studies examine therapeutics for individuals with vascular malformations.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF; PIK3CA; VANSeq; clinical diagnostics; ddPCR; endothelium; lymphatic malformation; mosaicism; post-zygotic; vascular
Year: 2022 PMID: 35373151 PMCID: PMC8972000 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: HGG Adv ISSN: 2666-2477
Somatic variants in LM detected by VANseq and confirmed by ddPCR
| LR18-536 | 2 years | F | lesion A | 1.3 | 21 | 1,669 | 1.1 | 144 | 13,401 | |
| lesion B | – | – | – | 0.2 | 23 | 10,709 | ||||
| lesion C | – | – | – | NEG | 5 | 12,251 | ||||
| lesion D | – | – | – | 0.2 | 22 | 12,569 | ||||
| lesion E | – | – | – | 1.4 | 151 | 10,827 | ||||
| lesion F | – | – | – | 0.5 | 88 | 23,161 | ||||
| lesion G | – | – | – | 0.9 | 74 | 9,877 | ||||
| skin | – | – | – | 0.3 | 30 | 9,480 | ||||
| salivary gland | – | – | – | NEG | 0 | 31,662 | ||||
| LR16-278 | 2 years | F | lesion | 0.7 | 12 | 1,709 | 0.5 | 48 | 12,295 | |
| LR16-264 | 3 years | F | lesion | 10.6 | 7 | 59 | 4.8 | 437 | 9,551 | |
| LR17-322 | 1 year | M | lesion | 2.1 | 34 | 1,618 | 1.7 | 165 | 10,555 | |
| skin | – | – | – | NEG | 0 | 10,374 | ||||
| LR19-346 | 5 months | F | lesion, deep | 0.6 | 7 | 1,143 | 1.2 | 69 | 5,872 | |
| lesion, inferior | – | – | – | 0.9 | 56 | 6,389 | ||||
| lesion, superior | – | – | – | NEG | 2 | 9,584 | ||||
| lesion, no location | – | – | – | 3.6 | 91 | 2,479 | ||||
| skin | – | – | – | NEG | 0 | 4,304 | ||||
| fat | – | – | – | NEG | 1 | 5,340 | ||||
| muscle | – | – | – | NEG | 0 | 6,129 | ||||
| LR19-443 | 1 month | M | cyst fluid, A | – | – | – | 0.2 | 29 | 13,055 | |
| cyst fluid, B | 0.3 | 4 | 1,458 | 0.1 | 10 | 9,661 | ||||
| cyst fluid, C | – | – | – | 0.3 | 31 | 13,292 | ||||
| cyst fluid pellet | – | – | – | NEG | 15 | 30,798 | ||||
ddPCR, droplet digital polymerase chain reaction; NEG, no variant detected; VAF, variant allele fraction; Var, variant; WT, wild type.
Age at time of tissue or cyst fluid attainment.
ddPCR VAF calculated using droplet concentrations and only reported for samples in which sample variant concentration was statistically different from WT control variant concentration based on 95% total error confidence intervals.
Lower than typical coverage.
Cell-free DNA was assayed from cyst fluid samples.
Figure 1Clinical features of BRAF-mutated LM and confirmation of genetic diagnosis
(A–G) Clinical photos of LR17-322 (A) and LR19-346 (C), showing posterior neck LMs. Corresponding computed tomography (CT) (LR17–322; B) and MRI (LR19-346, D; LR19-443, E) images demonstrate macrocystic lesions with minimal septations of the posterior lateral neck and axilla. Integrated Genomics Viewer image for LR19-346 demonstrates somatic BRAF p.Val600Glu variant (F), confirmed on droplet digital PCR (G).
(H) Variant concentration image from Quantasoft shows variability in mutation prevalence between samples (H).
Note: (A) and (B) were previously published prior to identification of this individual’s genetic variant.
Figure 2Histology and immunohistochemistry of PIK3CA and BRAF mutated LMs
LM tissue from two individuals with BRAF p.Val600Glu substitutions (A–F) and one individual with PIK3CA p.His1047Arg substitution.
(G–I). H&E stains (A), (D), and (G) show dilated cystic channels with bland, flattened epithelium. (B), (E), and (H) show presence of podoplanin (a.k.a. D2-40) immunoreactivity in endothelial cells. Panels on the right show BRAF p.Val600Glu immunoreactivity (VE1 staining) in endothelial cells in BRAF mutant LM (C and F), but not in PIK3CA mutant LM (I).
The genetic spectrum of LM, including BRAF p.Val600Glu
| Zenner et al. | 22 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 64 | – | – |
| Zenner et al. | 7 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 21 | – | – |
| Current study | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| Total, n = 101 | 30 | 29 | 23 | 7 | 89 (88.1%) | 3 (3.0%) | 9 (8.9%) |
All negative samples for the first two studies were included in this study if adequate sample was available for VANseq testing.
Total includes only individuals with detected mutations or sufficient DNA to undergo VANseq testing.