Douglas C Lambert1,2, Matthew K Abramowitz3,4,5,6. 1. Department of General Internal Medicine, Northwell Health, Great Neck, New York. 2. Section of Obesity Medicine, Northwell Health, Great Neck, New York. 3. Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 4. Department of Medicine, Institute for Aging Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 5. Department of Medicine, Diabetes Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York. 6. Department of Medicine, Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is associated with low serum bicarbonate, an indicator of metabolic acidosis and a CKD risk factor. To further characterize acid-base disturbance and subclinical metabolic acidosis in this population, we examined prospective associations of body mass index (BMI) with elevated anion gap and whether anion gap values in obesity associate with low bicarbonate. Methods: Data from adult outpatients (n=94,448) in the Bronx, New York were collected from 2010 to 2018. Mixed effects models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of BMI with elevated anion gap and anion gap metabolic acidosis and of baseline anion gap with incident low bicarbonate and anion gap metabolic acidosis. Anion gap was defined using traditional and albumin-corrected calculations. Results: Greater BMI was associated with higher anion gap over time and with progressively greater risk of developing an elevated anion gap (hazard ratio [HR] for body mass index [BMI]≥40 kg/m2 versus 18 to <25 kg/m2, 1.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.42 for traditional and HR for BMI≥40 kg/m2 versus 18 to <25 kg/m2, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.85 for corrected). Higher BMI was also associated with increased risk of developing anion gap metabolic acidosis (HR for BMI≥40 kg/m2, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.69). Among patients with obesity, higher anion gap was associated with increased risk of incident low bicarbonate (HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.44 for traditional and HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.48 for corrected) and higher risk of anion gap metabolic acidosis (HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.59 to 1.99). Conclusions: Obesity is characterized by unmeasured anion accumulation and acid retention or overproduction. Modest elevations in anion gap among patients with obesity are associated with previously unrecognized anion gap metabolic acidosis.
Background: Obesity is associated with low serum bicarbonate, an indicator of metabolic acidosis and a CKD risk factor. To further characterize acid-base disturbance and subclinical metabolic acidosis in this population, we examined prospective associations of body mass index (BMI) with elevated anion gap and whether anion gap values in obesity associate with low bicarbonate. Methods: Data from adult outpatients (n=94,448) in the Bronx, New York were collected from 2010 to 2018. Mixed effects models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations of BMI with elevated anion gap and anion gap metabolic acidosis and of baseline anion gap with incident low bicarbonate and anion gap metabolic acidosis. Anion gap was defined using traditional and albumin-corrected calculations. Results: Greater BMI was associated with higher anion gap over time and with progressively greater risk of developing an elevated anion gap (hazard ratio [HR] for body mass index [BMI]≥40 kg/m2 versus 18 to <25 kg/m2, 1.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.23 to 1.42 for traditional and HR for BMI≥40 kg/m2 versus 18 to <25 kg/m2, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.85 for corrected). Higher BMI was also associated with increased risk of developing anion gap metabolic acidosis (HR for BMI≥40 kg/m2, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.69). Among patients with obesity, higher anion gap was associated with increased risk of incident low bicarbonate (HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.44 for traditional and HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.48 for corrected) and higher risk of anion gap metabolic acidosis (HR for fourth versus first quartile, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.59 to 1.99). Conclusions: Obesity is characterized by unmeasured anion accumulation and acid retention or overproduction. Modest elevations in anion gap among patients with obesity are associated with previously unrecognized anion gap metabolic acidosis.
Authors: Olivier Moranne; Marc Froissart; Jerome Rossert; Cedric Gauci; Jean-Jacques Boffa; Jean Philippe Haymann; Mona Ben M'rad; Christian Jacquot; Pascal Houillier; Benedicte Stengel; Bruno Fouqueray Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Chi-yuan Hsu; Charles E McCulloch; Carlos Iribarren; Jeanne Darbinian; Alan S Go Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-01-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Christopher B Newgard; Jie An; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Robert D Stevens; Lillian F Lien; Andrea M Haqq; Svati H Shah; Michelle Arlotto; Cris A Slentz; James Rochon; Dianne Gallup; Olga Ilkayeva; Brett R Wenner; William S Yancy; Howard Eisenson; Gerald Musante; Richard S Surwit; David S Millington; Mark D Butler; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Ashkan Afshin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Marissa B Reitsma; Patrick Sur; Kara Estep; Alex Lee; Laurie Marczak; Ali H Mokdad; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohsen Naghavi; Joseph S Salama; Theo Vos; Kalkidan H Abate; Cristiana Abbafati; Muktar B Ahmed; Ziyad Al-Aly; Ala’a Alkerwi; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Azmeraw T Amare; Alemayehu Amberbir; Adeladza K Amegah; Erfan Amini; Stephen M Amrock; Ranjit M Anjana; Johan Ärnlöv; Hamid Asayesh; Amitava Banerjee; Aleksandra Barac; Estifanos Baye; Derrick A Bennett; Addisu S Beyene; Sibhatu Biadgilign; Stan Biryukov; Espen Bjertness; Dube J Boneya; Ismael Campos-Nonato; Juan J Carrero; Pedro Cecilio; Kelly Cercy; Liliana G Ciobanu; Leslie Cornaby; Solomon A Damtew; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Samath D Dharmaratne; Bruce B Duncan; Babak Eshrati; Alireza Esteghamati; Valery L Feigin; João C Fernandes; Thomas Fürst; Tsegaye T Gebrehiwot; Audra Gold; Philimon N Gona; Atsushi Goto; Tesfa D Habtewold; Kokeb T Hadush; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Simon I Hay; Masako Horino; Farhad Islami; Ritul Kamal; Amir Kasaeian; Srinivasa V Katikireddi; Andre P Kengne; Chandrasekharan N Kesavachandran; Yousef S Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Jagdish Khubchandani; Daniel Kim; Yun J Kim; Yohannes Kinfu; Soewarta Kosen; Tiffany Ku; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; G Anil Kumar; Heidi J Larson; Mall Leinsalu; Xiaofeng Liang; Stephen S Lim; Patrick Liu; Alan D Lopez; Rafael Lozano; Azeem Majeed; Reza Malekzadeh; Deborah C Malta; Mohsen Mazidi; Colm McAlinden; Stephen T McGarvey; Desalegn T Mengistu; George A Mensah; Gert B M Mensink; Haftay B Mezgebe; Erkin M Mirrakhimov; Ulrich O Mueller; Jean J Noubiap; Carla M Obermeyer; Felix A Ogbo; Mayowa O Owolabi; George C Patton; Farshad Pourmalek; Mostafa Qorbani; Anwar Rafay; Rajesh K Rai; Chhabi L Ranabhat; Nikolas Reinig; Saeid Safiri; Joshua A Salomon; Juan R Sanabria; Itamar S Santos; Benn Sartorius; Monika Sawhney; Josef Schmidhuber; Aletta E Schutte; Maria I Schmidt; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Moretza Shamsizadeh; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Min-Jeong Shin; Rahman Shiri; Ivy Shiue; Hirbo S Roba; Diego A S Silva; Jonathan I Silverberg; Jasvinder A Singh; Saverio Stranges; Soumya Swaminathan; Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Fentaw Tadese; Bemnet A Tedla; Balewgizie S Tegegne; Abdullah S Terkawi; J S Thakur; Marcello Tonelli; Roman Topor-Madry; Stefanos Tyrovolas; Kingsley N Ukwaja; Olalekan A Uthman; Masoud Vaezghasemi; Tommi Vasankari; Vasiliy V Vlassov; Stein E Vollset; Elisabete Weiderpass; Andrea Werdecker; Joshua Wesana; Ronny Westerman; Yuichiro Yano; Naohiro Yonemoto; Gerald Yonga; Zoubida Zaidi; Zerihun M Zenebe; Ben Zipkin; Christopher J L Murray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245